Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBid Opening - Public WorksAUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS Authorization given: September 8, 2020 to CALL FOR BIDS by the Department of Public Works for: Alternate Daily Cover 2020 Bid opening date to be September 29, 2020 at 1:30 P.M. at the Office of the County Commissioners, Commissioners Hearing Room, Grant County Courthouse, 35 C Street NW, Ephrata, WA 98823 Approv A" -E 7 - / /-1,1d (I Sam Castro B rba Vasquez eco and Public Works Director RECEIVED s; 1 202.0 GRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT COUNTY, W SHl GTON Yea Nay Abstain Cindy Carter Chair cr/❑ ❑ Tom Taylor ice Chair / L7 ❑ ❑ � D Richard Stevens Member Approv A" -E 7 - / /-1,1d (I Sam Castro B rba Vasquez eco and Public Works Director RECEIVED s; 1 202.0 GRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS STATE OF WASHINGTON - COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD RURAL ARTERIAL PROGRAM FINAL PROSPECTUS Biennium: 2021 - 2023 Region: NE County: Grant IDENTIFICATION State Legislative District: 13 Six -Year T.I.P. Priority No: 26 Total Points: 44.75 Road Number(s) Road Name(s) FFC(s) TRC(s) BMP(s) EMP(s) —777 94000 3 -NE (U -NE to County Line) 07 T4 1 10.9001 13.900 PROJECT TYPE Project Type: 2R - Resurface and Restore DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Attach Rating Worksheets Roadway Structural Section, or Bridge Condition: Existing BST is showing distress from heavy truck traffic and will be replaced with new Class A BST. Horizontal Alignment: The horizontal alignment meet current standards and will not be altered. Vertical Alignment: The existing vertical alignment meets current standards and will not be significantly altered for this 2R project. Width: rhe existing roadway will be widened to 11' lanes with 6' shoulders. Other: Clear Zone, Slopes, Guardrail, Illumination, signals etc.: The clear zone will be improved by removing or protecting roadside obstacles, flattening slopes, or nstalling guardrail as warranted. ESTIMATED FUNDING AND TIMING Estimated Year Phase Est Total Cost RATA Amount Start End Design/Prelim. Engr. $90,000 $81,000 Jan -22 Nov -22 Right of Way $0 Construction $696,000 $617,400 Apr -23 Jun -23 TOTAL $776,000 $698,400 Schedule of CRAB reimbursements for Constmctton will be or dependent on Projeer SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS THAT MAY AFFECT PROJECT SCHEDULE: ❑Wetlands ❑NMFS ❑R.O.W. ❑Shorelines ❑USFWS ❑BIA ❑HPA []RR ❑USACE ❑WDFW OCultrual (Hist. Arch. Palen.) E] Tied (Other agency work) ❑Other LOCAL PROJECT APPROVAL RAP Project Prospectus prepared under the supervision of: ign ure - Aunty e r )',Date RAP Project Prospectus submitted to CRAB with the approval of: Signature of Ch of the BoA of County Commissioners or County Executive / Date vl0Lu GRANT Ct�iINTY COMMISSIONERS Page i of 1 COUNTY Grant © rid e{�t PROJECT NAME 3 -NE (U -NE to County Line) �P ZR p PROJECT LENGTH 3.00 miles to hundredths NE Region TRAFFIC: 2R RATING SUMMARY: (Click an underlined text to inp_ tt projiect data; (10 points max.) TRAFFIC VOLUME TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS Possible Points 5 5 Subtotal 10 STRUCTURAL CONDITION: (50 points max.) Scored Points 5.00 2.75 775 SURFACE 20 2g SUBSURFACE 20 F&G 10 8 Subtotal 50 37.00 GEOMETRY: (10 points max.) ROAD WIDTH (shoulder to shoulder) 10 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT 5 Subtotal 10 0.00 Widening Points 2' 4 3'- 4' 7 5'-81 10 ROADSIDE SAFETY: (15 points max.) Reduce Roadside Hazards: SIDESLOPES & GUARDRAIL 5 CULVERT END TREATMENTS 5 REMOVE STRUCTURES & OBSTRUCTION: 5 UTILITY POLES 5 Subtotal 15 0,00 LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE: (15 points, one project 15 per Wennfum.) type in 15 points if this is the most important RAP application this biennium TOTAL 2R RAP WORKSHEET RATING: 100 44.75 possiblesc- a 7 NOTES: 1. Points for Surface and Subsurface visual portions of the STRUCTURAL CONDITION will be assigned by CRAB Engineer 2. No points are allowed for conditions which will not be improved by the proposed project. 3,-NE-2R—Final TRAFFIC RATING See calculation sheet below use the last five VOLU JM ACCIDENTS lull years' reports AADT 473 P.D. ONLY ACCIDENTS 2 TRUCK ADT 114 INJURY, NON FATAL ACCIDENTS PROJECT LENGTH, MI. 3.00 to 1/1005 FATAL ACCIDENTS 0 SCORE L� SCORE 2.75 SURFACE CONDITION (20 Points Max.) VISUAL RATING SHEET NE -2R Excellent 0 Tight surface with no slick or porous areas, no cracks or spalling Good 4 Only minor, localized transverse cracks, Adequate 8 Minor, localized, longitudinal cracks; rutting, spalling or ravelling; minor seal patching has been required; some transverse cracking Fair 12 Small areas that have required patching; larger areas have required seal patching; some longitudinal cracks, spalling, rutting, or ravelling Marginal 16 Several areas that have required moderate to heavy patching; moderate to heavy cracking, spalling, rutting or ravelling. Poor 20 Large areas that have required asphalt patching and frequent seal coating; heavy cracking, spalling, rutting and/or ravelling. Intermediate values are acceptable SUBSURFACE CONDITION 120 Pts Max) Excellent 0 No signs of displacement or settling Good 5 Minor localized sags along shoulder Fair 10 Moderate alligator cracking mid lane, some sags on shoulders and mid lane, minor localized settling Poor 15 Large areas of heavy alligator cracking, extensive sagging and settling. Very Poor 20 Major subgrade deterioration; extensive deep sags and settling; heavy alligator cracking throughout section. Intermediate values are acceptable GEOMETRY RATING TERRAIN (Check one) ROADBED WIDTH outside of shoulder to Minimum FLAT 32 EXISTING outside of shoulder Design ROLLING 34 PROPOSED Speed: MOUNTAINOUS 30 AASHTO Sind (Not applied to 2R projects) 30 SCORE: INPUT ALL DEFICIENT CURVES See below for (curves designed into the existing alignment) definitions and calculation method HORIZONTAL CURVES: Bali Bank Ratio a Ball Bank Proposed Percent Project Length Speed to Std 0 Speed speed tmQmM 3.00 Vb Vr: 9 - Vr 0.00 ! 0.00 2 1 0.00 1 0.00 3j 0.00 ! 0.00 4 0.00 1 0.00 5 0.00 .t_0.00� 60.00 0.00� 7 t i 0.00^0.00 8 i 0.00 0.00 9 0.000 00 10 o.00 0.00 11 10.00 0.00 12 1 0.00 1 0.00 13 _ 1 0.00 0.00 14 0.00 i 0.00 15 1 0.00 0.00 16 0.00 0.00 17 ��---t 0. 0 18^ 0.00 10.00 19 0.00 1 0.00 20 1.0.00 i 0.00 SCURE 0% Avg. "--Dc JU ROADSIDE SAFETY CHECKLIST: Iside Safety - Reduce Roadside Hazards (10 pts) - Attach Hazard Review Documentation 1 Sideslopes and Guardrail (5) Length of project to be improved in miles, only for slopes > 6 ft. and 2:1 or steeper. 3.00 Project length Sgt 2:1 or steepe>' ?6' 0% X 5 pts = 0.0 points . elt er sl e 2 Culvert End Treatments (5) Count section improved only once for any and all guardrail and slope improvements Count road approach culverts to be beveled, Cross culverts to have safety bars added. 3 Remove Structure and Obstructions (5) If forested, and to be cleared count 1 object every 100 ft Number of non mailbox objects that are "Roadside Hazards" If forested, and to be cleared, count 1 object every 100 ft F-07-007-1 Objects per mile Subtotals: Number of'Hazard' 1 - 4 jmile Mail Boxes 5 - 10 / mile 0 Subtotal > 10 /mile Structures and Obstructions 0 0 �0 4 Relocate Utility Poles (5) ONo. of poles to be relocated 4 ft beyond back of ditch or outside of clear zone STATE OF WASHINGTON - COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD RURAL ARTERIAL PROGRAM FINAL PROSPECTUS Biennium: 2021-2023 Region: NE County: Grant IDENTIFICATION State Legislative District: 13 Six -Year T.I.P. Priority No: Total Points: 72.42 Road Number(s) Road Name(s) I FFC(s) I TRC(s) I BMP(s) I EMP(s) 93020 9 -NW Road (SR 283 to Dodson Rd 1 09 1 TS 1 5.8401 10.000 PROJECTTYPE Project Type: RC - Reconstruction DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS -Attach Rating Worksheets Roadway Structural Section, or Bridge Condition: []Deviation Anticipated? he existing BST Is showing distress due to traffic loads. This will be widened, adding shoulders, and reconstructed with BST surfacing. Horizontal Alignment: ❑Deviaflon Anticipated? The horizontal alignment meets current standards. Vertical Alignment: r IDevlation Anticipated? current pavement width will be increased from 22' to 34', with 11' lanes Other. Clear Zone, Slopes, Guardrail, Illumination, signals etc.: ❑Deviation Anticipated? he clear zone will be improved by removing obstructions, providing wider shoulders, and grading improvements as appropriate. :STIMATED FUNDING AND TIMING Estimated Year Eft --e Est Total Cost RATA Amount StartEnd DeslgnlPrelim. Engr. $148,000 $132,900 Jan -22 Nov -23 Right of Way Construction $1,955,000 $1,759,500 Apr -24 Oct -24 TOTAL $2,103,000 $1,892,400 Schedule of CRAB reimbursements for Co,wrucdon will be or dependent on Project SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS THAT MAY AFFECT PROJECT SCHEDULE: []Wetlands ❑NMFS ❑R.O.W. ❑Shorelines ❑USFWS ❑BIA ❑HPA [:]RR ❑USACE ❑ WDFW ❑J Cuxrual (Hist. Arch. Paleo.) ❑Tied (Other agency work) ❑Other LOCAL PROJECT APPROVAL RAP Project Prospectus prepared under the supervision of: gn Yre- untyEngriei Cate RAP Project Prospectus submitted to CRAB with the approval of: G, Signature of Chai of the Board o ounty Commissioners or County Executive I Date ` j = ? 2020 Page 1 of 1 GRANT COUNTY COMIVISSIOPIERS COUNTY PROJECT NAME 9 NrW (SR 283 to Dodson dson Road) RAP RC pr PROJECT LENGTH 422 _ miles in hundredths NE Regit RC RATING SUMMARY: Possible Scored Points Points TRAFFIC TRAFFIC VOLUME 10 10.00 USAGE 15 7.00 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT! 10 1.42 Subtotal 35 18.42 LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE one project only > 10 10 MISSING LINKS 10 0 STRUCTURAL CONDITION: SURFACED GRAVEL CRAB Surface Condition 15 10 Provided Drainage 15 31.00 10 Subsurface or Soils 25 15 County 07 Functional Class for Gravel Road ---------------> 5 Provided •F&G Truck Class ------> 15 31 Subtotal 55 31.00 possible scored GEOMETRY: LANE WIDTH 10 5.00 ROADWAY WIDTH 10 8.0_0 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT 10 0.00 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT 10 Reduced 0.00 Subtotal 40 13.00 TOTAL NER RAP WORKSHEET RATING: 150 72.42 Note -Points for the Structural Condition of Roads will be assigned by the RAP engineer -No points are allowed for conditions which will not be improved by the proposed project -Proposals below design standards require WSDOT deviation approval. oject Dn Visual Cores F/C F&G Width Reduction Calcs 5.00 5.00 800 1200. TRAFFIC RATING VOLUME: ECONOMY IUSAGE: ACCIDENTS Check each that a PIs AADT 523 GRAIN CROPS X 2 Use the last five TRUCK ADT 149 THER FIELD CROPS X 2 full years' reports FUNCTIONAL CLASS 08 HORTICULTURE No. of Accidents PROJECT LENGTH 4.22 DAIRYILIVESTOCK X 2 NON FATAL to 1005 LOGGING FATAL O INDVSTRYIMINING RECREATION COMMUTE X 1 MILITARY COMMERCIAL HAUL 7 LOCAL SIGNIFICANCE Mark here to assign 10 pts to only one project this call. MISSING LINKS Assign 1 - 10 Pts based on project characteristics as defir MISSING LINK STATUS (10 Pts Max.) 1) Description: Explain the missing link characteristics of this project__ 2) Missing Link Rating: POINTS: DEFINITION: 10 Between two RAP funded sections 9 Between a RAP funded section and a section improved with other funds 8 Between a RAP funded section and an urban boundary or city limits 7 Between a RAP funded section and a state highway. 6 Between two sections recently improved or currently funded via federal funds. 5 The end section off two or more RAP funded sections. 4 An isolated section some distance between two other improved or funded sections on t (The other funded sections must both be no more than 3 miles from the proje 3 On the Freight and Goods Transportation System. 2 On the regional system recognized by the RTPO 1 Between two urban ares or two state highways, or one of each. 3) Conditions for missing link points: The project can qualify for only one category of points above. "Improved" means the work has been completed within the last ten (10) years "Between" means adjacent to. ied below he same road. ct) 1RAI_ RATING: Exist. Surface Type BST ACP, BST, PCC (Surfaced) 1. Visual: Surfaced OR Unsurfaced Gravel, Earth (Unsurfaced) from , CRAB 31 Add, for gravel or unsurfaced roads only: 2. Cores: I Freight and Goods Class POINTS :HE K ONE: GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY ORGANIC 0 See USCS sheet GW, GP, GM, GC SW, SP, SM, SC ML, MH CL, CH OL, OH CLASS Check ow POINTS T6 or T7 T5 x 7 T4 T3 7 STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASPHALT (55 Points Max.) (Page to be filled out by RAP Engineer) (Intermediate values on scales are acceptable) 1. SURFACE CONDITION (16 Points Max.) NE RC Excellent 0 " Excellent Tight surface with no slick or porous areas, ��— Excellent No signs of displacement or settling no cracks or spalling Good 3 Good Only minor, localized transverse cracks, Fair slick or porous areas Adequate 6 Adequate Minor, localized, longitudinal cracks: rutting, spalling or ravelling; minor seal patching has been required; some Poor transverse cracking Fair 9 Fair Small areas that have required patching; larger areas have required seal patching; some longitudinal cracks, spalling, Very Poor rutting, or ravelling Marginal 12 Marginal Several areas that have required moderate to heavy patching; moderate to heavy cracking, spalling, rutting or ravelling Poor 15 , Poor Large areas that have required asphalt patching and frequent seal coating; heavy cracking, spalling, rutting and/or ravelling. Intermediate values are acceptable 2. DRAINAGE (15 pts Max) Good/Adequate = 2 Fair = 7 Poor= 15 3. SUBSURFACE CONDITION (25 pts Max) Excellent 0 ��— Excellent No signs of displacement or settling Good 6 Good Minor localized sags along shoulder Fair 12 Fair Moderate alligator cracking mid lane, some sags on shoulders and mid lane, minor localized settling Poor 18 Poor Large areas of heavy alligator cracking, extensive sagging and settling. Very Poor 25 . Very Poo Major subgrade deterioration; extensive deep sags and settling; heavy alligator cracking throughout section. " Intermediate values are acceptable Surface Condition Drainage Subsurface Condition Structural Condition - Paved Only (Note Round rating to nearest whole number) STRUCTURAL_ CONDITION GRAVEL (55 Points Max.) NE RC, (Surface Condition and Drainage points to be filled out by RAP Engineer) (Intermediate values on scales are acceptable) I. SURFACE CONDITION (10 Points Max) Scored By CRAB Good 0 �— Good Adequate amount of surface material of proper gradation and well fractured. Fair 5 Fair Some material but over sized gradation or poorly fractured. Poor 10 Poor No surface material, large loose stones, barely travelable " Intermediate values are acceptable If traffic volumes and speed are such that excessive maintenance is required, a maximum rating may be applied. Visual Surface Scorefrom CRAB 2. DRAINAGE (10 Points Ma> Scored By CRAB Good 0 Fair 5 Intermediate values are acceptibie Drainage Scorefrom CRAB Poor 10 Total Visual Score from CRAB 3. BASE OR FOUNDATION CONDITION i'5 Points Max) Submit Test procedure and/or Data By Cores! Dig or excavate down 3 ft with backhoe or auger. Analyze material below surfacing. Points Possible SELECTEE SCORE: Good 3 GRAVEL 5 SAND Fair 9 SILT WITH CLAYS 12 CLAY Poor 15 ORGANIC 4. TRUCK CLASS BATING (15 Points Max.) Frcm Road Log CLASS SELECT ONE. POSSIBLE: T6 or T7 T5 T4 T3 4 7 11 15 SCORE Visual Rating Base Add 2 pts if: F/C = 07 Truck Rating TOTAL GRAVEL STRUCTURAL RATING[ KY RATING LANE & ROADWAY WIDTHS TERRAIN (check o ie; � EXISTING PROPOSED X FLAT LANES (BOTH SIDES)l 20 1 22 ROLLING ROADWAY (LANES PLUS SHOULDERS)l 22 1 34 MOUNTAINOUS Min Des. Speed 50 ASSHTO LIST ALL DEFICIENT CURVES (All projects are ranked by extent of improvement) VERTICAL CURVES: HORIZ. ALIGNMENT: Calc relies on Project tength, Calc relies on AADT and Terrain AADT and Terrain inputs: inputs, Points 0.00 weighted Exist Sight Length of Proposed Percent Exist. Safe Distance Curve, ft Speed lmorov Speed 0% Cum. 0 Deficient Length Des. Speed 507-1 Design Speed # 0.00 Pts Assigned Ball Bank Proposed % U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ImDr• Avg. 0% AASHTO 1