Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 97-175-CCGRANT �C)L�ITY cs���c� o� BC)ARD C�F CC7t1ItiTTY CC��iMISSICI�RS POST OPF(CE BC7X 37 EPHRATA. WASHItwCsiQtV s8823 4509) 754-201! ! � ' � � � ' # � � # i f ` ` ` •�� � IN THE MA.T'I`ER �3F CHANGING THE ZONII�TG FR4M AGR {Agraculture} T{3 CFS (C{�MMERCIAL FREEWAY SERVICE) IN A PORTION OF SECTIQN 33, T4WNSHIP 19 N., RANGE 29 E,, W.M., GRAi�IT C{�U�f I'Y, WASHINGTUN Resolution # 97-175-cc RESOLUTI�N DEN�ING A ZC�NE CHANGE TO CQMMERCIAL FREEWAY SERVICE Martell Palmer '4�Hk�2EAS, the Board of Coc�nty Commissioners of Grant County have heen adv�sed by t�e Grant Caunty Pla�niug Commission that a public hearing dva� conducted an Octaber l, 1.997 an the matter of changiug the zoning fram "AGR {Agricuitzare)" to "CFS (Commercial Freeway Service}" in a partian of Sectic�n 33, Townsshitp 19 North, Range 29 East, W.M., Graut County, Washington (Farm Unit 136, Irrigation Black 4l.), and; �E3tEAS, the Board of County Comm.issianers of Grant Couniy have been advised by the Grant Caunty Plarmia�g Department that the Grani Ct�unty Plannin.g Commission did noi have a quorum vote and were unable to forward a recommendation on said r�aatter, and, W�IEREAS, the Board of Caunty Commissioners, having sazci recommendatian, have given notice this matter would be conszdered ai a pub�ic hearing an November 3, 1�9'7, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that #he �aard of �ounty Commissioners af C,rant Caunty, Washingtan do by this �esoiution d�ny the zone change request from Agriculture tc� Commercial Freeway Service on the following described property. Fazm Unit 136, Irrigation Block 41, Columbia Basin Project except the North 77S feet as measured at right angles from the Nt�rth line thereof, lacated in the East one-half of Section 33, Township 19 North, Range 29 East, R�.M., Grant Caunty, Washi�gean in the vicinity +�f the Couuty Road `O' l�tE/Interstate 90 interchange. Site consisting of approximately 3S acres. Findings aud Fac�: 1. The prape�ty an whieh the zone change is proposed for is within tlie Gol.umbia �asin g'rolect and daes receive a water allotment. 2. ine gropasa� is not cansiste�x witn ii�e tYrant �oar�ry i o�p�eiier.�i;�� ��� �� s��l����� uses. 3. The propasal does fall vvithir� a Critical Area as defined by the Grant County Resaurce Lands and Critical Areas Development Ordinance. 4. The proponent h�s not presented suffieient evidence that changed czrcumstances in the area of the subject property warrant a rezone �f the property. 5. The proponent h�s not presented suffzcient evidence that there is sufficient need in the area for the types of uses allowed and size of Iots. .. _ ._ __-- --- _____ � �_ _ __. . _ _ . _ _._..-- - -- .�,�„ � - - . _ _. _. _ . ,. ___ . _ __. . _�ti � ---� _ �._ - - --- - _ - _ -_�_ _ -_�_.�a�.���,���.� � _ _ . �,..�.� _ _�_., � ..>;.:.��:��.��. _ ��Y `�,�.�;-,.:�...- ���.o� .go'�S��wU�°� oS. aq'� 6��`0� 3° p� ae1�J �� ����y��o� } •�€ `'.` �a�piS��� v o� sa�ois� : �-=- " , :ys���,� og a�� �� ��a�} � p . � � � � � r � � s� a�°Q � �.�4 � � � � �