HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 00-143-CC�o� oF cav�vT� co�ss�a�xs
Grant �aunty, Washangton
RESULUTION NTJMBER 2000-143-C�
ASSESSMENT RATE FOR
�IILLCREST LIGHTINCx DISTRICT FOR
200 � SET AT $1 b.�0 PER PARCEL
�-IEREAS, Resolution 93-9-CC appraved ihe formatian of the
Hillcrest Lighizng District, and
UVHEREAS, the Orde� set forth that the amount of the annual
ass�ssment for the LID was to be determined by Publ�c TJtility District No. 2
of Grant County, and
W;HEREAS, the current assessment of $18.00 per taxable parcel will
more than caver the estimated 2001 charges,
�C}W, THEREFC�RE, BE ZT HEREBY RESC)LVED, that pursuant to
the Order, the Board certifies to the Grant County Treasurer the assessment
rate for �001 will be lo�vered to $16.00 per taxable parcel in RID NO. 93-1,
and
IT iS FURT'HER RESOLVED that the Treasurer use these figures for
the assessment �ate in alI future assessmeni rolls of RID No. 93-1 untii
further order of ���e Board,
DATED this 14th day of November,2000
ATTEST:
�� ! .�� 1 .. �.._1 .�. �
-� ��� - :•. � i
BOARD QF CUUNTY CUMIVIISSIC}NERS
G-RANT CC?UNTY, �UASHINGTQN
�
� �j
�.i f�:��°L �' ����.�
Chairman f` •
R,J' ✓ `+' R
November 13, 2000
TO: GRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: DARRYL PHEASANT
GRANT COUNTY TREASURE��"
RE: 2001 ASSESSMENTS FOR HILLCREST LIGHTING DISTRICT
I have received from Jerry Tate of the Grant County PUD the estimated costs for 2001
that need to be paid and assessed on the properties within the boundaries of the Hillcrest
Lighting District 93-1 in 2001. The original resolution state that no new assessment will
be prepared unless there is an increase or decrease in the annual anticipated lighting costs
submitted by the Grant County PUD. Last years assessment rate was set at ($18.00) per
parcel for 2000. The anticipated carryover going into 2001 amounts to around $2,136.50.
The carryover balance is higher than anticipated due to the PUD's actua12000 rate being
less than forecasted (an $15.00 per month savings). Another unknown factor is the City
of Moses Lake's annexation in the Hillcrest area. They have yet to admit to what exactly
they have annexed which may include some street lights. The PUD has also gotten no
where with them on this annexation. Depending on what they annexed, the annual bill for
streetlights in Hillcrest area may actually be less. The PUD has informed me of no
increases for 2001 for the street lights. Assuming the annexation does not affect our
responsibility for paying all street lights and that rates were lower and will not change for
2001, I propose lowering the annual rate per p�ircel in 2001 from $18 00 to $16 00 .
Please start the hearing process to decrease the assessment rate to $16.00 for 2001,