Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 16-039-CC BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON ' ORDIl�TANCE: C' "" ��.� �- C'�...� An Ordinance rel�ating to the amendment of the Uni�ed Development Code, Chapter 25.04, Permit Application Review Procedures. Recitals: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant County intends to comply � fully with the laws and regulations of the State of Washington, and; WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant County adopted a Growth Management Act compliant Comprehensive Land Use Plan in September of 1999 and subsequently updated the Comprehensive Plan in 2006 as required by law , and; WFIEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant County adopted a Uni�ed Development Code implementing the Comprehensive Plan on October 1, 2000, and; WHEItEAS, the Unified Development Code Chapter 25.12 "Legislative Action" provides a process for amending the Code, and; WHEREAS, the Grant County Planning Depaitment initiated an amendinent, under Chapter 25.12, to the Unified Development Code for the purpose of amending portions of UDC Chapter 25,04,Permit Application Review Procedures,and; WHEI2EAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant County have been advised that an open record public hearing bafore the Grant County Planning Commission was conducted on Apri16, 2016 on the m�tter of amending the Grant County Unified Development Code, and; WHEREAS, on April 6, 2016 the Grant County Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend to the Board of County Comrnissioners approval of the UDC Amendment request and; WHEI2EAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant County held an open record public hearing on Apri126, 2016, and; WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners have been advised by the Grant County Planning Department that the proposed UDC Amendments were processed in accordance ' with the requirements of UDC Chapter 25.12"Legislative Action"; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Coinmissioners have been advised by the Grant County Planning Department that the proposed UDC Amendments were processed in accordance with the requirements of UDC Chapter 2�.04"State Environmental Policy Act"; and, i ' WHEREAS, Adequate accommodations have been made for agencies, individuals and interest groups to be heard and the Planning Comrriission has thoroughly considered the ; testimony in the record, and; WIIEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with adopted Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, and do not create adverse impacts to offsite properties, and promote f�exibility of property use, and; . WIIEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners have found that the proposal is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the Grant County Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has found that, the UDC Amendment will sei-ve the public use and interest, and; WHEREAS, Appropriate notice has been given to the Washington State Department of Commerce Growth Management Services in accordance with RCW 36:70A.106, and; WHEREAS, the proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable portions of , RCW 36.70B, and; W�IEREAS, Planning Staff shall have the authority to make grammatical and format changes as necessary to achieve code uniformity. Substantive changes are not to be made without further review by the Planning Comrnission and Board of County Commissioners. NOW, THEREI+ORE, BE IT ORDAINED, that t�he Board of County Commissioners for Grant County does hereby adopt an amendment to the Grant County Unified Development Code, Chapter 25.04,Permit Application Review Procedures. BE IT FURTHER OI�DAINED, that the effective date of this ordinance shall be 5 p.m. of the date of signature: DATED this G--�� day of April, 2016. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION�RS GRANT COUNTY,WASHINGTON , Yea Nav Abstain � � ❑ ❑ Cindy Cart , Chair ' . �1 ❑ ❑ (.-fi��'.���1�,��i%i fif�e,l��������=�E. ATTEST: Carolann Swartz, ember � ,,� � �� �...m......��_ /' /, � _ �, � /�' � � ❑ ❑ � / ��,(.� 1�„ � �,,.= Richard Stevens, Member ( Clerk of� e dard � onstituting tlie Bonrd of County Gommissioners of Grant Cotuity,W�shington � 2 UDC§25.04 Amendment First Attachment—Amendment to GCC 25.04 3 UDC§25.04 Amendment 1 Chapter 25.04 2 3 a. PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES s 6 7 Sections Page , 8 Article I. Purpose and Authority..........................................................................................................1 9 25.04.010 Purpose and Authority........... ..........................................................................................1 10 25.04.020 Applicability........................................................................................................................1 ' 11 25.04.030 Legislature Not Restricted...................................................................................................1 12 25.04.040 Conflict of Provision—Severability.....................................................................................1 13 , 14 Article II. Classi�cations by Project Permit Type............. . ...............................................................1 15 25.04.050 Introduction...............................:..........................................................................................1 16 25.04.060 Project Permit Types—Defined...................................................:.......................................2 17 25.04.070 Classi�'ication of Proj ect Permit Applications...................................... .................................2 , 18 25.04.080 Classification of Project Pernut Applications—Administrative Review.............................2 19 25.04.090 Master Application Process—Optional Consolidated Review.:..........................................3 , 20 25.04.100 Administrative Interpretations........................................... . ............................. . . .........5 21 25.04.110 Exemptions froin this Title..................................................................................................5 ,. 22 23 Article iII. Application Process Overview..........................................................................................5 24 25.04.120 Application Process Overview.............................................................................................5 ' 25 26 Article IV. Application Submission....................................................................o................................5 27 25.04.130 Pre-Appliaation Review.......................................................................................................5 28 25.n4.140. Application�nd Accompanying Data....................................................... .......................7 .... 29 25.04.150 Review for Counter Complete Status...................................................................................7 30 25.04.160 Review for Techriically Complete Status.......................................................................... 8 31 32 Article V. Processing a Technically Complete Application................:.............................................:..9 33 25.04.1&0 Vesting.................................................................................................................................9 34 35 Article VI. Public Notice of Application. ...........................................................................................9 36 25.04.190 Distribution of Notice of Application..................................................................................9 37 25.04.200 Method of Public Notice of Application by Application Type..........................................10 38 25.04.210 Contents of Notice of Application.....................................................................................10 39 25.04.220 Optional Public Notice.......................................................................................................12 40 25.04.230 Public Comment on the Notice of Application..................................................................13 41 25,04.240 Notice of Public Hearing .............:.....................................................................................13 42 . 43 Article VII. Procedures for Application Review................................................................................14 44 25.04.250 Type I Procedure—Ministerial Decision...........................................................................14 45 25.04.260 Type II Procedure—Administrative Decision...................................................................14 46 25.04.270 Type III Procedure=Quasi Judicial Decision...................................................................14 47 25.04.280 Type IV Procedure—Final Plat....................................................................:................ ..15 48 49 50 Chczpter 25.04 i Mcereh 2016 czmenclments 1 Sections Paae 2 Artiele VIII. Open Record Hearings.................................................................................................15 3 25.04.290 Generally............................................................................................................................15 4 25.04.300 Responsibility of Administrative Official for Hearing........:.............................................15 5 25.04.310 Order of Proceedings.........................................................................................................16 6 25.04.320 Burden of Proof—Open Record Hearings........................ .............................................17 7 25.04.330 Site View of Subject Property................................................. . ......................................17 8 25,04.350 Conflict of Interest,Ethics, Open Public Meetings,Appearance of Fairness....................17 9 25.04.360 Ex Parte Coinmunications........................................... ...................................................17 ' 10 25.04.370 Disqualification..............................................................................:...................................18 11 12 Article IX. Final Decisions..................................................................................................................18 13 25.04.375 Notice ofFinal Decision....................................................................................................18 14 25.04:380 Timeline for Notice of Decision.........................................................................................19 15 25.04.390 Exemptions from Time Periods for Issuing Notice of Decision........................................19 16 17 Article X. Judicial Appeals.......................................................................::..........................................20 18 19 25.04.430 Judicial Appeals.... .........................................................................................................20 20 21 Article XI.. Consistency Analysis ancl SEPA Integration.................................................................20 22 25.04.440 Determination of Consistency.......................................................... . ..............................20 23 25.04.450 Consistency Analysis............ . .. ...................................................................................20 24 25.04.460 SEPA Integration...............................................................................................................21 25 25.04.470 Use of Existing Erivironmental Documents.......................................................................21 26 25.04.480 Issuance of SEPA Threshold Determinations..........................:.........................................22 27 25.04.490 Appeals of SEPA................................................................... ........:................................22 28 25.04.500 Categorical Exemptions..................................................................................:..................22 29 30 Article XII. Optional Hearing Exnminer Review...:..........................................................................22 31 25.04.510 Hearing Examiner Review Available................................................................................22 32 , 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Chapter 25.04 ii Mnrch 2016 ccmendments 1 Article I. Purpose and Authority 2 3 25.04.010 Purpose and Authority 4 5 (a) The provisions of this title implement cert�in state requirements contained in Chapter 347, Laws of . 6 1995, relating to the integration of growth management planning and environmental review. Tt is the 7 , purpose of this title to effectively and efficiently administer applications for land use development ; 8 activities (entitled "project permit applications"by this title)by creating a permit classification system 9 with consistent procedures for similar applications types, and by combining environmental review 10 process(SEPA),both substantive and procedural, with the procedure for review of proj ect permits. 11 , 12 (b) When a project permit application is filed, t�e project review process shall include l�nd use, . 13 environmental,public and governmental review so that docum�nts prepared under different requirements 14 may be reviewed together by the public and other agencies,in one proj ect review process. . 15 16 25.04.020 Applicability 17 18 (a) The provisions of this title shall apply to all land use pernuts under Grant County Codes including but ; 19 not limited to the following: 20 (1) Chapter 22.04;Land Division; , 21 (2) Chapter 23.04—Zoning; , 22 (3) Chapter 24.04—SEPA; 23 (4) Chapter 24.08—Critical Area; and 24 (5) Chapter 24.12—Shoreline Master Program. 25 � 26 (b) The provisions of this Title shall not apply to legislative decisions, including: 27 (1) Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and any amendrnents, including Subarea Plan adoption and 28 amendments; 29 (2) Site-specific land use re-designations and density changes; 30 (3) Area-wide reclassification of land use districts to implement new Comprehensive Plan policies;and 31 (4) Adoption of development regulations and amendments, 32 Legislative actions shall be subj ect to the requirements of Chapter 25.12 of the GCC. 33 34 25.04.030 Legislature Not Restricted 35 36 (a) Nothing in this title shall.limit the authority of the Board of County Commissioners to amend the county's 37 comprehensive plan,development regulations or other land use or environmental regul�tory laws. 38 39 25.04.040 Conflict of Provision—Severability 40 � 41 (a) In the event that any chapter, section, subsection, sentence clause, phrase, part or portion of this title 42 is for any reason held to be inva�id or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such 43 decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this title or the application of the 44 provisions to other persons or circumstances. 45 46 Arti.cle II. Classifications by Project Permit Type 47 48 25.04.050 Introduction 49 50 (a) For the purpose of project permit processing, all development permit applications shall be classified Chapter 25.04 1 Mc�rch 2016 ccmendments L I , 1 as one of the following: Type I, Type II, Type III, Type IV, or �xempt. Actions exempt from the 2 requirements of project permit application processing are listed in 25.04.110. 3 4 25.04.060 Proj ect Permit Types—Defined 5 ' 6 (a) The Administrative Official shall determine the procedural classification(Type I, II, III or N) for all 7 project permit applications. If a question exists as to the appropriate procedure type, the 8 Administrative Off"icial shall resolve it in favor of the higher procedural classification. 9 10 (b) The act of classifying 1n application as to type shall be a Type I ministerial action. Classification of 11 an application shall be subject to appeal consistent with the appeal procedure for a Type I action. 12 (1) Type I applications involve ministerial acts and are exempt from the Deternvnation of Completeness 13 and public notice requirements. Final determinations on Type I applications shall be made by the 14 Adrninistr�tive Official without a public hearing and may be appealed to the Board of County 15 Commisaioners. In the case of denial of a building permit based on the currently adopted Building 16 Code and/or Fira Code only, the appeal.shall be to the Building Board of Appeals. Such Type I 17 applications include, but are not limited, to permitted uses not requu-ing site plan review, boundary 18 line adjustments, segregation applications,and building permits. 19 (2) Type II applications typically involve administrative acts and generally, but not always, are 20 exempt from the public notice requirements. Final determinations on Type II applications shall 21 be made by the Administrative Official without a public hearing, and can be appealed to the 22 Board of County Commissioners. Where a.decision on a Type II application is appealed to the 23 Bo�rd of County Cornmissioners,public notice of the open record appeal hearing shall be given. 24 Such Type II applications include,but are not limited to, short plats, sign permits,reasonable use 25 exception, design reviews, revisions to shoreline management permits, minor amendments to 26 planned unit developments, and other minor administrative amendments to land use approvals. 27 (3) Type �II applications involve quasi judicial acts and require an open record hearing before the 28 Planning Commission or Hearings Examiner. Public notice will be provided on Type III 29 applications. The Planriing Commission's written decision constitutes a recorrunendation to the 30 Board of County Commissioners. Such Type III applications include, but are not limited to, 31 preliminaiy plats, vacations or alterations of plats, binding site plans, conditional use and 32 variance permits, planned unit developments, major amendments to planned unit developments 33 and zoning map amendments. The decision of the Hearing's Examiner or Board of County 34 Commissioners is not subject to further administrative review, except where the Hearings 35 Examiner or Board of County Commissioners agrees, in its discretion, to reconsider the matter. 36 Decisions of the Hearings Examiner or Board of County Coinmissioners are appealable to the 37 Grant County Superior Court. 38 (4) Type IV applications refer to applications for final plats. 39 40 25.04.070 Classification of Project Permit Applications 41 42 (a) Classification of proj ect permit applications shall be as delineated in Table 1. 43 44 25.04.080 Classification of Pro,�ect Permit Applications—Administrative Review 45 46 (a) Administrative review of proj ect permit applications shall be based on their classification as 47 summarized in Table 2. 48 49 50 Chapter 25.04 2 Mc�reh 2016 ctmendments 1 Table 1 2 Project Per�nit Clczssificc�tzon 3 Type I—Ministerial Type II- Type III—Quasi- Type IV—Final Plat 4 Administrative 5 Judicial 6 Building Permitsl Shoreline Management Planned Unit Final Subdivisions� 7 Permits5 Developmentslo 8 Permitted Us�s 6 9 14 Preliminaiy Short Preliminary Subdivisions , Final Short Site Plan Review Subdivisions�, Plat Vacationsll, Subdivisions 10 11 Plat Alterations12 1.2 Boundary Line Minor admin'istrative Binding Site Plans13 13 AdjustmentsZ pernut amendments 14 15 Segregation Sign permits9 Variancesls 16 Applications3 17 18 Administrative Minor amendments to Major amendments to 19 Consistency Review Planned Unit Planned Unit 20 (Uses Allowed Outright)4 Developments10 Developmentslo 21 Rezone Determination of Discretionary Use Conditional.Use 22 Consistency16 review4 Permits4,ls 23 24 Zoning District Reasonable Use Minor Zoning 25 Boundary Interpretations Exceptionsl� Amendmentsl� 26 Flood Hazard Area 27 Development Permits 28 2g 1 See GCC Title 14. � See GCC�22,04 Article III. 11 See GCC§22.04.490. �� See GCC§23.04.150. 30 z See GCC§22?,rticle V. � See GCC§22.04 Article V. 12 See GCC§22.04.480. �� See GCC§24.08.110 31 3 See GCC§22.04.090. 8 Not used. 13 See GCC§22.04 Article VII. and GCC§23.04.170. 32 4 See GCC§23.04.040. 9 See GCC§23.12.130. 14 See GCC§23.04.140. 33 5 See Shoreline Master Program. 10 See GCC�22,04.700. �5 See GCC§25.08, 34 35 25.04.090 Master Application Process—Optional Consolidated Review 36 37 (a) If an applicant submits a project permit application that involves two or more of the administrative 38 processes set forth in 25.04.050, the applicant may, at the time of the application submittal, elect to 39 have the project permit. applications processed collectively under the highest numbered process 40 required for any of the project permit applications submitted. If no such election is made at the time 41 of application, each projecti permit application wi11 be processed individually under each of the 4.2 procedures identified by the Grant County Code. If the application is processed under the individual 43 procedure option, the highest numbered type procedure must be processed prior to and separately 44 from the subsequent lower numbered procedure, Consolidated review shall not be permitted where a 45 variance must be granted in order to allow the development to proceed. 46 47 48 44 50 Chapter 25.04 3 Mczreh 2016 czmendments Table 2—Summary of Adnzinistrative Review of Project Pe�mit Applicationsl' Project Permit Application Type Type I—Ministerial Type II—Administrative. Type III—Quasi-Judicial 'i'ype IV Steps in Permit Consistency Flood Building BLA, Shoreline Preliminary Discretionary Conditional Minor Rezones, Final Review Process Review6 Hazard Permits Segregations, Pe�mits Short Use, Use, Others Subdivisi Permits� Others Subdivisions, Reasonable Variance, on,Final Use Preliminary Short Exceptions, Subdivisions, Subdivisi Others PUDs, on Public 1�otice of Application No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Notice of Public Hearing No No No No No No No Yes Yes No Public Comment Period No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Open-Record Predecision Hearing(Hearing Body) No No No No No No No Yes Yes No (HE) �pC�s Decisfion MakerB AO . AO AO AO AO AO AO HE PC' BOCC Administrative Appeal No No No No No No No No� No No Judicial Appeal(Hearing No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Body) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) (GCSC) Other Appeal No' No No No SHB No No No No No 1 Abbreviations: AO: Adminisirarive Official BOCC: Board of County Commissioners BLA: Boundary Line Adjustment HE: Hearing Examiner BBA: Building Board of Appeals PC. Planning Commission SHB: Shorelines Hearing Board GCSC: Grant County Superior Court 2 Not Used.25.04.510 3 PC makes advisory recommendatian to BOCC,who makes final decision(see GCC§22.04). � 4 Request for reconsideration of Hearing Examiner Decision available priar to judicial appeal(see GCC 25.32) 5 Yes,if part of appeal of underlying construction or development permit. 6 Consistency review for Uses Allowed Outright(See GCC§23_04.040)and Rezone Determinations of Consistency(See GCC§23.04.150. ' See GCC Chapter 24.16. Chczpter 25_04 4 March 2016 amendments i 1 25.04.100 Administrative Interpretations 2 3 (�) Upon request, the applicable official shall issue a formal written interpretation of a development 4 regulation which includes the applicable shoreline master program pursuant to WAC § 173-26-140. 5 The request shall be on a form provided by the Grant County Department of Community 6 Development and shall include identification of the regulation in question, a description of the 7 property (if applicable), and.a clear statement of the issue or question to be decided. Grant County 8 shall consult with the Department of Ecology on interpretations of the Shoreline Master Program to 9 insure that any formal written interpretations are consistent with the puipose and intent of RCW 10 § 90.58 and the applicable guidelines of WAC § 173-26-040. Formal written interpretations sha11 be 1.1 Type I actions, unless otherwise specified, and as such may be appealed to the Grant County _ 12 Commissioners or other appropriate appeal body as specified in Grant County Code or BoCC adopted 13 policy. 14 15 25.04.110 Exemptions from this Title 16 17 (a) Wherever a permit or approval in the Grant County code has been designated Type I, II, III, or IV,the 18 procedures in this Title shall be followed in project permit processing, The following permits or 19 approvals are,howaver, specific�lly excluded from the procedures set forth in this title: 20 (1) Landmarlc designations; 21 (2) Street vacations; and 22 (3) Road use pernuts. 23 24 (b) Pursuant to 1ZCW § 36.70B.140(2), building permits, bound�ry line adjustments, other construction 25 permits, segregation applications, and similar administrative approvals which are categorically 26 exempt from env�ronmental review under SEPA, are excluded from the following procedures: 27 (1) Determination of technical completeness(25.04.160); 28 (2) Notice of application(25.04 Article VI); 29 (3) Master application/consolidated review processing(25.04.090); 30 (4) Joint public hearings (25.04.330); 31 (5) Notice of decision(25.04.370); and 32 (6) Completion of project review within applicable time periods including the one hundred twenty 33 (120) day permit processing time(25.04.370). 34 35 Article III. Application Process Overview 36 37 25.04.120 Application Process Overview 38 39 (a) The application process shall consist of the following components: 40 (1) Pre-application review conference,where applicable; 41 (2) Plan review; 42 (3) Determination of completeness; 43 (4) Notice of application; 44 (5) Application review; and 45 (6) Notice of final decision. 46 47 , Article IV. Application Submissfon 48 49 25.04.130 Pre-Application Review 50 Chapter 25.04 5 Mccrch 2016 nmendments 1 (a) Applications for project permit Type I actions involving structures over the SEPA threshold, Type II, 2 Type III and Type IV actions may be scheduled for pre-application review at the re.quest of the 3 applicant. The Administrative Official, at his/her sole discretion, may require pre-application review 4 for any project determined to be unusual or complex in nature. 5 6 (b) Pre-application review is not intended to provide an exhaustive review of all the potential issues that a , 7 given application could raise. Pre-application review does not prevent the County from applying all , 8 relevant laws to the applicant.The purposes of pre-application review are: 9 (1) To acquaint agency staff with a sufficient level of detail about the proposed development to enable 10 st�ff to advise the proponent accordingly; 11 (2) To determine generll consistency with any rel.ev�nt comprehensive plan and development 12 regulations; 13 (3) To identify applicable regulations and permit needs,including permit fees; 14 (4) To identify permits/requireinents from other agencies,to the extent known; 15 (5) To provide early identification.of study reqizirements,issues,and potential mitigation requirements; 16 (6) To acquaint the proponent with the applicable requirements of local ordinances and other law;and 17 (7) To provide an opportunity for other agency staff to be acquainted with the proposed application and 18 applicable law. 19 , 20 (c) To initiate pre-application review, an applicant shall submit a written request detailing the nature of 21 the proposed project, the required fee;and all information required by the relevant section(s) of local 22 ordinances and other applicable regulatioris. 23 �4 (d) Information not provided in the written request shall be provided on the face of the preliminary plat, 25 in an environmental.checklist, or on other attachments. The Administrative Official may modify 26 requirements for pre-application materials and may conduct a pre-application review with less than all 27 of the required information. However, failure to provide a11 of the required inform�tion may prevent 28 the Administrative Official from identifying all applic�ble issues or providing the most effective pre- 29 application review. 30 31 (e) Within twenty-one (21) calendar days after receipt of a written request for pre-application review,the 32 Administrative Official shall schedule a pre-application conference. 33 34 (� The Administrative Official shall coordinate the involvement of agency staff responsible for planning, 35 development review, roads, utilities and other subjects, as appropriate, in the pre-application review 36 process. Relevant stafF shall attend the pre-application conference or shall take other steps to fulfill 37 the purposes of pre-application review. 38 39 (g) The pre-application conference should be held as soon as practicable after the Administrative Official 40 accepts the application for pre-application review. Such conferences are not publicized and the public 41 is not permitted to attend in orcler that a potential applicant's interest be protected. Tl�e applicant shall 42 be informed of the time arid place of the meeting. 43 44 (h) Within ten(10) working days after the pre-application conference, the applicant may�equest that the 45 following be provided: 46 (1) a form which lists the requirements for a completed application; 47 (2) a general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; 48 (3) the references to the relevant code provisions, approval criteria, ox development standards which 49 may apply to the approval of the application; 50 (4) the County's design guidelines; and/or Chcepter 25.04 6 Mczrch 2016 czmendments � � � 1 (5) To the extent known by the permitting agency, the permitting agency shall identify other 2 agencies of local, st�te, or federal governments that may have jurisdiction over some aspect of ' 3 the application. 4 5 25.04.140 Application and Accornpanying Datn 6 i 7 (a) Applic�itions for project permits shall be submitted upon forms provided by the Administrative 8 Official, .An application shall consist of all materials required by the applicable development 9 regulations, and shall include the following general information: 10 (1) A completed project permit application form signed by (1) the owner(s) of the property subject 11 to the application, or (2) a representative authorized to do so by written instrument executed by 12 the owner(s)and filed with the application; 13 (2) A verified statement by the applicant that tne property affected by the application is in the 14 exclusive ownership of the applicant or that the applicant has submitted the application with the 15 consent of all owners of the affected property; 16 (3) The completed application shall identify a single contact person or. entity to receive 17 determinations and notices required by tihis chapter; , 18 (4) All other items listed �s applications requirements in the relevant sections ot'the Grant County 19 ordinances and other applicable regulations governed by this Chapter; 20 (5) A property and/or legal description supplied by the Grant County Auditor, a title company, a 21 surveyor licensed in the state of Washington, or other party approved by the review authority9 22 and current Grant County assessor's map(s) showing the property(ies) subject to the application; 23 (6) �vidence of adequate water supply as required by RCW § 19.27.097; and/or other applicable 24 regulations; _ 25 (7) Evidence of sewer availability; or evidence of on-site sewage disposal approval by the Grant 26 County Health District, or jurisdictional agency incluciing but not limited to the Washington 27 State Department of Health or Washington State Dep�irtment of Ecology; . 28 (8) Any SEPA documents, �s applicable; and 29 (9) The applicable fee(s), 30 31 25.04.150 Review for Counter Complete Status 32 33 (a) Before accepting an application for a Type I, Type II, Type III, or Type IV process for review for 34 technically complete status, and unless otherwise expressly provided by code, the Administrative 35 Official shall deternune if the application is counter complete. ' 36 37 (b) The Administrative Official shall decide whether an application is counter complete when the 38 application is accepted,typically"over the counter". . 39 40 (c) An application is counter complete if the Administrative Of�cial finds that the application purports 41 and appears to include the information required by section 25,04.140; provided, no effort shall be 42 made to evaluate the substantive adequacy of the information in the application in the counter 43 complete review process. 44 45 (d) If the Administrative Official decides the application is counter complete, then the application shall 46 be ac.cepted for review for technically complete status. In the case ot'a Type I application, this review , 47 and approval may occur at the same time. However, regardless of whetlier the application is a Type 48 II, III or N, a finding of counter complete st�tus begins the 28 calendar day timeline for the County 49 to issue its determination of technical completeness specified in Section 25.04.160. 50 Chczpter 25.04 � Mczrch 2016 nmendments 1 (e) If the Administrative Official decides that the application is not counter complete, then the � 2 Administrative Official shall reject and return the application and identify in writing what is needed to 3 make the application counter complete. 4 5 25.04.160 Review for Technically Complete Status 6 7 (a) Before accepting an application for processing for a Type I, II, III or N review, the Administrative � 8 Official shall determine that the application is technically complete, . 9 10 (b) The Administrative Official shall decide whether an application is technically complete subject to the 11 following: 12 (1) Within twenty-eight (28) calendar days (RCW 36.70B.070) after an application is determined to 13 be counter complete 14 15 (c) A project permit application is technically complete if it meets the submission requirements specified 16 in section 25.04.140 above, as well as the submission requirements contained in the applicable 17 development regulations, application forms required by the Administrative Official, and the 18 applicable.fee has been paid. The deternunation of technical completeness may also inclLtde any other 19 information the Administrative Official deems appropriate. If the application is determined to be 20 technically complete, a Notice of Technically Complete application shall be provided to the ' 21 application. 22 (d) If the Administrative Official decides that an application is not technically complete (within the time ' 23 provided in subsection (b) of this section), the Administrative Official shall send the applicant a 24 "Notice of Technically Incomplete Application", that outlines why the application has been deemed 25 "technically incomplete" and lists what information is required to make the application technically 26 complete. 27 (2) The Notice of Technically Incomplete Application shall specify a date by which the responsive 28 materials �re required to be resubmitted. Applicants shall be provided. 90-days to resubmit 29 materials for incomplete applications. Failure, by the applicant, to resubmit will result in the 30 immediate closure of the application file, which will require refiling.the application materials 31 and paying the application fee for the new submittal. 32 (3) The Notice of Incomplete Application also may include recornmendations for additional 33 information that, although not necessaiy to make the application technically complete, is 34 recommended to address other issues that are or inay be relevant to the review. 35 36 (e) If the required information is submitted by tk�e date specified, then within fourteen(14) calendar days 37 the Administrative Official shall decide whether the application is technic�lly complete and, if not, 38 the Administrative Official shall: 39 (1) Reject the application and mail the applicant another Notice of Incomplete Application which 40 lists the remaining additional information needed to make the �pplieation technically complete; 41 or 42 (2) Issue a decision denying the application,based on a lack of information; or 43 (3) Allow the applicant to restart the technically complete review process another time by providing . 44 the required missing information by a date specified by the Administrative Official, in which 45 case the Administrative Offici�il shall retain the application and fees. 46 47 48 (f� A Type II, Type III or Type IV application shall be deemed to be technically complete if a written 49 determination has not been mailed to the proponent within twenty-eight (28) calendar days of the date 50 the application is accepted for reviaw. Chc�pter 25.04 8 Mc�rch 2016 cz�nendments 1 2 (g) Grant County's determination oF technical completeness shall not preclude it from requesting , 3 additional information or studies either at the time of the notice of completeness or subsequently if 4 new information is required or substantial changes in the proposed action occur. ' S 6 Article V. Processing a Technically Complete Application 7 8 9 25.04.180 Vesting 10 11 (a) An application shall become vested on the date an application is accepted as technically complete 12 under this Title. Thereafter, the application sh111 be reviewed under the codes, regulations and other 13 laws in effect on the date of vesting; provided, in the event an applicant substantially changes his or 14 her proposed development after a determination of coinpleteness, as determined by the administrative 15 official, the application shall not be considered vested until a new determination of completeness on 16 the changes is made under this Title. 17 18 Article VI. Notice of Application 19 20 25.04190 Distribution of Notice of Application 21 22 (a) ApplicabiTity. Grant County shall provide, within fourteen (14) days of the date an application is 23 determined to be technically complete under this title, a notice of application for all project 24 applications that are not categorically exempt from SEPA review, or for which a public comment 25 period or open record pre-decision hearing is required. If an open record pre-decision hearing is 26 required, a notice of application shall be provided at least fifteen (15) days prior to the open record 27 hearing. If Grant County has made a SEPA determination of significance under 43.21 C RCW 28 concurrently with the notice of application, the notice of application may be combined with the 29 threshold determination and scoping notice for a determination of significance. Nothing i� this sub- 30 section prevents a determination of significance and scoping notice from being issued prior to a notice 31 of application. 32 33 (b) Issuance of Notice of Application. The notice of application shall be provided by one or more of the 34 following methods, as required by 25.04.200 Tab1e 3: 35 (1) Mailing to project applicant or the designated representative of the applicant; 36 (2) Mailing to County Departinents and agencies with jurisdiction; 37 (3) Publishing a summary of the notice, including at least the project location in other than a legal 38 description, brief description of the project, type of permit(s) required, comment period dates, 39 and location where the complete application may be reviewed, in the County's official 40 newspaper of general circulation; 41 (4) Notifying public or private groups with known interest in a certain proposal or in the type of 42 proposal being considered or who request such notice in writing; 43 (5) Mailing to adjacent landowners. Adjacent landowners are owners of real property, as shown by , 44 the records of the County Assessor, located within 300 feet of any portion of the boundary of the 45 proposal's tax parcel or lot of record (real property). If the owner of real property which is 46 proposed for activity owns another parcel or parcels of real property which 1ie adj�cent to the 47 real property proposed for activity, notice shall be given to owners of real property located 48 within three hundred (300) feet of any portion of the boundaries of such adjacently located 49 parcels of real property owned by the owner of the real property proposed for activity; 50 Chccpter 25.04 9 Mnrch 2016 nmendments � 1 (6) Posting of the property by Applicant. The applicant as soon as possible shall post one or more 2 notice boards as I'ollows: � 3 (A) A single notice board shall be placed by the applicant where it is completely visible and 4 readable to pedestrians from the public right-of-way. 5 (B) Additional notice may be required where: 6 (i) The site does not abut a public road; ; 7 A large site abuts more than one public road; and/or 8 The Director determines that additional notice boards.are necessary to provide adequate 9 public notice. 10 (C) Removll of the notice board prior to the end of the notice period may be cause for 11 discontinuance of the Department review until tha notice board is replaced and remains in 12 place for the specified time period. 13 (D) An affidavit of posting shall be submitted to the Director by the applicant prior to the 14 hearing' ar final comment date. If the affidavits are riot filed as required, any scheduled 15 hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application, will be postponed in , 16 order to allow compliance with this notice�equirement. 17 (E) Notice boards shall be constructed and .installed in accordance with specifications 18 promulgated by the Department. 19 20 21 (c) SEPA Exempt Projects. A notice of application shall not be required for project perxnits that are 22 categorically exempt under SEPA, unless a publie comment period or an open record-predecision 23 hearing is required. 24 25 25.04.200 Method of Public Notice of Application by Application Type 26 27 (a) The method of public notice of project permit applications shall be based on their classification as 28 delineated in Table 3. 29 Tczble 3 30 Methocl of Picblic Notice by Appliccction Type 31 Mailina to Notify 32 Application Agencies of Adjacent Applicant� Posting of Publish$ Groups w/ 33 Jurisdiction4 Landownerss Property� Interest9 34 T e 35 Type I No No No No No No 36 Type II Yes No2'11 No3 No3,il No3,11 Nol 37 Type III Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 38 Type IV Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 39 Z except if SEPA required. 7 see§25.04.190,subparagraph(b)(1). except for shoreline substantial development permits under the see§25.04.190,subparagraph(b)(6). 40 County's SMP. $ see§25,04190,subparagraph(b)(3). 41 3 except if SEPA or shoreline substantial development permit is � see§25.04.190,subparagraph(b)(4). 42 required. 10 except if pursuant§23.04.140,subparagraph(g)(3). 43 5 see§25.04,190,subparagraph(b)(2). �� except Preliminary Short Subdivision pursuant to Table 2. see§25.04.190,subparlgraph(b)(5). 44 45 25.04.210 Contents of Notice of Application 46 47 (a) The notice of application shall include the following: 48 (1) The case file number(s) date of application, the date the application was determined to be 49 technically complete, and the date of the notice of application; 50 Chc�pter 25.04 10 Mareh 2016 nmenclments 1 (2) A description of the proposed project action and a list of the project permits included in the , 2 application, and, if applicable, a list of any additional studies requested by the Administrltive 3 Offici�l to complete the application; 4 (3) A list of other permits not included in the application to the extent known by Grant County; ' S (4) A list of existing environmental documents that avaluate the proposed project; 6 (5) A stateinent th�t delineates the public comment period, together with a statement of the right of 7 any person to comment on the application, receive notice of and participate in any hearings, 8 request a copy of the decision once made, and any appeal rights; 9 (6) The date,time,place and type of he�ring, if applicable; 10 (7) A statement of any preliminary determination, if one has been made at the time of the notice, of 11 those development regulations that will be used for project mitigation and of consistency; 12 (8) The name of the proponent and any representative of the proponent, and the name, address and 13 telephone number of a contact person for the proponent, if any; 14 (9) A description of the site, including current zoning and nearest road intersections; reasonably 15 sufficient to inform the reader of its location and zoning; 16 (10) The dates, places, and times where information about the application may be examined and the 17 name and telephone number of the staff representative to contact about the.application. 18 (11) Any other information determined appropriate by Grant County. 19 20 (b) Content of Shoreline Master Program Permit Application Notice. In addition to the notice content 21 speci�'ied in subsection 25.04.210 (a) of this section, a notice for a Shoreline Master Program permit 22 sha1T also include: 23 (12) The public comment period shall be 30 (thirty) days..The notice shall state the manner in which 24 the public may obtain a copy of the county's decision on the application no later than two (2) 25 days following its issuance. 26 27 (c) Content of Type III Preliminary Subdivision Permit Application Notice. In addition to the notice 28 content specified in subsection 25,04.210 (a) of this section, a notice for preliminary subdivision 29 permits shall�lso include: 30 (1) Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat application adjacent to or within one mile of the 31 boundaries of a city or town, or which contemplates the use of any city or town utilities shall be 32 given to the appropriate city or town authorities. 33 (2) Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat application of a proposed subdivision located adjacent 34 to the right-of-way of a state highway or within two (2) miles of a boundary of a state municipal 35 airport shall be given to the secretary of transportation, who must respond within fourteen (14) 36 days. 37 38 (d) A notice of application shall not be required for project permits that are categorically exempt under 39 43.21 C RCW (SEPA), unless an open record predecision hearing is requir.ed, or an open record 40 appeal hearing is allowed on the project permit decision, or for projects identified in subsection 41 25.04.210(b)of this section. 42 43 (e) Except for a threshold determination, the County may not issue a decision or recommendation on a 44 proj ect permit until after the expiration of the public comment period on the notice of application. 45 46 25.04,220 Optional Public Notice 47 48 (a) As optional methods of providing public notice of any project permits, in addition to the no.tice 49 requirements established in 25.04.200,the Administrative Official may: 50 Chczpter 25.04 �2 Mc��•ch 2016 amendments 1 (1) Notify the public or private groups with known interest in a certain proposal or in the type of � 2 proposal being considered; 3 (2) Notifying the news media; 4 (3) Placing notices in appropriate regional or neighborhood newsp�pers or trade journals; 5 (4) Publishing notice in agency newsletters or sending notice to agency mailing lists, either general 6 lists or lists for specif"ic proposals or subject areas; and 7 (5) Mailing to neighboring property owners. , 8 9 (b) The County's failure to provide the optional notice as described in this subsection shall not be grounds 10 for the invalidation of any permit decision. 11 12 25.04.230 Public Comment on the Notice of Application 13 14 (a) The public comment period shall be not less than fourteen (14) days following the date of the notice 15 of application, except as provided in subsection 25.04.230(b), below, and except for those projects 16 determined by the Adnunistrative Official to require more time,up to a maximum of thirty(30)days. 17 18 (b) The public comment period shall be thirty(30) days for shoreline permit applications. 19 20 (c) Public comment on the Notice of Application will be receivec�by the Administrative Official until the 21 close of Planning Department business hours on the final day of the comment period. Comments may 22 be mailed, personally delivered or. sent by email. Comments should be as specific as possible. 23 24 25.04.240 Notice of Public Hearing 25 � 26 (a) The Notice of Hearing may be issued within the Notice of Application in GCC 25.04.210, however, 27 in the event the original hearing date needs to be revised, a separate Notice of Hearing shall be 28 required. 29 (b) Notice of Public Hearing. At least fifteen (15) calendar days before the date of the hearing for an 30 application(s) subject to open record review, the Administrative Official shall issue a public notice of. 31 the hearing. Such notice of the public hearing shall contain: 32 (1) The name and address of the applicant or the applicant's representative; 33 (2) A description of the affected property, which may be in tha form of either a vicinity location or 34 written description, other than a legal description; 35 (3) The date,time and place of the hearing; 36 (4) A description of the subject property reason�bly sufficient to inform the public of its location, 37 including but not limited to the use of a map or postal address and a subdivision lot and block 38 designation; 39 (5) The nature of the proposed use or development; 40 (6) A statement that all interested persons may appear and provide testimony; 41 (7) When information may be examined, and when and how written comments addressing findings 42 required for a decision by the hearing body may be�dmitted; 43. (8) The name of a local government representative to contact and the telephone number where 44 additional information may be obtained; 45 (9) A statement that a copy of the application and any associated documents are available for 46 inspection at no cost;.copies will be provided at the County's cost; and 47 (10) Notice of such a public hearing shall be mailed to: 48 (A) The applicant or the applicant's designated representative; 49 (B) Adjacent land o�vners as defined in GCC § 25.04.190(b)(5); 50 (C) Any person who submits written comments on an application; and Chapter 25.04 13 March 2016 ccmenclments 1 (D) Any person who submits a written request for notification on a specific application: 2 , 3 (c) Al1 public notices shall be deemed to have been provided or received on the date the notice is 4 deposited in the mail or personally delivered, whichever occurs first. Failure to send notice by mail to 5 any such property owner where the address of s�tid owner is not a matter of public record or because 6 the ownership is not of public record shall not invalidate any proceedings on the application. , 7 ' 8 Article VII. Procedures for Application Review 9 10 25.04.250 Type I Procedure—Ministerial Decision 11 12 (a) Review, The Administrative Official sh�ll approve, approve with conditions, or deny a Type I 13 application within one hundred twenty(120) calendar days after the date the application was accepted 14 as technically complete; provided an applicant inay agree in writing to extend the time in which the 15 County shall issue a decision. The County may consider new evidence or information the applicant 16 provides with or after such a written request. 17 18 (b) No Public Hearing.No public hearing is authorized for a Type I application. 19 20 25.04.260 Type II Procedure—Adminxstrative Decision 21 22 (a) Review,The Administrative Official sh�11 approve,approve with conditions, or deny a Type II application 23 within one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after the date the application was accepted as technically 24 complete.The County shall issue a written decision regarding the application(s);provided that: 25 (1) If a determination of significance (D.S) is issued, then the Administrative Official shall issue a 26 decision not sooner than seven (7) calendar days after a fmal environmental impact statement is 27 issued; and 28 (2) An applicant may agree,in writing to extend the time in which the Administrative Official shall issue 29 a decision. The Administrative Official may consider new evidence or information the applicant 30 provides with or after such a written request. 31 32 (b) Final Decisions.Final decisions shall be made as specified in Article IX of tlus chapter. 33 34 25.04.270 Type III Procedure—Quasi Judicial Decision 35 36 (a) Review, A Type III application requires one (l) public hearing before the Planning Commission or 37 the Hearing Examiner. In the case.of a Planning Commission hearing, their decision constitutes a 38 recommendation to the Board of County Cominissioners. The public hearing should. be held withiil 39 ninety (90) days after the date the County issues the determination that the application is technically 40 complete. Preliminary Plats must be approved, disapproved or returned to the applicant for 41 modification or correction within ninety d�ys from the filing date of an application that has been 42 accepted by the Planning Department and determined to be technically complete except as may be 43 provided by this_title. In determining the number of days that have elapsed after Grant County has 44 notified the applicant that the application is complete, the periods stated in 25.04.370(c) shall be 45 excludecl. 46 47 (b) Planning Commission Recommendation. The Planning Commission is a recommending authority for 48 Type III applications as outlined in Table 2; the Board of County Commissioners renders final 49 decisions, The Planning Commission shall direct the Planning Department within fourteen (14) days 50 of the date of the open record hearing to prepare a written.report setting forth the.recommendation of Chczpter 25.04 14 Mc�rch 2016 ccmenclments 1 the Planning Commission including: findings, conclusions, staff report, and testimony on the record 2 from agencies and interested parties. 3 4 (c) Board of County Corrunissioner Decision. Upon receiving the recomrnendation from the Planning 5 Commission, the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners shall proinptly set the matter for a 6 closed record public hearing to malce a decision on the Planning Commissi.on recommendation. The � , 7 Board of County Comrriissioners, at their discretion,may make the following decisions: ' 8 (1) Upholcl recommendation of the Planning Commission. 9 (2) Uphold recommendation of the Planning Commission with additional conditions. . 10 (3) Modify recominendation of the Planning Commission, with or without the applicant's ll concurrence,provided that the modific�tions do not; 12 (A) Enlarge the area or scope of the proj ect. , 13 (B) Increase the density of the proj ect. 14 (C) Significantly increase adverse environmental impacts as determined by. the SEPA 15 responsible official. 16 (4) Denial (reapplication or resubmittal is permitted). ; 17 (5) Denial with prejudice(reapplication or resubmittal is not allowed for one year). 18 (6) Remand for further proceedings. 19 20 (d) Notice of Public Hearing. At least fifteen (15) calendar days before the date of the hearing for ari 21 application(s) subject to Type III review, the County sh�ll issue a public notice of the hearing 22 consistent with the requirements of GCC §25.04.240. This Notice of Hearing may have been issued 23 within the Notice of Application. . 24 25 (e) Public Hearings. Public hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the requireinents specified in 26 Article VIII of this Chapter. 27 28 (� Final Decisions. Final decisions shall be made as specified in Article IX of this chapter. 29 30 25.04.280 Type IV Procedure—Final Plat 31 32 (a) Review: Final Plats shall be reviewed for conformance to all applicable local, state, and federal 33 regulations and any conditions of approval stipulated by the Hearing Examiner. 34 35 (b) No Public Hearing: Notice of an open record public he�ring is not provided for a Type IV application 36 because no public hearing is authorized. 37 38 39 40 Article VIII. Open Record He�rings 41 42 25.04.290 Generally 43 44 (a) Open record public hearings, including open record pre-decision and appeal hearings, held on a 45 proj ect permit�pplication shall be conducted in accord�nce with this chapter. 46 47 25.04.300 Responsibility of Administrative Of�cial for�Iearing 48 49 (a) Upon the filing of a project permit application requiring a public hearing, the Administrative Official 50 shall: Chc�pter 25.04 15 Mctrch 2016 ctmenc�ments � 1 (1) Set the time and place for the public hearing and shall provide notice of the hearing as set forth 2 in GCC § 25.04.240; 3 (2) Prepare a st�ff report on the application and present this stlff report at the public hearing. This 4 staff report will incorporate on the project permit application, any mitigation measures 5 recommended under the County's development regulations or under the authority of SEPA, and 6 the County's final SEPA determination on the project permit application, if applicable. In the 7 ,case of a Type II project permit application,this report may be the permit. 8 (3) Prepare the notice of decision, if required by the hearing body and/or mail a copy of the notice of 9 decision to those required by this code to receive such notice. 10 11 25.04.310 Order of Proceedings 12 13 (a) Public hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the ri.iles of pxocedure adopted by the County, 14 except to the extent waived b.y the County. The Planning Commission or a Hearings Examiner may 15 adopt other rules of procedure not inconsistent with these procedures. Further, if deemed appropriate 16 to facilitate review of a p�rticular development permit application, the Hearing Examiner or Planrung 17 Commission m�y adopt specific procedures for an individual matter. A public hearing shall be 18 recorded on audio or audiovisual tape. 19 20 (b) Public hearings shall serve to create or supplement an evidentiary record upon which the Pl�nning 21 Commission, Board of County Commissioners, or the Hearing Examiner will base its decision or 22 recor�unend�tion. The review authority shall open the public hearing and, in general, observe the 23 following sequence of events: 24 (1) At the beginning of a hearing or agenda of hearings the review authority shall: 25 . (A) State that the testimony will be received only if it is relevant to the applicable approval 26 criteria and development standards and is not unduly repetitious; 27 (B) Identify the applicable approval criteria and development standards; 28 (C) State that the review �iuthority will consider any party's rec�uast that the hearing be 29 continued or that the record be kept open for a period of time and m�y grant or deny that 30 request; 31 (D) State that the review authority must be impartial and whether the review authority has had 32 any ex parte contact or has any personal.or business interest in the application. The review 33 authority shall afford parties an opportunity to challenga the impartiality of the authority; 34 (E) State whether the review authority has visited the site; 35 (F) State that persons who want to receive notice of the decision may sign a list for that 36 purpose at the hearing and where that list is kept; and 37 (G) Summarize the conduct of the hearing. 38 (2) Staff presentation, including submittal of any administrative reports. The Planning Commission, 39 Decision Maker or Review Authority may aslc questions of the staff. 40 (3) Applicant presentation, including submittal of any materials. The review authority may ask 41 questions of the applicant. 42 (4) Testimony or comments by the public relative to the matter being he�rd. Questions directed to 43 the staff or the applicant shall be posed by the review authority at its discretion but the review 44 authority shall act to facilitate rights to confront and examine adverse witnesses. 45 (5) Rebuttal,response or clarifying statements by the staff and the applicant. 46 (6) The public hearing portion.of the hearing shall be closed and the review authority may deliberate 47 on the matter. At this time, the review authority may further question a person submitting 48 information or the staff if opportunity for rebuttal is provided. 49 (7) At the conclusion of the hearing on each application, the review authority shall announce one of 50 the following actions: Chczpter 25.04 16 Mnrch 2016 c�mendments i i 1 (A) That the hearing is continued. If the hearing is continued to a place, date and time certain, 2 then additional notice of the continued hearing is not required to be mailed, published or 3 posted. If the hearing is not continued to a place, date and time certain, the notice of the 4 continued hearing shall be given as though it was an initial hearing. The review authority 5 shall adopt guidelines for reviewing requests for continuances; 6 (B) That the public record is held open to a date and time certain. The review authority shall , 7 state where additional written evidence and testimony can be sent, and shall announce any 8 limits on the nature of the evidence that will be received af�er the hearing. The review 9 authority may adopt guidelines for reviewing requests to hold open the record. 10 (C) That the application(s) is/are talcen under advisement, and a final order will be issued as 11 provided in GCC § 25.04.375 12 (D) That the application(s) is/are, denied, approved ar approved with conditions, together with 13 a brief summary of the basis for the decision, �ind that a final order will be issued as 14 provided in GCC § 25.04.375. 15 (E) In the case of a Planning Commission open record public hearing, if a recommendation is , 16 made to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal, the recorrnnendation shall 17 be forwarded the Grant County Commissioners for approval at a closed record public . 18 meeting. 19 20 25.04.320 Surden of Proof—Open Record Hearings ' 21 � 22 (a) The burden of proof is on the applicant, or, in the case of an open record appeal, on the appellant. 23 24 25.04.330 Site View of Subject Property 25 26 (a) The review authority may view the subject property with or without notification to the parties,but the , 27 circumstances of such site view shall be placed on tlie record. 28 29 30 25.04.350 Conflict of Interest,Ethics, Open Public Meetings,Appearance of Fairness 31 32 (a) The hearing body shall be subject to the code of ethics (RCW � 35A.42.020), prohibitions on the 33 conflict of interest (RCW § 35A.42.050 and ch�pter 42.23 RCW), open public meetings (chapter 34 42.30 RCW), and appearance of fairness (chapter 42.35 RCW) as the same now exists or may 35 hereafter be amended. 36 37 25.04.360 Ex Parte Communications 38 39 (a) No member of the helring body may communicate, directly or indirectly, regarding any issue in a 40 proceeding before it, other tlian to p�rticipate in communications necessary to procedural aspects of 41 maintaining an ordarly process, unless it provides notice and opportuiuty for all parties to participate; � 42 except as provided in this section; 43 (1) the hearing body may receive advice from leg�tl counsel; 44 (2) the hearing body may communicate with staff inembers (except where the proceeding relates to ' 45 a code enforeement investigation or prosecution). . 46 47 (b) If, befora serving as the hearing body in a quasi judicial proceeding, any member of the hearing body 48 receives an ex part communication of a type that could not properly be received while serving, the 49 member of the hearing body promptly after starting to serve, shall disclose the comrnunication 50 described in subsection c)below. Chctpter 25.04 17 Mareh 2016 czmendments 1 2 (c) If the hearing body receives an ex parte communication in violation of this section, he or she shall 3 place on the record: 4 (1) All written communications received; 5 (2) All written responses to the communication; 6 (3) State the substance of�ll oral communications received, and all responses made; 7 (4) The identify of each person from whom the examiner received any ex parte communication. 8 9 (d) The hearing body shall advise all parties that these matters have been placed on the record. Upon 10 request made within ten (10) days after notice of the ex parte communication, any party desiring to Y 1 rebut the communication shall bE allowed to place a rebuttal statement on the record. 12 13 25.04.370 Disqualffication 14 15 (a) The order oF proceedings for a hearing will depend in p�rt on tlie nature of the hearing. The following 16 shall be.sup�lemented by administrative procedures as appropriate. 17 (1) Before receiving information on the issue,the following shall be determined: 18 (A) Any objections on jurisdictional grounds shall be noted on the record and if there is 19 obj ecti,on,the hearing body has the discretion to proceed or terminate; 20 (B) Any abstentions or disqualification shall be detiermined. 21 (2) The presiding off'icer may talce official notice of known information related to the issue, such as: 22 (A) A provision of any ordinarice, resolution,.rule, officially adopted development standard or 23 state law; and 24 (B) Other public records and facts,judicially noticeable by law. 25 (3) Matters officially noticed need not be established by evidence and may be considered by the 26 hearing body in its determination. Parties requesting notice shall do so on the record. However, 27 the hearing body may take notice of matters listed in subsection(a)(2) of this section if stltement 28 for the record. Any matter given judicial notice may be rebutted. 29 (4) .The hearing body may view the area in dispute with or without notification to the parties, but 30 shall place the time,manner and circumstances of such view on the record. 31 (5) Information shall be received form the staff and from proponents and opponents. The presiding 32 officer may approve or deny a request from a person attending the hearing to ask a question after 33 taking into account rights to confront and examine adverse witnesses. Unless the presiding 34 officer specifies otherwise, if the request to ask a question is approved, the presiding officer will 35 direct the question to the person submitting testimony. 36 (6) When the presiding officer has closed the public hearing portion oPthe hearing, the hearing body 37 shall openly discuss the issue and may further question a person submitting informltion or the 38 staff if opportunity for rebuttal is provided. 39 40 Article IX. Fin11 Decisions 41 42 25.04.375 Notice of Tinal Decision 43 44 (a) Decision Content. The review authority should issue a written decision regarding the application(s) 45 that includes: 46 (1) A statement of all determinations made under SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW) the applicable 47 criteria and standards in this code and other applicable law; 48 (2) The reasons for a conclusion to approve or deny; 49 (3) The procedures for administrative appeal; and 50 (4) Any notices required by RCW 36.70B.130. Chtrpter^25.04 1 g Mc�reh 2016 amenclments � 2 (b) Distribution of Final Decision. The.Notice of Decision shall be provided to the applicant and the 3 applicant's designated representative and all parties of record, including all persons who, prior to the 4 rendering of the decision, requested notice of the decision or submitted substantive comments on the 5 application. 6 � 7 25.04.380 Timeline for Notice of Decision 8 ' 9 (a) Unless otherwise provided in this Chapter, the notice of.decision shall be issued within one hundred � 10 twenty (120) calendar days after the date of determination of technical completeness under the 11 provisions of GCC § 25.04.160; provided, the review authority shall not issue a written decision 12 regarding the application(s) until at least fifteen (15) calend�ir days after the threshold determination 13 under the Grant Cou�ty SEPA Ordinance is made. 14 15 (b) A proponent may agree in writing to extenci tihe time in which. the review authority shall_issue a 16 decision. The review authority may consider new evidence the proponent introduces with or after 17 such 1 written request. 18 19 (c) In determining the number of days that have elapsed after the local government has notified the 20 . applicant that the application is complete for purposes of calculating the time for issu�nce of the 21 notice of decision,the following periods shall be excluded: 22. (1) Any period during which the applicant has been requested by Grant County to correct plans, 23 perform required studies, or provide additional required information. The period shall be 24 calculated from the date the County notiF'ies the applicant of the need for additional information 25 until the earlier of the date the local government determines whether the �dditional information 26 satisfies the request for information or fourteen(14) days after the date the information h�s been 27 . provided to the County; 28 (2) If the County determines that the additional information submitted by the applicant is 29 insufficient, it shall notify the applicant of the coritinued deficiencies, and the procedures under 30 subsection(1)above shall apply as if a new request For.studies had been macle; 31 (3) Any period during which an environmental impact st�itement is being prepared following a 32 determination of significance pursuant to.chapter 43.21C RCW; 33 (4) Any period for administrative appeals of project permits or SEPA, if an open record appeal 34 hearing or a closed record appeal, or both, are allowed. The time period for consideration and 35 decision on appeals shall not exceed: 36 (A) ninety(90) days for an open record appeal hearing; and 37 (B) sixty(60) days for a closed record appeal. 38 (5) Tha parties may agree to extend these time periods. 39 40 (d) If the County is unable to issue its final decision on a project permit application within the time limits 41 provided for in this section, it shall provide wxitten notice of this fact to the project applicant. The 42 notice shall include a statement of reasons why the time limits have not been met and an estimated 43 date for the issuance of the notice of decision. 44 45 25.04.390 Exemptions from Time Periods for Issuing Notice of Decision 46 47 (a) The time limits established by 25.04.370 do not apply if a permit application: 48 (1) Requires amendment to the comprehensive plan or development regulation(s); 49 (2) Requires approval of a new fully co�tained community, a m�ster planned resort, or the siting of 50 an essential public facility; or Chctpter 25.04 19 Mczreh 2016 cemendments 1 (3) Is substantially revised by the applicant as determined by the Administrative Official, in which 2 case the time period shall start from the date at which the revised proj ect application is 3 deternuned to be complete. 4 (4) Requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, in which case the 5 Administrative Official shall issue a decision no sooner than seven(7) calendar days after a final 6 environmental impact statement is issued 7 8 Article X. Judicial Appeals 9 10 11 12 13 25.04.430 Judicial Appenls 14 , 15 (a) Proceedings for judicial review shall be pursuant to 36.70C RCW. This process shall be the exclusive 16 means of judicial review of Type III or Type IV land use decisions, except for: 17 (1) Land use decision of a local jurisdiction that are subject to review by a quasi judicial body 18 created by state law, such as the Shoreline Hearings Board or the Growth Management Hearings 19 Board; 20 (2) Judicial review of application for a writ of mandamus or prohibition; or, 21 (3) Claims provided by any law for monetary damages or compensation. 22 23 Article XI. Consistency Analysis and SEPA Integration 24 25 25.04.440 Determanation of Consistency 26 27 (a) Fundamental land use planning choices made in adopted comprehensive plans and 'devel�pment 28 regulations will serve as the foundation for project review. As part of project review, the reviewing 29 official shall determine if a proposed project is consistent with Grant County's applicable 30 development regulations, or in the absence of applicable development regulations, the adopted 31 comprehensive plan. This consistency review will consist oF a review of the type of land use(s) 32 pertnitted at the site, the level of developmant allowed, infrastructure analysis, and the character of 33 the development. 34 35 25.04.450 Consistency Analysis 36 37 (a) During project permit application review, the County shall determine whether the items listed in this 38 subsection are defined in the development regulations as applicable to the proposed project. In the 39 absence of applicable devalopment regulations,the County shall determine whether the items listed in 40 this subsection are defined in the County's adopted comprehensive plan, This determination of 41 consistency shall include the following: 42 (1) The type of land use permitted at the site, including uses that may be allowed under certain 43 circumstances, if the criteria for their.approval have been satisfied; 44 (2) The level of development, such as units per acre, density of residential development, or other 45 measures of density; 46 (3) Where applicable, passage :of a Concurrency Test and a Finding of Concurrency for the 47 availability and adequacy of transportation facilities to meet the elemands of development or use 48 as provided in GCC § 25.20; and, , 49 (4) The character of the development, such as development standlyds. 50 Chcrpter 25.04 20 Mcer^ch 2016 c�mendments 1 (b) In determining consistency, the determinations made pursuant to this chapter shall be controlling. � 2 3 (c) During project review, Grant County or any subsequent reviewing body shall not reexamine 4 alternatives to or hear appeals on the items identified in subsection (a) of this section, except for 5 issues of code interpretation. 6 7 25.04.460 SEPA Integration 8 9 (a) Environmental review for projects determined not to be categorically exempt under SEPA (RCW 10 43.21 C) and the Gr�nt County SEPA ordinance shall be integrated and run concurrently with the 11 permit procedures of this title. Specifically, the County shall review the project permit application 12 under the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, the 13 SEPA rules, Chapter 197-11 WAC, and the Grant County SEPA ordinance and shall; 14 (1) Determine whether the.applicable regulations require studies that adequately analyze all of the 15 proposed project's specific probable adverse environtnental impacts; 16 (2) Determine if the applicable regulations require measures that adequately address such 17 environmental imp�cts; 18 (3) Determine whether additional studies are required.and/or whether the project permit application 19 should be conditioned with additional mitigation measures; and 20 (4) Provide prompt and coordinated review by governinent �gencies and the public in compliance 21 with applicable environmental laws and plans,.including mitigation for specific project impacts 22 that have not been considered and addressed at the plan or development regulation level, 23 24 25.04.470 Use of Existing Environmental Documents 25 26 (a) As provided by in the Grant County SEPA Ordinance,the Administrative Official may determine that 27 existing comprehensive plans, subarea plan elements of a comprehensiva plan, development 28 regulations, or other local, state or federal rules or 1�ws provide adequate analysis and mitigation of 29 the specific probable adverse environmental impacts of a proposed action if: 30 (1) Tn the course of project review, including any required environmental a�alysis, the local 31 government considers the specific probable adverse environmental impacts of the proposed 32 action and determines that these specific impacts are adequately addressed by the development 33 regulations or other applicable requirements of the comprehensive plan, subarea plan elements 34 of the comprehensiye plan, or other local, state, or federal rules or laws; and 35 (2) The local goverriment bases or conditions its approval on compliance with these requirements or 36 mitigation measures. 37 38 (b) In its review of a project permit application, the County may determine that the requirements for 39 environmental analysis, protection and mitigation measures in the applicable development 40 regulations, comprehensive plan, and/or in .other applicable local, state, or federal l�ws provides 41 adequate �nalysis of and mitigation for the specific adverse environmental impacts of the proposed 42 proj ect. 43 44 (c) A comprehensive plan, development regul2tion or other applicable local, state or federal law provides 45 adequate analysis of and mitigation for the specific adverse environmental impacts of a proposed 46 proj ect when: 47 (1) The impacts have been avoided or otherwise mitigated; or 48 (2) The County has designated as acceptable certain levels of service, land use designations, 49 development standards or other land use planning required or allowed by chapter 36.70A.RCW. 50 Chczpter 25.04 21 March 2016 czmendments 1 (d) In its decision whether a specific adverse environmental impact has been addressed by an existing 2 rule or law of anothez agency with jurisdiction with environmental expertise with regard to a specific , 3 environmental impact, the County shall consult orally or in writing with th�it agency and may ; 4 expressly defer to that agency. In making this defei7al, the County shall base or condition its approval 5 on compliance with those other existing rules or l�ws, 6 , 7 (e) Nothing in this section limits the authority of the County in its review or mitigation of a project to 8 adopt or otherwise rely on environmental analyses and requirements under other laws, as provided by 9 chapter 43.21 RCW. 10 11 25.04.480 Issuance of SEPA Threshold Determinations 12 13 (a) Expiration of.Notice of Application Comment Period. Except for a threshold determination, Grant , 14 County may not issue a decision or a recommendation on a project permit until the expiration of the 15 public comment period on the notice of application, 16 17 (b) SEPA Determination of Signii"icance. (DS) and Notice of Application. If Grant County has made a : 18 SEPA threshold detennin�tion concurrently with the notice of application, the notice of application 19 shall be combined with the threshold determin�tion and scoping notice. Nothing in this subsection 20 prevents a determination of significance and scoping notice from being issued prior to a notice of 21 application, 22 23 (c) Public Hearing on Project Permit. If an open record predecision hearing is required on the underlying 24 project permit application, Grant County shall issue its threshold determination at least fifteen (15) 25 days prior to the open record predecision he�iring. 26 27 25.04.490 Appeals of SEPA 28 29 (a) Administrative SEPA appeals to the Board of County Comznissioners are established in the GGC § 30 24.04—SEPA and RCW 36.70B. 31 32 25.04.500 Categorical Exemptions 33 34 (a) Actions categorically exempt under Chapter 43.21c.110(1)(a) RCW do not require environmental 35 review or the preparation of an environmental impact statement. An action that is categorically 36 exempt under the rules �dopted by the Department of Ecology (WAC chapter 197-11) may not be 37 conditioned or denied under SEPA. 38 39 Article XII. Optional Hearing Examiner Review 40 41 25.04.510 Hearing Examiner Review Available 42 43 (a) Under the terms of this ordinance, whereyer the Board of County Commissioners or the Planning 44 Commission has authority to review, make a recommendation on, or make a decision on a project 45 permit application, the applicant or the Bo�rd of County Commissioners, may at their option, elect to 46 have a Hearing Examiner talce the place of the Planning Commission or Board of County 47 Commissioners in reviewing, or making a recommendation or decision on a project permit 48 application, provided; the applicant or the Board of County Commissioners agrees to pay any and all 49 costs, ch�rges, and fees associated therewith. 50 Chnpter 25.04 22 Mczrch 2016 ccmendments , • , � : � � ; � 5 ' 6 7 8 9 10 11 I2 l� 14 15 ' ]6 17 18 19 20 zt za 23. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ChcaptGr 2S.04 23 Nlnrch 2016�mendnaents