HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 05-216-CCBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION NO. 05 -216 -CC
An Ordinance/Resolution Relating To Comprehensive Planning For Grant
County In Accordance With The Washington State Growth Management Act
(Chapter 36.70A RCW), The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA, Chapter
43.21.0 RCW), And The Final Decisions And Orders Of The Eastern
Washington Growth Management Hearings Board; Amending And Adopting A
Growth Management Act Compliant Urban Growth Area For The City Of
Ephrata, Amending And Adopting A Growth Management Act Compliant
Rural Density For The Rural Residential 2 Land Use Designation And, Other
Matters Properly Relating Thereto.
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, in 1990 the Washington State Legislature passed and the Governor signed
into law the Growth Management Act (the "GMA") as contained in SHB No. 2929 (Washington
Laws, 1990 1st Ex. Sess., Ch.17), which was subsequently codified as, among other chapters,
chapter 36.70A RCW; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature found that uncoordinated and unplanned growth, together
with a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in the conservation and the wise use
of our lands, pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health,
safety, and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of the state; and
WHEREAS, the GMA requires all counties and cities in the state to participate in some
planning and, the fastest growing counties and the cities within them, to plan extensively in
keeping with state goals on. sprawl reduction; affordable housing, economic development, open
space and recreation, shoreline management, environmentally sensitive and natural resource
areas, regional transportation, environmental protection, property rights, natural resource
industries, historic lands and buildings, permit processing, public facilities and services, and
early and continuous public participation; and
WHEREAS, chapter 36.70A RCW requires Grant County (the "County") to adopt a
Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan") that meets specified GMA goals and addresses the mandated
GMA elements; and
WHEREAS, the County adopted the Plan in October of 1999 and, a GMA compliant
Unified Development Code (development regulations) in October of 2000, pursuant to chapter
36.70A RCW; and
05 -216 -CC
HACurrent Planning\HTorres\Long Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
F1NAL.doc Page 1 of 8
WHEREAS, following the adoption of the County's Plan, the City of Moses Lake, the
City of Ephrata, the Town of Royal City and, the Town of Warden, filed appeals with the Eastern
Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (the "Board") with issues including, but not
limited to, the County's adoption of a rural density of 1 dwelling unit/ 2.5 acres within the Rural
Residential 2 Land Use Designation; and,
WHEREAS, during the County's 2002 Plan amendment cycle, an amendment was
approved expanding the City of Ephrata's (the "City") Urban Growth Area ("UGA") by
approximately 13 acres; and,
WHEREAS, following the adoption of the County's 2002 Plan amendment cycle, the
Greenfield Estates Home Owners Association ("Greenfield") filed an appeal with the Board,
regarding the County's adoption and amendment of the City's UGA, petitioning for a finding of
non-compliance and/or invalidity; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") intends to comply fully with
the orders and directives of the Board issued in EWGMHB Nos. 99-1-0016 and 04-1-0005 and,
the orders of Thurston County Superior Court, as appropriate; and,
WHEREAS, the BOCC initiated an appeal of the Board's decision in EWGMHB No. 99-
1-0016 addressing, including but not limited to, the County's adoption of rural densities in the
Plan as GMA non-compliant; and
WHEREAS, Thurston County Superior Court has remanded the Final Decision and Order
of the Board regarding the County's rural densities back to the County in order to bring this
element of the County's Plan into compliance with the GMA; and
WHEREAS, in EWGMHB No. 04-1-0005, the Board issued Final Decision And Order on
or about September 7, 2004, and received by the parties on or about October 12, 2004,
determining that the proposed expansion of the City's UGA by approximately 13 was "clearly
erroneous" and GMA non-compliant and, not addressing Greenfield's request for a finding of
invalidity. The Board ordered the County to take legislative action to bring itself into
compliance. No party to said action timely filed a motion for reconsideration and/or an appeal;
and,
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2005, the Board conducted a hearing pursuant to a request for a
finding of "Invalidity" by Greenfield; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the March 4, 2005, Board hearing on Invalidity, the Board
entered Order Denying Motion Seeking A Finding Of Invalidation And Continuing Compliance
Hearing, in EWGMHB No. 04-1-0005; and
05 -216 -CC
FI:\Current Planning\I-ITorres\Long Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doc Page 2 of 8
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2005, the City provided a voluminous amount of material in
support of retaining the —13 acre area within the City's UGA to the BOCC, which was out of
session until April 11, 2005. The material was submitted to the BOCC without the benefit of the
Planning Commission's (the "Commission") review and advisory recommendation and, without
adequate time for public comment which, due to timing, did not afford a reasonable opportunity
for the County to review and evaluate its merits; and
WHEREAS, it appears to be the clear intent of the Board that the County must take action
to remove the —13 acres from the City's UGA in order to avoid a finding of Invalidity, as the
Board indicated to the parties during the hearing of March 15, 2005, that affected landowners
and/or the City may wish to initiate an amendment through an appropriate process whereby, all
would have an opportunity to present new or reorganized facts for consideration by the Board;
and
WHEREAS, that the County's Plan is a dynamic document which can and will be
modified consistent with the GMA from time to time as circumstances warrant same and, as
such, the action(s) herein will not preclude interested parties from petitioning or otherwise
participating in proposed changes to the Plan through a public review and comment process; and
WHEREAS, proposals amending the Rural Residential 2 density and the City's expanded
UGA within the Plan have been produced that meet the specified GMA goals and addresses the
mandated GMA elements; and
WHEREAS, the Commission completed a public hearing/participation process that meets
the requirements of GMA pursuant to RCW 36.70A.020(11) and RCW 36.70A.140; and
WHEREAS, the Commission compiled a public record, including documents and
correspondence that was considered during its review of the proposal to amend the Rural
Residential 2 density and, the City's UGA within the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Commission relied upon best available data in specifying and considering
proposed amendments to the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were reviewed by State Office of Community
Trade and Economic Development ("CTED"), as well as other affected State, federal and local
agencies and Tribes, and found, generally, to be in compliance with the requirements of the
GMA; and
WHEREAS, the comments and correspondence provided by the public, affected State,
Federal and Local Agencies and Tribes, have been considered during review of the proposal to
amend the Rural Residential 2 density and the City's UGA within the Plan and in the preparation
of the attached "Additional Findings of Fact"; and
05 -216 -CC
HXurrent Planning\EITorres\Lang Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)WCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doc Page 3 of 8
WHEREAS, the County, acting through its Responsible SEPA Official, conducted a SEPA
review process which included the issuance of Adoption of Existing Environmental
Documentation on January 14, 2005, all of which was reviewed and considered by the
Commission during its decision malting process; and
WHEREAS, following public notice, the Commission conducted a public hearing on
February 2, 2005, which was continued to March 2, 2005, to consider the proposed density and
UGA amendments and, receive public comments; and
WHEREAS, upon public notice, the BOCC conducted a public hearing on April 12,
2005, to consider the proposed advisory recommendations of the Commission, along with other
public comments pertaining to the proposed density and UGA amendments to the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the BOCC considered the entire public hearing record, including the
Commission's advisory recommendations, and written and oral testimony submitted during the
BOCC's hearings. Now, Therefore, It Is Hereby,
ORDAINED that the BOCC adopts the Commission's recommendation to amend the
rural density of the Rural Residential 2 Land Use Designation from 1 DU/2.5 acres to 1
DU/5acres in the Plan; and,
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the BOCC adopts the Grant County Planning
Department's recommendation to amend the City's UGA by removing the subject —13 acres
pursuant to the Board's order and, re -designating the area as Rural Residential 1; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the BOCC adopts the amended Rural Residential 2
density and the amended —13 acre reduction of the City's UGA (including all maps, text and
appendices referenced and included herein) and, adopts the Adoption of Existing Environmental
Documentation, adopts the attached Additional Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and
incorporates the record compiled by the Commission; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the BOCC rescinds and repeals in their entirety
those portions of the Plan which conflict with the changes adopted herein; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that if any provision or provisions of this
ordinance/resolution or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the
remainder of this ordinance/resolution or the application of the provision to other persons or
circumstances shall not be effected; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that all prior policies, ordinances, resolutions and/or
regulations rescinded and/or repealed by the adoption of this ordinance, including without
limitation, the County's 1999 GMA Plan, as amended, are hereby expressly revived in the event
that the County's GMA Plan is at any time hereafter declared in its entirety to be invalid or of no
effect by a reviewing body with jurisdiction, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.302(4); and
05 -216 -CC
HACurrent Planning\HTorres\Long Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doc Page 4 of 8
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the BOCC adopts all recitals herein as findings of
fact in support of this action; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the effective date of these amendments to the
Grant County Comprehensive Plan is April 13, 2005; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the BOCC directs the Department's Director to:
(1) incorporate into the Plan the changes delineated by the BOCC's decision as annexed in
Attachment B as supported in the Findings of Fact, Attachment A; (2) and to provide copies to
the CTED and to other agencies as may be required by law; (3) publish a Notice of Action Taken
in newspapers of record and the SEPA Register; and (4) provide copies to those parties
specifically requesting copies; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the BOCC directs the Department's Director to
prepare for consideration of the Commission's advisory recommendations and, the BOCC's
amendments to the UDC and the Official Zoning Map to reflect the revised Rural Residential 2
density, the City's UGA and land use designations.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS hereby adopt this ordinance/resolution effective immediately.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners in regular session at
Ephrata, Washington, by the following vote on April 12, 2005, and, signed by its membership
and attested by its Clerk in authorization of such passage this 13`h day of April, 2005.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Yea Nay Abstain GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
LeRoy C. llison, ai
L� ❑ ❑
Deborah Ray are, Member
Richard B. Stevens, Member
05 -216 -CC
H:\Current Planning\HTorres\Long Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doc Page 5 of 8
ATTACHMENT A
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
FINDINGS OF FACT
Rural Residential 2 Density Amendment — Text
GENERAL FINDINGS:
(1) The change would benefit the public health, safety, and/or welfare;
(2) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for
additional property in the proposed land -use designation;
(3) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the Plan;
(4) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the
subject property;
(5) The change has merit and value for the community as a whole;
(6) The change, if granted, will not result in an enclave of property owners enjoying greater
privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity
where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves with justifies
different designations;
(7) The benefits of the change will outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change;
(8) The change is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Plan and the requirements of
GCC Titles 22, 23, 24 and 25; and
(9) The change complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of this Chapter.
Amendment to the City's UGA and, Land Use Re -designation
GENERAL. FINDINGS:
(10) The change would benefit the public health, safety, and/or welfare;
(11) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for
additional property in the proposed land -use designation;
(12) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the flan;
(13) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the
subject property;
(14) The change has merit and value for the community as a whole;
(15) The change, if granted, will not result in an enclave of property owners enjoying greater
privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity
where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves with justifies
different designations;
(16) The benefits of the change will outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change;
(17) The change is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Plan and the requirements of
UDC Titles 22, 23, 24 and 25; and
(18) The change complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of this chapter.
05 -216 -CC
FIACurrent Planning\FlTorres\Long Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doc Page 6 of 8
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The BOCC has a legal obligation to enact a Plan that meets the requirements of chapter
36.70A RCW and the authority to amend said Plan.
2. The BOCC has a legal obligation to satisfy the requirements of the Board's Final Decision
and Order in EWGMHB Nos. 99-1-0016 and 04-1-0005 and, the Orders of Thurston County
Superior Court;
3. The BOCC has met these obligations by enacting Ordinance No. 99 -15$ -CC. The Plan as
amended and, the associated environmental review comply with the goals and requirements
of chapter 36.70A RCW, chapter 365-195 WAC, chapter 43.210 RCW, chapter 197-11
WAC and, County SEPA regulations.
4. The BOCC has met the obligation of providing public input into the decision-making process
as required by chapter 36.70A RCW.
05 -216 -CC
HACurrent Planning\H Torres\L.ong Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doe Page 7 of 8
ATTACHMENT B
Rural Residential 2 Density Amendment — Text
And
City UGA Amendment and Land Use Re -designation
05 -215 -CC
fl:\Current Planning\HTorres\Long Range Planning\2.5 and Ephrata UGA (Ephrata 2)\BOCC Ordinance (2.5-Eprata UGA)
FINAL.doc Page 8 of 8
RURAL LANDS SITE -ELEMENT...
Urban Reserve —1 Unit per 5 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to recognize
'those areas that appear to be transitioning, at
varying rates, from rural to urban, and are
appropriate for areas of increasing density and
potential future service from a municipal or
privately -owned community water system. Such
areas may currently range in density from rural,
or contain a hybrid of rural and urban densities.
Such areas are located in close proximity to an
urban growth area, but are either beyond the
present availability of city water and sewer
service, or are not yet urban in character, making
them inappropriate for inclusion in the UGA.
Such areas are deemed necessary to hold in
reserve for potential inclusion within an Urban
Growth Area in response to future needs as
reflected in revised or updated population or
employment forecasts or allocations,
These areas are given an interim low density
designation of one dwelling unit per 5 acres as a
means of preventing establishment of land uses
or land use patterns that could foreclose planning
options and eventual development or
redevelopment at higher urban densities.
Designated Urban Reserve lands should be
considered as "joint planning areas" subject to a
joint planning process between the County and
the affected city or cities intended to resolve
issues regarding potential land uses. Such areas
should undergo annual review of urban growth
area assumptions and monitoring of growth
indicator data to provide "early warning" to
ensure that the land supply is not being over
constrained or that development is occurring in a
maiuler inconsistent with the intent of the urban
growth area. An annual review process for such
areas is described in Chapter 5 — Land Use.
Designated Urban Reserve lands that are
determined to not be needed or appropriate for
urban development and future inclusion in an
Urban Growth Area, pursuant to a defined joint
planning process, may be re -designated through
the Comprehensive Plan amendment process.
Rural Residential 1— x Unit per 5 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to maintain the
<" w
rural aspects of the County and to provide
buffering or transitions between existing rural
developments and areas of higher or lower
densities. The rural residential areas are
characterized by activities including, but not
limited to, small-scale farms, dispersed single-
family homes, and open space. The maximum
density is one dwelling unit per Five (5) acres.
Lands are typically too far from the urban area to
enable cost-effective provision of public services
nor do typical uses rewire provision of urban
services.
Rural Residential 2 —1 Unit per 24-5 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to maintain the
rural aspects of the County and to recognize
those areas where some platting to smaller lots
already exists and where some services and
infrastructure may exist. The rural residential
areas are characterized by activities including,
but not limited to, small-scale farms, dispersed
single-family homes, and open space. The
maximum density is one dwelling unit per .
and ,,e half L
five S acres.
Rural .emote -1 Unit per 20 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to differentiate
from the higher density rural land use to reflect
the area's remoteness and/or limited opportunity
for development. Such areas are those not
suitable for intensive farming and are generally
not attractive for residential development. The
primary land uses in the remote residential areas
include, but are not limited to, resource -oriented
activities (farming and mineral extraction), open
space, and residential. The maximum density is
one dwelling unit per twenty (20) acres.
Lands are typically too far from the urban area to
enable cost-effective provision of public services
at this time. Such areas require on-site water and
sewer service, may be outside of fire service, or
have other site constraints. They may be outside
existing main road networks and distant from
existing utilities.
Grant County Comprehensive Plan September 1999
5R U--8
rural residents and others can gather, work, shop,
entertain, and reside. Commercial and
compatible industrial development may continue
to locate and prosper in rural centers under
limited conditions.
Land Use Decision Making
In making land use decisions, one of county
government's ongoing challenges is to balance
the various special interests of the community
within the context of protecting the health, safety
and welfare of the community at large.
Therefore, an issue of particular concern is how
to take into account the variety of community
interests as the policies are being developed. In
making land use decisions, the three general
guidelines presented below should be used.
Citizen Preference Through Public Process
Desires of the citizenry for certain types of land
uses over others should be an important
consideration in making land use decisions.
Citizen preference is important, for example,
when deciding to give weight to one factor over
another, or in deciding among conflicting factors.
Impacts on Economy, Employment and Tax Base
A variety of factors associated with these impacts
should be considered when making land use
designation decisions. For example, a county-
wide balance should be maintained between
residential and industrial, commercial, and
agricultural areas in order to enhance and
provide diversity to the county's tax base and
employment opportunities.
Easy to Identify Boundaries
The boundaries of land use designations should
follow easily identified features on the land, such
as the existing built environment, utility corridors
or observable terrain changes. When areas with
severe limitations for development (e.g. soils,
geology, flooding) do not coincide with such
identifiable landmarks, the boundaries should be
drawn with land capability in mind.
Rural Area Designations
The purposes of rural area designations are to:
...RURAL LANDS SUB -ELEMENT
• Support the rural aspects of Grant County.
• Protect areas with environmental constraints
and preserve and buffer natural resource
areas of agriculture, mineral deposits, and
fish and wildlife habitats from encroachment
by or irreversible conversion to more intense
uses.
Allow low intensity residential uses which
do not require a high level of public services
and facilities.
Allow limited areas of more intensive rural
development including the infill,
development or redevelopment of existing
areas; the intensification of existing or
development of new small-scale recreation or
tourist uses; and the intensification of
existing or development of new isolated non-
residential development, cottage industries,
and small-scale businesses. Public services
may be provided to these areas.
Rural areas are characterized by low density
residential dwellings, concentrated mixed use
areas, isolated commercial and industrial uses,
farms, mining areas, outdoor recreation and other
open space activities. Commercial uses are
generally small in scale. They may provide
convenience services to the rural neighborhood,
but are not principally designed to serve the rural
population. Industrial uses will generally be
those that are related to or dependent on natural
resources such as agriculture, aquifer supply, or
minerals, Home -base occupations and cottage
industries are allowed throughout the rural area
provided they do not adversely affect the
surrounding residential uses.
Grant County recognizes the following Rural
Land Use Designations:
- Urban Reserve
• Rural Residential 1
• Rural Residential 2
• Rural Remote
These land use designations are illustrated in
Figure 5-5 and on Map 3 included in Part V —
Map Portfolio, and are described as follows:
Grant County Comprehensive Plan September 1999
5R U 7
RURAL LANDS SUB -ELEMENT...
Urban Reserve —1 Unit per 5 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to recognize
those areas that appear to be transitioning, at
varying rates, from rural to urban, and are
appropriate for areas of increasing density and
potential future service from a municipal or
privately -owned community water system. Such
areas may currently range in density from rural,
or contain a hybrid of rural and urban densities.
Such areas are located in close proximity to an
urban growth area, but are either beyond the
present availability of city water and sewer
service, or are not yet urban in character, making
them inappropriate for inclusion in the UGA.
Such areas are deemed necessary to hold in
reserve for potential inclusion within an Urban
Growth Area in response to future needs as
reflected in revised or updated population or
employment forecasts or allocations.
These areas are given an interim low density
designation of one dwelling unit per 5 acres as a
means of preventing establishment of land uses
or land use patterns that could foreclose planning
options and eventual development or
redevelopment at higher urban densities.
Designated Urban Reserve lands should be
considered as "joint planning areas" subject to a
joint planning process between the County and
the affected city or cities intended to resolve
issues regarding potential land uses. Such areas
should undergo annual review of urban growth
area assumptions and monitoring of growth
indicator data to provide "early warning" to
ensure that the land supply is not being over
constrained or that development is occurring in a
manner inconsistent with the intent of the urban
growth area. An annual review process for such
areas is described in Chapter 5 — Land Use.
Designated Urban Reserve lands that are
determined to not be needed or appropriate for
urban development and future inclusion in an
Urban Growth Area, pursuant to a defined joint
planning process, may be re -designated through
the Comprehensive Plan amendment process.
Rural Residential 1-1 Unit per 5 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to maintain the
Grant County Comprehensive Plan
5R U-8
rural aspects of the County and to provide
buffering or transitions between existing rural
developments and areas of higher or lower
densities. The rural residential areas are
characterized by activities including, but not
limited to, small-scale farms, dispersed single-
family homes, and open space. The maximum
density is one dwelling unit per five (5) acres.
Lands are typically too far from the urban area to
enable cost-effective provision of public services
nor do typical uses require provision of urban
services.
Rural Residential 2 — 1 Unit per 244r-5 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to maintain the
rural aspects of the County and to recognize
those areas where some platting to smaller lots
already exists and where some services and
infrastructure may exist. The rural residential
areas are characterized by activities including,
but not limited to, small-scale farms, dispersed
single-family homes, and open space. The
maximum density is one dwelling unit per two
and -etre-l',4) five5 acres.
Rural Remote -1 Unit per 20 Acres
The purpose of this designation is to differentiate
from the higher density rural land use to reflect
the area's remoteness and/or limited opportunity
for development. Such areas are those not
suitable for intensive farming and are generally
not attractive for residential development. The
primary land uses in the remote residential areas
include, but are not limited to, resource -oriented
activities (farming and mineral extraction), open
space, and residential. The maximum density is
one dwelling unit per twenty (20) acres.
Lands are typically too far from the urban area to
enable cost-effective provision of public services
at this time. Such areas require on-site water and
sewer service, may be outside of fire service, or
have other site constraints. They may be outside
existing main road networks and distant from
existing utilities.
September 1999
5. It is further provided that no liability shall attach to the County by reason of entering
into this contract, except as expressly provided herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Contractor has executed this instrument, and the
said Board of County Commissioners of aforesaid County has caused this instrument to be
executed by and in the name of said Board by its Members, duly attested by its Clerk, the
day and year below written, and the seal of said Board to be hereunto affixed on said date.
F d, , 2005
Stephen R.
Desert Rock Exc. Inc.
Signature
Name
Firm Name
707!7 5_ PinnaF+rWaUy Srritca R
Address
Moses Lake, WA 98837
509 765-2255
Phone
APPROVED AS TO FOIA�
Z a of '2005
Pro a gAtto e BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Done this J 'c ay of 2005
Chair
Member
Member
Contract Page 2 of 3