HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Hearing - BOCCGrant County Board Of County Commissioners
Please Sign In For The Record
PUBLIC HEARING 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Adoption
DATE July 14, 2026
TIME 11:30AM
Please Print Your Name Clearly
NAME
REPRESENTING
CONTACT INFO: PHONE/E-MAIL
45�
q &oo
r
7?
7 V,
J� Ce-;0
https://grantcountywa.sharepoint.com/teams/BOCC/Shared Documents/General/Templates/Public Hearings/0 Sign In Sheet, Open Record.docx
GRANT COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AGENDA MEETING REQUEST FORM
(Must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board by 12:00pm on Thursday)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
REQUEST SUBMITTED BY: victoria Seim
CONTACT PERSON ATTENDING ROUNDTABLE: John Brissey
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: ❑YES ONO
DATE:06.17.2026
PHONE: 509-754-6082
EN,21 it"cli-Imli
ff.'1Wg_WA]
❑Agreement / Contract
❑AP Vouchers
❑Appointment / Reappointment
❑ARPA Related
❑ Bids / RFPs / Quotes Award
❑ Bid Opening Scheduled
❑ Boards / Committees
❑ Budget
❑ Computer Related
❑ County Code
❑ Emergency Purchase
❑ Employee Rel.
❑ Facilities Related
❑ Financial
❑ Funds
8 Hearing
❑ Invoices / Purchase Orders
❑ Grants — Fed/State/County
❑ Leases
❑ MOA / MOU
❑ Minutes
❑ Ordinances
❑Out of State Travel
❑ Petty Cash
❑ Policies
❑ Proclamations
4B4Request for Purchase
0 Resolution
❑ Recommendation
❑ Professional Serv/Consultant
❑ Support Letter
❑Surplus Req.
❑Tax Levies
❑Thank You's
❑Tax Title Property
❑WSLCB
L=1 3 it A
-- M Uin 2M 11"WIL&Z rml
Resolution notice of hearing for the Transportation Improvement Program for 2027-
p p g
2032, to be held July 14, 2026 @ 11:30 AM in the Grant County Commissioners
Hearing Room, in the Courthouse in Ephrata, Washington.
If necessary, was this document reviewed by accounting? ❑ YES ❑ NO X N/A
If necessary, was this document reviewed by legal? ❑ YES ❑ NO 0 N/A
DATE OF ACTION: 6-0?2- DEFERRED OR CONTINUED TO:
APPROVE: DENIED ABSTAIN
D1:12
D?
D3:
WITHDRAWN:
4/23/24
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Grant County, Washington
RESOLUTION NOTICE OF HEARING, RESOLUTION No. 26- 047, -CC
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR THE 2027-2032 YEARS
WHEREAS, Grant County has updated the Transportation Improvement Program for the
2027 to 2032 period per RCW 3 6.81.121; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Improvement Program is updated each year to provide for
an annually updated six -year window, which may include new projects; and
WHEREAS, a Non -Project SEPA has been submitted for the projects proposed by the
updated Transportation Improvement Program, and
WHEREAS, an updated Priority Array of Projects for the 2027-2032 years has been
provided to the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT AN OPEN RECORD
PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD July 14, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. in the Grant County
Commissioners Hearing Room # 101, Courthouse, Ephrata, WA 9 8 823.
The Annual TIP can be viewed anytime at: https://www.grantcounWwa.,gov/1379/ROAD-
PT s://www.grantco-LinWwa.,gov/1379/ROAD-
PT.ANNTNC-r
interested persons may appear regarding these matters.
Grant County is also providing access to this scheduled hearing via Zoom audio. To participate in the
hearing please call in to the hearing at 1 (253) 205-0468, enter the access code (940 4827 7440) and
password (26229323) and you will bejozned to the meeting in a `muted ' status until such time as the
hearing allows for public testimony. If you have any questions aboict this procedure, please call the
Commissioner's Office in advance of the hearing.
DATED,\x
OUNrie
�• � ''�
'• � Yea Nay Abstain
. s
1 V • • �� s
• • wry �I�
SE
r
c -
•o
•
❑ ❑
V0, •� i
0, \0 • s
ZYM
IA
M tie`®`-�
O!O►Illllllti
-
❑ ❑
ATTEST:
z za
,
❑ ❑
aitlin E. Manell
Clerk of the Board
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
GRANT COUNTY, WASIUNGTON
Kevin Burgess,,-�haffl,
ice Chair
Cindy Carter, Member
Page 1 of 1
Grant County Roads
2027=2032
6-Year
Transportation Improvement Program
Annual Update
Prepared 06.16.2026
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ADOPTING RESOLUTION
ROAD, BRIDGE, AND CULVERT IN
PRIORITY ARRAY.'ROJECTSA FUNDING:
6.YEAR:PROJECTS MAP
I.
2027 TIP PROJECTS �s }
.,,1028 TIP: PROJECTS
2029 TIP PROJECTS
20A0 TIP PROJECTS.'
2031 TlP:.PROJECT$.,`l t;
13'
2032 TIP PROJECTS
BRIDGE REPORT
APPENDIX
SEPA APPLICATION
APPENDIX
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Grant County, Washington
RESOLUTION IN THE MATTER. OF RESOLUTION No. 26- -cc
ADOPTING THE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE
2027-2032 YEARS
WHEREAS, a priority array of projects was prepared in''.,, accordance with the County
Road Administration Board Standards of good Practice: WAC :13 6-14 and was made available
and consulted by the Board during the preparation of the Six. Year Program; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements ofRCW 36.811.121 1, '
and WAC 13 6-14 the
Grant County road Engineer submitted the Six Year; Program to the hoard of County
Commissioners on June 23, 2026; and {
WHEREAS a report with respect to deficient Bridges was available .too the Board during
the preparation and discussion of the Six Year Program; and
WHEREAS a SEPA applicafio was. submitted forenvironmental r e_assessnent and a
letter of .Addendum was received from 'ra.nt Cn n Develo ment Services indicating that the
P g
social, economic and aesthetic values would not be disturbed; and .
WHEREAS, AN":
otic6 cif Public Hewing was .published twice for 2 weeks preceding the
Hearing, with no objections to the process and, said hearing was held on July 14, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Cor n y Commissioners has reviewed the recommended Six
Year Pro rain and has made the
g revisions ad changes deemed practicable to the Count 's long
g
range road ,program;and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of R.C.W. 36.81.121 the legislative
authority slhaltadopt a Six Year Transportation Im rovement Program updated earl the Board
p g p yearly,
of County Cossioners did prep1:
are, revise, and extend the Six Year Program and did hold a Public
Hearing on July 14, 2026, Adopting said program as resolution 26- -CC;
N:\Staff\BVasquez\Resolution-Ordinance\0 - Form.docx
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT the Grant County Board of
Co,mmissionersADOPT the attached Six Year Transportation Improvement Program for the
years 2027 through 2032.
1
DATED:
ATTEST:
Caitlin E. Manell
Clerk of the Board
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Cindy C,after, Member
N:\Staff\BVasqLiez\Resol-Lition-Ordinance\O - Form.docx
SPRING 2026
ROAD INVENTORY
ROAD FUNCTION
-.ROAD SURFACE
URBAN
URBAN:RURAL'RURAL
RURAL
TOTALS:
TYPE,'
PRINCIPLE
MINOR
MAJOR
MINOR
LOCAL'
ARTERIAL
ARTERIAL
COLLECTOR
COLLECTOR
ACCESS
(FFC 14)
(FFC 16)
(FFC 07)
(FFC 08)
(FCC 09)
HMA (ASPHALT)
2.0
7.8
49.1
15.0
51.3
125.2
BST (OIL CHIP)
0
1.5
264.5
411.8
644.1
1321:9
Pa. (CONCRETE BRIDGES) `
0
0
'' '0
0.1
0.1
4.2
GRAVEL
0
0
0
'35.9
175.1
.`211A
PRIMITIVE GRAVELED
0
0
4.2
2807
744.1
777A
PRIIVIITIVEIJNIMPROVED;
0
0
0
� 0
63.0
63A`
TOTAL 2498.3 `
SPRING'2026
BRIDGE AND CULVERT INVENTORY
BRIDGE
B{tIbGE LENGTH
TYPE:
TO 30'
30' TO 50'
50' 70100'
100' +
TOTALS
CONCRETE
36
37
45
126
'STEEL
NA
11
4
1
2
18
WOOD
`NA
17
21
8
3
49
TEMP (BAILEY)
NA
0
0
2
0
2
,SHORT SPAN /CULVERT
(ANY MATERIAL)
�2
NA
NA
NA
NA.
65
TOTAL II 260
PAGE 5
GRANT COUNTY
Previous•Years'
W A s H I N G T® N
ti
Completi*on Reports
Grant County
2025
Annual Construction Projects (ACP) Report
WAC 136-16
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DONE (total sum of column 15 + column 16): $10,077,772
COMPUTED COUNTY FORCES LIMIT: $1,307,393
TOTAL COUNTY FORCES CONSTRUCTION (total sum of column 16): $707,000
Road Segment Information
Completed
Project Type
County fortes
County
Sources of Funds
Estimated Expenditures
Right of Way
Construction
County t orces
Grand Total
Annual
C R.P.
Project Status
Project Name
Length(ml.)
Code
Project
Forces
Dollars
(595.20)
Contract
JAII595)
Other funds
Program
No.
Road d
Road Name
NAP
EMP
FFC
Announcement
Project
County Road
Funds
PE & CE
Amount
Program Sown
Item N
a�.
Ck sure
(595.10)
1 23-02 v{?2CN Bridge 247 Replacement (PW5044) 26530
ROAD W-SE
1.98
NA
09
NA
BRIDGE (>20')
NO
NO
$0
$3,544,000
CDF FEDERAL
$870,000
$0
$3,560,000
$0
$4,430,000
$886,000
WSDOT STATE
2 23-12 r''2025 PE / 2026 CN Bridge 426 Deck Repair 16570
S FRONTAGE ROAD NW
1.52
NA
08
NA
BRIDGE (>20')
NO
NO
$0
$845,000
FEDERAL
$66,000
$0
$779,000
$0
$845,000
3 21-06 MERCONSTRUC'iION Stratford Road (PHASE 3) 94025
STRATFORD ROAD
17.24
20.28
07
3.04
RECONSTR
YES
NO
$106,000
$744,000
RAP
$0
$0
$678,000
$172,000
$850,000
4 18-05 tvh;7025 PE / 2026 CN Grape &Maple 42350
GRAPE DRIVE
0.12
0.36
18
0.99
RECONSTR
NO
NO
$205,875
$1,319,125
STP(US)
$125,000
$0
$1,400,000
$0
$1,525,000
4+ -
42600
MAPLE DRIVE
0.00
0.75
5 23-13 2024 t4 2025 PE Comprehensive Road Safety Program (YEAR 2) NA
COUNTY WIDE
NA
NA
NA
NA
SAFETY
NA
NA
$200,000
$0
ALL LOCAL
$200,000
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
6 24-03 2025 PE / 2026 CN Desert Aire Ped Safety 10660
DESERT AIRE DRIVE
0.00
2.57
07
2.57
SAFETY
NO
NO
$45,900
$294,100
STP(US)
$45,900
$0
$294,100
$0
S340,000
7 20-05 UNDER CONSTRUCTION 2025 Gravel to Oil Program 46220
ROAD 7.8-NE (VISTA DR TO D.5-NE)
0.00
1.16
09
1.16
NEW SURFACE
YES
NO
$185,000
$0
ALL LOCAL
$0
$0
$0
$185,000
$185,000
8 25-01 UND91t CONSTRUCTION Drumheller Connector (PHASE 3) 40555
DRUMHELLER ROAD (CENTER ROCKS)
7.87
8.87
09
1.00
NEW CONSTR
YES
NO
$0
$150,000
REET
$0
$0
$0
$150,000
$150,000
0.83
2.95
05
2.12
RESURFACE
NO
NO
$376,090
$2,409,760
STP(US)
$126,178
$0
$2,659,672
$0
$2,785,850
9 21-08 UNDER CONSTRUCTION Westshore Drive Overlay 40950
WESTSHORE DRIVE
10 25-02 UNDER{ON Stratford Bridge #110 Repair 94026
STRATFORD ROAD
0.21
0.28
07
0.07
RECONSTRUCTION
YES
NO
$200,000
$0
ALL LOCAL
$0
$0
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$1,118,865
$10,191,985
$1,433,078
$9,370,772 1
$707,0001
$ 11,51Q,850
-r.
PAGE 6
Grant County
2026
Annual Construction Projects (ACP) Report
WAC 136-16
(A) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DONE (total sum of column 15 + column 16): $10,177,772
(B) COMPUTED COUNTY FORCES LIMIT: $1,307,393
(C) TOTAL COUNTY FORCES CONSTRUCTION (total sum of column 16): $807,000
Annual C.K.P. Project Status Project dame
408ram No.
Road 0
tern No.
Road Segment information
Completed
length(ml,)
Project Type
Code
County Forces
Project
Announcement
County
Forces
Project
Closure
'
Sources of Funds
Estimated Expenditures
Dollars
CE
PE S.10
59S.1Q
Right of Way
(595.20)
Construction
Contract
County Forces
Grand Total
(All595)
Road Name
BMP
EMP
FFC
County Road
Funds
Other Funds
Amount
Program.Source
1 23-02 2025 PE / 2026 CH Bridge 247 Replacement (PW5044) 26530
ROAD W-SE
1.98
NA
09
NA
BRIDGE �>20')
NO
NO
$0
$3,544,000
$886,000
CDF FEDERAL
WSDOT STATE
$870,000
$0
$3,560,000
$0
$4,430,000
2 23-12 z0Z5 FIE % 2026 CN Bridge 426 Deck Repair 16570
3 21-06 UNDER CONSTRUCTION Stratford Road (PHASE 3) 94025
4 18-05 2025 VE { 2026 CN Grape & Maple 42350
42600
S FRONTAGE ROAD NW
STRATFORD ROAD
GRAPE DRIVE
MAPLE DRIVE
1.52
17.24
0.12
0.00
NA
20.29
0.36
0.75
08
07
18
NA
3.04
0.99
BRIDGE ;>20')
RECONSTR
RECONSTR
NO
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
$0
$106,000
$205,875
$845,000
$744,000
$1,319,125
FEDERAL
RAP
STP(US)
$66,000
$0
$125,000
$0
$0
$0
$779,000
$678,000
$1,400,000
$0
$172,000
$0
$845,000
$850,000
$1,525,000
5 23-13 2014 & 205 PE Comprehensive Road Safety Program (YEAR 2) NA
6 24-03 2025 PE / 2026 CN Desert Aire Ped Safety 10660
7 20-05 urdGEit C(,NSTRUCT+ON 2025 Gravel to Oil Program 46220
8 25-01 NNI)ER CONSTRUCTION Drumheller Connector (PHASE 4) 40555
9 21-08 '-UriDER CGNSTRUCTIOrJ Westshore Drive Overlay 40950
10 25-02 UiJDER CONSTRUCTION Stratford Bridge #110 Repair 94026
COUNTY WIDE
DESERT AIRE DRIVE
ROAD 7.8-NE (VISTA DR TO D.5-NE)
DRUMHELLER ROAD
WESTSHORE DRIVE
STRATFORD ROAD
NA
0.00
0.00
4.63
0.83
0.21
NA
2.57
1.16
8.63
2.95
0.28
NA
07
09
09
05
07
NA
2.57
1.16
4.00
2.12
0.07
SAFETY
SAFETY
NEW SURFACE
NEW CONSTR
RESURFACE
RECONSTRUCTION
NA
NO
YES
YES
NO
YES
NA
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
$200,000
$45,900
$185,000
$0
$376,090
$200,000
$1I 1I I - 165
$0
$294,100
$0
$250,000
$2,409,760
$0
$10,291,985
ALL LOCAL
STP(US)
ALL LOCAL
REET
STP(US)
ALL LOCAL
1
$200,000
$45,900
$0
$0
$126,178
$0
1 $1,433,078
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$294,100
$0
$0
$2,659,672
$0
$9,370,772
$0
so
$185,000
$250,000
$0
$200,000
$807,000
$200,000
$340,000
$185,000
$250,000
$2,785,850
$200,000
$11,610,850
-- Project is under construction.
Project is in design phase.
PAGE 7
GRANT COUNTYwA=„,NG,oNPriority Array
Projects & Funding
TIP FED COUNTY
ITEM FLtNCT ROAD
COUNTY PUBLIC
ROAD WORKS PROJECT NAME
BEGIN END COUNTY ESTIMATED
PROJECT ROAD NAME MILE MILE LENGTH FORCES FUNDS FUNDS PRELIM ENGINEERING I RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION
POST POST MILES CONSTR SOURCE ALLOCATED CUNST ENGINEERING ACQUISITION BY CONTRACT
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATED
BY COUNTY TOTAL
M CLASS LOG
(FCC) Jr
i n4 75530
PROJECT PROJECT
(CRP)
23-02 5044 BRIDGE 247 REPLACEMENT
TYPE
0 11 USE 1595.10) (595.20)
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ROAD W SE 1.98 NA NA NO CDF FEDERAL S4,430,000 $830,625 $0 $4,70(i,875
wcW)T Sl 107.500
(ALL 595)
$0 $5,537,500
2 24 2.25 0 Al YES LOCAL
$562 50U
$18 750
$0
$543 750
$0
$562,500 i
2 07 91030 23 09
5052 DODSON & 12 SW ROUNDABOUT SAFETY DODSON ROAD
_
DECK REPAIR REHAB BRIDGE S FRDNTAGE ROAD N'v"J
7 c� nin Na NO FEDERAL
i S1,U56,7`.0
$147,875
SO
$908,375
$0
$1,056,250
3 08 16570 23 12
5054 BRIDGE 426
0.82 5.82 5.00 NONE LOCAL
$180,000
$200,000
$0
S1,600,000
$0
$1,800,000
4 07 91U35 TBD
TBD Q-SW RECONSTRUCTION RECONSTRUCTION ROAD Q-SW
RAP
$1,626,000
5 07 92035 24-02
�5059U-NE HMA OVERLAY ROAD U-NE
12.84 15.80 2.96 NONE LOCAL
SiP(AL
$188,156
51,205,594
$143,750
$0
$1,2S0,000
_T_
$0
$1,393,750
INEW CULVERTS I ROAD B SE
0 24 0.44 0.20 YES LOCAL
$SOOOOC
$125,000
1 $0
$0
$375,000
$500,000
6 1 09 20550 18 10
5015 8 SE CULVERTS
NA LOCAL
$250 000
$250,000
$0
$0
$0
$250,000
NA NA 23 13
5055 COMPREHENSIVE ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM (YEAR 3) SAFETY SIGNAGE COUNTY WIDE
NA NA NA
0.00 2.57 2.57 NO LOCAL
$57,375
$57,375
$0
$367,625
SO
$425,000
8 07 10660 24-03
5U60 DESERT AIRS PED SAFETY SAFETY DESERT AIRE DRIVE
S i Pf US)
$ 367,625
(GRAVEL TO OIL K SW (11 SW TO 12 5 SW)
I 0 00 1.00 1 49 YES LOCAL
5468 750
cn
Cn
$0
$468,750
$468,750
y 09 1201U TBD
10 09 40555 TBD
TBD 2027 GRAVEL TO OIL PROGRAM
TBD DRUMHELLER CONNECTOR (PHASE 5) IMPROVE GRAVEL SURFACE DRUMHELLER ROAD
8.63 12.54 3.91 YES BEET
>312,SOU
$0
$0
$0
5312,5uu
�slt,�uu
=Gravel to Oil Project
PAGE 9
COUNTY TOTAL
TOTAL GRANTS TOTALLOCAL TOTAL PE & CE CONTRACT
$10 099 469 $2,206,791_T $1,773,375 $9 376,625 $1,156,250 $12,306,250
of 3Jdd
000'SL8'OT$
1tl101
OSL'EbE"T$
A1NI103
Ooo"059'8$
DVHINOJ
I
OSVT8E$
33 13d 1V101
A£b`5+6L'LS
1V3'O11V101
E9S'SLO'95 1:)afoJd 110 0118AeJ9
S1NV2191V101
SSSOb 60 IZ
000'SZ9,
000'SZ9S
0{
OS
0$
000"SL95
l�'001 53A T0'0 f0 bi TO'bI OtlOa a3ll3HiNn A13JVS (1f108t/ONnOa 3N-V) B0113NN00 U3ll3HWf1a0 481 081
OSZ 90b$
I
OSZ gobs
0$
0$
0$
0SZ 90b$
lVOnl S3A EZ'I L6'L bL'9 (MS-N 01110 JO ON3) MS-Zi 110 0113AVa9 WVb90Nd 110 O1l3AVa9 SZOZ 081 081 OLZOL 60 _
000'00£'TS
OS
000'OSZ'TS
OS
000`OSS
o00'01T'T S
O81 LO
3NUN Z Ef'6T bL'9T (ddlaN Ol 8a5) 3N-M OVOa N0117fa15NO:M3 NOI13f1SNOJ3a 3NAA6T
39VN91� A13]VS (b aV3A) WVN90Nd A134V5 OVOa 3AISN3H3adW03 SSOS EI £Z VN 00 8I
000 USZ$
O$
0$
O$ I
000 OSZS
OQODSZ$
1V7L11 3NON VN VN' VN 301M A1Nf100
OSL"£60'T$
OS
000"000"i$
OS
OSL"f6$
000'SLSS
OSL"BTZ$
ddHN
1V�01 ]NON ) i0'0 6Z'Z 8Z'Z MN-H OVOa 3901a8 M3N MN-H OVOa 1V ZBE 3901N8 081 081 0£b0£ 80 LT
OSL'EVVT$
0$
OSL'EVZ'T$
0$
000"OOiK
SLE'60Z'i$
SL£'tifT$
081
1V301 3NON 00'£ IC V TO-T MS -a OV08 N0117f181SN0�3a (M5 LZ O1 M5 bZ) MS a O91 O91 Ib0T6 LO 9I
005 Z9E$
005 ZIE$
0$
05
ODO OS$
owlgC5
1V301 I S3A 1 VN VN ZE'6 !AN-EZ OVO'd 3901a8 M3N LN3W3DVld3a UT 3901N8 £b05 b0 ZZ Bb0E6 60 SL
E9S'98h5
(5f1)d15 b0
AVla3A0 OVOa A3llVA LEOS b0 LZ OSZib bL
000'SZ9$
O$
005'Z95$
OS
00S1Z9S
BE/'BETS
11iJOl 3NON 8SSSTIT'Z ES'L OVOa A3llVA 30V]af153a
009Lb
i
£ZL LSIS
8Z0`OTO'TS
15f1 dIH ET'0 00'0 Odoa aMWllo
OSSTb
(Sfl)d1S Wo I SZ'O OMO I NVaHDOD
aVW11018 N"HDO9 890b 60-VT OSSib SO ET
000'0SCIS
0$
000'OSE'i$
0$
OS
OSZ'Z8T
ltl3w 3NON Z6'0 SZ'O AI OVO'd NVaHDOD N011JflalSNOD3H
N011DNalSNOD3a LN3W3DVld3a SSE 3901a8 18 MN-S 8S05 9i £Z OSSLE 90 ZL
[:DSL'8Lo'Z$
0$
OSL"898'i$
0$
:oo:woSi$ ��vg�-Iars
1Y�01 ]NON 00'f 66'£ 56'0 MN-S OVOa
0DWOSEIS dVN I 1
000'OOS'T$ 0$ I 000'SLE"T$ 0$ 000'SZI$ 000'OSTS 1V3O1 S3A I 00'h bZ'LL bZ'ET OVOa (180jlValS N011JflalSN003a (Z 35VHd) OVON OaOdlVa15 6Z05 b0 OZ SZOb6
(56511V) (OZ'S6S) (OL'S65) 3Sl1 # 11 rr (3ro Dolp (S%1
1V101 A1Nf1OJ A8 11VU1NCi7 A9 N011JSJflb3V ONIN33NION3 1SNO3 031VI3011V 33Nf10S ` NOI13nVlSN-O 5311W 1SOd 1SOd 1 I 3dAl SWHOld 1JVOMd lvo SSmn
031V1V11S3 N011.3nV.LSN03 N0113f1N1SNO3 AVM 101HOIV '.1NIN33NION3 W113Nd S0Nf11 50N(li ; 53 JlN10] H1Oh31 I GN3 NI93 , 3WVN tlV01! - 1J3fOMd 3WVN J>3fONd SNNOM OVON t1VON 13Nt13 VJ311
3119f1d A1Nfi07 A1Nf103 43j
DHd SZL
PJ~ -
COY COUNTY PUBLIC BEGIN END COUNTY
FEU COUNTY ESTIMATED
ROAD WORKS PROJECT NAME PROJECT ROAD NAME MILE MILE LENGTH FORCES FUNDS FUNDS PRELIM ENGINEERING RIGHT Of WAY CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATED
ITEM F FEDUNT
u CLASS ROAD PROJECT PROJECT TYPE POST POST MILES CONSTRUCTION SOURCE ALLOCATED CONST ENGINEERING ACQUISITION BY CONTRACT BY COUNTY TOTAL
M M USE (59S.10) (595.20) (ALL 595)
72 (K09 -- (CRTBD) TBD K.7-NE 7-NE TO 8-NE RECONSTRUCTION ROAD K.7-NE 0.00 1.06 1.06 YES LOCAL $143,750 $18,750 $0 $0 $125,000 $143,750
23 10
5051
BRIDGE 248 AT 11 SE REPLACEMENT
NEW BRIDGE
ROAD 11-SE
4.21
4.22
0.01
YES
CDF FEDERAL
S5,2S6,250
$1,250,000
$0
$5,006,250
$0
$6,256,250
23
09 24500
WSDOT
$1,000,1300
3.98
NONE
LOCAL
$506,25U
$312,500
$312,S00
-T
$3,125,000
$0
$3,750,000
24
07 33700
24 04
5061
24-NW PALISADES RECONSTRUCTION
RECONSTRUCTION
24-NW
4.31
8.29
53,243,1SU
25
00 NA
23 13
5055
COMPREHENSIVE ROAD SAFETY PROGRAM (YEAR 5)
ISAFETY SIGNAGE
COUNTY WIDE
` NA �_NA
I
NA
NONE
LOCAL
$250 ODU
$250 000
$0
$0
$0
$250 000
TBD
TBD
GRAND COULEE HILL (UPPER) RECONSTRUCTION
RECONSTRUCTION
GRAND COULEE HILL
0.00
2.89
2.89
NONE
tOtA:
$,181,250
$62,500
$0
$1,250,000
$0
$1,312,500
26
07 95039
ii. \I•
5118125
TBD
11-SW
0.00
0.75
0.75
YES
LOCAL
$237,500
$0
$0
$0
$237,500
$187,500
$237,500
$187,500
27
p9 10270
09 21930
TBD
TBD
TBD
2029 GRAVEL TO OIL PROGRAM
GRAVEL TO OIL
K-SE (END OF OIL TO 4-SE)
1.50
2.01
0,51
YES
LOCAL
$187,5U0
$0
$0
7.91
YES
LOCAL
$468,750
$0
T$U
$0
$0
$3,125,000
$3,125,000
2u
09 40555
TBD
TBD
DRUMHELLER CONNECTOR (OILING PHASE)
•'" FFC 07 RECLASSIFICATION
NEW CONSTRUCTION
DRUMHELLER ROAD (OILING)
4.63
12.54
$2,65ti,250
TO OIL
HIAWATHA ROAD (OILING)
3.08
4.63
1.55
YES
LOCAL
$156,750
$45,000
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$1,04S,000
2g
p9 40555
TBD
TBD
HIAWATHA CONNECTOR (OILING)
GRAVEL
SIB6
S888,250
FFC 07 RECLASSIFICATION
TOTAL GRANTS
TOTALLOCAL
TOTAL PE& CE
ROW
CONTRACT
COUNTY
TOTAL
$14 225 7S0
$2 U81 75U
$1 938 750
$312,500
$9,381,250
$4,675,000
$16,307,500
Gravel to Oil Project
PAGE 1 I
i
FED
COUNTY
COUNTY
PUBLIC
BEGIN
END
MILE
LENGTH
COUNTY
FORCES
FUNDS
FUNDS
tSTIMATED
PRELIM ENGINEERING
RIGHT OF WAY
CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTIONYCOUNTY
ESTIMATED
ITEM I FUNCT
ROAD
ROAD
WORKS PROJECT NAME
PROJECT
ROAD NAME
MILE
POST
POST
MILES
CONSTRUCTION
SOURCE
ALLOCATED
CONST ENGINEERING
ACQUISITION
BY CONTRACT
By COUNTY
TOTAL
ALL 595)
CLASS
LOG
PROJECT
PROJECT
TYPE
#
#
USE
(595.10)
(595.20)
$118,750
$125,000
(LAS
30 09
#
30330
(CRP}
BRIDGE 353 AT Ft -NW REPLACEMENT
NEW BRIDGE
ROAD R-NW
0.01
0.02
0.01
5.uU0
$6,250
$0
SO
7 NE TO N NE TRUCK ROUTE INTERSCT & RECONST
RECONSTRUCTION
ROAD N-NE AND / NE
0.00
0.89
0.01
YES
LOCAL
159 375
$62,500
$62,500
I $937,500
I
$0
$1,06t,500
sl UG
=27oG
_
GRANT TBD
$903,125
_._.
I
2.28
3.40
1.12
YES
TRAILS
S18/,5
$125,000
50
S437,S00
$250,000
$812,500
32 09
2159G
SAND DUNES CONNECTOR=ANDRAII (PHASE 1)
RECONSTRUCTION
SAND DUNES ROAD
LIAI_
5625,00z
33 p7
94025
STRATFORD AND 7-NE ROUNDABOUT
INTERSECTION
STRATFORD
4.02
4.04
O.U2
NONE
LOCAL
,RANT TBD
875 000
$3,500,000
5312.500
$312,500
$3,750,000
$0
$4,375,000
NA
NA
NONE
LOCAL
$250 000
$250,000
$0
�- $0
50
$250,000
34 00
NA
23-13
5055 COMPREHENSIVE kOAD SAFETY PROGRAM (YEAR 6)
SAFETY SIGNAGE
COUNTY WIDE
NA
!
12-NW (U-NW TO 12-SW)
1.00
1.33
0.33
YES
LOCAL
$125,000
$0
$0
$0
50
$125,000
$312,500
$1?,5,000
$312,500
' 75 p9
32260
TBD
T6D
2030 GRAVEL TO OIL PROGRAM
GRAVEL TO OIL
H-SW (SR-26 TO 12-5W)
0.00
1.02
1.02
YES
LULAL
>317,500
$0
$0
09
12530
TBD
TBD
TOTAL GRANTS
TOTAL LOCAL
TOTAL PE & CE
ROW
$375,000
CONTRACT
0 $5,125 000
COUNTY
$8061250
TOTAL
) $7,062,110 1
Gravel to
Oil Project
$5 215 621.
S1 g4t� 87S
$756 250
r�
)_
Local Funds
Funding Source Other
than Local
PAGE 1?.
£ I q—Dvj
-----------------
Doo I OSL 1 9$
13V)JIN0:)
I e:)0j UeLl
I J@LI 10 a»n oS RU I PLJnj
spunj le:)01
030)d 110 01 InAE!J9F—1
Sit'ILT sli'm 1 9s
IV301 IVIOL SINVHD 1V101
000,0SL$
000'Doo's$
Iviol kIN(103
.3:) V 3d 1VI0I
000,0055— Doo,00ss
01 os
05
000'D05s IvDOI To F.S.5 zs E (IN-S'S 01110 jO GN3) 9N-SI 1110 01 I�AV�19 NVU9MId 110 Oil3AVd9 TEOZI (19 L ostit, 60 or
000,osz$ 05
05 I 05 T
000,0ST.5
oc)o,osz$ 1 'IVJOI 3NON VNI VN VN 301/1A A.LNn0Dj 30VN9IS A-t3j\tsl (I HVgA) VWHDMJd A134VS GVMJ 3AISN3H34,11NOT
000,szl,Es
oos'zlg,zs os
�3 N 0 N_� E07 T: IH 331n0:) (INV'dg N01L7mJISN0:)3H NOI1Jf1N1SNOJ38 (IdIAAOI) IIIH 331n0D CINVd
�
000'szq,z<
000,00S,Z5 o5
000'sus
MMOUARI 3NON t7o't7 S 660 3N-S CIV081 NOij:)n ISNOD AAgNj g]jiimmjcl ol 3N 9 V40dj H01:)9NNOD 9N-S OVOU t7TSOt7 IE
()N,Stg,zs alm I
000,00s'Te, 0�
(S6� Ily)
iviol AINAIT) NO
00S'lEt?'T$
i:)Vl)iNO:) AS
NOJIISI()'OZ)V
oos'zgs
MIUMIDN3 ISNO:)
031V:)011V
1N3V433W9V
4)NVNIA )NI ]NON
asn
3)wnos NoLonHisNoz)
t7 6V'O
ES'E zo IN-N (IVO'd
#
5311W ISOd Isod
HLDN31 311W 311 W ?WvN GVON
N01I)mISNOD98
3dU
133fOl!d
\jojjDnUSNOD3d Rnov >oml 3N-N CJVO)J
IWVN 133fOVd
133fOHd
SIANOM
lolloutf
avow
OSL�t7l
o"t"
4
ft
901
a 141
avow
(30
ssvl:)
DNM
9E
0
VY311
031MUS3 NOIDIMUSNO3
NOUYIWISN03
AWM 10 IH!)Ili
DNIV33NIDN3 V4113Md
o7lvv4lls3
SONni
I
1
saNni 533"01
I AINnO)
aN3
N1939
'llond
AINA03
luw*#0:3)
all
M RRC
FED
COUNTY
COUNTY
PUBLIC
.... --- _
i
PROJECT
ROAD NAME
BEGIN MILE
MILE
END
MILE
LENGTH
COUNTY T
FORCES
FUNDS
FUNDS
PRELIM ENGINEERING
RIGHT OF WAY
ACQUISITION
CONSTRUCTION
BY CONTRACT
CONSTRUCTION
BY COUNTY
ESTIMATED
TOTAL
ITEM
FUNCT
ROAD
ROAD
WORKS
PROJECT NAME
TYPE
POST
POST
MILES
CONSTRUCTION
SOURCE
ALLOCATED
CONST ENGINEERING
ALL 595)
r`
l
CLAS5
(FCC)
LOG
p
PROJECT
(CRP)
PROJECT
if
#
USE
NONE
LOCAL
$937,500
(595.10)
$562,500
(595.20)
$375,000
$5,312,500
$0
�6,250,000
41
U7
10660
DESERT AIAE DRIVE & SR243 ROUNDABOUT
INTERSECTION
DESERT AIRE DRIVE
0.00
0.01
0.01
HISP
?5,312,50u
4.50 1.10 YES
TRAILS
S187,500 5125,000
$0
137,5'00
F
$25U.000
5812,500
42 09 21590
T77:7SAND DUNES CONNECTOR AND TRAIL (PHASE 2)
RECONSTRUCTION SAND DUNES ROAD 3.40
lTA(
S625 000 J
!A Z3 13
5055 !COMPREHENSIVE ROAD Sf FETY PROGRAM (YEAR 2)
_
(SAI t I Y SI(�NHC�t jw�ry r vviv� j NA j NA ( NA I NON-
OCAc
e,� , �,� .��n nnr
I w p
$0
$0
SO
$250,000
4� UO {
34 09 2210U TBD
TBD 2032 GRAVEL TO OIL PROGRAM
GRAVEL TO OIL BASELINE 0.5-SE 0.00 1.Oi 1.01 YES
LOCAL
j250,000 1 $0
$0
$0
$250,000
$250,000
TOTAL GRANTS
56 125 000
TOTAL IOCAI TOTAL PE & CE
( 1 437,500 $937,500
ROW
$375,000
CONTRACT
$5.750,000
COUNTY
$500,000
TOTAL
$7,562,500
[-Gravel to Oil Project
L
Local Funds
�
Funding Source Other than Local
PAGE 14
GRANT COUNTY
S A H I N G T O N
W PP
endix
Bridge Report
GRANT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL BRIDGE & INSPECTION REPORT 2026
CO UNTY ROAD ENGINEER
CADS C. EGBERT, PE
.Public Works Director
Bridge Inspection Team Leader, GI409
ANDYBOOTH
Bridge Crew Super -visor
Bridge Inspection Team Leader, G1801
TIM MASSE Y
I. INTRODUCTION
11. DEFICIENT BRIDGES
BRIDGE INSPECTIONS
1. Routine Bridge Inspections
2. Special Inspections
IV. SCOUR EVALUATIONS
V. BRIDGE RESTRICTIONS
VI. EMERGENCY REPAIRS
VII. MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
VIII. COMPLETED PROJECTS
IX. CURRENT PROJECTS
X. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
Appendix A- Deficient bridges
Appendix B- Bridge scour ratings
Appendix C- Posted bridges
I. INTRODUCTION
The 2025-2026 Annual Bridge and Inspection Report summarizes the status of bridges
owned, operated, and maintained by Grant County, and is prepared under the direction of
the County Engineer in accordance with WAC 136-20-060. This report is for your use
during preparation of the 2026-2031 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program.
This report is based upon the most current data available in our Bridgeworks files.
The health of Grant County's bridge infrastructure is good overall. We currently have
one bridge with a sufficiency rating below 40. A sufficiency rating of 40 or below would
make a National Bridge Inventory (NBI) bridge eligible for federal bridge replacement
funding. Project selection for all funding sources, other than local, is based upon a
statewide priority selection process and bridges with a sufficiency rating higher than 40
are not currently considered.
County Arterial Federal Aid bridges are eligible for STP, BRS, RAP, and local funds.
County Arterial Non -FA bridges are eligible for BROS, RAP, and local funds. Local
access bridges are eligible for BROS, and local funds.
DEFICIENT BRIDGES
Appendix A describes how Public Works determines if a bridge is considered deficient in
one way or another. Reasons we determine a structure to be deficient include structural
deficiency, functional obsolescence, posted for weight restrictions or deck condition.
111. BRIDGE INSPECTIONS
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA) requirements mandate that public 'agencies
inspect and report on all bridges (vehicle carrying structures. with span length equal to or
greater than 20 feet) at least once every 24 months. The purpose of routine inspections is
to evaluate and record the current condition of the bridge, determine the degree of wear
and deterioration, and recommend repairs or needed services. Bridge inspections also
ensure and maintain public safety, while protecting public investment.
Grant County has three certified bridge inspectors. The public works director is a
certified bridge inspector and is qualified as the program manager. The bridge crew
supervisor is also a certified bridge inspector and qualifies as a team leader. In addition
the safety coordinator is a certified bridge inspector. The county has an Assistant County
Road Engineer who passed BCIT in the spring of 2023. She began inspecting in the fall
of2023.
L Routine Bridge Inspections
Grant County inspects a total of 195 bridges subject to the National Bridge Inspection
Standards (NBIS). Grant County also performs NBIS routine inspections on all our 65
short span bridges even -though it is not mandated. Of these, 111 National Bridge
Inventory (NBI) bridges and 20 short span bridges (SSB) have received inspections
during the 2025-2026 inspection season.
All bridge inspections must be performed mid to late October through mid -February due
to high water levels in the canals. The following breaks out the number of 'bridges
inspected by month this past inspection cycle:
14 National Bridge Inventory (NBI).
October 7 Short Span Bridge (SSB)
. .... ............... - ------ -------- . .. ...... ......
November 28 NBI (11 with specialized inspection equipment)
-- - -----------
December 30 NBI This number includes I city owned bridge.
6 SSB
Inspections were performed by qualified public works personnel. County -personnel also
inspect bridges for the cities of Krupp/Marlin, Quincy, and Wilson Creek, for which
Grant County is reimbursed.
2. Special Inspections
Special inspections are performed by Grant County personnel using specialized
equipment such as a boat and underwater camera or platform trailer. WSDOT performs
the -underwater inspection' on one of our structures.
UBIT Inspection:.An Under Bridge Inspection Truck (UBIT) is necessary to
perform inspection if the -underside of the bridge is inaccessible. The UBIT
inspections are generally required on a 24 month frequency. A total of 22 bridges
in Grant County require this type of inspection. Grant County performs these on
a 12 or 24 month frequency. Grant County performed 11 of these inspections in
2025-2026 season.
Underwater Inspection: In 2015 Grant County purchased and implemented the
use of a high -definition underwater camera to eliminate the need for underwater
inspections on all but Br-303. Grant County will use the camera in conjunction
with our boat at every routine inspection. Should Grant County find any
deficiencies during this inspection we would have an underwater inspection
performed at that time. WSDOT performed an -underwater inspection on Br-303
in September 2021. Br-303 is due for underwater inspection in September 2026.
IV. SCOUR EVALUATIONS
A scour evaluation is required for all bridges over water. The purpose of a scour
evaluation is to determine susceptibility of the bridge's foundation to the erosive actions
of flowing water removing material from the bridge's foundation. A bridge is considered
scour critical if its foundation is determined to be unstable for observed or calculated
scour conditions.
When a bridge inspector identifies an actual or potential problem, the bridge must be
further evaluated to determine whether or not it should be considered scour critical. Grant
County has no scour critical bridges. See Appendix B.
A load rating is performed for each bridge in the NBIS inventory and the Short Span
Bridge inventory in accordance with federal and state regulations by a professional
structural engineer. A bridge load rating is the measure of the bridge's load carrying
capacity. There Are two capacity levels* that bracket this ability, the inventory rating and
the operating rating. The Inventory Rating is the load that a bridge can carry for an
indefinite number of load cycles without detriment to the bridge. The Operating Rating is
the 'maxim -Lim load that can be carried on an infrequent basis without significant
detriment to the bridge. The NBIS requires the posting of load limits or restrictions on a
bridge when the load rating factors for the legal loads are less than one. Load rating
factors are calculated using six standard truck configurations to check the capacity levels:
three truck configurations represent legal loads; one a national standard truck; and two
overload vehicles.
A recent development is specialized haul vehicles (SHVs). SHVs are closely spaced
multi -axle single unit trucks introduced by the trucking industry in the last decade.
Examples include dump trucks, construction vehicles, solid waste trucks and other
hauling trucks. SHVs generally comply with Bridge Formula B and are for this reason
considered legal in all states if a state's laws do not explicitly exclude the use of such
vehicles.
Grant County has 35 bridges posted using the SHV analysis. See Appendix C
VI. EMERGENCY REPAIRS
Br-229 on M-SE @ 5-SE was damaged in a motor vehicle accident. Girder G stem 4
was damaged beyond repair. Grant County is currently negotiating to replace girder G.
The condition of this bridge has not worsened since the initial impact. The replacement of
girder G will most likely take place after the bridge 247 project is com-Dleted. See -photos.
& -
VIL MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
The Grant County Bridge Crew was formed in 2002. The crew consists of 3 crew
members and a working supervisor. Specialized equipment and vehicles are assigned to
the crew. The Bridge Crew performs a wide range of maintenance and construction
projects on our extensive guardrail, bridge and drainage structure system.
Proper maintenance and repairs are necessary to prevent further deterioration of
structures, to extend their useful life and to prevent or reduce major repair costs in the
A -t -
-le prioritized, and wor is
future. During inspeeLlOrIS Maintenance needs are duocurnem U, p-1 V
scheduled for completion by the Bridge Crew.
Typical annual maintenance and construction activities include:
• Repair wood posts, railing, curbing, anduprights due to vehicle collision.
• Repair guardrail and concrete corbels due to vehicle damage.
• Clean winter sand, chip seal gravel and debris from under guardrail to
maintain adequate height.
• Replace rotted or broken wood girders, wood decking, curbing and uprights.
0 Replace rotted wing rail posts.
0 Clean decks in the spring and tops of abutments in the fall.
* Repair concrete deck spalls and grout lines.
0 Repair ACP or BST on decks and settled or heaved approaches.
0 Install new large or multiple culverts as needed. 4' and larger.
• Annual cleaning of all large culverts.
• Repair or replacement of drainage structures from flash floods or winter
runoff, including resetting of pipes, adding, or repairing riprap.
• Joint repair on bridge decks.
• Deck seating of concrete bridge decks.
• Replace, reset and clean survey monument cases.
• Replace and repair sidewalks as needed.
V111. COMPLETED PROJECTS
No completed projects in 2025.
IX. CURRENT PROJECTS
Br 247 W-SE at East Low Canal. Grant County Public Works removed span 3 of the
three span bridge so that East Columbia Basin Irrigation District could widen the canal.
Grant County's intention was to install a temporary Bailey bridge that would span the
void. During the widening process, the East Columbia Basin Irrigation District damaged
pier 3 beyond repair. Due to the severity of the damage, the decision was made to remove
the existing spans and piers. Federal funding has been finalized we are now- waiting on
design work to be completed. Construction will begin in Fall of 2026. See photos.
Br 426 West Canal at George. The bridge deck has 7.7% in Condition State 2 (repaired)
and 2.8% is Condition State 4 (poor). This project has been WSDOT funded. This project
will have design work done in the summer of 2026. Construction will begin in Fall of
2026. See photos.
X. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
Br 370 E SE .8 mi S of 13 SE. Routine inspection showed increasing amount of rotten
deck boards. Gravel was removed from the deck and further inspection revealed a 330
square feet area of rotten decking. Removal of existing and replace with new treated 2X4
lumber is planned for late summer of 2026. See photos.
Br SSB 171 Sagebrush Flats at 23 NW. Replace 8" by 19" deck boards with treated
nail laminated 2x4 decking.
Br 382 H NW at West Canal. Inspection showed 2 red tagged girders due to rot and I
due to large split. All in span 2. Replacement of these girders to be done early summer of
2026.
GRANT COUNTY
Appen ix A
W A S H I N G T O N
Bridge Sufficiency Rating
The sufficiency rating (SR) is the basis for establishing eligibility and priority for
replacement or rehabilitation of bridges with Federal Highway Bridge Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program (HBRRP) funds. The sufficiency rating is a numeric value which
indicates a bridge's relative ability to serve its intended purpose. The value ranges from
100 to 0. The sufficiency rating is the summation of four calculated values: Structural
Adequacy and Safety, Serviceability and Functional Obsolescence, Essentiality for Public
Use, and Special Reductions. The sufficiency rating is generated automatically in Bridge
Works, the Washington State Bridge Inventory System (WSBIS) bridge management
C'� _lC_ _: s__ 4� r, 1.�..+. .a.�,.� v,�'s�,• r� n r�� 7n !� !� r*1nY1 C �PP
software. ►J1.1111L1en�y idling �la� U�Gll UJL, 11L111UeU a� V1 GdV�.J. Tllis uescrlrL1V11 ia� bee
left in the inspection report as it is still populated in Bridgworks. Taking its place is
called the Overall Condition Rating, Goad/Fair/Poor, to capture the overall condition of
the bridge. This field is automatically populated from the lowest condition code for Deck,
Superstructure, or Substructure.
There are two types of deficient bridges. structurally deficient (SD) and functionally
obsolete (FO).
A structurally deficient bridge, as defined by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
is one whose condition or design has impacted its ability to adequately carry its intended
traffic loads.
A functionally obsolete bridge as defined by FHWA, is one in which the deck geometry,
load carrying capacity, clearance, or approach roadway alignment: has reduced its ability
to adequately meet the traffic need or is below accepted design standards. Those bridges
meeting the criteria for both SD and FO are only considered SD, the structural deficiency
overrides the functional obsolescence, and the bridge will be considered in the SD
classification.
In general, the lower the sufficiency rating, the higher the priority for rehabilitation or
replacement. To qualify for replacement, a bridge must have a sufficiency rating of less
than 40.00 and be structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. To be eligible for
rehabilitation, a bridge must have a SR of 80.00 or less and be structurally deficient or
functionally obsolete. The bridge roust be greater than ten years old. Based on funding
availability and critical needs within Washington State, H&LP sets a sufficiency rating
qualification for monies available for local projects. The current sufficiency rating
qualification is 40.
a" GRANT COUNTY
Appendi*x B
W A S H I N G T O N
On February 3, 1949, Grant County and the United States Bureau of Reclamation
(USBR) signed the Blanket Crossing Agreement. This document contains 27 Articles, of
which Article 18 covers Title to and Maintenance of Crossing Facilities. Each party is
required to perform maintenance on their own structures or waterworks. If canal flows
create adverse effects on Grant County bridges, it is the responsibility of the USBR to
complete repairs within their canal prism to mitigate the damage or potential damage to
Grant County bridges.
Each fall as the irrigation canals drain, a survey is performed by County bridge inspectors
to identify any areas of concern with respect to exposed pier or abutment footings lying
within the canal prisms. If any are found, the respective irrigation district personnel are
contacted with repair requests.
OUNTYGRANT C
C
=�/zj*x
W A S H I N G T O N
Bridge Number
location
•
• Structures
SHV Rating Factors
Posting Rating Factors
I01
Wilson Creek @ RR Xing
SU6-.98, SU7-.89
103
20-NE @ Adrian Rd
S'U6-.91, SU7-.83
106
36 NE
SU4-.68, SU5-.64, SU6-.58, SU7-.55
Type 3-.80, 3-S2-.85, 3-3-.97
119
20-NE @ Main Canal
SU4-.85, SU5-.80, SU6-.73, SU7-.70
208
W-NE Ruff
SU6-.95, SU7-..87
210
P-NE 5 of 7-NE
SU6-,98, SU7-.90
221
T-SE North of 7-SE
SU5-.98, SU6-.90, SU7-.86
229
M-SE @ 5-SE
SU4-.74 SU5-,.68, SU6-.63, SU7-.61
Type 3-.88, 3-S2-.91
248
11-SE @ East Low Canal
SU7-.97
305
N-SW @ 12.5
SU6-.93, SU 7-.90
310
Frenchman Hills @ Tunnel
SU6-.93, SU7--.87
311
9-NW @ Winchester WW
SU4-.91, SU5-.86, SU6-.78, SU7-.74
31,2
5-NW @ Winchester W'W
SU4-.84, SU5-..79, SU6-.72, SU7-.68
313
E SE at 14.8
SU6-..99, SU7-.95
3.17
1 SW North of 11
SU4-.62, SU5-.58, SU6-.53, SU7-.50
Type 3-.74, 3-52-.77, 3-3-.92
3�:9
12-SW ,2 East of K
SU4--.98, SU5-.90, SU6-.83, SU7-.82
323
8 NW at the West Canal
SU4-.77, SU5-30, SU6-.65, SU7-.63
Type 3-.9113-S?-.94
328
Martin Rd. @ H
SU5--.96, SU5-.87, SU7-.83
329
K NW @ 11.5 NW
SU4-.90, SU5.83, :SU6.78, SU7.77
339
Q-NW @ Upper Lateral
SU6-..96, SU7-.91
342
Martin Rd
SU6-.97, SU7-.93
351
Martin Rd at R-NW
SU5-.99, SU6-.91, SU7-.82
356
9-NW @ S
SU4-.98, SU5-.95, SU6-.96, Su7-384
3S7
E-SE N of 12
SU&.94, SU7-.91
360
3-NW East of P
SU6,99, SU7-.95
352
P-NW Feedlot North
SU5-395, SU6-.88, SU7-.84
372
M-SW Asparagus
SU6-.99, SU7-.95
373
1-NW .5 W of U
SU5-,99, SU6-31, SU7-.89
373
V-SW South of Baseline
SU5-.99, SU6-.91, SU7-.89
376
Dodson 1.3 N of 9-NW
SU6--.93, SU7-.85
382
H-NW @ West Canal
SU4-.62, SU5-.58, SU6-.53, SU7-.50
Type 3-34, 3-S2-.76, 3-3- .92
383
G-NW @ West Canal
SU4-.88, SU5-.79, SU6-.71, SU7--.64
Type 3-.98, 3-S2-.81, 3-3- .80
384
1-NW @ Pumping Plant
SU4-.90, SU5-.82, SUE-.76, SU7µ.73
387
Q-NW @ West Canal
SU4-.90, SU5-.83, SU6-.76, SU7-.73
415
F SE @ county line
SU4-,99, SU5-.924 SU6-.84 SU7-.81
417
B SE North of 12 SE
S06-,96 SU7-.91
419
E.3 SW South of Frenchmen
SU4-.80, SU5-351 SU6-.69, SU7-.66
Type 3-.97, 3-S2-.99
422
D-SW South of Frenchman
SUS-.96, SU6-.941 SU7-.96
lip fill
4j
rZIP
IV
Iry
14
ry
e,:y
ell)
sari ',
pi
lit� �_. r % a'�t, rj•� _..
.�ssr - � i+li.. -r *'}�Y '.1.' "bars. �� .: - •��,.�,
10
47
ir
- j s »`�.� r-'''-. � �(r y .. y •. 1'��, � , ,r'�'r�t�7 ht.'MK ��,.'��., yt' 4 .•r � �. '�'� r ��i�'•.
"it'll! �• � _ w s +t f. � �•� `�• ._ �s .. - �� ~�"FS'�.��.,{ ,�. ! r;}:� ," :s'r+.vrx ���� �r'!''�
a , .d,''.'l.r• ��.w .,=•. { N .` rRr 1• j"h�^�t,., i ���r {{. 't' ,
`r.:,� }t.l". .trs C.•s;'• -'� {+ it �, l �'.s ..�-'i�'t�:•,wt• . •%'•� .�i-r��� ��i f+'.`��,s �
�� 1 » ,rt .� �wh4 r�;#��1t'r ,`,W�,�i�` kj'r�sr p•i�.� I�, i
1
..lr�••I�F. g� - [} R ! r7r` / -' 'r•„�� _ . • , ,t! �+ Yd��y i,i ' �� it ..
r M,�r_.,,. � � �Cjly:, j:�r„Ii 1 - - - . r � �• ♦ V rf � -. •� t 4it.
,u. �f t v.'�. .� t �'!:. t i t� r1 a �d1 �'Y tA��u�f�f•�t �� _.t'y r �., �J r, i�+,}{L,�.h�.i . y:
, t:• •.o s `i- 1 �f� +��,Li'�A SY�`�` +1t') r+ viYf�.i+y.'S/�Y�, `.
- - � E 1 FBI. F�� ' f "r�. Y.N` 7t t�•'. KK ri�'j,C{`�- r :
_ r � ,. i r �`. -t ...' y. r 1 �F I'T� .�i S.�Yrti�'Aj k,sJ/ '•s y�' t i � � t r r�. ������ IZ
.e S.•sLL..,+.,.,-s ... .-,..-'a' - ...,�--1._ ... - � .. .- ....,.. .,, ,,.... �. �+n'_'.r .0 �. _ .#.1131.•.k;,, ii�... a��.�::R1iCG':i�fl.T,r.-..ti141fL•]...:tl�i,.arii•��d'.e(ilt�.�t,tiiLi. .z.,��S.�ir'.
�• I t� it ��(;r t �) � � t 1
'. i' �• �,�4'
�1 � 1 •rE 4�•E �` r 1 ,. 1•.
�sy:� ;t,�- -; •)' �•! yf,`�.j, :fit
oei
t dr�l •
t .lip I
,t .
ate._ •�.�. ^� S ERR f i� /f lr. �
4.4
- _•ram' - -'' r , ;i�} i! T••.
•,.,, �-•a•t•wljli •i.V~�, . i r' !�.. _,� Y • «t ..r • •� f.= T .� `, .� F i •' i �: 1
• ��� w �MW
M� /rr►6 M '_ ...•r_� ~.►.w : i1W a� a ri` (i ih• k . f % \. N ..
M;;•• r u .?.r �y `Y41 �• �yi ' .1�r +)� i ~ /''t ,1 �tf�
• '•4iri. r.. _ JM:�r". _ ... � • • � ...�'�.� .1► •"' 'r� �7� j Y . � �f� 1. ^ � 4 �. _
w t
- - w t•,�' - � _,-,•_,, i«=tiles. _ - �,_,r-•r:- �' _ �-_-__
y •r�r w�l "L� r Ir+�'.t i'". pT t. _` + _ . a' _ '� r-I` - - c s- i
.� __ - Rat"-' _. _._� _. .� '� '� � ..�'t 1�--/��'•�.' ��'� �1'� �-'- ,i.._ _ _ _s
\`� � -. ' � , ' _ - . � . _- .. J _.- .. �-..c �C .+-T►:--�+..fir►.. _i � - _. .- _ • +R
r•.-,+,,. 1-+ �:�' •�` � `t� .. -�. J • 1, t,_�, ;,t •,� ;��
b �7'� •L){ r � TII
. ti �1*�j• a • 4.. �1,� `s. , gal ' : ��:'� ■7j`! �' �I
Br — 382 Elevation
' .. ,.. � - - - f .. ,. '�5 �Ty.,�Yi {tit: .� •� Y �Y''J'r �f{f�j��t�-,r�;t�p
( ., - r _1 •r,�'j':. rti t 1 f'Jr -t .aw•J .t.�.�y,!`
i - _ 8 :.'•r+t.. Lt.:.i7 .•7. 1t
't•Y.'�
54�'n...t4%Y.fT�ii
6-1LZt �, t11 F�:t{yJtl�. >ti j�tn..l ty
^ ari'•yj •� �t. tfy •'r -r � �'•, ifs ' ('!: �{'•Z..✓'C'!�Z ♦
j._ i''• r t ,�r r -�h le .'i ta•A�'�•r,�:', "t .(, 1� r,tit�S �L' tt 1i
.R'•"� rt f. - t -.tit1 `�'��['Y'•d ��; �d'!.:n-i°r. � � � ::!SC• rti
� 1. i.: r, r- :�� 't' '� -� '. 1. .. +' w•'.' .. ,'lt ..ti t'.t,.,iss��i G ��' '•i
�• , 1 ,.t -i✓ ',.i,•ia ia!L•t •t Y•t 7 '••, •� t r : _ ... � _.0 r.j ,�. p31.
I11 t. t _�.• ,r' r. ,� r.. .t 'i}�'�•,. It t�r+r: Y.1 +C t:,t. . + ♦!.. 1.
t` 1 ..• �, e ;, .a a-�t •:r-,•S. M^ yv.� .r� G- t 1, =1' .,. r t �
,r:♦ r .,-- y •1,Y, G •!.: •' 'r ri a� r" ' + _ , 41 •�.3'. �iy'(yi!tr is f: t
,�Y li`!tr i i r y �1. •y:1r .�'Sti} 1, .' :t�: _ r .. � .,{. ti t :1 ♦ •�1��r��t�^;'�� i>�±�.f+-�r. '�•'t'
.a, r, .rt�.+` •!t .ti.�• r' l rt �)� � � t'r;. r r{ r"�l
71.
..ta;t .`r' '- .•Y- �v; � 't t •���Na..F' �t ;� ~�;; �!f. ,," ( .}. .. i J�'•'F G�,,,:�ii;•: , !. ....:
'.�I'� :d .'r. i. ,7 . e J. S T"' rylii"1• i• i,t j . tt ..t t. 1 L. ,r 1!,H i .k.
r;al �1T�, �v,111^ It l+. -�� y �t.J � •,r" + 1.-�.'�/i. •S•i. i......� ff'j; at i.' a�•li •i♦,?:�' f .. � r.r,. a•t -r ,f.
.'`1 'N'1.1 ,!.•• t,�� r�'3'.44 i. .). .t•�,�+�yr ..l!,tr l!•l.rr} :►' Y ,�1: '� t: t � r, ',` /t.. k.:.
�r... .. r. r. SL'ti .4+TrA V i+; rid 't: l„ :r• a?"'.d: 'i �' t!•+ J'. is 'J. `'/ •, t 1; . „ ,C•-•,:r. .fl,yy .% + ..{: .ti± i ' ✓':i' n'• rt I +T 'ii.N y .i n r, �:• Y .,, • ... ...( t .r:- li j,1r •y'� [.Yy t r:tl, •.7`:.7 •`t' -.r :n4^t, 5'd\v,}�... St.I}) r•r ..ii -*4 .1•'.1.` '+`•.-t.t'+"''�:' t• 'r t,( .4t••.r^1, T..
.., i,-.;:wir 'i:':1t� t � t 3�'. „'t:' 'r T �.• ,4; ' � _ t �i' r wr
;,ti t
t •,. •�iL. ,i\ t r ;4Y,S :;.r'•. ;y.,,t' ,I, .t: tit �•�r t'. + r' .i:,'? h }C
�I`- 'i~'ti. '•i 't. 4 .t1'll.:l - .I !'ii �.w rw:� r v't::�tt y i' ..♦. ..'ti• t•`y", t:' •t T✓'11 �.r �,- ♦•,/ •! 1 tt .thy r, t t..•t••. ,r 17�;5t
.IJM\`•.i, 31r', \t: F r,'. 'ti )" f` t:.f .,,)" .rt l"A,•:t`•. ♦ '...I -,.�:, ., +.. J.i-.•i f - t t 1 ,.,. 't, ..,_•
tt tJ'' r.• +.�t:t•`t ty�y�y,, ,r!•.t, :t. � Jj� '_i•:.r i1S i, ,TT'4 t ;)...a.r:ie,!t •"• •.7 '�...t tp rr.e' i :•:! .1 .i ,17 f:xri
t wi. '•1,�-2 r :tx-�j. i�!.h.t t Rr1, t y" i. (�i.nrr .1,.:; A'+. )i, :'i;'.• / 1 rr
:�r•.. .Y. )•'a'••y� ;e [�r. J, �, ink[ !i• �i} t. ..,r C.i••.,, rr"" -,i:.i. ;/R•i_..� l .a: .r ,+1-' �, f
ih w '.�,.' 4'. 1. :(aL i. ,�i'r'f'• 1' .• f.7 r_ �) �N1'rryy� i W, �� 'S. �.•7!.•'' ,•3. .•i.'• t` .1 , -1 � 1 T•„
1t .i � 'i: - :•i .� ••.j�, ,'4.{,r`"r,'_'�+7. � r.,•x f ,.f•... 1: k-•.+%' Sj •'.1. ••5 •;':..y•:." �.r i t !' 1•,
•a'i• r: i,'�- 1�.,xi• Fc�'�i+-i ;+i Z V F• •t-:iC:..r 1t.:, !• S'k ,J-�fn, +l.ii}.�• !" 'i::Ys.. ,� �.• r.', s - .t, r,�:,• 'r - � j
•'J f��t- fdw1 t. 4 s �#•,'�•,C'l. .,ti^�i'� - �r� f•.. .t .♦J� ".�t�t i�S ij Ct +'t •S.T t. ..,.r'�i`�►:•' .� 1�`ta.�' ��,F.�,' W,Y'.I .•1. N~' 'a a .,w i,�. ,1 ; tr, •♦� �•,
•,% • i .! tZ 1• '� a:G tl"• .,,,�;:t( .t,�. . � ,.. n. 1 y r;. b✓1.: .{ ,t r- + C � t r, r t � )
r �� .;��.:� +fl,:. ' i? 4't' %t .� "tr�••'i•. i r}h •fit t• ti 't••.,, tr. i',. �•� rµ `+ . '�i'` ter• l 1 -.� }'h• f-:j i /t:
*!..'•,.•. �� ,ft1, '1,: '..,C ,,.. .,,�•: j..t• ::: •j',,:"�, ,+�Itii -x.l l�. :7 7 +-' }r� '�`1
�tw '. '` w 1 _'�r f r � r �- T �} r Z ,r{. •t :.•Y �
t` r 0'. •f `S n `: t t l Y •
.!fh�•wta..r:.. _•'S � •';,� �;�ir• �' .fS� �'� .•• ��I:�1G'.j,_ .�• 7ti�. �; y.. tS �{_t'•`t F _ 1 3�5�
a.- •+�.$itr• ,SLi1R ,`_ .!0.1• .'Y'� �1�c"_ •t � rt^ r•,j aL'!{ t 4M F_a; •try .r. ,: r�r°j+f''t 4 ' r'' �i�, ifl�w�y��IrY Y�i! -F k7�7 •,� Stt, I f :%=- •�L.1 ��L. ` it "4- ' .�'�•�?•vr �J•�t :LN �kFrj, 7, � '�'.�� ! 1`:r: a -• �•i wv r t} . 1 ` g� l i
' •t'f'�'1i,..•jii ..tY.;wi` .� ♦ ttf 'k ,i , _ 4..at. C�1 m 4 .��Y �+��t �f 7
r` fti sqs'' `.:' L
iaji��ly�(q�!y{j� � .,..i .{�' � �`•/• .�. �� i••.1 � �1w •-- - �. i Id
fF EF it t r _ l..
' �i_ _ 1.L�,�� ► J ♦+' l +�,r'K� t"+ •3''� i-t _ tj. 5.t � ,n�.��.
In
, � r (i � ., .. r •-� yr
1i ,N 1�0 ..` i�i,�w rJ .�� ♦ 1<ri ^1• }(j 7 iir'�. w .. ` �:�1
'tl}••., ' -•.w' r •'. ,! 1. -
•i. ._Y'_ rt �.+-.1�,t. f Y. + t-. !, f S.: ' t i t t�n�;^ �.•'r ... -� _f +�1~ � ,. . _ .. , - •+
oA
,.. �1:� 'S 7t�.;'+!�71 �.-.. * 3 - t ti Nil �a :.V't'1.•+t.►!'!�'i..a ...d••�';.—mot' - 42f :A.1 _•r�"t��t• \ 1 ,�1•.l. �yf . ; -. I � i T�. ~ �� 1 .- .. {l;, y,.•N•-+'mot •'pj���
... - ^G '�� • ^r F `,: r� _ 4 i�ry � � . �� r ��. ,1. � !is( � wb...y,s.s," �. j €' 1 t � • ► ZA0
IIIIIIIq
:•l, N.`�s'i F. .t ..i�r` i r�•+. �.j J1•• ^�.ct ;r.. , l f
•i e�S-''f.•Y tii.C. - '� L .i•. .,lp� '`��f���'A r tr1.I. .),L n7.�''R',�. �IF+�'.,y a f�.K
r.�� �� � � , - yx � - +I a•' t :-.d:,�, is. y.�f "•.�C.. «.7x �+r � � ,+rF. v :�Yr.. r. .. � •"1`� .a`
i1 T.. t *i ��:•v ♦,�.s�'�
i .►Y'.r�. y L. '. '4 ♦ y 1 ` - �y.t
' ''j ��'`' � i ".'r � . { .;.. s �74 , ��'.3,r �{*�" ' ,ly, , s1': t'f �' �+r. ti �'�i •. ?. d!�` :6.' . r,' � %
��-Oar1•:JL%`,�''.. � '~r' '"� .ri,";i�l!%�.S;,i r Y:. �.�k�.t�Yti7 �.. .� ,�,y` U -� �!:,
+ �" i��. RJc.h 7 a�•y.,� iv �',l'T'`. ' • .n*A� 1 3, _ "7.j �"• f:..t C� e - .
•i r )w � r' � j y ��:
-� � � T . ` C;"C�k� �t+•sY�•1r a ;,U,i�;.' ' + t, .• •f ,,� •. Y•�'..-r r"
r .N.. $ ♦L v a t � .f' �"j t:. v �'
{[ + t Sf -1( Lyr i �. ! w rp �, i Y tU" , �•: {y r► �♦ Lt a-s
•�'4 �`Cr�' • .,f J ) 1. K> �i. , r � �. fir. •..�
�•
t,3�•.�t.''�`r3•'�yf��-ri L•S�4.Iy1„
a c{ ) i w: � �y'')'Y � �i�' wrt'��'�'';,��� ^�. t ° cy j�!`i I���J ��• 4, t: t�t��`�`..
i .a�f y -I• S t �7.! , t+• �'1r. ..r �il�,• •.M 1.. 1 f ,�y •x, - r • 1'� ,,1 1 Q.:iC ,� ��
�;r.t � � :'•t�t`r :y � 4 ! ' ., ^t s �:+/ �,�'•�a t f / _ � t`,+j} Y" ;w 1- j'y ,,� 1 ` � as��t�;.a��+y .
f rl' t :. ,'f.;. • � i[� r t •K ��� :+irt [ �.'sr '- v >�
`i,. �(h^'r i, L_ +i ..-r .�:• } v a '(.J�� � ..., f � ���� �f ;, �t`� ,)t. .♦•; �_�, i+ r♦/y���:L,��.; �; e' r ..
.� s7• .sr yS,7./n.+ fi �. a +,. 'f y;•'S�y�r, i+r '•^�f�•� ft =•1^
11 f .. �� r 7 et• t7(i;. r.:SFi rt y:lG �� p 7*' +� sf +♦ yi• '�� r Y
{ T ' ♦.r. !",Q �il.v� 1 !?•F]1`�l �t S31iy •A4[ Tit
�jj� fir, ~ � 1• '
,S j�.+�1xt. w!4 �9��-�..4+4av_T,)'1• � `.• �r�. "V. � A -7 �' •:hN� :R'Y'.}�'t- yf�rY� •;� t• y�'`�-�� yyi•���y}�_ ► 3 V
••l. 9•. .Kif• a:;L i;f+-• .t tf ryt•a .♦ f i�',�y}`
// +. ra 4� '� i �(. � } �� ��� •� j rr �., .� '1 ^..,5�_. S - x�t �+ �* VXV- ...t. y ,M �R•d'. I�
-r,C, -r : a. �',f �, f•� •.. . ifs 't 1 !r ♦ ''a A' >�. � r t '.►'�. r.
��'�F, � � �' �y.�Ityl+� F , y r a� r'liSr" } � .. .�' r � �♦`' `0. � �- A��' s, n }j�i,�'�i'� � � �' � .
, " • J U ��1'I ♦ Y'_S'_ .,14`i����.. 4• � t=Y1R �, t ��� •> C '•!.�' V -{' �" �r
i I I'. . - - .. �i. �: �'.. ..fit _.'.. 1i • :.�. a
ey}�y�J�+ rr �- p' 'tea R' +:LE w .�yf r. j etc -. _ �L�S4'C`t1':?'ilS,.�.MtJAFr, •- .[ -, ,' ,�,, .-
a.:t.r...-,•wn,.n �x -.. Y ... �i. 1C��.,d5a �1�`.i .�•.$SI .i.:S �'w �`'1-...Lw� ��rT..��.. � }�rl'�LriYa't.�..L,# d •a.. ��` 7
to
irrir i ; r 1
• , f .1 All 1�I 1
qw
40
rM' r. cttr,� t •'rr1 ,, � L� • 1
= s ' 14 (� 1
r
Ar
F '
so
ire •�• � � • � 9k
_
r , �► At'
t . - ,f s
�F Y ti a. t i
99 �� ri r r . , r i1� a � .H.., � � • 1• ' r t 1
ra
It
r Sri �' •' ,rh ;' 1 • , '+' •�� � 1\ \ ' / , f E ' �� •' � ,1 -�.
r
_ �
I - r _ ,may .,ya. k Y .:� � �` � '1G"� 7• ��� '
- — —,U, -Vsv—�" . . A I - ': f , "�'T'
GRANT COUNTY d* B
_446 11/;, W A S H I N G T O N
SEPA Application
Permit Number:
GRANT COUNT`
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 37 - 264 WEST DIVISION AVENUE
EPHRATA, WA 98823
(509) 754-201 1 ExT 2501
TYPE OF PERMIT YOU ARE APPLYING FOR
*SEE FEE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT*
❑ Preliminary Short Subdivision El Planned Unit Development ❑ Administrative Approval 0 SEPA
El Preliminary Subdivision / Alt ❑ Conditional Use Permit El Administrative Interpretation El Planning Permit
❑ Preliminary Binding Site Plan ❑ Transient Residence (CUP) ❑ General Information Meeting ❑ Site Plan Review
El Final Subdivision Short / Long / Alt ❑ Discretionary Use Permit ❑ Pre -Application Conference ❑ Developer Agreement
El Final Binding Site Plan ❑ Reasonable Use Exception El Utility Easement Alteration El Variance
APPLICANT INFORMATION
APPLICANT
Grant County Public Works
MAILING ADDRESS
124 Enterprise Street SE, Ephrata WA 98823
PHONE NUMBER
EMAIL ADDRESS
509-754-6082
ccegbert@grantcountywa.gov
NAME, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER(S), IF OTHER THAN APPLICANT
N/A - Various Public Rights -of -Way
AGENT INFORMATION
AUTHORIZED AGENT
Cade C. Egbert, PE
MAILING ADDRESS
124 Enterprise Street SE, Ephrata WA 98823
PHONE NUMBER
EMAIL ADDRESS
509-754-6082 x3502
ccegbert@grantcountywa.gov
PROJECT SITE INFORMATION
SITE ADDRESS
Road Construction Projects Located Throughout Grant County (See Attachment A)
ASSESSOR TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S)
SITE SIZE (acres or sq. ft.)
N/A - Various Public Rights -of -Way
N/A
SECTION
TOWNSHIP
RANGE
FARM UNIT
BLOCK
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ZONING CLASSIFICATION
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION
Public Rights -of -Way
N/A
acknowledge that:
1. The information, plans, maps and other materials submitted on and with this application are, to the best of my
knowledge, a true and accurate representation of this proposal;
2. This application shall be subject to all additions to and changes in the laws, regulations and ordinances applicable to
the proposed development until a determination of completeness has been made pursuant to GCC 25.04.160;
3. Grant County does not guarantee success of this permit application, and/or the issuance of an affirmative notice of
action. The County's assistance to the applicant/owner does not preclude the need to address impacts raised by
the public or by other federal, state or local agencies;
4. correspondence ondence will be sent to the identified project agent, and may be sent to applicant. Failure to notify
p
applicant does not constitute a procedural deficiency;
5. If the applicant is not the owner of the real property which is the subject of the permit application, this application and
acknowledgment shall also be executed by each owner;
6. All persons executing this acknowledgment in a representative capacity shall be personally liable and hereby
personally guarantee payment of all fees, expenses and costs required by this application;
7. If the applicant, representative and/or owner fail to respond to a request by the Department to submit additional
information, or the applicant, representative and/or owner request, orally or in writing, that further processing be
suspended or postponed, and if such failure to respond or requested suspension/postponement exceeds 90 days,
p_ application �h . l considered abandoned and all proposed development, uses and act,v;t�es shall only be
the appi�ca�iori 5na1� be
further considered in the submission of a new application and fees;
pp
8. This application does not constitute approval of the proposed development activity and it is acknowledged that
additional permit applications and approvals may be necessary to conduct specific activities and
9. Owner's signature serves as authorization for Agent/Applicant to act on my behalf.
DATED: Applicant/Agent
DATED:
FOR STAFF USE ONLY:
Permit Type:
Applicant/Agent
Owner
Owner
Subdivision & BSP - Proposed Lots up to 100: Fee Per Lot:
Subdivision & BSP - Proposed Lots 101 and above: Fee Per Lot:
Intake By:
Receipt #
Fee Paid:
Sub -Total:
Sub -Total:
TOTAL.
2
GRANT COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
P.O. BOX 37 - 264 WEST DIVISION AVENUE
EPHRATA, WA 98823
(509) 754-201 1 EXT. 2501
SEPA Checklist
The followings information must be present to be accepted at the counter.
Incomplete submittals will not be accepted.
Missing
Items
Counter
Complete
Submittal Requirements
❑
El
Completed Master Application (Signed &all parcel numbers included)
F-1
El
Pre -Application Summary (If applicable)
F-1
F-1
Complete SEPA Checklist
1:1
E:1
Site Plan (Consistent with GCC 23.04.140(f)(2)) or Other Land Use Permit Plans
F-1
F-1
Reproducible Site Plan at 11 "x17"
❑
F-1
Applicable Fees
Counter Review By:
NOTE: The above required information is necessary to start the application review. Additional
information/materials may be required during the course of project review.
Revised 05/09/2024
SEPA-1 Environmental Checklist
.. ..._ .... .. .... . .. .:�u.. .. ,;..-... ,.. :... - :, .�� ..,.. �gi�1.'2.-`' ri�YfXti+e!�Pl'' ,.- ..� ... ..+.82 w'!%h.. .lilYM:a11i - ..P. "z3�•*t^, �'r:S �e;+u.�a.:�.r.. ,s..na�:-,;. � ,x.. •�'.a:f� .._;�N ^-:�;»W �t . �.+i:�;, a.'..r ';-nF:�'r,.:>.,....,._
Jja
�� po.` � checklist
J
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or
compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environments impact
p Y
statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions
t
ntc.-F
�`,
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer
each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an
a en l s~ecialist yr ivate cvi ijUltant for some questions. Your may use "not applicable" or "does not apply"
� Y N N
only you can explain Fain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach
p
or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions
'ten
r n A I I I .. �- 4- L.+ .� .. ' � ; r, -�rn rs r� r ra r• � � r
o'ten avoid delays with the StrH process as weir as later III lI IC uCL-isivll-Ma-MaNI
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time
or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. T he agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the
existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist
is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate
threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the
completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
ise of checklist for nonproject prowposals.
For
J non ro'ect proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts
p
of sections A and B plus the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Part D). Please completely answer all
questions that apply and note that the words ''project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
" ro osal " " onent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -
projects) p pro p
' questions in "Part B: Environmental Elements" that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of
1ects )
the proposal.
t https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/Checklist-oruidance
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 1
(WAC 197-11-960)
GRANT COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
P.O. Box 37 - 264 WEST DIVISION AVENUE
EPHRATA, WA 98823
(509) 754-201 1 ExT 2501
ABackground
Find help answering background questionsz
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2027-2032 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
2. Name of applicant:
Cade C. Egbert, PE
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
124 Enterprise Street SE, Ephrata WA 98823 - 509.754.6082 x3543
4. Date checklist prepared:
06.02.2026
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Grant County Public Works
6. Proposed timing of schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Projects are phased over (6) years from 2027-2032.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes. The Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan is updated annually. Completed projects are
removed and new projects are added.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Some of the projects will require environmental, cultural, and historical reports, assessments, and
permits. This will be determined during the design process for each project.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None Known.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Not known. Additional government approvals or permits will be
determined during the design process for each project.
2 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-A-Background
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page - 2 -
(WAC 197-11-960)
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you
to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on
this page.
The proposed project is for the adoption of the 2027-2032 Six Year Transportation Improvement (TIP)
Program and the related Resolutions authorizing County Road projects, all as approved by the Grant
County Board of Commissioners.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the
range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by
the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any
permit applications related to this checklist.
Please see the attached project location map:
B.Environmental Elements
1. Earth
Find help answering earth auestions3
2027-203 2 Six Year TIP - Projects Map
a. General description of the site:
Road Construction Projects Located Throughout Grant County (See Attachment A}
Circle or highlight one: Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Flat , Rolling, Hilly, Steep Slopes Apply.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Maximum Slope of 10% for these Public Roads.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them, and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal
results in removing any of these soils.
The soils vary from location to location but, generally consist of fine grained near surface soil
grading to sands and gravels with depth. Some locations have exposed basalt bedrock.
3 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-b-environmental-elements/environmental-elements-earth
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 3
(WAC 197-11-960)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If
so, describe.
Non known for these projects.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected
area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Earthwork will consist of road grade cuts, fills, and widening to meet current road geometry
standards. Each individual road construction project will likely be more than the 500 cubic yards
threshold.
f. Could erosion occur because of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Yes. However appropriate Department of Ecology BMP measures will be taken by the designated
Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL) for the project, both during and after const.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Varies by project. Most project overlay existing impervious roads. Typically 45-80% of ROW will
be impervious pavement, gravel, curbs, sidewalks, trails, or paths.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any.
Adoption of the TIP and Annual Construction Program does not require specific mitigation
measures. Individual projects that are determined to have adverse environmental impacts, will be
evaluated prior to construction activities and mitigation plans developed as necessary.
2. Air
Find help answering air cluestions4
a. what types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Dust and emission from construction equipment, during construction only.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If
so, generally describe.
None Known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Water will be used for dust control during construction.
4 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-S ection-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-Air
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 4
(WAC 197-11-960)
3. Water
Find help answering water questionss
a. Surface:
Find help answering surface water questions6
1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and Season al streams, saltwater, Fakes, ponds, 10.1etlands)? If
yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it
f I ows into.
None proposed.
2. will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
None proposed.
3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that
would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
No surface waters filling or dredge materials are proposed.
4. will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No surface water withdraws are required.
5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
None proposed.
5. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If
so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No discharges to surface waters are proposed.
https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Pei-mits/SEPA/Enviroiunental-review/SEPA-guidancceT/SEPA-checklist-
• t iry7111 i""6/ 1 1 (') T l� / �-.- a-.f-- OQ- n 2 \A ter
guidance/�JEPA-CnecKllst-Section-O-Environmeii�dl-elelllolllS/Elly 1ro11111e11La1-�Y�iiie�its-.>-� awl
https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Pei-inits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-3 -Water/Environmentat-
elements-Surface-water
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 5
(WAC 197-11-960)
b. Ground:
Find help answering ground water questions'
1. will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes?
If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate
quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater?
Give a general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No groundwater draws or recharging are proposed.
2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks
or other sources, if any (domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following
chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number
of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number
of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None proposed.
c. Water Runoff (including stormwater):
1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? will
this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
All stormwater generated by roads will be infiltrated in the roadside shoulders, roadside
ditches, or drywells.
2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
Yes. Vehicle collisions/accidents on a public roadway could result in a spill.
3. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the
site? If so, describe.
Yes. However, all overland flows are conveyed under the road by culverts or bridge
structures into their original conveyance paths. In addition, all stormwater generated by roads
will be infiltrated in the roadside shoulders, roadside ditches, or drywells.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and
drainage pattern impacts, if any:
The Grant County Road Standards require roadside ditches. Long linear ditches provide excellent
infiltration capacity for the soils typical of Grant County.
https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-3 -Water/Environmental-
elements-Groundwater
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 6
(WAC 197-11-960)
4. Plants
Find help answering plants questions
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
❑ shrubs
❑ grass
❑ pasture
❑ crop or grain
❑ orchards, vineyards, or other permanent crops.
❑ wet soil ;plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
u water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
❑ other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Weeds, grasses, shrubs, and trees within public right-of-way work areas for most of the proposed
projects. Typically associated with shoulder widening. Some vegetation maybe removed for safety
and sight distance requirements.
c. list threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any.
Post -construction reseeding of native grasses.
e. list all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Grant County Public works has a vegetation control program to mitigate roadside noxious weeds.
It should be noted that public truck and automobile transportation continuously distributes noxious
weeds and invasive vegetation on road shoulders, therefore vegetation control is continuous as well.
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 7
(WAC 197-11-960)
5. Animals
Find help answering animal questions$
a. List any birds and other animals that have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
• Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
Hawks, Eagles, Songbirds
• Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
Deer
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
Threatened & Endangered species exist throughout the County. Projects require individ analysis.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Grant County is in the Pacific Flyway migration route. Projects will not impact.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any.
None known.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
6. Energy and natural resources
Find help answering energy and natural resource questions9
a. what kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
N/A
b. would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If
so, generally describe.
N/A
c. what kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any.
N/A
8 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-5 -Animals
4 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B -Environmental-elements/Environmental- elements -6 -Energy-natural-resou
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 8
(WAC 197-11-960)
7. Environmental health
Health Find help with answering environmental health questions10
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur because of this
proposal? If so, describe.
Yes. A future collision / accident on public roadways could result in a spill.
1. Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past
uses.
None.
2. Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project
development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas
transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity.
None known.
3. Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during p rothe ect's development or construction, or at anytime during the
�'
operating life of the project.
Fuel and oil from the construction heavy equipment, during construction. Contractors are
required to have a spill prevention and response plan ready to implement on all County projects.
4. Describe special emergency services that might be required.
County forces are trained in spill prevention and response. Contractors are required to have a
spill. prevention and response plan ready to implement on all County projects.
S. proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any.
County forces are trained in spill prevention and response. Contractors are required to have a
spill prevention and response plan ready to implement on all County projects.
1. what types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Construction equipment.
to https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-7-Environmental-health
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 9
(WAC 197-11-960)
2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation,
other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site)?
Construction equipment.
3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
8. Lind and shoreline use
Find help answering land and shoreline use questionsll
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect
current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
Adjacent uses are typically agricultural or residential, with a very small amount of commercial.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands? If so, describe. How much
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses
because of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how
many acres in farmland tax status will be converted to nonfarm use?
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way. However, some of the properties adjacent to the
projects are agricultural.
1. Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farmland
normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application
of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how?
Non known.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
No known structures are proposed to be demolished.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No structures are proposed to be demolished.
" https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-8-Land-shoreline-use
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 10
(WAC 197-11-960)
e. what is the current zoning classification of the site?
All projects are in public rights -of -way.
f. what is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Public / Right -of -Way
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the county? If so, specify.
None known.
L Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
None - Public Right of Way.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None - Public Right of Way.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any.
None - Public Right of Way.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected
land uses and plans, if any.
Projects are consistent with Grant County Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Element.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
None proposed.
9. Housing
Find help answering housing questions1Z
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way.
1' https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-9-Housing
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 11
(WAC 197-11-960)
10. Aesthetics
Find help answering aesthetics questions13
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way. Roadway project are typically at grade with the
ground, with some cuts and fills of existing ground.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None. All projects are in the public right-of-way.
11. Light and glare
Find help answering light and Aare questions14
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it
mainly occur?
N/A
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Existing farm/residential/commercial lighting.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None proposed.
12. Recreation
Find help answering recreation questions
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate
vicinity?
Varies on the project location. Grant County has ATV Parks, Boating, Hunting, Fishing, and
Hiking available close to all of the proposed projects.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No. The proposed projects provide access to these recreational uses.
13 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-1 O-Aesthetics
" https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-ll-Light-glare
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 12
(WAC 197-11-960)
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
Find help answering historic and cultural preservation questions1s
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over
45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation
registers? If so, specifically describe.
All projects are in the public right-of-way. Private property buildings adjacent may be old.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or
occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material
evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any
professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources.
All projects are in the public right-of-way.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic
resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and
the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys,
historic maps, GIS data, etc.
Cultural studies, as needed for projects.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and
disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may
be required.
Most projects overlay the existing roadway. Additional disturbance outside the right-of-way is
not proposed.
14. Transportation
Find help with answering transportation questions16
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The proposed projects are all upgrades to existing segments of the Grant County Road System.
1s https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Pet-mits/SEPAiEnvironmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental- elements -13 -Historic-cultural-p
16 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-B-Environmental-elements/Environmental-elements-l4-Transportation
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 13
(WAC 197-11-960)
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so,
generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
The proposed projects are all upgrades to existing segments of the Grant County Road System.
c. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, -
pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so,
generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
The proposed projects are all upgrades to existing segments of the Grant County Road System.
d. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
None proposed.
e. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or
proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of
the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What
data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?
No additional trips will be added. Improvements are for maintenance.
f. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural
products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe,
None. All proposed projects are transportation improvements, which will improve transportation
for the County.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None. All proposed projects are transportation improvements, which will improve transportation
for the County.
15. Public services
Find help answering public service questions17
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? if so,
generally describe.
Traffic flows may be impacted, delayed, or rerouted during construction.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
A traffic plan will be prepared during the design phase of each project.
17 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-b-environmental-elements/environmental-elements- 15 -pub lic -services
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 14
(WAC 197-11-960)
16. Utilities
Find help answering utilities questions18
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse
service, telephone, sanitary sever, septic system, other:
Not known. None Proposed.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity
which might be needed.
None Proposed.
C.Signature
Find help about who shou19
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Type name of signee:
Cade C. Egbert
Position and agency/organization:
County Road Engineer
Date submitted:
`� https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidai7ice/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-b-environmental -el ements/environmental-elements-l6-utilities
19 https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/SEPA/Environmental-review/SEPA-guidance/SEPA-checklist-
guidance/SEPA-Checklist-Section-C-Signature
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 15
(WAC 197-11-960)
D.Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions
Find help for the nonproiect actions worksheet?°
Do not use this section for project actions.
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with
the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities
likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate
than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of
noise?
None. All projects will be designed to infiltrate stormwater generated by the roadway in
roadside ditches or drywells.
® Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
100% infiltration of stormwater.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
No new impacts proposed. The proposed projects are within the existing public rights -of -way
to reconstruct existing roads.
® Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
No new impacts proposed. The proposed projects are within the existing public
rights -of -way to reconstruct existing roads.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
N/A
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
N/A
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection, such as
parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat,
historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
No new impacts proposed. The proposed projects are within the existing public rights -of -way to
reconstruct existing roads.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
No new impacts proposed. The proposed projects are within the existing public
rights -of -way to reconstruct existing roads.
20 https://ecology.wa.gov/regulations-permits/sepa/environmental-review/sepa-guidance/sepa-checklist-
guidance/sepa-checklist-section-d-non-project-actions
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 16
(WAC 197-11-960)
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline ]uses incompatible with existing plans?
No new impacts proposed. The proposed projects are within the existing public rights -of -way to
reconstruct existing roads.
• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
No new impacts proposed. The proposed projects are within the existing public
rights -of -way to reconstruct existing roads.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or ! !public
services and utilities?
None expected. These projects preserve existing transportation capacity.
• Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
None expected. These projects preserve existing transportation capacity.
7 �-W
Identify, i f. possible .~ - whether the proposal may - y conflict with local, state, or federal laws
,-
or requirements for the protection of the environment.
None expected.
SEPA Environmental checklist September 2023 Page 17
(WAC 197-11-960)
1 Bridge 247 Replacement
CP c`
2
'f c
At,
Dodson Road & Road 12-SW Roundabout
- I.ff
3 Bridge 426 Deck Repair
4 Road Q-SW Reconstruction
Grant County Public Works
removed span 3 of the three span
bridge so that East Columbia Basin
Irrigation District could widen the
canal. Federal funding has been
finalized.
Resolution 23-012-CC
PE: $83025
CN: K706,875
Upgrade the intersection to a
roundabout.
Resolution 23-104-CC
PE: $50,000
;CN: $1,000,000
Ouw_
!-]k.x l
The bridge deck has 7.7% in
Condition State 2 (repaired) and
2.8% is Condition State 4 (poor).
This project has been WSDOT
funded.
Resolution 23-111-CC
PE: $1471875
CN: $908!1375
MP 0.82 to MP 5.82
Road Q-SE will be widened
from 24 feet wide to 34 feet
wide. Work will include
earthwork, drainage, B S T
surface, traffic control and other
items.
RAP Funding — $1,620,000
Resolution 23-154-CC
PE: $200MOO
CN: $100,000
5 Road U-NE Overlay
6 Road B-SE Culverts
7 Comprehensive Road Safety Program
as®.o■Nom
ZME1111m
--.MERM
-i..-
STOP �tov
8 Desert Aire Pedestrian Safety
MP 12.84 to MP 15.80
Work will include earthwork,
drainage, HMA surface, traffic
control and other items.
STP Funding - $1,205,594
Resolution 24-049-CC
PE: $143,750
CN: $1,25000
MP 0.24 to MP 0.44
Culvert replacement. Work
will include removal of failing
exiting culvert pipe,
approaches, traffic control, and
& ' other items.
Resolution 18-054-CC
PE: $12500
CN: $37500
Proposed preparation of a 6-
year Comprehensive Road
Safety Plan and Safety
Improvements Program. Work
includes safety enhancements.
Resolution 23-122-CC
PE: $25000
CN: $0
MP 0.00 to MP 2.57
A trail will be constructed
along Desert Aire Drive SW
from SR 243 to the PUD park.
Traffic calming methods will
be installed.
STP Funding - $367,625
Resolution 24-049-CC
PE: $57,375
CN: $3671625
9
2027 Gravel to Oil Program
ME INK
10 Drumheller Road Connector (Phase 5)
— BST surface construction by
county forces in accordance with
BOCC approved scoring and
ranking order.
K- S W
MP: 0.0 to MP: 1.49
PE: $0
CN: $4W750
MP 8.63 to MP 12.54
Improve gravel surface.
PE: $0
CN: $312,500
11 Stratford Road (Phase 2)
TMrry1 Work will include earthwork,
_ drainage, BST surface, traffic
control and other items.
RAP Funding - $1,350,000
Resolution 20-001-CC
PE: $125MOO
CN: K37500
12 Road S-NW & Bridge 355 Replacement
6N .�
h,
�► toil
-
yw �
- Ull m
+31
13 Cochran Road & Ottmar Road
j,
.t
MP 0.99 to MP 3.99
BST surface, replace Bridge 355
pillwith a pre-fab concrete bridge;
.�:. finished width of 34 ft.
--� RAP Funding — $1,816,875
Resolution 2 - - 3 155 CC
PE: $150,000
CN: K868,750
Cochran MP 0.10 to MP 0.89
i
Ottmar MP 0.00 to MP 0.13
M Work will include grade,
drainage, HMA surfacing, curb
Ny & gutter, sidewalks, traffic
control and other items.
STP Funding - $1,010,028
HIP Funding - $157,723
Resolution 14-003 -CC
PE: $94,500
CN: $1,35000
14 Valley Road overlay
MP 1.53 to MP 2.11
Work will include HMA
surfacing, traffic control and other
items.
STP Funding - $486,563
Resolution 20-001-CC
PE: $62,500
CN: $562,500
15 Bridge 171 Replacement
Replace Bridge 171. Work
will include
ude demolition,
structure replacement,
" approaches, traffic control
1 and other items.
TP S Funding —$ 3 62, 5 00
Resolution 22-119-CC
PE: $5000
CN: $312,500
16 Road R-SW
MP 1.01 to MP 4.01
Reconstruction work will
include earthwork, drainage,
�.- BST surface, traffic control,
.,, - and other items.
PE: $100,000
CN: $L243,750
17 Bridge 382 at Road H-NW
• - Replace Bridge 382. Work
will include demolition
structure replacement,
approaches, traffic control
and other items.
NHPP Funding — $875,000
PE: $93 750
f
CN: $1,000,000
18 Comprehensive Road Safety Program
on��asa�
SPEED
35 , {,
YOUR
SPEED
19 Road W-NE Reconstruction
20 2028 Gravel to Oil Program
Updating the 6-year
Comprehensive Road Safety
Plan and Safety
Improvements Program.
Work includes safety
enhancements.
Resolution 23-122-CC
PE: $25000
CN: $0
MP 16.74 to MP 19.33
Reconstruction work will
include earthwork, drainage,
BST surface, traffic control,
and other items.
RAP Funding - $1,170,000
PE: $501000
CN: K25000
BST surface construction by
county forces in accordance
with BOCC approved
scoring and ranking order.
12-SW
MP: 6.74 to MP: 7.97
PE: $0
CN: $406,250
21 Drumheller Road Connector (A -NE Roundabout)
- � Upgrade the intersection
to a roundabout.
PE: $43 750
CN. $625,000
�y k-.. .
.�....._-:.
22 Road K.7-NE (Road 7-NE to Road 8-NE)
% 1 _
23 Bridge 248 at Road 11-SE Replacement
24 Road 24-NW Palisades Reconstruction
25
Comprehensive Road Safety Program
EED
N:m:®
STOP fop.
MP 0.0 to MP 1.06
Reconstruction work will
include earthwork, drainage,
BST surface, traffic control,
and other items.
PE: $3500
CN: $250,000
Replace Bridge 248. Work will
include demolition, structure
replacement, approaches, traffic
control and other items.
CDF Federal Funding —
$5,256,250
WSDOT Funding — $1,000,000
Resolution 23-027-CC
PE: $1,25000
CN: $506,250
MP 4.31 to MP 8.29
Work will include grade,
drainage, BST surface, traffic
control and other items.
STPR Funding - $3,243,750
Resolution 24-049-CC
PE: $312,500
ROW: $312,500
CN: $3J2500
Updating the 6-year
Comprehensive Road Safety
Plan and Safety Improvements
Program. Work includes safety
enhancements.
Resolution 23-122-CC
PE: $250!1000
CN: $0
26
Grand Coulee Hill (Upper) Reconstruction
Nw
N Me
r
A4
27 2029 Gravel to Oil Program
28
Drumheller Road Connector (Oiling Phase)
29 Hiawatha Road Connector (Oiling)
MP 0.00 to MP 2.89
Work will include grade,
drainage, BST surface, traffic
control and other items.
RAP Funding - $1,181,25 0
PE: $62,500
CN: $1,25000
BST surface construction by
county forces in accordance
with BOCC approved scoring
and ranking order.
11-SW
MP: 0.00 to MP: 0.75
CN: $237,500
K-SE
MP: 1.50 to MP: 2.01
CN: $187,500
MP 4.63 to MP 12.54
Work will include grade, drainage,
BST surface, traffic control and
other items.
STBG Funding - $2,656,250
PE: $2M750
CN: $3J2500
MP 3.08 to MP 4.63
Work will include grade, drainage,
BST surface, traffic control and
other items.
STBG Funding - $888,250
PE: $4500
CN: $1,0005000
30 Bridge 353 at Road RAW Replacement
Replace Bridge 353. Work will
include demolition, structure
replacement, approaches, traffic
control and other items.
PE: $15000
CN: $40000
31 Road 7-NE: Road M-NE to Road N-NE Truck Route Intersection & Reconstruction
32 Sand Dunes Connector &Trail (Phase 1)
33
Stratford Road & Road 7-NE Roundabout
71
MP 0.0 to MP 0.989
Reconstruction work will
include earthwork, drainage,
BST surface, traffic control,
and other items.
PE: $62,500
ROW: $62,500
CN: $937,500
MP 2.28 to MP 3.40
Work will include grade,
drainage, BST surface, traffic
control and other items.
LTAC Funding - $625,000
PE: $12500
CN: $687,500
Upgrade the intersection to a
roundabout. Traffic flow
improvent, earthwork, drainage,
HMA surface, traffic control,
and other items.
PE: $312,500
ROW: $312,500
CN: $3,75000
34 Comprehensive Road Safety Program
Rs :
SPEED
35�
(i YOUR
SPEED b
. ".� 4 A a.
-
v
35 2030 Gravel to Oil Program
la
Updating the 6-year
Comprehensive Road Safety
Plan and Safety Improvements
Program. Work includes safety
enhancements.
Resolution 23-122-CC
PE: $250,000
CN: $0
BST surface construction by
county forces in accordance
with BOCC approved scoring
and ranking order.
12-NW
MP: 1.00 to MP: 1.33
CN: $1251000
H-S W
MP: 0.00 to MP: 1.02
CN: $312,500
36
37
38
Road N-NE Truck Route Reconstruction
Road 5-NE Connector (A -NE to E-NE)
Grand Coulee Hill (Lower) Reconstruction
39 Comprehensive Road Safety Program
HNNEMBEEM
PED
35
YOUR
SPEED � '
= kA
MP 1.0 to MP 4.02
Reconstruction work will
include earthwork, drainage,
BST surface, traffic control,
and other items.
Tax Inc. Finance Agreement
Funding: $1,500,000
PE: $62,500
CN: $114371500
MP 0.99 to MP 5.03
Work will include earthwork,
drainage, BST surface, traffic
control, and other items.
PE: $125,000
CN: $2,50000
MP 2.89 to MP 4.92
Work will include grade,
drainage, BST surface, traffic
control and other items.
STPR Funding - $2,703,125
PE: $112,500
CN: $2,812,500
Updating the 6-year
Comprehensive Road Safety
Plan and Safety Improvements
Program. Work includes safety
enhancements.
Resolution 23-122-CC
PE: $25000
CN: $0
40 2027 Gravel to Oil Program
1)IKT %11 0 N \%HRII\RI)
I.K\\11 KII\I
•� ._i �=l�f��^•••:�: 'w.'. -' I�PGK\U! IOHS11'\\lUK01Uti
)T 1 \1 FR OF l HIP 1F \1 i
BST surface construction by
county forces in accordance
with BOCC approved scoring
and ranking order.
S-NE
MP: 3.52 to MP: 5.53
PE: $0
CN: $50000
41
Road N-NE Truck Route Reconstruction
42 Sand Dunes Connector & Trail (Phase 2)
43 Comprehensive Road Safety Program
SPEED
35}
YOUR c
� SPEED
hA
7
Upgrade the intersection to a
roundabout. Traffic flow
lmprovent, earthwork, drainage,
HMA surface, traffic control,
and other items.
HISP Funding: $5,312,500
PE: $562,500
ROW: $375,000
CN: $5,312,500
MP 3.40 to MP 4.50
Work will include grade,
drainage, BST surface, traffic
control and other items.
LTAC Funding - $625,000
PE: $12500
CN: $687!P500
Updating the 6-year
Comprehensive Road Safety
Plan and Safety Improvements
Program. Work includes safety
enhancements.
Resolution 23-122-CC
PE: $25000
CN: $0
44 2027 Gravel to Oil Program
Y.. �.*•Ao-
BST surface construction by
county forces in accordance
with BOCC approved
scoring and ranking order.
Baseline.5-SE
MP: 0.00 to MP: 1.01
PE: $0
CN: $25000
Order Confirmation
Ad Order Number
Customer
0000051623
GC PUBLIC WORKS*
Sales Rep
Customer Account
bgriffithsteel e@col...
3519
Order Taker
Customer Address
bgriffithsteele@columbiabasinherald.corril24 ENTERPRISE STREET SE
EPH RATA, WA 98823
Order Source
Customer Phone
5097546082
Tear Sheets Proofs Affidavits
0 0 0
Invoice Text
#07028/51623 C2 TIP RESOLUTION
Pavor Customer
GC PUBLIC WORKS`
Pavor Account
3519
Pavor Address
124 ENTERPRISE STREET SE
E P H RATA, WA 98823
Pavor Phone
5097546082
Blind Box Promo Type Materials
0 0 0
Ad Order Notes
Pub: July 1 & 8, 2026
Ordered by: Victoria Seim
PO Number
Ordered By
bgriffithsteele@columbiabasinherald.
Customer Fax
Special Pricing
ifs
Net Amount
Tax Amount
Total Amount
Payment Method
Pavment Amount
Amount Due
221.42
$0.00
221.42
Invoice
$0.00
221.42
06/25/2026 01:59 PM
page 1 of 1
Ad Number Ad Type Ad Size
0000051623 WA -Metro 3 x 6.589" (52 lines)
Run Date Product Placement Position Rate C-
WA-COLUMBIA
07/01 /2026 BASIN HE LEGALS Any $5.60 $110.71
WA-COLUMBIA
07/08/2026 BASIN HE LEGALS Any $5.60 $110.71
06/25/2026 01:59 PM page 2 of 2
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER
Grant
RESOLUTION NOTICE OF HEARING, RESOLUTION No. 26mO42=CC
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR THE 2027=2032 YEARS
WHEREAS, Grant County has updated the Transportation Improvement
Program for the 2027 to 2032 period per RCW 36-81-121; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Improvement Program is updated each year to
provide for an annually updated six -year window, which may include new projects; and
WHEREAS, aNon-Project SEPA has been submitted for the projects proposed
by the updated Transportation Improvement Program, and
WHEREAS, an updated Priority Array of Projects for the 2027-2032 years has
been provided to the Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THAT AN OPEN RECORD
PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD July 14, 2026 at 11:30 a.m. in the Grant County
Commissioners Hearing Room #101,, Courthouse, Ephrata, WA 98823.
The Annual TIP can be viewed anytime at: https://www.grantcountywa.qov/1 379/
ROADPLANNING
Any interested persons may appear regarding these matters.
Grant County is also providing access to this scheduled hearing via Zoom audio. To
participate in the hearing please call in to the hearing at 1(253) 205-0468, enter the
access code (940 4827 7440) and password (26229323) and you will be joined to the
meeting in a `muted'status until such time as the hearing allows for public testimony. If
you have any questions about this procedure, please call the Commissioner's Office in
advance of the hearing.
DATED: June 23, 2026
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
Yea Nay Abstain GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
x /s
Kevin Burgess, Chair
x /s
ATTEST: Rob Jones, Vice Chair
/s x /s
Caitlin E. Manell Cindy Carter, Member
Clerk of the Board
#07028/51623
Pub: July 1 & 8, 2026
tz" ANN,
STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF GRANT
1, Blaze Griffith -Steele, do solemnly swear that I am the Principle Agent of the Columbia Basin
Herald, a newspaper established and regularly published five days a week in the English language,
in and of general circulation continuously for more than six (6) months prior the 31st day of
Mareb, 1944; that said newspaper is printed in an office maintained at 'Its place of publication in
the City of Moseg Lake, Washington; that said -newspaper -was approved and designated as a legal
newspaper by the order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Grant County on the
31 st day of March, 1944; and that said order has not been revoked and is in fill force and effect.
That the almexed is a true copy of Legal Notice # 07028/51623 C2 TIP RESOLUTION as it was
published in regular issues (and not in supplement form) of said newspaper once each WEEK for
a period of 2 consecutive WEEKS commencing on the. IST of DULY 2026 and ending on the
8TH of SLILY 2026 both dates inclusive and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its
subscribers during all of said period, that the full amount of fee charged for the foregoing
publication is the sum of $221,42
141
,aze Gri ith- ele
I
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 8THDAY OF JU 2o;z6,
Ift Q - A
0
RIO 66ds'—
Notary Public
'n 0
State of Washington""k,.1
-My Appointment Expire$ 11114 1 )2029 Commls sign Number 21034179
Bob Ray Richardson
Nota' Public in and for the State of Washington"
ry
Residing in Moses Lake, Washington
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Grant County, Washington
RESOLUTION NOTICE OF HEARING,
`TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT RESOLUTION No, 2g,.�42_CO
PROGRAM FOR THE 2027-2032 YEARS
WHEREAS, Grant County has updated the Transp ortation Im
Program for the 2027 to 2032 period per RCW 36-81-121 • and provement
WHEREAS, the Transportation Improvement Pro ram is u
provide for an annually updated six -year window, which may include
pdated each year to
y ude new projects; and
WHEREAS, a Non -Project SEPA has been submitted for the r
by the updated Transportation Improvement Pro 9ram and p oleos proposed
,
WHEREAS, an updated Priority Array of Projects for the 202
�becn provided to the Board. 7 2Q32 years has
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 17
PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD Jul14,
4 HEREBY RESOLVED THAT AN OPEN RECORD
Comm►ssioners Hearing Room #101, Courtho?�efi at "I'1:30 a,m, in the Grant County
,Ephrata, WA 98823.
a The Annual TIP can be viewed anytime at: https://www. rant
RQADP.__�ANNING a countvwa ov/� 379/
-
Any interested persons may appear regarding these matters.
Grant County is also providing access to this s
Aa�ic�pate in the hearing please call in to the cheduled hearing via �aom audio. Tc
access code (940 4827 7440) and password hearing at 1(253) 2Q5_0408, enter the
meeting in a `muted' status until such timed (26229323) and you will be joined to the
You have an as the hearing allows for public testimon , l�
y questions about this procedure. please call the Co y
advance of the hearing, Commissioner's office in
DATED: June 23, 2026
BOARD OF COUNTY
Yea Nay Abstain
COMMISSIONERS
GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
x
- -
Is
Kevin Burgess, Chair
ATTEST; X
is
Rob Jones, Vice Chair
/s X
Caitlin E. Man_el 1 - -
/s
Clerk of the Board
Cindy Carter, Member
#07028/51623
Pub: Julv 1 & 8. 2026