Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPolicies - Emergency ManagementGRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA MEETING REQUEST FORM (Must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board by 12:00pm on Thursday) REQUESTING DEPARTMENT. Sheriff's Office REQUEST SUBMITTED BY: J. Sainsbury CONTACT PERSON ATTENDING ROUNDTABLE.J. Sainsbury CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: 7YES Fmil NO DATE: 9-4-24 PHONE: 509-750-7306 TYPOFIDOC UMENTS SUBMITTED: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) DAgreement /Contract ' EIAP Vouchers ElAppointment / Reappointment FIARPA Related F-1 Bids / RFPs / Quotes Award E]Bid Opening Scheduled f� Boards / Committees R Budget El Computer Related OCounty Code E]Emergency Purchase El Employee Rel. ElFacilities Related ElFinancial ❑Funds OHearing ❑ Invoices / Purchase Orders ❑Grants — Fed/State/County ❑Leases 7MOA/MOU E]Minutes ElOrdinances 7 Out of State Travel 7 Petty Cash El Policies El Proclamations El Request for Purchase 7 Resolution 0 Recommendation E]Professional Serv/Consultant E]Support Letter DSurplus Req. =ax Levies E]Thank You's E]Tax Title Property 7WSLCB SUGGESTED WORDING FOR AGENDA: Who, What, When, Why, Term, cost, etc.) The Grant County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) has has been completed by the Emergency Manangement Team and needs to be signed off"by the BOCC. If this can be pushed to 9-17, 1 can be there to answer any questions. If necessary, was this document reviewed by accounting? El YES ❑ NO F-1 N/A If necessary, was this document reviewed by legal? F-1 YES F-1 NO F-1 N/A DATE OF ACTION: c� 1,17o <,9 APPROVE: DENIED ABSTAIN D1: D2: _a D3: DEFERRED OR CONTINUED TO: WITHDRAWN: 4/23/24 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Date: � / � BOARD OF COUNTY, COMMISSIONERS GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cindy Carter, Chair ATTEST: arbara J. Vasquez Clerk of the Board Rebekah Kaylor Grant County Prosecutor's Office Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Date: S' AF84 T F �;. T f E O F WASHINGTON MILITARY DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DIVISION TA-20 Building 20 * :amp Murmy, Washington98430-6122 August 14, 2024 Joe Kriete, Sheriff Grant County Sheriff s Office Emergency Management Division 35 C Street NW PO Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98823 Re: Grant County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Dear Sheriff Kriete: Thank you for submitting Grant County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) for our review as required under RCW 38.52.070. Congratulations on completing this significant accomplishment. The enclosed documents provide a compilation of recommendations for your next planning and review cycle to meet the requirements of chapter 38.52 RCW and chapter 11830 WAC. Addressing the lawful requirements category will ensure your CEMP's continued consistency with the State CEMP and incorporate industry best practices. The Washington Emergency Management Division (EMD) looks forward to receiving the next iteration of Grant County's CEMP in five years. To better incorporate the use of core capabilities while also making the CEMP a more operational document, CEMP development in Washington has changed significantly. If you would like additional information or assistance, please contact EMD's Planning Section at emdcem.preview(iDmil.wa.gov. Sincerely, Sharon Wallace Digitally signed by Sharon Wallace Date: 2024.08.15 09:13:54-07'00' Sharon Wallace Acting Director Enclosures (2) EMD CEMP Evaluation Checklist 2024 —Grant County CEMP Review and Recommendations 2024 —Grant County EMD CEMP Evaluated Checklist 2024 - Grant County *Each Tier Total is the sum of all elements that have been addressed across all sections in the column and displayed in a percentage Palle hint nra r►ra-ara ^-+ A- --+ -1-- n1e.v.o. +. +U. + ..«.. ----A P-- 4t -+ 4:-- Five �'undamentai Flan Review Criteria: Rafing RatbwSvstene: 1 = Missing All of the. specified' characteristics 2 = Minimally addresses the specked characteristics 3 = Addresses Some of the specified characteristics 4 = Addresses Most of specified characteristics 5 = Addresses All of the'specified characteristics 'ADEQUACY A plan is adequate if. 3 The scope and.concept of planned operations identify and address critical tasks effectively; 3 The plan can accomplish the assigned mission while complying with guidance; 3 The plan's assumptions are valid, reasonable, and comply with guidance. 3 FEASIBILITY A plan is feasible if: 2 The organization can accomplish the assigned mission and critical tasks by using available resources whithin the time contemplated by the plan; 3 The organization allocates available resources to tasks and tracks the resources by status; 2 Available resources include internal assets and those available through mutual aid or through existing state, regional, or Federal assistance agreements. 3 Specifically, the jurisdiction should complete a capability estimate that: 2 Identifies the current status of resources arrayed to support the plan; 2 Analyzes the required resources based on the courses of action in the plan; 2 Identifies the most supportable courses of action and ways to reduce the impact of resource deficiencies. 2 ACCEPTABILITY A plan is acceptable if 3 It meets the requirements driven by a threat or incident; 2 It meets decision maker and public cost and time limitations; 3 It is consistent with the law; 3 It can be justified in terms of the cost of resources; 3 Its scale is proportional to mission requirements. 2 COMPLETENESS A plan is complete if it: 2- Incorporates all tasks to be accomplished; 2 Includes all required capabilities; 2 Integrates the needs of the general population, children of all ages, individuals with disabilities and others with access and functional needs, immigrants, individuals with limited English proficiency, and diverse racial and ethnic populations; 1 Provides a complete picture of the sequence and scope of the planned response operation; 2 Makes time estimates for achieving objectives; 2 Identifies success criteria and a desired end -state. 4 COMPLIANCE The Plan should align with guidance and doctrine to the maximum extent possible because these provide a baseline that facilitates both planning and execution. 3 COMPLETE OVERVIEW Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) Review & Recommendations Jurisdiction: Grant County - 2024 The plan provides well written, easy to understand and necessary information for the administration of an emergency management program. The recommendations provided below are separated into three tiers: Tier III — Lawful Requirements; Tier Il — State Suggestions; and Tier I — Optional State consistency reviews will follow the recommendations identified in Tier III. Tier II identifies the next logical step in the planning process and should be considered guidance to assist with state-wide planning coordination; Tier II is not a requirement, but highly suggested to better prepare your jurisdiction. Tier I identifies entirely optional, accreditation -related elements and remains dependent on individual jurisdictions' preparedness goals, capabilities and resources; Tier I is not a requirement. tnsure the approval document is signed by either Basic Pan = ' the Emergency Management Director or the senior Chapter 118-30, Approval elected official. This is expected and is a reminder to - WA CEMP, CPG Document sign the official document when it is ready to be 101 promulgated/approved. Ensure the most current version(year) is accurately :Chapter 118-30, Basic Plan — Footer displayed throughout the entire document. (See WA CEMP, CPG .. ....... . ........ not...... . .....e under *Additional Considerations) ..... 101 ... Please provide a highlight or high-level overview of the hazards.tha;t your jurisdiction has identified. A brief explanation of each hazard is necessary to understand how and why a hazard can be impactful. EPCRA, Title Basic Plan This information should: be contained in your Hazard 38.52 RCW, Mitigation Plan. It is not necessary to fully duplicate Chapter 118-30 that information here, only to provide a high-level WAC, WA overview. CEMP, CPG 101 Additionally, it can be very useful to provide a hazard probability matrix to highlight the likelihood of occurrence versus the anticipated level of impact. Basic Plan — Be sure to add a section to identify FEMA's Whole Public Laws 109- Concept of Community Concept. Within this section, discuss 308, 110-325; Operations how your jurisdiction has address .. ................. Washington Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 1 Whole Community • Americans with Disabilities Executive Involvement • Essential Needs of Children Orders 13347, • Access and Functional Needs 13166; Title • Essential Needs of Household Pets and 38.52 RCW, Service Animals Chapter 118-30 • Non -Discrimination WAC, Title 49.60 This needs to be expanded more than just RCW; WA mentioning that your plan was developed from "this CEMP, CPG 101 mindset". ....... ........ _ _ _ _ _ Consider discussing what Desired End -States or ..... Outcomes look like, A desired outcome comes from the accomplishment of Operational objectives, which in turn are established through Leadership's Intent within the emergency management organization throughout all Mission Areas. When an incident occurs, Leadership's Intent establishes the Operational Objectives (with a priority, that matches the developing situation). For each Operational Objective, what is the Desired End State or Outcome (i.e. What does a Successful response look like? How do you know when y0U Basic Plan - have achieved the Objective?) For a small wildfire Chapter 118-30 Conce t of p that has not reached an urban interface t might i WAC, e Operations — look like: Leadership, s Intent — Contain the fire within 36 National Leaderships' hours. Control access to the area to protect life Planning Intent, Operational - . safety. Focus initial attack on areas that could Frameworks, Objectives and f J encroach on public and private lands. WA CEM P, CPG Desire.- End State 101 Operational Objectives - (1) Ensure life safety, (2) Manage the incident, (3) Protect property,(4) Protect the environment. Desired End State/Outcome — Eliminate the wildfire in the affected area and monitor for additional fire risk. Desired End State/Outcomes are the end of an incident's story. They help define the life cycle of an incident for emergency management, communicate clear progression to elected officials, and provide Washington State Emergency 17/9/2024 Management Division Page 2 the public with expectation management. For the Basic Plan you can keep it high-level and generalized; however, for your annexes you can get more specific based on the roles and responsibilities ... _ _ } that each specifically addresses. ..... Include EOC activation levels in the Concept of Operations section. "EOC personnel should use the standard NIMS activation level titles listed in Table 2 [on Pg. 39 of the NIMS 2017 Doctrine], for communication outside their jurisdiction/organization. Additionally, Basic Plan — some organizations may opt to use number or color Chapter 118-30 Conce t of p designations of activation levels for internal WAC, NIMS Operations communications. When numbers are used the 2017 WA ' numbers should reflect the standard NIMS approach CEMP, CPG 101 of descending numbers meaning higher levels of activation (e.g., full activation should be level 1)." ^' Directly from the NIMS Doctrine — it may be beneficial to explore what implementing this NIMS concept would look like compared to the current ............ . ....... definition. ........................s for your jurisdiction. .. ..... .. ...... .Consider creating an organization section. Information typically found in this section discusses the jurisdiction's Emergency Management Program structure and may also include an organizational Basic. Plan - diagram which visually depicts the chain of Chapter 118-30 Organization command .structure. WAC WA ' CEMP, CPG 101 Also include a matrix that identifies your Agency/Department representatives with their associated Annex role. _ _ .......... .... .... ... ....... The Communications Section plays an integral role in implementing the programmatic and Public Laws 109- support needed to provide ADA/ 308, 110-325;implementation AFN / LEP communications and outreach. This Presidential Basic Plan - • • critical role needs to be identified and addressed Executive Communications b the coordination of efforts with Y Orders 13347, communications resources. There are many 1 3166; Title elements a CEMP must meet in accordance with 38.52 RCW, the new LEP bill amending Chapter 38.52 RCW. Chapter 118-30 WAC; WA CEMP Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 3 Be sure you discussthe communications methods which address the needs of the Whole Community. Discuss resources /processes /agreements /etc. to meet (or no capacity to meet) the needs your jurisdiction identifies (i.e. preparedness outreach, emergency warning, etc.). Also, specifically discuss the applicable LEP population you must address per the "significant population segment" criteria described in Title 38.52 RCW. Additionally, be sure to include in Evacuation considerations as well. Consider expanding on your jurisdiction's use of After -Action Reports (AAR) to review an incident/exercise for addressing challenges associated with communications efforts, proposed recommendations to address the challenges, and list f the resources needed to address the challenges. Consider expanding the Administration section to Title 40.14 RCW, your CEMP. Your plan does a good job discussing Chapter 118-30 Basic Plan - the documentation process for incidents but WAC, WA Administration consider including exercises to this process, essential CEMP, National records, retention policies, preservation of essential Planning records, etc. Frameworks ' CPG 101 Consider adding a generalized Finance section to t t your CEMP. Discuss the process used for expenditure approval and how those costs are documented. Also, in this section your Plan can describe the process used to recover cost and/or reimbursements. Title 38.52 RCW, Basic Plan — Planning efforts should also make considerations for Chapter 118-30 Finance federally declared disasters, in which federal WAC, WA assistance programs may become available. CEMP, CPG 101 Consider discussing the following programs and what the implementation process would look like: Public Assistance (PA), Individual Assistance (IA), Other Needs Assistance (ONA),, and Small Business Administration, (SBA) assistance. ..... ...... _ . ....... Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 4 PPD 8, Title 38.52 RCW, Consider adding a generalized Logistics section to Chapter 11.8-30 Basic Plan - your CEMP. Discuss how resource gaps are WAC, The Lo Logistics C g identified specialized resource fulfillment and how p National those resources are requested. Planning Frameworks, WA CEMP, CPG 101 Include in the Development and Maintenance PPD-8, Title section an acknowledgement of Training and 38.52 RCW, Basic Plan — Exercise Program participation, discuss conducting Chapter 118-30 Development and p I annual exercises what an incident review process WAC, National Maintenance consists of (AARs), what is done to ensure the plan is Planning available to the public, and what the process is for p Frameworks, monitoring any legal changes. WA CEMP, CPG 101 E.O. 131661 EPCRA, Title Consider including a Resource Requirements section 38.52 RCW, SSB All ESFs —Resource to your ESFs. Resource Requirements can discuss 5046 LEP, Requirements items that an individual may need to fill the role Prevention e.g. specific train.ings, materials, access to systems Framework, or facilities, etc.). Protection Framework, WA CEMP Discuss the procedures to provide projected or anticipated costs, as well as the reimbursement process when mutual aid agreements are activated. 1 Also, consider including as attachments any ' Title 38.56 RCW, ESF 7 — Mutual Aid checklists and forms for requesting and providing WA CEMP, CPG assistance. 101 Discuss your participation in the Washington Mutual Aid System (WAMAS). Also discuss the resource process request using WAMAS. q p 8 In conjunction with resource typing, a requirement ESF 7 — of NIMS is to establish a credentia.ling system. PPD-8, Chapter Credentialing Credentialing is essential to the emergency 118-30 WAC, System management. community because it verifies the WA CEMP, CPG identity and attributes (e.g., affiliations, skills or 101 Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 5 privileges) of response team members through standards. The standards allow the community to plan for, request and have confidence in resources deployed from other jurisdictions for emergency assistance. Credentialing also. ensures that personnel resources match requests and support effective management of deployed responders. This FEMA resource may assist with content to include: f National Incident Management System: Guideline for the Credentialing of Personnel ... ....... .https://www.fema.goy/pdf/emergency/ni................ ... . ... ...................ms/nim.......... ......s cred guidelines report.pdf ......... ... . ..... . .................. — ESF 7 Unsolicited ESF 7 is unlabeled in this plan. Consider addressing . Chapter 118-30 Donations or developing a plan which covers the management WAC, WA ..... .. . ... .Discuss of unsolicited donations. ..... .. . . .... CEMP, ... ...... .CPG 101 any planning efforts to facilitate Title 38.52 RCW, ESF 13 - evacuations: This discussion could touch on SSB 5046 LEP, Evacuations methods processes, or link back to existing ,p 8 Chapter 118-30 . ..... WAC, WA CEMP __ ....... Consider describing the implementation or ... activation of a Communications Plan. The plan addressed pre -scripted messaging and notifications Public Law E.O. for AFN populations (to include LEP), which are two 13166, Title elements that normally fall into this discussion; also 38.52 RCW, SSB ESF 15 — consider discussing communications 5046 LEP, The Communications implementation for hearing -impaired individuals as National f Plan another component of a Communications Plan. For Planning ideas about the content to address for this subject, Frameworks, look at the references in the next column. Discussion = WA CEMP, CPG points could include the importance of emergency 101 1 notifications when it intersects with AFN populations, hazardous materials incidents, etc. Washington State Emergency 17/9/2024 Management Division Page 6 the person receiving your CEMP as well as the date your plan was sent. ...... .... .. ...... . ..... . . .... .. Part of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan should include a description of the activities taking place in the other mission areas (i.e. Prevention, Protection, Mitigation., Recovery). While your Annexes show some of this planning consideration, the Basic Plan is meant to The Nati onal Basic Plan — Direction, describe the relationships between these Planning Control, & mission areas/planning efforts/etc. The State Coordination is currently moving in CEMP this direction. Frameworks WA with its own Plan which is thereasoning CEMP behind offering this recommendation and the previous one as a suggestion for future updates to your CEMP. Consider scheduling a Planning Assistance Visit with an EMD Planning Team member for more information. ........... When discussing multi -jurisdictional National Response Basic Plan —Direction coordination, there is an opportunity to Framework, Control & discuss how your jurisdiction would National Disaster Coordination — coordinate vertically in order to establish Recovery Stain Areas to staging areas. Framework WA CEMP CPG 101 Provide a brief overview of the policy -level dedsionmaking process (City/County Boards, MAC Groups). Also, discuss how the decisions that these bodies make emergency affect mer ency Basic Plan - management operations. National Response Organization Framework WA Describe the conflict resolution process that CEMP CPG 101 exists or would be used to resolve issues which present themselves amongst local departments. There are many tasks and abilities that Departments/Agencies (at all levels of The National Basic Plan — government), the private sector, community Planning Responsibilities organizations, and individuals should be Frameworks, WA participating in and accomplishing based on CEMP,, CPG 101 the guidance offered by the National ............. ...... ...... ....... ...... . . ..... . ......... .. .. . ... ......... ... .... ....... ... ­__ .......... ........ ....... . .... ....... ....... . .. .... ­..­­..­­­­ ............ . .. ... ...... .... . .. . .. ... Washington State Emergency 17/9/2024 Management Division Page 7 Planning Frameworks. The Responsibilities section is an opportunity to not only address what capabilities are, but what they should be. This section should also be considered a place to set expectations. For more information on stakeholder responsibilities, consult the CEMP Evaluation Checklist —Tier .......... ....... ........ II Suggestions tab. __._ . _ .... ..... _ _ _ ...... ........ _ ... Consider briefly discussing the impact and role of insurance for recovering from the impacts of emergencies and/or disasters. Consider discussing how grants are managed in your jurisdiction. For example, consider National Disaster Basic Plan - Finance how the Homeland Security Regions j Recovery participate in grants management and also framework, WA how the individual jurisdictions within the CEMP region_ participate in the process. There may be. other EM grant funded initiatives and projects that operate outside of the H LS Region, consider discussing what is done to . . ......... ....manage those grants........... a.... well. ....s National Response Consider designating locations that will serve Framework, Basic Plan — i as Community Points of Distribution (CPODs) National Disaster Logistics Also, provide a brief description of how those Recovery locations are determined. Framework, WA . ......... _... ..... ... .. ... ...... ......... ....... ... . .............. . CEMP Basic Plan ...... .. ... .... ...... ....... _... Briefly discuss the promulgation` process that Development and your CEMP goes through in order to become WA CEMP, CPG 101 Maintenance approved by your jurisdictions appointed and/or senior leadership. Support Agencies that do not fall within the jurisdiction of the county should not be given responsibilities. Rather, you should list how ALL ESFs — you coordinate with them when they are Responsibilities executing responsibilities onsibilities that are WA CEMP, CPG 101 detailed in their own plans. For example, State Patrol should not have responsibilities listed, rather what should be listed is how Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 8 you coordinate together to help accomplish . ... ._ _... .__.. _ the mission. ..... The ESF 4Annex made frequent references ESF.4 - Firefighting to Firefighting Agreements but did not detail National Response Assistance how those agreements would be Framework, WA Agreements -implemented (or the process to implement CEMP, CPG 101 them). Please detail what these agreements entail and how they are implemented. Consider detailing the actions and processes that take place to specifically address the National Response ESF 4 — Fire Incident process to request Fire Resource Framework, WA Mana Management g Mobilizations and how Situational and Damage Assessment information flows into CEMP CPG 101 ' the EOC (as separate considerations). National Disaster ESF 5 — ICS. Form Describe the use of ICS and FEMA ICS forms Recovery for documenting and organizing a response. Framework, WA C. ..._ _ Describe how information gets analyzed and disseminated. Consider describing the critical or essential information needed, the source of the information, who uses the information, how the information is shared, the format for providing the information, and any specific times the information is needed. This section should include information on: • Information Collection —the process i of gathering Essential Elements of ESF 5 —Informational 1 Information (EEIs) The Nati onal Collection, Analysis, • Information Analysis —the process the Planning and Dissemination information collected goes through to Frameworks; WA verify accuracy of the information and any CEMP, CPG 101 details necessary to inform operations and decision -making Information Dissemination —the process this support annex takes to share the information ". once it has been verified and analyzed (e.g. the ESF shares the information with the Operations Section Chief in the EOC and the ESF 15/13I0, or Situation Unit in the Planning Secti. . .. .......on. ......... if applicable).. ... .. .. . ....... ... Washington State Emergency 17/9/2024 Management Division Page 9 uescrir)e ine process invoivea to proviae ESF 5 — Senior Officials routine briefings toSeniorOfficials during an WA CEMP, CPG 101 incident. Briefly discuss what the initial notification National Response ESF 5 — Notification and documentation process is for an incident. Framework, National Disaster andDocumentation Also, if this incident were to expand into a Recovery neighboring jurisdiction, discuss the notification process which exists. Framework, WA CEMP CPG 101 'ESF 5 24 hour Describe the process which will be initiated -Operations and sustained to provide for 24-hour WA CEMP, CPG 101 operations for IC/EOC operations. Consider discussing the consideration for the ESF -5 Public unplanned arrival of individuals and Information volunteer group as well as integration of WA CEMP, CPG 101 Management unplanned assistance from community ..... .... ....................... .. ...... .... .. .. ... ... ........ . ... . ... ... . ...... ....... ...... . .. .... .. ... .. . .... ......... . . members or neighboring jurisdictions. .... ... ...... ........... ... .. ..... ......... . .. .... .................. ....... .... .. .... ....... .. ................ ............. ... ......... . ... ..... . ... .... ... ........ ........... .. ..... ... .. .. .. .. ... ....... There are a couple of additional elements .... ...... .. ........ that should be addressed when describing Nati onal Response this ESF. The first is the development of Framework, ESF 6 — Shelters agreements. The second is the- establishment l Natrona Disaster of reception centers at shelter locations (not Recovery to be confused with disaster recovery Framework, WA centers). .............................. . ........ .... ..... .. .......... . .. .... . .. .... . ..... .... .. ......... CEMP CPG 101 Consider discussing more information regarding what communications are established and maintained for sheltering operations. Important areas to consider are what information collection and dissemination efforts will be conducted National Response ESF 6—Shelter between the various stakeholders, such as Framework, Communications & between shelters and the media or shelters National Disaster Operations and evacuees. Another consideration to Recovery discuss is the process and procedures to Framework A W address unaccompanied children, registered CEMP CPG 101 offenders, or household pets when they arrive at -shelters. [Recommendation can be found on the CEMP Evaluation Checklist Tier . . ........ .. ... 11 — Suggestions tab under ESF 6] . ....... . ... ... ESF 8 — Water and Consider discussing the provision and National Disaster Wastewater distribution of water to affected Recovery Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 10 Communities. Also consider What is done to Framework, WA acquire or provide for food production and CEMP, CPG 101 protection Services. National Disaster s ESF 8 —Vector Control Briefly discuss how vector control services Recovery are provided for during an outbreak. Framework, WA CEMP, CPG 101 Consider identifying and describing how to ESF 9 — Search and monitor distress communications; track and Rescue locate distressed personnel; coordinate and WA CEMP, CPG 101 execute rescue operations, including extrication or evacuation. While a separate review is conducted for ESF 10/LEPC Plans by EMD's LEPC Planning Team, there are a few elements that are addressed in FEMA guidance. Consider discussing the following: • Methods to detect and assess the extent of contamination; National Mitigation • Description of the methods to stabilize a Framework, release; National Response ESF 10 — Concept of • Environmental cleanup Framework, Operations • Waste disposal methods/processes; National Disaster • Implementing storage options; Recovery Framework, WA • Implementing treatment options. CEMP CPG 101 Even if your jurisdiction does not participate in the process (i.e. Department of Ecology takes care of the waste),. ESF 10 should briefly describe/highlight who is participating in these activities and if any coordination is involved. National Response Framework, ESF 13 - Public Safety Discuss the process for determining public National Disaster and Security j safety and security resource support. Recovery Framework,. WA CEMP, CPG 101 The topics covered within ESF 15 encompass National Response — ESF 15 Notices aspects of nearly all of the activities of other Framework, ESFs and is therefore a difficult Support National Disaster ..... ........ ....Annex to............... ... de....... .....velop. Considering t. . .. ......his, y.... ...... ...... - . .....our ESF ............ ­1 ......... .Recovery Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 11 1� Hr lr sex ucr nur IbLr a yes a nn i -level Ur rrdmeworK vvH development and forward thinking. There are CEMP only a few considerations which can be addressed. Discuss how information pertaining to the potential impacts of secondary hazards is relayed to the public. Discuss mechanisms which will be in place for the family reunification process. Discuss the notifications provided for emergency transportation information. Lastly, discuss the possibility of providing announcements for upcoming community meetings (i.e. involving state officials, local authorities, damage assessments, etc.). ...... ............. .......... ....... ............ ............................... ...... TIER I —Optional The biggest concern with accreditation ..w wN.. ..,.. entities and requirements is. detailed explanations of process and procedures. It is General - often not enough to simply address that you EMAP perform an activity, but rather explain each step of the process involved to. accomplish suchactivitie ..... ............ _ .......... .... _ _..... _ ............ ....... ._.. _ .. .................... I Develop and/or reference a multi -year ............ Basic Plan strategic plan complete with goals, EMAP 3.1.1 objectives, milestones, and implementation met... . .. ...h... ...ods. Basic Plan. Concept Discuss some basic NIMS concepts (i.e. ....... of 0 erations p modular, unified command process, span of EMAP 4.5.1 control, etc.)` _. There are a lot of elements to try and provide Basic Plan - methods and processes regarding crisis EMAP 4.11.1- Communications communication, public information, and 4.11.4 education. Basic Plan - Atraining and exercise program contains Development- and numerous components. Accreditation is EMAP 4.9 - 4.1.0 Maintenance primarily concerned with the methods used to train, exercise, and track all this data. Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 12 All previous entries can be removed. This is not considered a Record of Changes list of. historical updates. This record is to record all changes made during the last 5 years. . .. ..... .. ... ...... Table of Contents Consider updating this before final -distribution to ensure . ... .. .... . .......... . . .... .......... . ... ... .... information is included and review for accuracy. ... . ....... . ..... ..... ..... .. .. Suggest reviewing plan to ensure all references to 2023 or Consistent Year of Plan other are changed to 2024 to match actual date of .. .. ........ ... . ..... . .... . . .......... . ... . . . ........ . submission. . .... . ..... . ... . The Basic Plan is meant to contain the information that is relevant to all other attachments/sections/annexes/etc. of the CEMP. There are several elements contained within your Basic Plan —Annex Annexes that are not needed and could be better identified Relationship in your Basic Plan. If you can ask the question, "does this statement apply to all other Annexes?" then it could be most beneficial to remove it from the Annex and tie it into the Basic Plan. ......... .... ..... .... . . .... .... ESF 10 Oil and Hazardous Make sure the date in the footer matched the most current Materials Response .. .. ........ ... review. .... ...... .... .... ........ ..... ....... . ... .... .. ...... ... . ..... Washington State Emergency 7/9/2024 Management Division Page 13 N `.. .may. ....ti ..GNEIVCY omprehenswive Emergency Management Plan 2024 Grant County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan GRANT COUNTY EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBERS If immediate emergency or disaster assistance is required, contact Emergency Management: Grant County Sheriff's Office Emergency Management 24-hour Emergency Telephone: (509) 237-2598 Washington State Emergency (253) 512-7104 Operations Center 24-hour (253) 512-7101 CEMNET: Channel 3-45.48 MHZ, State EOC Channel 3-45.48 MHZ, KQP-422 Emergency Management ACCESS: MLKCC NAWAS: Washington Warning Point, Grand Coulee Dam March 2024 i Grant County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank March 2024 Grant County Department of Emergency Management Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) PROMULGATION This Grant County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan dated September 17, 2024, is hereby adopted this day of 2024, as the official plan providing emergency services when protection of life, property, and the environment cannot be accomplished as normal daily function of the local governments of Grant County, and the incorporated cities/towns of Coulee City, Electric City, Ephrata, George, Grand Coulee, Hartline, Krupp, Mattawa, Moses Lake, Quincy, Royal City, Soap Lake, Warden, and Wilson Creek. Approved by: GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON Cindy Carter, Chair Danny S)fone, Vice Chair R&b—M"n"trs, Member