Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - JuvenileJuvenile Court & Youth Services Tuesday, January 16, 2024 Agenda Submitted by: Suhail Palacios 1) Financial 2) Intakes 3) Courts: i. Offender/Diversion: ii. Truancy: iii. Dependency: 4) Chelan County 5) Administration 6) Needs of the Department Tuesday,, January 16,, 2024 Submitted by S. Palacios 1) Financial: In December 2023, we allocated $43,890 over 266 days, resulting in an average daily population of 8.58. In 2023, our total expenditures amounted to $351,858, resulting in an excess of $78,143 beyond the budgeted amount of $430,000. This surplus is equivalent to approximately a month and a half of our current monthly expenses with Chelan County. It positions us well in terms of financial flexibility and stability. days per month: 31 31 28 it 30 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 Mar -23 Martin Hall Stats Dec -22 Jan -23 Feb -23 MH Mar -23 CH CO, Apr -23 May -23 Jun -23 Jul -23 Aug -23 Sep -23 Oct -23 Nov -23 Dec -23 AVG/MO YTD TOTALS 2023 BUDGETED AMOUNTS A MT OVER, I ODER 18.175 &JIDGET # of CHARGED days T_ 92.5 116 92.5 3 " I 164 188 197 1 1 ,: 1 113 156 210 276 293 r 260 167.71 2348 2150.00 :BUDGETED DAYS IN 2023 -198.00 # of youth 1 15 14 141 6 q 18 23) 27 19 18 19 21 24 30 16 18.71 262 MH -"Avg Used Bed" I CH -"Avg Daily Pop" 2.98 3.74 3.3 0.1 5.47 6.27 6.35 6.03 3.65 5.03 7.00 8.9 9.77 8.58 5.28 77.17 cost $161,188 $23,2001$18,5001 $600 of u 1J(.1W1M., M1% $27,066 $351,858 5430,000 !:BUDGETED INACCT.60.4101 $78,143 $165 $16S $165 $16S 5165 $165 $16S $165 5165 5165 N/A QUARTERLY AMTS CHARGED BY CHELAN COUNTY: $21,351.66 $66,066.00 $66,792.00 $66,792-00 N/A $221,001.66 AMOUNT IF WE PAJD $165/DA Y, PER QUARTE& $27,060.00 $93,390.00 $791033,00 $137775.00 N/A $337,260.00 DIFFERENCE FROM CHARGED AMOUNTS TO ACTUALS: - --- -_------ ------ $5,708.34 $27,324.00 512,243.00 570,983.00 N/A lvovowwl AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION AVG P'ER QUARTER. SA 7 6.22 5.23 9.08 N/A 6.50 1.82 0,83 Each 2023 qtr we are charged 4.4 ADP > diff here1.07 N/A 8.40 *NOTE: ADP over 4.4 will billed @ $165/day at reconciliation 2) Intakes:- Today's Daily Population Report: Currently, Chelan County facility is managing the custody of eight juveniles from Grant County facing various charges, including Assault 1st, Murder 2nd, Drive-by Shooting, Assault 2nd, Assault 4 DV & Malicious Mischief 3rd, and Probation Violation for Whereabouts Unknown. Bail has been individually set for each person. Notably, three juveniles are currently being charged as adults in superior court. Juvenile Intakes 2023 250 '10A 187 200 150 100 50 8 9 9 9 12 12 20 20 18 19 17 19 16 18 17 . 17 19 19 21 2124 25 10 2 2 0 0 0 6 0 6 7 0 a Offender a ARY a III n takes Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Au Sep Oct Nov Dec totals 3) M 0 15 Juvenile Intakes 2024 0 A 5 Offender AY Alt Intakes January 6 6 s 5 3 2 Air nBusinesshours ISAfterhours in a Total Intakes i. OFFENDER/DIVERSION: Currently, all civil and criminal proceedings are conducted through WebEx, with in-person court hearings exclusively reserved for Dispositions and Trials. Within the Offender unit, there are presently 224 cases, with 138 of them categorized as Diversion and Low Risk. ii. TRUANCY: Presently, we have 210 active petitions, with a total of 104 stays in effect. Throughout the current school year, 83 stays have been filed, 23 stays have been lifted, and 24 cases of contempt of court have been filed. Additionally, there are 32 extended stays, and 89 cases have been dismissed this school year. iii. DEPENDENCY: The dependency unit is conducting regular docket hearings, offering the flexibility of participation through WebEx or in person. As of now, our dependency unit manages a total of 173 active cases. Among these, 123 are assigned to staff, 39 cases are delegated to volunteers, and 11 cases are actively monitored. The monitored cases, while still active, involve individuals with legal representation, eliminating the necessity for a Guardian ad Litem (GAL). 4) Chelan: I maintain bi-weekly meetings with Chelan to collaboratively address any emerging issues. 5) Administration: We are presently collaborating with Rebekah Kaylor and Kim Allen to address judgments and fines for parents related to truancy. At the moment, we do not have an established system for imposing fines on parents, and our efforts are focused on working together to address this matter collaboratively. 20 19 19 is 17 17 14 14 14 14 6 6 s 5 3 2 Air nBusinesshours ISAfterhours in a Total Intakes i. OFFENDER/DIVERSION: Currently, all civil and criminal proceedings are conducted through WebEx, with in-person court hearings exclusively reserved for Dispositions and Trials. Within the Offender unit, there are presently 224 cases, with 138 of them categorized as Diversion and Low Risk. ii. TRUANCY: Presently, we have 210 active petitions, with a total of 104 stays in effect. Throughout the current school year, 83 stays have been filed, 23 stays have been lifted, and 24 cases of contempt of court have been filed. Additionally, there are 32 extended stays, and 89 cases have been dismissed this school year. iii. DEPENDENCY: The dependency unit is conducting regular docket hearings, offering the flexibility of participation through WebEx or in person. As of now, our dependency unit manages a total of 173 active cases. Among these, 123 are assigned to staff, 39 cases are delegated to volunteers, and 11 cases are actively monitored. The monitored cases, while still active, involve individuals with legal representation, eliminating the necessity for a Guardian ad Litem (GAL). 4) Chelan: I maintain bi-weekly meetings with Chelan to collaboratively address any emerging issues. 5) Administration: We are presently collaborating with Rebekah Kaylor and Kim Allen to address judgments and fines for parents related to truancy. At the moment, we do not have an established system for imposing fines on parents, and our efforts are focused on working together to address this matter collaboratively. 6) Needs of the Department: L I am currently in need of enhanced courtroom security measures. As I have only one security officer available, I have proposed to the judges the idea of utilizing this officer at the entrance for the purpose of scanning individuals for weapons. if approved, this would result in a lack of security presence in the courtroom itself, leaving only my staff until a resolution is reached regarding courtroom security responsibilities and the potential assumption of duties by the sheriff. In the interim, I am requesting the addition of an extra security guard to be stationed within the courtroom, ensuring a temporary solution until a definitive plan for courtroom security is established.