The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutGrant Related - BOCC (005)0 GRANT COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS iT I I I k, • APPROVED MAY 2 3 2023 CONSENT .J To: Board of County Commissioners n,. From: Janice Flynn, Administrative Services Coordinator Date: May 15, 2023 Re SIP Advisory Committee Recommendations on SIP No. SIP No. 2023-02 Ro�C�fiiE MAY 15 2 023 GRANT COU Ty COMMISSIONERS ?023- an The SIP Advisory Committee met on Friday, May 5, 2023, to review and make recommendations on the above -referenced projects. The Committee's recommendations were provided to the BOCC on 05/09/2023 and a copy of the Committee's letter and the applications are attached. The proposed projects are as follows: 1.` SIP Project #2023-01: Grant County Hospital #4 — McKay Healthcare — Phase 1, Architecture and Engineering Site Plan. The Hospital's request was for a $400,000.00 grant. This project was added to the Grant County comp plan in 2022. The SIP Advisory committee has recommended a $400,000.00 grant. Action: The BOCC APPROVES or DISAPPROVES the recommendation of the SIP Advisory Committee to approve $400,000.00 in grant funding. 2. SIP Project #2023-02: Grant County Port District #10 — Moses Lake — Southwest Hangar Utility Extension - The Port's request was for a $500,000.00 grant. This project is on the list of 2023 Appendix J projects to be added to the Grant County comp plan. It is anticipated the updated comp plan will be adopted in August 2023. This project could be approved contingent upon approval of the comp plan. The SIP Advisory Committee has recommended a grant in the amount of $500,000.00 Action: The BOCC APPROVES or DISAPPROVES the recommendation of the SIP Advisory Committee to approve $500,000.00 in grant funding. Note: The Port of Coulee City submitted an application for a new medical facility. They subsequently pulled their application so the SIP Committee made no recommendation. Grant County 6594 Patton Boulevard NE Moses Lake, WA 98837 Economic Ph: 509.764.6579 Fax: 509.762.5161 Development Council www.grantedc.com May 9, 2023 Board of Grant County Commissioners P. 0. Box 37 Ephrata, WA 98837 Subject: April 2023 Advisory Committee —Project Review/Recommendations Dear Commissioners: The SIP Committee met Friday, May 5th and reviewed 2 project applications. Committee members present for the meeting were Corinne Isaak, Chuck Allan and Brant Mayo. Absent was Tony Massa, Curt Morris and Scott Hunter. Curt and Scott sent their recommendations via email prior to the meeting. SIP #2023-01: Grant County Hospital District #4 (requested $400.,000 grant) Phase 17 Architecture and Engineering Site Plan Applicant: McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Recommendation: The committee voted to recommend a $400,000 grant for GC Hospital District #4 regarding their need for an architecture and engineering site plan. This project is in the City of Soap Lake' comprehensive plan. The site plan work is integral for McKay to plan for future expansion and be able to apply for additional grants. McKay currently serves families in Grant County from Ephrata, Coulee City, Hartline, Quincy, Soap Lake, Grand Coulee and Moses Lake. This is an important and valuable facility for the citizens of'Grant County. city. The committee views this as a vital step for the continued operations, sustainability and future expansion for McKay Healthcare. The recommendations were given a motion by Corrine Isaak and seconded by Chuck Allen. The remaining committee voted in unanimous favor of recommendation. SIP #2023-02: Grant County Port District #10 (requested $500,000 grant) Southwest Hangar Utility Extension Applicant: Port of Moses Lake Recommendation: The committee voted to recommend a $500,000 grant for GC Port District #10 regarding their need for installation of utilities to new development area at the Grant County International Airport. The Port of Moses Lake has already invested $1.04M in this project that includes site prepreation and construction of new taxi -lane. The grant would support the installation of basic utilities to the site. The Southwest Hangar Utility Extension project will support several private and public entities in need of their own facility, bringing new investors and jobs to the area. The Port of Moses Lake submitted this project to be included in Grant County's amended comprehensive plan. The recommendations were given a motion by Corrine Isaak and seconded by Chuck Allen. The remaining committee voted in unanimous favor of the recommendation, pending approval of this project in Grant County's amended comprehensive plan later this summer. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the recommendations of the committee. Sincerely, Brant Mayo Administrator Grant County SIP Advisory Committee "RCW 82.14.370 Sales and use tax for public fact'll"ties in -rural counties. (3)(a) Moneys collected under this section may only be used to finance public facilities serving economic development purposes in rural counties and finance -personnel in economic development offices. The public facility must be listed as an item in the officially adopted overall economic development plan, or the economic development section of the county's comprehensive plan. Ti he Funding Source s Account 113.155 Economic Enhancement SIP. aoaa +*0,U)oa3 01. io A4U** *Mw EDC ORGANIZATION PROJECT FUNDING COST Realth6are deed's Assessment &. Modernization Feasibility, Study, 1,13A55 $26,000 Now Wing 113.155 $312.71 538 Main! Build Ing Conversion 113.155 634,468 Outdoor Area improvements 113.155 $944,500 Subtotal $1.3$8761506 • Port of Quint. Internodal Yard Loadingand Unload Ing FXP anqion 113.155 $2811500 Addition across Dock Facilit- y Intermodal Yard 113.155 $88,:180. Upgrade Securi *�y. and' Asset Tracking Syste- ms 1 1 -3. 1 �55 11-3.155 $2.500000 Subtotal $610�064 1. Saved water. District y N'ew Wall and Water Reservoir 113.155 $1 - 7,400 I Water Distribution _�5ystem 113.155 .15.1 .$6.361500-1.. Subtotal A815050 Port of Warden Industrial Park #3 Infrastructure_ Improvement's 11 3.165 -$5.30,000 Industria): Park #5 Expansion & I nfrastructure 113.155 .-85'1000 Airport Master Plan Study and Runway Rphab. 13.155 $230,000 u btotal $2��0453000 •S Samaritan Healthcare District I.Mose's Lake New Hospital 13.155 $167,000,000 Subtotal $161060000 _ - __I 77T. Port Of Mattawa .Wastewater Improvoment Project 113.155 .$500,10001 -Sentinel Gap Industrial Park 111155 $,?15002000 -Subtotal 1000-3000 Town of Coulee City' Rodeo GroundImprovements 113.155 -$117701000 Campground Improvements 113'4 155 $1 200jO0O New Medical, Clinic - - --- ----- 113.155 $3,260,000 Subtotal $612309 -000 Port of Royal' Industrial Park Rail SiOng 113.155 _$21 000,1000 p Fam Well #3 and Fire Pure i1fty 113.155 $3,600;000 - . ch Water New 12 -in Main Extension 113.155 $?-jO001000 Road Expansion 113.155 $1,000,000 Trans Loadin g f8d I ity 113,155 $4001000 Subtotal 113.155 $9#405000 I Total 2022,Eligible Projects 1 $203,353,020 2023 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS EDC ORGANIZATION PROJECT FUNDING COST :"-City of Oungicy Capital. Improvements (Water)_ for 20231 $2.0.94y5oo Water Rights 11 13. 1155 $4 6r 0,00 Peasibility Study 113,155 $:65'0'1000 Additional Intakes and t, n's $1,51-500 DOH, SW Sdurce Approval 113.155 $567jOOO ASIR Permitting 113.155 50,000 Capital Improvements (Wastewater) for 2023 97,000 113.155 1082,000 Reclaim,orl, M;fchr Use 113.155 $7451Qoo Subtotal Port of Mos* es Lake Ai:rport'SW Hangar Utility Extension Water 11-3.155. )i000 $10 - Storm Water 113.155 -000 "SpOtotal $850,9000 ri Royal City Library Caplotal Build'in gject-- New Library, Site Pr aration 113.155 $501000 Phase I - Main Structure 113.155, $587604 Phase 11, - Inter, ior 113.155 $254'.1585.- -Exterior Completion 113.155 190000 Subtotal Beverly Water District Feasibility Study - New Communit Building 111155 $20-000 Subtotal 03000 Sentinel. Gap Water Ass. 'Proposed 8GWA infrastructure ImproovempntS 30 -foot D"18 'Meter Water Tank and Booster Pump 113.155 $1 ell 7 000 ,-,New Water Meters 113.155 $1161600 Install -at 4 ion of 480 feet of .4 -inch water line 113.155 $99 . X0 Subtotal $1 �4;_ 31-900 GRANT COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FOREIGN TRADE ZONE 14203 March 31, 2023 Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program (SIP) c/o Grand County Economic Development Council 6594 Patton Blvd. NE Moses Lake, WA. 98837 RE: Strategic Infrastructure Program (SIP) Application Dear Councik. T 509362.5363 F. 509.762,271'a" PORTOFMOSESLAKE-COM, Enclosed is our completed application to the Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program. Based on the scope of our project we are requesting your consideration in the amount of $500pO0O. PL6'ect Sum,Mg,ry,—,,G.,ra qqnt " rnationallAir ort "Southwest Hanffl,r.!4,t11.1it.y,EM sionl- J -nt,,L _vj, te The Port of Moses Lake has invested $1.04M in this project that includes site preparation and construction of our tax! -lane. However, as we progress to the completion phase, we are seeking community support in the amount of $500,000 for the installation of basic utilities. The Southwest Hangar Utility Extension project will support several private and public entities in need of their own facility* We appreciate the opportunity to participate in this funding cycle. Please contact me if further information is needed. Respectfully submitted, Don Kersey, Executive Di .. r dg,DggElofmoseslake.com Y ' 509-762-5363 10 Enclosure,s, SIP Application Letters of Support Project Maps Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Eligibility Requirements The Strategic Infrastructure Program fund is available because of a state program authorized by the legislature in 1997 (RCW 82.14.370). The legislature has established eligibility requirements for using these funds: FIRST: Funds can only be used to finance "public facilities" such as "bridges, roads, domestic and industrial water facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, earth stabilization, storm sewer facilities, railroads, electrical facilities, natural gas facilities, research., testing, training,and incubation facilities in innovation partnership zones designated under RCW 43.330.270, buildings, structures, telecommunications infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, or commercial infrastructure, and port facilities in the state of Washington." RCW 82,14.370(3) {c)(i). SECOND.: The public facility must also serve "economic development purposes," which is defined as "those purposes which facilitate the creation or retention of businesses and jobs in a county." RCW 82.14.370(3)(a), (c)(*Ii)o I THIRD: Finally, to be eligible for funding: "The public facility must be listed as an 'Item in the officially adopted county overall economic development plan, or the economic development section of the county's comprehensive plan, or the comprehensive plan of a city or town located within the county for those counties planning under RCW 36.70A.040. For those counties that do not have an adopted overall economic development plan and do not plan under the growth management act, the public facility must be listed in the county's capital facilities plan or the capital facilities plan of a city or town located within the county." RCW 82-14-370(3)(a). Eligibility Checklist: 1. Yes No 0 This request is for a "public facility as described above. 2. Yes No EJ The public facility facilitates the creation or retention of businesses and jobs in Grant County. 3. Z Yes No 0 The public facility is listed as an item in the economic development section of Grant County's comprehensive plan OR [] Yes No 0 the public facility is listed as an Item in the economic develo'pruient section ofthe com'prehensiv"'e plan of a City or Town located within Grant County. If the answer to all three questions is yes please proceed with the application process. If the answer to any of the three questions is no, the project is not eligible to receive funding from this program. Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Economic Impact of the Project 1. What economic goals and/or objectives (identified in the comprehensive plan) does this project help the community achieve? a. Grant County Comprehensive Plan i. Section 4.2.3 of the Land Use Element briefly describes the role of airports as essential public facilities and the special consideration necessary for land us planning near airports. This section also further highlights and incorporates the agencies Airport Master Plan and consultation to reflect future airport plans and operations. N. Section 4.4.2.4 Urban Land Use Designations highlight the zoning designation "Port of Moses Lake" as areas owned and operated by the Port of Moses Lake. This area is designated for the Port's various aviation and commercial businesses. 'The Port maintains master planned land uses within this land use designation. iii. Section 5 Economic Development Element recognizes the Grant County International Airport, owned and operated by the Port of Moses Lake, as a strength to Grant County's economic development, specifically providing that "the airport plays an important role in the regional economy by providing easy access to the rest of the country as well as brining aviation training related jobs." iv. Section 5 of the Economic Development Element further recognizes several manufacturing, forestry and other like services that the Port of Moses Lake supports through its infrastructure and provides an continued global economic opportunities. v. When looking at the weaknesses within the Grant County landscape, the requested funding would help create additional opportunities to bring back air service to our market by having additional corporate hangar space, diversify the revenue at the Port for continued investment into infrastructure, promote uses not compatible elsewhere, and uses generally supported within the Airport Master Plan. vi. Per RCW 36.70.547 and 36.70A.510, consultation with airport owners, managers, private airport operators, general aviation pilots, ports, and the Aviation Division of WSDOT is required for comprehensive planning. Both the Grant County and City of Moses Lake comprehensive plans incorporate and give reference to the Port of Moses Lake Airport Master Plan as being the controlling mechanism within the Port of Moses Lake zoning designation. b. GLIA Port of Moses Lake Airport Master Plan i. Exhibit 4J Development Areas, Constraints and Property Acquisition shows the SW Hangar Site as area that is suitable for Aviation Development. ii. Page 238 also provides that "The options for hangar development follow a philosophy of planning similar activity levels in the same location in order to provide a safer movement environment. As such, any future general aviation facilities, such as T -hangars, should be planned in the same general location as the existing T -hangars. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies ( ht copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd NE; Moses Loke, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Cover Sheet Date: April 3, 2023 Grant County SIP Number: — -------__ -------------------------- - .... --------- -------- Applicant: Port of Moses Lake Address:7810 Andrews St. NE Contact Name: Don Kersey City: Moses Lake Title: Executive Director State: Washington Zip: 98837 Signature of person authorizing submittal: Phone: 509-762-5363 Position of person authorizing submittal: Fax: Executive Director Email: dkersey@portofmoseslake.com Project Title: Southwest Hangar Utility Extension Population of the community: 3,939 Total area population served by the project: 102,123 The County is required to report to the State Auditors Office the estimated number of businesse's and jobs that will be created and/or retained by this project. Retained businesses and jobs means businesses and jobs that will be lost if not for the completion of the project. How many businesses will be created and/or retained by this project? Within 3 years we estimate 2 new customers. How many jobs will be created and/or retained by this project? There are an estimated 15 job created. What comprehensive plan lists this project as an item in its economic development section? Grant County Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive plan of the city or town of Moses Lake North Type of Public Facility: (check all that apply) 13 Bridge 0 Road 13 Domestic Water Facility Industrial Water Facility ,0 Sanitary Sewer Facility 13 Earth Stabilization Storm Sewer Facilities 0 Railroads 13 Electrical Facilities 0 Natural Gas Facilities 0 Buildings 0 Structures 13 Telecommunications infrastructure 13 Transportation Infrastructure 13 Port Facilities 0 Commercial Infrastructure kk Funding is needed for: (check all that apply) capital facilities costs including acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, alteration,, expansion, or improvements of public facilities 13 project specific environmental costs 0 costs of site plan and analysis 13 development and improvement for the public facilities 0 project design, including feasibility and marketing studies and plans, and debt revenue impact analysis 0 land use, and permitting costs .... Total project cost:$ *Unknown Total SIP request to date for project: $ Amount raised to -date: $ 1.04M Current SIP Loan Request: $ 0 Current SIP Grant Request* $ 500j,000 0 Total cost of all four (4) phases ois unestimated at Previous SIP Loon Request: $ 47,270-00 this time. Previous SIP Grant Request,,, $100,.000.00 Is this a phased in Project? Yes Z No 13 If yes, how many phases? There are a total of four (4) phases. During how many years? Four (4) to five (5) Anticipated Project is currently in phase: "Stage 3" of Phase I Please complete this form on your computer using Microsoft Word. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (fight. cogies total) to: Grant County EDC,, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application iii. Page 255 also describes Hangars general use and needs at the GCIA and p Ides that "the plan called for locating any new general aviation hangars on provides the west end of the Airport.... and generally goes on to discuss details, as illustrated within the project Technical Memorandum and conceptual and schematic design drawings. iv. Page 260 further describes this area as being located within the Aviation Development (AD) subzoning designation and provides a list of acceptable/approved uses. v.- Page 272,, depicting the Capital Improvement Program (CiP) lists tho beginning stages of the project as an intermediate term program (6-10 years) which began in 2020, c. City of Moses Lake Comprehensive Plan L Within the Vision Statement of the City of Moses Lake, the following goals support the project: Foster economic innovation and opportunity. ii. Within the Land Use section the Port of Moses Lake is listed within the industrial zoning classification as its own zoning designation. The Purpose identifies that "These properties are owned by the Grant County Port District #10 (Port of Moses Lake) and developed according to the Grant County Airport Master Plan. The Principal uses section identifies that " The Master Plan emphasizes the development of aviation related industries, or industries compatible with the airport operation." iii. Outside of those references, the City of Moses Lake largely did not include a Economic Development section within the new comprehensive plan, 2. How will this project foster economic growth, development, and address future economic needs? Economic growth and development has been stagnant since COVID19 in 2020. Several private and public entities in need of their own facility have approached the Port, including but not limited to: Local mosquito district • Life Flight, which operates air ambulance services for Grant County Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRI) business • Agriculture support company Renewable energy companies Aerospace companies Establishing these businesses at the Port would result in additional economic development and lead to career and job growth. Also, Life Flight (an air ambulance service) currently operates their business from two separate facilities — the company would like to bring both operations to the Port, which can provide a range of services that cannot be provided at their other facilities. Having Life Flight stationed at the Port would decrease response times to their service area of all Central Washington and could ultimately save lives. The expected outcome of this project would be attracting and expanding businesses in the region while competing with locations outside of the state of Washington for these same companies. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837- Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental moterials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Companies seeking to locate to the Port will be a catalyst for other opportunities and create new industrial hubs. The Port of Moses Lake is in a pivotable location to potentially become a hydrogen hub, and this infrastructure will be critical to those opportunities. This additional infrastructure will bring development opportunities to the rural communities in Central Washington. The region is well-positioned to become an energy hub for small modular reactors, hydrogen and renewable energy storage. However, the Port's ability to attract companies is directly tied to available infrastructure. 3. How will this project improve local infrastructure capacity? Currently the Airport only has eighteen (18) T -Hangars and eight (8) box hangars. The T -Hangars provide storage for Aircraft Design Group (ADG) I aircraft, while the existing box hangars (old alert hangars, 70' x 701, 65' door width) provide storage for smaller Group 11 aircraft. These facilities are full and there is an existing waiting list for additional hangars. Existing Box and T -Hangar demand includes facilities for ADG I up through ADG III aircraft. In addition to needing more aircraft storage, the existing T -hangars and Box Hangars are 1970 and 1950 vintage, and are in need of replacement. The proposed Southwest Hangar Facility anticipates the development of a future complex of taxillanes and varying hangar sizes to support ADG I to ADG III aircraft. These new hangars would replace the existing T -Hangars as well as provide increased storage "capacity. The area is located west of the terminal ramp and Taxiway Bravo, and is designated as an Aviation Development (AD) area as indicated on the Grant County International Airport Land Use Drawing (ALP Sheet 22). A conceptual layout of the proposed site was developed as part of a master planning effort conducted in 2019. 4. Will the project result in training or other opportunities for the local workforce? E Yes If yes, please describe: Lifeflight desired to be the first tenant within the Phase 1 development area of the project. The facility will include a heliport and provide for approximately 15 employees immediately. Additional development of the project would provide for similar opportunities to businesses and individuals with similar employment opportunities. Additionally, keeping planes coming to this airport will provide ancillary local workforce opportunities for other tenants at the airport who provide services such as aviation fuel supply and maintenance. S. Will the project build and/or strengthen strategic alliances or partnerships? M Yes The Port's current utility infrastructure has been at capacity for several years and this impedes the Port's ability to attract new and emerging companies in our growing community. The Port currently has a shortfall of $750.,000 to complete an infrastructure expansion project which would put the Port is in a great position to attract several new companies to the region thanks to incentive's from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). However, companies looking to locate in Moses Lake, including renewable energy companies, are apprehensive due to the lack of basic infrastructure and expect the Port to provide this utility. The Port doesn't have the infrastructure built to the capacity needs of what new industries are seeking to locate here. Attracting and retaining companies to expand and bring economic vitality to the region is our mantra and this project would fulfill that. For the Port, this infrastructure investment is a big ask that would yield longevous careers and the return on investment will be tremendous for the Moses Lake community. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application 6. How many full-time,, permanent jobs will be created and/or retained as a direct result of this project? a) Retained? Current onsite employees are 8 b) Created in 1-3 years? 15 fu litime jobs c) Additional created in 3-5 years? Estimate undertermined due to the number of phases. d) Wage rates for jobs created and/or retained? 7. What is the size of the population that will benefit from this project? 102..123 8. What quantifiable outcomes are you going to track to measure the success of this project? L Job Creation —The primary mission of the Port of Moses Lake is to promote economic development through job creation and retention. Job creation is not a means to an end, and requires continued investment into assets that Will retain employers and employees in the local economy. ii. Revenue Support —The GLIA Airport Master Plan provides that revenue support activities help to: a. Minimize 'incompatible uses adjacent to the airfield and provide; b. Revenue support to the GLIA and; c. Provides for opportunities for ancillary services provided for use of the runways and tenant services. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (fight_coples total) to: Grant County EDC, 6.594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies .Oft - - Gront County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application 1, When did or will you start work on the project? The project began in 2014 during the Airport Master Plan update. From there, ongoing discussion with the FAA and Port staff provided for preliminary review of land uses within the SW hangar site and other alternative locations. Through that additional analysis., it was confirmed that the ideal location for the project is in its present location. In 2020, the project had a technical memorandum prepared outlining the project components. Initial project for grading of Phase I and It areas occurred in 2021 with Taxilane development of Phase I area occurring in 2022. Ongoing development of the utilities within the development began in 2022, providing a schematic design level for utilities infrastructure. 2. How many months will the work on this project take to complete? This phase? Six (6) months It is currently estimated that the entire project development will take up to 60 months to complete. This phase of the project is estimated to take 6 months to develop and up to 6 months for construction activities, though the initial schedule aims to beat those estimates. 3. Please describe what steps are necessary to begin this project or this phase if you are proposing a multi -phase project: (Please be specific) L Design Activities: Complete design detail of water, sewer and storm facilities to serve the entire project. li, Perthit Activities: Complete environmental and grading permits as required. Environmental permitting is assumed to be minimal, if required, based on the .NEPA categorical exemption previously received. i i L Bid Services: Complete bid set plans and specifications following a public works process. iv. Pre -Construction Requirements : Contractor to meet contractual obligations & Pre -Construction i requirements. v. Construction Phase: Contractor to build vi. Post Construction/Acceptance Phase'. Close out., punch list, and contractual obligations. Beginning of warranty period. 4, Summarize efforts taken to date in. terms of project funding: a) Amount and source of funds? Federal funding has been sought however, itis currently unavailable. b) Matching funds? No additional matching funds available 0 if conditions are attached to any of these funds, please describe. N/A So What engineering reports and feasibility studies have prepared? a) When? June, 2020 b) With what recommendations? Century West Engineering, Southwest Hangar Development Area Technical Memorandum iM Recommendations: Design Recommendations & Criteria basis of design, Elevation - restrict -ion requirements, etc. While not directly related to this project site, the Maul Foster Alongi, Port of Moses Lake Westside Employment Center, Economic Feasibility Study, has been informally adopted to include the SW Hangar site for decision making purposes. Please submit original, signed applicotion with seven copies (gight.cogies total) to,, - Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application 1. When: December 2018 2. Recommendations : Economic feasibility and marketability of WEC areas allows the Port of Moses Lake to continue serving the growing market for the aviation and aerospece sector. iii. SEPA was completed for the project under SEPA Register #202105085 and received a DNS/Adopt, DCE. 1. When: August 2021 2. Recommendations: Requirements for Hazardous Waste &Toxics Reductions Program for demolition activities., Water Quality Program requirements mitigation per the SEPA checklist. 6, What permits are necessary for the project? (Please list with approval dates) i. Utility Connection/ Use: PoML Private /City of Moses Lake ii, Grading Permit: Grant County iii. Building Permit: As defined by agency of jurisdiction. iv. Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSWGP) i.Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 2.Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Plan (TESL) v. All Permit required would be submitted per design of the facilities for approval to the agency, likely prior to or during the bid services stage of development. 7, Are there other factors significant to this project that we should be aware of? No a) Emergency declarations.? b) Regulatory compliance issues? c) inability to secure alternate funds? d) Other? 8, If your project receives a commitment for an SIP grant or loan, when will you need the funds? As soon as they are available. 9. Identify funds (General Fund, Utility Fund, Property taxes, etc,,) that are eligible to repay a SIP loan, General Fund 10. In the context of the local government's overall annual budget, explain the need for SIP assistance. It the applicant has reserve funds or budget reserves, please explain why these funds are not available for the project. There are no "reserve dollars," if funding the project is declined it will be placed onhold until fundm'g becomes available and are approved forcing the Life Flight hangar into an unknown future. Ig Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (!2* htcogies total) to: Grant County EDC,, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Local and Regional Support & Investment for the Project 1. Are Cities,, Port Districts,, the County, Schools, or other entities involved in funding the project? No 2. Are there any regional, State, or Federal funds being used for the project? No 3. What is the private sector investment in the project? LifeFlight (an air ambulance service) currently operates their business from two(2) separate facilities — the company would like to bring both operations to the Port, which can provide a range of services that cannot be provided at their other facilities. Proving LifeFfight with a centralized station at the Port would decrease response times to their service area of all Central Washington and would ultimately save lives. LifeFfight has committed to occupancy once the first -phase is complete. 4. What is the local investment in the project from clubs and other organizations (non-government)? None 5. Is there other support or investment in the project not covered above? No Please submit original., signed application with seven copies (gight coo es ta P1. _t. 11 to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake., WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Progrom Application Attachments 1. Economic Development Section of the Comprehensive Plan listing the public facility 2. Project Budget: Please attach a copy of your complete project budget. Attach or include your specific budget for use of SIP funds. Please list all identified revenue sources and the dollar amounts and list whether they are committed or requested. 3. Property Plat, Building Plans: Please attach copies of a property plat with project location clearly shown .on the plat. Please attach engineer's drawings or at least a good drawing of the project for committee review. 4. Letters of support: If applicable please include any letters of support for this project form partners or others entities in the community. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (gi-ght c6gies total) to: Grant County EDC,, 6594 Patton Blvd NE; Moses Lake., WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies February 27, 2023 The Honorable Patty Murray United States Senate 154 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Dan Newhouse United States House of Representatives 504 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 The Honorable Maria Cantwell United States Senate 511 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senators Murray and Cantwell and Representative Newhouse: I am writing on behalf of Life Flight Network to support the FY24 appropriations request submitted by the Port of Moses Lake. The Port is seeking federal funds for utility infrastructure, to include but not limited to water, sewer, and power to support the Port's economic development mission, which "includes supporting the expansion plans of companies currently located in Moses Lake and attracting new businesses to the region. All this will support the Pott's long-standing efforts to create good -paying jobs in rural Washington. 4-� The Port of Moses Lake has a long history of generating economic activity M' the region, having supported the growth of several 'industries, including aerospace, renewable energy, manufacturing and advanced technology. With respect to the aerospace industry, the Port is m* a great position to attract several new companies to the region thanks to federal incentives provided through Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). While prospective companies and private developers have indicated their intent to construct their own facilities, the expectation is that basic utility infrastructure (including water, sewer, and power) should be provided by the Port. This means the Port's ability to attract additional business activity to the region and create jobs is contingent upon their ability to build upon existing infrastructure investment already made by the Porto While the Port has invested millions of dollars to build the infrastructure needed to support new 0 10, 'A a business growth, additional infrastructure is needed. Unfortunately, the Port is limitect m how quickly it can make these investments given its limited annual operating budget. In other words, this request for federal funding will allow the port to support new business growth and job creation on an expedited timeline, while also mitigating the risk of losing business opportunities caused by a delay M' making the necessary infrastructure investments. I hope you will support this important funding request. Sincerely, Jacob Riedel I Customer Service Manager Mobile 509-630-4136 Jr1.ede1@,1ifef1.ight.,o,M � www. Life Flig htpM 14 Automated Ag February 23, 2023 Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program (SIP) c/o Grant County Economic Development Council 6594 Patton Blvd. NE Moses Lake, WA. 98837 Dear Council Members: I am writing on behalf of Automated Ag and Two J's Aviation, to support the FY24 appropriations request submitted by the Port of Moses fake, The Port is seeking federal funds for utility infrastructure, to include but not limited to water, sewer, and power to support the Port's economic development mission, which includes supporting the expansion plans of companies currently located in Moses Lake and attracting new businesses to the region. All this will support the Port's long-standing ettbrts to create good -paying Jobs in rural Washington. The Port of Moses Lake has a long history of generating economic activity in the region, having supported the growth of several industries, including aerospace, renewable energy, manufacturing and advanced technology. With respect to the aerospace industry, the Port is in a great position to attract several new companies to the region thanks to federal -incentives provided through Inflation Reduction Act (IIIA). While prospective companies and private developers have indicated their intent to construct their own facilities, the expectation is that basic utility infrastructure (including water, sewer, and power) should be provided by the Port. This means the Port's ability to attract additional business activity to the region and create jobs is contingent upon `their ability to build upon existing 'infrastructure investment already made by the Port. While the Port has invested millions of dollars to build the infrastructure needed to support new business growth additional infrastructure is needed. Unfortunately, the Port is limited in how quickly it can make these investments given its limited annual operating budget. In other words, this request for federal funding will allow the port to support new business growth and job creation on an expedited timeline, while also mitigating the risk of losing business opportunities caused by a delay in making the necessary infrastructure investments. I hope you will support this 'important funding request. Sincerely, Kelly & John "B" Dagorret s YP , h -. 1 •. 4 .,,>r.. .,.�� va,•wo F( t� Y u n {�� f 1t ��f ••J ; l 3 F) i i F i i i i F L. � y jj ♦' rvih -f t > t.... ,. "sz t ni x i N. 1. .. Y r h�. 'Rr �1• `1, may. 'w, k5 •'S x r ` , t � Y fv A , s A.. ` r?a ai y. Co , yy x : ,S ,e e .• to ��\' y w ,M �.a• vtyry a, f y. � r 3�� or A/CI ! t 1AOG P M j t T s \ m•• \ r i /i W 99t R p AAAA dlA p ay x & Y 1I '�v f .. '� \ �� lY SV i ft�VtfHrw Y+:.[L�li� ft* U y�� .t �: � V .. \`W -r 1 ; �.i '�-.,�`•`*i�! �� {mat"! ,i;`\I 5' .,�. 11111W_ w r 9 C 4 t Note,.r U tx �F+rl 74 k • 7- ' .,Y :. ,:\rt •s �'• 4 -- x•.a,+, . vrt i, a+w.we^» : e as W a'.) x ,a.Nn \* x' wr v \ 4 :• 2 \4' t 1t< Y " .k > .c. �.. � ,n L t'8.. f ?, ,. •r,.+� ...\t. P 'F t v\ i �,t....vr ...:; .>:.. .,, +<\ ..:: .... .. .. .:..... ;' .. i;A•f .',r\ ua. <, S.., 1. .., .. > ,, ,. .n ^W, .:';a.k nea w^ '. Mi` h', a,.::i `. r:': >.�, 4s�h'�r r.x«.w.« • .aw«,•.�« �� .:� t.: \ �.\'za,, � fi: �'' M ` n 3 :: \^`'� \" .\ . vot ' `�\ e v: ..,. .,. .,. .P e... .. '. .\ . \ .,., . ,.. uF 1 A. r. rx'at. .r; r. ,,, a SA` .Y.?8 U:•„ \, a i" ,,. . .: : :... >- .f: -a s ..Ti .,,Yr ,, $_ )�,. .,.<, ., , .k ... \ .-.: .: \ ':s 1';. y,.-.;1v.^a-, .x:,. wv .r h... ,\e .. n. a•v'�F< .. a,. .i. .... .... >: ,� ,W . R.. °p1 , 7 .: ,,,.. , n \5': ... ,. ,t, :.:.; :, "L4 ...;, t .. 2. .r •. , 4�.1h` <,�` ,:.,..,, :, > .y '1 fix,, �,�. �• ;�a�'r�:' .,n. :,.. , ..>..,, r�,..\'„a\ {g,?aNr ..9 ;.,,. e.i ,. r ..: �.:,.. .. t..,. �•� +, � t . : •: .. ?e ,F. as � ��>¢. s a.Z't `Uck'\?. , t ♦ ;:. ,..., `.',.x r t e2 -aa �� m \ \ �; ..sx ..� 3- '+:r�>',\,'�o>a F,>, .,`�, ��t4 '�\. ,'V„ ... „,n fyA•. '` :.a `� >. :. \. ,v '.ri`..r>>°e . „�n;�'w 0th , r\'o 7'.� „ s „v -i. ��,.:., .o�a.P�. r ,n(<�< ,,.: �. . �r;F•,v” `�ny,�,., �.1°�t. �' a " •, \Y`a'> i, ; t n., ':.t w sA� y r a �t� a`iir7 'rx'" �• ,f ''�;,. .��'s,�`n. ;,. _. '.- ., ,. ,.. �i?A?X . fi. :t 'c \ :,t „ 5 v3a.+: t.. c M, 1 r� '`� � {.t� Ly �< � !'' r a: is 1 k„ \$` �x4 � b c Wa o •. � s A:•:ei ;2.s ;rt" }e �' :, ;er'`\ � � � Cs v nt�� 4 ..,ry ,.t: ';:: \! '\' ,�\#r. \.. .fit t,..._ ..,,r:, :Y '..; \ t >,-'(?."' t\t•., .X. An h \ , ... 1. L rr.. .. `� ... .. , ... t i t f. t- f sr r< . \'r., „ .., r. .-'�:. "{.'_.`'A .. :?\ ton "-- :, '. . r• ^. t a.P +R �IpY n t x r w R 2 CY> F i its y \� 5 V x J 1 ! D a S C 1 f f .{ ! P P a P \ \ y 1 t b \ +LA t srf U i \ 1 x Y' x CY . rr < t Y a tf, , x y 1� N ! X S c` \ zf C c w f « t A � 1 ,C w b t t t J s>, A tJ 3 8 e, z d i Y c r<•, y'� ra 7' 'a t Y 1 • 2 a Z Y,.n A a A \i Y i- \L a`P \ 4�Y wt .a .rv�x '!m"�`^?'�"x•^ar�`:"..�!° :h`?�.'�`Yw1.Y`�!Yt... ta'aV)tlle4�ati�4t�5VA�.,ks`a?'i.�;ti;u,�'�ne x .:. $""�,' 'tay. iF�,,. _:lR, ._.. ._.., GRANT n+ N -71Y N T R:NAT NAL R.P -P,, , h -. 1 •. 4 .,,>r.. .,.�� va,•wo F( t� Y u H. Q 2 + a h, {�� f 1t ��f g v X w 1 y jj ♦' rvih -f t i i s 1Y R 7 "sz t ni x i N. 1. .. Y r h�. 'Rr �1• `1, may. 'w, k5 •'S x r ` ,i rtl � a, �' , n ,wt \g.'. r �r Y fv A , s A.. C a �x i�1� �+�, t ,k u, w) a• x a "� ' �s° .. az r?a ai y. Co , yy x : ,S ,e e .• to ��\' y w ,M �.a• vtyry a, f y. � r 3�� or A/CI ! t 1AOG A. f: I k •� t S , 1 .x u< f A ` T -i .'�,+ ,�•,�+�.. a:` ' �{{, [1'017 ,\ 1' i } j F ,� A s i E yy .LAS _ � f .. 77 S- :J'7'l LL M t �l a T s \ m•• \ r i /i W 99t R p !k.,t„ ,� ,) .\ ,ATO`. •� :y„� p ay x & Y 1I '�v f .. '� \ �� lY SV i ft�VtfHrw Y+:.[L�li� ft* U y�� .t �: � V .. \`W -r 1 ; �.i '�-.,�`•`*i�! �� {mat"! ,i;`\I 5' 5„ `Fv i iM'� m4 R, p Pit w r 9 C 4 t Note,.r U tx �F+rl 74 k • c+ � 1 k,A \ :_r fttti T iS• i Y m N �l u y L. �1. ,K � Y ,r r � �j�{ bV eofaIHeee1+a 2 Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program A l ica n Cover Sheet Date-, April 14,. 2023 Grant County SIP Number. Applicant Grant County Public Hospital District #4 Address-, 127 2tid Ave SW d/b/a,McKay Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Contact Name: Sam Cole City,* Soap Lake --- - -- Title: Administrator State, Zip: Washington, 98851 Signature of par sonau- U u, rizing submittal, Phone* (509) 246-1111 Position of person authorizing submittal: Fax ChiefOperat* P.. I.Lg.Onicer Email** samcole@mckayhealthcare.org A, I Project Title: Phase I - Architecture and Engineering Site Plan Population of the community* 1,551 (U,S.C.B., 2020) Total area popu lation served bv the r+ jecti.Grant Coun!y , The County 'is required to report to the State Auditors Office the estimated number of businesses L and jobs J that will be created and/or retained by this projea, Retained businesses and *obs Mea11 s bus*nesses,and jobs n that Will be lost if not for the completion of the project, How .manybusine - sses will be created and/or retained by this project? _25 locally retained Now many jobs will be created and/or, retained by this proiect"? , 45 at McKaYi - dozens more local What comprehensive plan lists this project as an item in its econom I ic develop pm- section? Grant County Com p.rehensive Plan U Comprehensive plan of the city or town of Type of Public Facility: (check all that apply) 0 Bridge 0 Road 0 Domestic Water Facility 0 Industrial Water Facility 0 Sanitary Sewer Facility 0 Earth Stabi'lization es E3 Storm Sewer Facilities 0 Railroads 0 Electrical Facilities 0 Natural Gas Facilities X Buildings 0 Structures 0 Telecom m unicatilons Infrastructure El Tra'nsportation Infrastructure 0 Port Facilities 0 Commercialinfrastructure Fund1nJ!L is needed for: (check all that apply) 0 capital facilities costs includi ing acquisition, construction, rehabi'litation, alteration,expans' ion, or improvements of public facilities i ies 0 project specific env* ironmental costs 0 costs of site plan and analysis nalysis 0 development and improve ment for the public facilities 0 project des,ign, inCluding feasibility and marketing studies and plans, and debt revenue impact analysis -0 lard .use and permitting costs Total project cost:*$400 1000 Total SIP request to date for$0 project, Amount raised to -date: $0 Current SIP Loan R equest: $0 Current SIP Grant Ret# ues L * $4001000 .q S Previous I 'IP JoCin Request.* $0 Previous $IP Front Request.- $400 . . .. .... 000 is this a phased 'in Project? Yes X No 13 If Yes, how many phases? 3 During how many years? 10 ect is currentlyin phase; . . .... LL' Please, complete MIS form on your computer using Microsoft Word. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies el ht cqpies total to* - 'rant County EDC -- ------- r \L 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837 Phone: 509-764-6579 1 t Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Grant County Strategic Infrastructure Program Application Eligibility Requirements The Strategic Infrastructure Program fund is available because of a state program authorized by the legislature in 1997 (RCW 82.14.370). The legislature has established eligibility requirements for using these funds: FIRST: Funds can only be used to finance "public facilities" such as "bridges, roads, domestic and industrial water facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, earth stabilization, storm sewer facilities, railroads, electrical facilities, natural gas facilities, research, testing, training, and incubation facilities in innovation partnership zones designated under RCW 43.330.270, buildings, structures, telecommunications infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, or commercial infrastructure, and port facilities in the state of Washington." RCW 82.14.370(3) (c)(i). SECOND: The public facility must also serve "economic development purposes," which is defined as "those purposes which facilitate the creation or retention of businesses and jobs in a county." RCW 82.14.370(3)(a), (c)(ii). THIRD: Finally, to be eligible for funding: "The public facility must be listed as an item in the officially adopted county overall economic development plan, or the economic development section of the county's comprehensive plan, or the comprehensive plan of a city or town located within the county for those counties planning under RCW 36.70A.040. For those counties that do not have an adopted overall economic development plan and do not plan under the growth management act, the public facility must be .listed in the county's capital facilities plan or the capital facilities plan of a city or town located within the county." RCW 82.14.370(3)(x). Eligibility Checklist: 1. Yes X No ❑ This request is for a "public facility as described above. 2. Yes X No ❑ The public facility facilitates the creation or retention of businesses and jobs in Grant County. 3. Yes X No ❑ The public facility is listed as an item in the economic development section of Grant County's comprehensive plan OR Yes ❑ No X the public facility is listed as an item in the economic development section of the comprehensive plan of a City or Town located within Grant County. If the answer to all three questions is yes please proceed with the application process. If the answer to any of the three questions is no, the project is not eligible to receive funding from this program. 3 Economic Impact of the Project 1. What economic goals and/or objectives (identified in the comprehensive plan) does this project help the community achieve? Grant County Public Hospital District #4 doing business as McKay Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center (McKay) is a long-term care and skilled nursing facility in rural Soap Lake, Washington. McKay has a strategic vision to support underserved and marginalized seniors in the region with the development of a comprehensive senior living community. The project is broken into three phases over 10 years and consists of (Phase 1A and B) a unit conversion and wing addition project; (Phase 2A) an assisted living/memory care wing; (Phase 213) an initial independent and assisted living arrangements; (Phase 3A) additional independent living and affordable housing project; and (Phase 313) senior living amenities like dining services, community spaces, outpatient therapy, and a variety of specialty clinics. Once complete, the senior living community will facilitate the continuum of care model on McKay's 22 -acre property, bringing critical rural health infrastructure to Soap Lake and rural communities in Grant County. McKay's senior living community project is included in "Appendix J" as an amendment to the Grant County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment was approved by the Grant County Planning Commission in September 2022 and Board of County Commissioners on November 22, 2022. The new appendix section "Appendix J — Strategic Infrastructure Program Eligible Projects" includes a list of McKay's projects which support the directives in Goal 3.3.6 "Economic Development" of the Grant County Comprehensive Plan, as well as Chapter 5 "Economic Development Element" in its entirety. Following the completion of the ZBA feasibility and capital needs ass retai es or arc iineerin s that are required for project construction. First, ZBA identified a need for development of a site plan with sufficient design and engineering analysis to meet the community's future needs and to comply with the City of Soap Lake's zoning code for a planned development. (McKay Healthcare is currently a, grandfathered or non -conforming use under the R-1 single family residence zoning code classification and that has to be addressed before any development can take place). Second, ZBA identified a need to complete the pre -design work / concept development work for the main facility through a facilitated stakeholder driven process to achieve McKay Healthcare's goals with staff and community support. This work would include schematic level drawings, structural feasibility analysis of interior modifications, cost estimating and concept renderings. This process will set the stage for the final design and construction process. Economic impacts of this project will be felt by the number of jobs directly maintained and those that will be created through McKay's continuous operations and future expansion in capacity and services. Currently, McKay employs 48 staff within several departments including nursing services, business office, housekeeping, facilities, activities, social services, and administration. The organization is the second largest employer in Soap Lake and is a well-established pillar in the community. In addition to retaining existing staff, engineering and architecture planning will allow McKay to move forward onto Phases 2 and 3 of its comprehensive Facility Master Plan, creating several indirect local jobs for construction and/or the completed facility's operations, routine maintenance, repairs, and service. Furthermore, the project aligns with President Biden's Build Back Better Plan nd will achieve the nation's goal to invest in our elderly. The engineering a d architecture planning will support McKay's efforts to continue providing essential long-term and skilled nursing care services to severely underserved and rural aging and disabled populations in Grant County. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies 2. How will this project foster economic growth, development, and address future economic needs? Beyond meeting urgent healthcare needs, the completed senior living community and rural health infrastructure project will bring important economic growth to the region. Soap Lake, a small rural community in Grant County is home to an estimated 1,551 residents; 26.8% of the population is 65 or older, 11% are veterans, 66.3% are white, and 30.3% Hispanic. The region maintains a unique history and geology and attracts visitors during the summer months for its healing waters, outdoor recreation, and proximity to other tourist and wine destinations. Completion of McKay's Facility Master Plan projects and the resulting dynamic senior living community will entice retirees, seniors, and their families to move to the area for its affordable housing, wonderful weather, sense of community, small- town amenities, and continuum of care services. 3. How will this project improve local infrastructure capacity? The engineering and architecture site planning documents are an essential prerequisite for the bidding, permitting, and actual construction of McKay's unit modernization renovation and/or expansion and a new wing. Engineering/site plan documents will ensure the project has a comprehensive project plan that takes into consideration risk, quality, communication, finance, and resources, among other things. An approved site plan will also signify the project's readiness to receive other grant funding. Architectural renderings will illustrate what the renovation or expansion will look like, supporting McKay's efforts to effectively communicate the project vision and goals to community and funding partners. In Grant County, 14% of the population is 65 or older and there are only 239 nursing home beds — 256 less than the 2024 need projected by Washington State Department of Health. This next stage of the project is designed to improve infrastructure for the aging population residing in Grant County. Updated and expanded facilities, including reconfigured space and additional wings and housing options, will dramatically increase the number of private rooms available and create a balanced physical environment for residents, further reducing the chances for illness and other virus outbreaks. As McKay's senior living community expands to facilitate a continuum of care model, residents here will be able to transition seamlessly to other types of residences, have timely access to care appropriate for their specific health conditions, improving their overall quality of life. Increased private rooms and private pay residents will also positively influence McKay's revenue, ensuring organizational financial sustainability and peace of mind for locals currently or prospectively seeking medical and/or senior housing close to home and all that is familiar. 4. Will the project result in training or other opportunities for the local workforce? X Yes ❑ No If yes, please describe: Completion of engineering and architectural planning documents are the basis for McKay"s long-term vision to expand low-income senior living infrastructure and capacity. The proposed unit modernization and new construction projects will support employment growth locally and county -wide that will result in a distinct and immediate need for additional trained, certified, and licensed personnel including nurses, certified nurse assistances, and certified medication aides. Later phases of the larger project, including renovation of current buildings and construction of new buildings will further support local businesses and workforce. 5. Will the project build and/or strengthen strategic alliances or partnerships? X Yes ❑ No If yes, please describe the alliance and/or partnerships: (agencies, volunteers, etc.): McKay currently collaborates with two other agencies to provide its full spectrum of services: TeamHealth and Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies W RehabVisions. TeamHealth is based in Spokane and provides McKay with a Medical Director who oversees clinical operations through bi-weekly visits. A nurse practitioner provides telehealth visits bi- weekly to each patient. McKay also contracts physical, speech, and occupational therapists from RehabVisions for specialized resident care. Engineering and architecture planning is the critical next step in McKay's long-term strategy to support these and other service providers in their efforts to provide efficient and sustained care to residents. It will also strengthen existing strategic alliances established between McKay leadership and leaders from other skilled nursing facilities, as they seek to find ways to improve the quality and availability of services for aging populations, low-income senior housing resources, and rural community health needs. The engineering and architecture services will provide McKay with comprehensive documents that will support the board and staff's efforts to build, leverage, and strengthen funding partnerships for the next phases of the overall project. McKay has partnered with the Columbia Basin Foundation (CBF) to assist with fundraising outreach and grant writing. Together, the two organizations have raised over $2 million in philanthropic and grant support toward Phase I of McKay's Facility Master Plan. These funding relationships will be key in raising new dollars and support for the larger senior living community project. 6. How many full-time, permanent jobs will be created and/or retained as a direct result of this project? a) Retained? 48 at McKay; dozens in other local businesses as McKay continues to operate. b) Created? in 1-3 years? Approximately 7-9 FTE including registered nurses and certified nursing assistants at McKay following the addition of a wing and expanded services as part of Phases 1 and 2. c) Additional created in 3-5 years? Approximately 10-12 FTE for McKay including licensed and certified roles following the addition of multiple wings and expanded services as part of Phases 2 and 3. d) Wage rates for jobs created and/or retained? Licensed nursing positions can earn between $26 and $40 per hour depending on licensure, skill, and experience. Entry level and certified positions range from minimum wage to $17 per hour. To attract top performers to an updated and expanded facility, wage rates could increase by five to 10% over time. 7. What is the size of the population that will benefit from this project? Grant County, Washington is home to 97,733 residents, of which 14% or 13,682 people are age 65 or older. In addition, 8.9% or 8,698 people are under age 65 and living with a disability. In Soap Lake, a community of 1,551, 27% of the population is 65 or older and the median age is 42.5. As these individuals age or their health conditions worsen, they will look to long-term care and skilled nursing facilities to meet their healthcare, residential, and social needs, particularly those in rural Grant County. 8. What quantifiable outcomes are you going to track to measure the success of this project? Completion of the engineering and architecture planning documents is the next step in McKay's unit modernization and senior living community capital improvement plan. Afully vetted and community supported site plan and preliminary design documents will support staff, leaders, and partners secure additional funding necessary for the project's final design and construction which is expected to have the following anticipated outcomes: 1. An increase in long-term care, skilled nursing, assisted living, and memory care options for residents in Grant County. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies G a. Measured by the number of beds, rooms, and types of services available at McKay. 2. An enhanced quality of life for residents at McKay. a. Measured by pre- and post- construction surveys that gauge current resident satisfaction with privacy, their physical environment, and their health and well-being among other things. b. Also measured by McKay's ability to effectively prevent and/or mitigate the spread of infectious disease and virus outbreaks. Progress will be tracked by McKay's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (Administrator) and evaluated by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis during the grant period. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Project Readiness 1. When did or will you start work on the project? The engineering and architecture planning is expected to be completed in 10 months. We will start as soon as funding is secured. 2. How many months will the work on this project take to complete? This phase? The engineering and architecture planning will take approximately 10 months to complete. This facet of this project is included in Phase I of McKay's 10 -year, three-phase, Facility Master Plan, which is expected to be complete by December 2023. 3. Please describe what steps are necessary to begin this project or this phase if you are proposing a multi -phase project: (Please be specific) To begin the engineering and architecture planning facet of this project, McKay needs to: 1) Select a qualified architecture and engineering firm based on submission of a Request for Qualifications. 2) Negotiate a contract with the selected firm. 3) Award a contract to the selected firm. 4) Begin the engineering and architectural planning facet of this project. After funding award, the portion of the scope of work relating to facilitated discussion of goals, community outreach and buy -in on final design and site plan may proceed separately under a negotiated contract. 4. Summarize efforts taken to date in terms of project funding: a) Amount and source of funds? McKay has not received other funding to date for this part of the Phase I project. However, staff, leadership, and nonprofit partners have diligently and successfully secured funding for other components of Phase I facility improvements and modernization including over $2 million in grants and contributions to purchase an emergency generator and bus, upgrade kitchen equipment, install entrance signage, improve the residents' outdoor area, and launched a redesigned website and branding. If awarded $400,000 for this project, it will allow McKay to complete a major project in the development phase of a senior living community in the heart of Grant County. Grants and donations from federal funding sources such as Grant County American Rescue Plan Funding, foundations like the Paul Lauzier Foundation, and other major donors will assist in the construction of the comprehensive project. b) Matching funds? N/A c) If conditions are attached to any of these funds, please describe N/A 5. What engineering reports and feasibility studies have prepared? a) When? McKay worked with Critical Data Strategies, LLC to conduct a market feasibility study and needs assessment for organization expansion. The study was completed in August 2021. McKay also consulted with ZBA Architecture to complete at feasibility and capital needs assessment. That study was completed in April 2023. b) With what recommendations? Critical Data Strategics determined the four following options are viable at for McKay to pursue: 1) expansion of current facility 2) adult family homes 3) low- income senior housing and 4) memory care center in current McKay facility. The cost to develop and operate the current facility was deemed the most viable option, followed by the Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies construction of additional low-income senior housing. The full feasibility study is available upon request. The finding of the ZBA feasibility plan was to proceed with a robust design plan detailed in their attached report, Appendix C. 6. What permits are necessary for the project? (Please list with approval dates). The goal of the site plan is to obtain zoning approval for the planned development by December 30, 2023. This will permit future development and project construction to procced. Other permits (e.g. building and grading permits) may be required as a result of those efforts. 7. Are there other factors significant to this project that we should be aware of? a) Emergency declarations? COVID-19 Global Pandemic b) Regulatory compliance issues? N/A c) Inability to secure alternate funds. N/A d) Other? N/A 8. If your project receives a commitment for an SIP grant or loan, when will you need the funds? If awarded, McKay would need $400,000 to begin the engineering and architecture planning by May 2023 and to complete the same by December 30, 2023. . 9. Identify funds (General Fund, Utility Fund, Property taxes, etc.) that are eligible to repay a SIP loan. N/A 10. In the context of the local government's overall annual budget, explain the need for SIP assistance. It the applicant has reserve funds or budget reserves, please explain why these funds are not available for the project. Considering the Medicaid reimbursement rate is substantially below the costs of providing 24-hour skilled nursing services, the high variability among Medicare, private pay, and other income sources, McKay cannot effectively budget for capital facilities projects. In addition, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation, and other socioeconomic circumstances, the costs for professional services such as architecture, engineering, and consulting have dramatically increased making it even more necessary to secure support from other private and public philanthropic sources. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies 1J Local and Regional Support & Investment for the Project 1. Are Cities, Port Districts, the County, Schools, or other entities involved in funding the project? No 2. Are there any regional, State, or Federal funds being used for the project? Not at this time, however, McKay will con ' dditional American Rescue Plan Funding through Grant Count for support of this comprehensive building project. 3. What is the private sector investment in the project? There are currently no private sector funds secured for this specific project. McKay will consider approaching local or regional corporate foundations for support. 4. What is the local investment in the project from clubs and other organizations (non-government)? There are currently no other local investments in this project. However, McKay plans to solicit local and regional private, public, and community nonprofit foundations and/or individual donors for grants and contributions to fully fund this project. 5. Is there other support or investment in the project not covered above? No Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies 10 Attachments 1 1. Economic Development Section of the Comprehensive Plan listing the public facility. See Appendix A, Grant County Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Public Notice of Application. 2. Project Budget: Please attach a copy of your complete project budget. Attach or include your specific budget for use of SIP funds. Please list all identified revenue sources and the dollar amounts and list whether they are committed or requested. See Appendix B, Project Budget 3. Property Plat, Building Plans: Please attach copies of a property plat with project location clearly shown on the plat. Please attach engineer's drawings or at least a good drawing of the project for committee review. See Appendix C, McKay Property Plat and Building Plans. 4. Letters of support: If applicable please include any letters of support for this project from partners or other entities in the community. See Appendix D. Please submit original, signed application with seven copies (eight copies total) to: Grant County EDC, 6594 Patton Blvd. NE; Moses Lake, WA 98837; Phone: 509-764-6579 Please include attachments and supplemental materials in each of the copies Attachment 3: Project Boundary Maps and Building Concept Plans TerraScan MapSifter - Grant County Washington https:Hgrantwa-mapsifter.publicaccessnow.com/defaultHTML5.aspx 1 of 1 4/13/237 11:57 AM w M Ream The McKay foundation & Columbia Rasin Foundation -present.... MASTM RMNING: RfrURE MSION FOR HEALTHCARE CLOSE TO HOME V00own kwo* PtAqf W4 Mom* *wI aNvog. A uewwft w III —W, vr4topw4wt 14Vi 9R0rso ------------ OUR FAMILY CARING FOR YOURS N ----------- ------------------ LIZ --------- -- She plan, to W 40th pt fa V00own kwo* PtAqf W4 Mom* *wI aNvog. A uewwft w III —W, vr4topw4wt 14Vi 9R0rso ------------ OUR FAMILY CARING FOR YOURS N -� i icy _ . Attachment 2: Project Budget from ZBA Architects and Final Report 49 1. Architects and engineering services to include: • Site plan - $300,000 • Main building design feasibility, and consensus development. $100,000, (All funds are requested) Z B A A R C N I 7 E C T U R E April 7, 2023 McKay Healthcare 127 2"d Ave SW PO Box 819 Soap Lake, WA 98851 Re: Capital Needs Assessment & Modernization Feasibility Study To Superintendent and Commissioners: 421 W, RIVERSIDE SUITE 860 SPOKANE, WA 99201 ZMARCH ITECTU ISE. COM t, 509.456,8236 ZBA was hired to analyze the scope of a modernization project for the McKay Healthcare and Rehabilitation Facility, a public facility located in Soap Lake, Washington. This analysis assumed a small new wing to increase the number of single -bed rooms while maintaining the total number of licensed beds. The goal of the report was to provide a comparison of the'cost of current capital needs (including modernization), versus the cost of comparable new construction. The results of this study show that both options appear to have relatively the same overall cost. Given that information, McKay has determined they want to proceed to renovate or modernize portions of the existing building, in addition to building a new wing. Identifying which portions of the building to salvage will be determined based on the priorities for the project, the design and licensing requirements, and which components of the existing building are most feasible for reuse. Additionally, we identified the need to develop a site plan and zoning overlay for the entire 20 plus acre parcel. Since the current zone does not allow the existing use, this process is required before any new construction could occur. Further, McKay has identified some potential future uses that need to be considered within the context of the design for the site and building. Our recommendation for McKay Healthcare is to proceed with a robust design process, as outlined below: 1. Goal Setting + Consensus Building. A goal -setting process will help McKay build consensus around which areas of the building to salvage. Goals for the project and future uses will be identified and prioritized in the context of the overall campus plan. The process will include identifying and engaging with stakeholders. The outcomes from this process can also be a helpful tool for future grant writing, fundraising and community outreach. 2. Schematic Design + Renderings. A Schematic Design study should be conducted, with an in-depth focus on feasibility to identify areas of the existing building to salvage or modernize. This study will integrate information from many sources, including the goal setting outcomes, licensing requirements, engineering, and cost estimating, to ensure that the project is being most efficient with limited funds, while still achieving McKay's highest priority goals. This study would set the stage for the design and construction process. This process would include schematic level drawings, cost estimating and concept renderings. 3. Site Plan + Zoning Process. The goal setting and schematic design work will inform the Planned Development District process required by the City of Soap Lake, prior to any future development on their 20 -acre site. This process will subdivide the lot, identify future uses, provide the necessary zoning overlay, and will include civil engineering for access and utilities. Please find attached the final report, as well as a scope of work and fee estimate with the recommendations listed above. It has been a privilege to work with McKay Healthcare. We look forward to continuing this journey to help you implement an intentional design for your organization, residents, and community. Thank you for the opportunity. Sincerely, Sarah Brede, AIA Associate Architect 2241 7r 421 W. RIVERSIDE SUITE 860 A R C H I T E C T U R E SPOKANE, WA 99201 ZMARCHITI~CTURECOM t. 509.456.8286 McKay Healthcare Pre -Design Services Purpose: The purpose of the McKay Healthcare Pre -Design services is to clarify their goals and priorities; to build consensus around which portions of the building to salvage; to identify which functions would be best located within a new wing; and consider the context of the overall campus plan and future uses. Timeframe: 4-6 months Deliverables: Final deliverable will be a PDF book summarizing the study process. This will include an executive summary of recommendations supported by the Guiding Principles developed by the team, schematic plans, cost estimates, meeting minutes and interview notes. Estimated Fee: Time and materials invoiced on an hourly basis, not to exceed $100,000. Goal Setting +Consensus Building • Identify team + prepare preliminary materials • MEETING: Kick-off meeting o Overview of project, priorities and values (summarize what we know) o Identify what we need to know and key players to interview, stakeholders o Brainstorm Organization/Resident/Community goals, develop project mission statement Develop interview materials and interview key players previously identified o Assumes 3-5 interviews/meetings o Synthesize information into "guiding principals" Using data collected, update the existing site program (see Schematic Design below) including: o Functions, adjacencies, access points, connection opportunities o Produce schematic diagram of site and of each building w/ key functions MEETING: Test for consensus o Present and Review progress and plans o Select preferred option and identify next steps Schematic Design + Renderings • Develop Program list and Adjacency diagrams o functions/spaces, approximate sizes, and preferred adjacencies o create one for campus uses and one at the building level • 2-3 potential schematic options (bubble diagrams) representing the above program information • Analyze/compare potential cost implications for each option • Perform relevant licensing and code research • Engineering analysis as needed for feasibility • MEETING: Programming + Schematic Options Review • Refine leading option(s) with more detail (schematic floor plans) • Include 3D massing as needed for decision-making • Provide final concept renderings :moor zea rr AR CHITEC7t1RF McKay Healthcare Site Plan + Zoning Process Services Purpose: To complete the Planned Development District process as required by the City of Soap Lake, for the 20 - acre parcel. Timeframe: 6-12 months Deliverables: Various levels of site planning, landscape design and engineering are required throughout the city process. The intent for the final product will include road and utility engineering, sub -division of the lot, and completed zoning overlay process. Estimated Fee: $300,000 Site Planning + Zoning Process Process and deliverables will be as required by the Soap Lake Municipal Code 17.67, Planned Development District, which may include but is not limited to the following: • Develop schematic level as -built drawings of existing site • Relevant code research including setbacks, land use, required parking and separations for potential uses • Revise site program based on team feedback (estimate 1-2 revisions) • Project management (by architect) • Attendance and/or presentation materials for public process meetings • Landscape concept plans • Survey • Preliminary topo, property research, and title report findings • Prepare Binding Site Plan • Establish easements, parks, right-of-way dedications • Electrical Engineering for Street lighting • Civil Engineering Scope: o SEPA o Preliminary Application & Maps including: Utility Capacity Studies, Vehicle circulation planning, Pedestrian circulation planning, Open space/hardscape calculations, Stormwater management plan for the campus, Advising on site plan o Final Application & Maps including: Stamped Plans for the main roads, utilities, stormwater management, Attend meetings and hearings, Respond to comments, Cost estimating to set bonds, Rough grading for future developed sites Does not include engineered design of each building phase including individual utility connections, stormwater management, fine grading, setting finished floor elevations, parking lots, Dry utility designs (gas, power, comm, etc.) Does not include 3rd party reporting such as Phase 1 ESA, Title Report, Geotechnical Engineering, floodplain review, Traffic study, etc. 2241 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December, 15 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART 2 - OVERVIEW 2.1 Purpose 2.2 Scope 2.3 General Description PART 3 - GENERAL PHYSICAL CONDITION 3.1 Site 3.2 Architectural 3.3 Structural 3.4 HVAC Systems 3.5 Plumbing Systems 3.6 Electrical Systems 3.7 Fire Protection Systems 3.8 Vertical Circulation Systems 3.9 Accessibility 3.10 Health and Safety 3.11 Owner Proposed Improvements PART 4 - OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS PART 5 - PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX A — Opinion of Probable Costs, 20 -year Cost Estimate APPENDIX B — Needs Assessment, Mechanical APPENDIX C— Needs Assessment, Electrical CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 PART 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Capital Needs Assessment and Modernization Feasibility Study is for the McKay Healthcare & Rehab Center, located at 127 2nd Ave SW, Soap Lake, Grant County, Washington. This report was commissioned by McKay Health and prepared by ZBA Architecture PS and a team of Engineering Consultants from L&S Engineers. The purpose of this report is to provide a baseline comparison between the modernization of the existing facility with comparable costs of new construction. McKay Health desires to update the facility and is exploring the feasibility of various options, including a phased approach with some new construction. The McKay building was originally constructed in 1935, with a major renovation and addition completed in 1967. The property appears to have been of quality design and construction, but due to the age of the building, a capital improvement project is required to reduce maintenance expenses and provide a more updated environment for staff and residents. As observed, the facility has been regularly and competently maintained over the course of its life. Most issues identified in this report are common to buildings of this age. Some investment will be required to update and extend the life of various systems and address other deficiencies described in this report. When looking at a major capital improvement project, any repair scope falling within Years 1-5 of a 20 -year analysis should be incorporated. Also included in the modernization budget are the Owner Proposed Improvements, which include some reconfiguration of resident rooms to provide accessibility and greater privacy. A small new wing would be necessary to accommodate existing residents and maintain the same number of beds once the modernization is complete. As such, the costs of a new wing are included as part of the modernization approach. To help inform decision-making, the cost of an entirely new building is desired for comparison. This assessment presumes the demolition of the existing building would occur after the new building is constructed elsewhere on site. The summary below shows the comparison of an equivalent, new construction facility. It should be noted that, while the grand total of the Modernization + New Wing is close to New Construction, the ability to break that project into smaller pieces could be more advantageous, from an operational standpoint as well as the ability to secure funding. Modernization + New Wing $9,639,366 New Construction: Right -Sized Facility $8,444,500 - $9,552,500 2241 Page 1 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 PART 2 OVERVIEW 2.1 PURPOSE ZBA was hired to provide a study to analyze the existing capital needs of the McKay Healthcare and Rehabilitation Facility. The study examines the capital needs to maintain the building over the next 20 years, plus investigate the feasibility of modernizing the systems during a renovation project. The goal of the report is to provide base -line comparison of current capital needs (modernization), versus the cost of comparable new construction. 2.2 SCOPE This assessment is limited in scope and has been conducted to the extent necessary to render an opinion regarding the condition, maintenance requirements, and integrity of the facility and its systems. This report provides review of the facility's architectural components, structural systems, mechanical systems, electrical systems, fire protection systems, health and safety issues, building code compliance and accessibility issues. Excluded from this study are compliance with state requirements for a skilled nursing facility licensing. A site visit was conducted on December 15, 2022. The purpose of the visit was to become generally familiar with the building and document its condition through observation and discussions with property maintenance personnel. No destructive testing was performed. This assessment is based upon visual observation only. 2.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The McKay Healthcare building is located just south of Soap Lake at 127 2nd Avenue SW. The facility consists of a single, roughly 20,400 sf building broken into two wings: one administrative and one resident care wing. The. primary access to the site is via 2nd Avenue. The driveway and surface parking lot at the main entrance is located toward the east end of the site. There is a secondary driveway that loops around the building and is used for maintenance only. The building was originally commissioned as a Veteran's Hospital and was constructed to meet those 1930's hospital standards. Some of these standards still contribute to the building's value today. As an example, the hallways and resident room doors are very wide to accommodate hospital beds and equipment. The history of the building for the community of Soap Lake is substantive and holds sentimental value. 2241 Page 2 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 PART 3 - GENERAL PHYSICAL CONDITION 3.1 SITE CONDITION Parking Lots and Drives The exterior parking lot and driveways are asphalt. The surface is cracked and uneven in areas and the markings are faded. A seal -coat and restripe is warranted, along with some areas of patching or repairs. There is one accessible parking stall that does not meet current code. The slope is not level, there is no accessible aisle and the signage is inadequate. This area should be reconfigured to meet ADA when the parking lot is restriped. Landscaping, The site was covered in snow during the walkthrough, but observations on other occasions indicate that the grounds are generally well-maintained and kept in good condition. The landscape is simple, mostly turf grass and mature trees. There are some sparsely planted beds with mulch adjacent to the building, and a few raised garden beds for the residents. Irrigation was not observed, due to the snow. There are some areas along the building perimeter where either the irrigation or roof -runoff are causing the mulch and dirt to splash up on the stucco of the building. These need to be observed and corrected to prevent water damage. Hardscaping, Concrete walkways at the main entry appear to be in good condition. There is one section of sloped ramp with two handrails, however those rails do not meet code and should be replaced. Site lighting is mounted on two of the power poles in the parking area. There are also some flood lights mounted on the building. These lights likely provide sufficient lighting for security and safety, however they are a mixture of ages and efficiencies. 2241 Page 3 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 3.2 ARCHITECTURAL Buildina Shell The exterior is generally made of long-lasting materials and has been maintained over the years. However, compared to current standards, the envelope system performs poorly. The building is lacking a consistent insulation or air barrier, leading to high energy usage and uncontrolled ventilation. The exterior envelope of the building consists of concrete masonry block structure with a stucco finish and aluminum -framed windows. There is one area of exterior wall damage in the dining room. The maintenance personnel report that this area has been experiencing an ongoing leak from the roof above. It appears that the overflow roof drain is directing a large volume of snowmelt onto the aluminum window below (see "Roofing" section for more information). The aluminum windows throughout the building have exceeded their expected useful life and should be replaced. The exterior doors are hollow metal frames with insulated metal doors, most with half -lite glazing. They are serviceable and receiving regular maintenance but have exceeded their expected useful life. The crawispace and basement are uninsulated and the vapor barrier has been destroyed. The crawl appears to be neither conditioned nor ventilated. The crawlspace and part of the basement hallway has been reportedly flooding during rain or snowmelt events. It appears that the design of the loading dock roof and slope of the paving is directing moisture to the exterior stairwell where it infiltrates the foundation and crawl space through cracks in the concrete. Repairs to both the roof drainage system and paving are likely required to correct this issue. Grant County is in a Radon Zone 2 according to the EPA, which means is has a moderate risk for elevated radon levels. There was no radon system observed. Testing for radon levels is recommended. Roofing, The roofing is primarily low slope design over wood frame trusses with some steeper sloped accent roofs around the perimeter. The original finish from the 1967 remodel was a ballasted, built -up -roof. More recently, an elastomeric coating was installed in three phases, from 2019 through 2020. The steeper pitched areas have standing seam metal roofing. The surface was covered in snow during the inspection, but maintenance personnel reports that there are no active leaks. Records from the re -roof project note a 12 year warranty period. The metal flashing appears to be in good condition. The standing seam metal roofing is faded but appears to be functional. The leak observed at the dining room wall is likely the result of the main roof drain being clogged or iced over. The runoff is then directed to this overflow drain which is not designed for such high volume. The primary roof drain is likely in need of repair or deicing. Drawings from the 1967 remodel show approximately 6" of batt insulation in the truss cavities. Much of this area is inaccessible and could not be verified. Approximately 6-8" of blown cellulose insulation (R-21) was observed in one portion of the attic accessible from the mechanical penthouse. The insulation had been moved around and was not level or consistent. More insulation should be added for better energy efficiency. The attic appeared to be well ventilated, though the mechanical penthouse and access stair were very drafty. It seems likely that conditioned air is being lost to this drafty, unconditioned space, resulting in poor energy performance. 2241 Page 4 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 Interior Space The interior of the building consists of two distinct wings; the east wing for administrative offices, and the west wing for resident rooms. The circulation corridors and common areas in the resident wing primarily consist of vinyl composition tile flooring, wood or resilient base, painted gypsum board walls, and acoustical tile ceilings. There are some areas with wall protection and/or handrails. The finishes are in generally fair to poor condition. The walls were recently touched up with paint, however a different sheen was used so the repairs appear spotty. The ceiling tiles are a mixture of style and finish, the supports are damaged. The VCT flooring is damaged in many locations, but it contains asbestos so the Owner's ability to make repairs is currently limited. Resident rooms and bathrooms consist of VCT flooring, resilient base, painted gypsum board walls and ceilings. Resident rooms also have fabric drapes, a handwashing sink, mirror, and some cabinetry. The age and condition of cabinetry and window treatments varies throughout the building. The resident bathrooms are accessed off the corridors. There are some accessibility issues with these restrooms. Refer to Accessibility section of this report. Bathrooms contain toilet, sink, wall -mounted mirror and a variety of accessories. Most have a privacy curtain because the in -swinging door does not provide enough room for a resident and caregiver. Newer ceramic tile was observed in two updated bathrooms/shower rooms, however the plumbing was in the midst of a repair so a portion of the tile had been removed. The administrative wing corridors are a mixture of vinyl tile and carpet, of a variety of ages and conditions. There is a wainscot, chair rail and some handrails, similar to the resident wing. The acoustical ceiling tiles are in fair condition. Offices are primarily carpet flooring, with painted walls and ceilings. Staff and visitor restrooms are extremely small, accessed through a narrow corridor door, and each contain a single wall hung lavatory and toilet. These restrooms do not meet accessibility requirements. The commercial kitchen has quarry tile floors, and painted walls and ceilings with some FRP panel wall protection. The cabinets are stained wood and appear original to the project. 3.3 STRUCTURAL The building is a single -story structure, supported by concrete spread footings, which bear on rock or native soils. The building construction consists of concrete walls supporting concrete floor slabs, were applicable. Floors not over the basement are slab on grade. The roof consists of wood framed trusses, observable in one location. The building appears to be in good structural condition overall and has the outward appearance consistent with a well maintained building of its age. The scope of this report does not include a seismic evaluation of the building. 2241 Page 5 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 3.4 HVAC SYSTEMS See Appendix B. 3.5 PLUMBING SYSTEMS See Appendix B. 3.6 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS See Appendix C. 3.7 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS Fire Alarm System See Appendix C. Fire Sprinkler System The existing building is fully sprinklered. According to maintenance records, a new NFPA 13 system was installed around 1986. Most of the building is covered by that newer system, with the exception of the commercial kitchen and penthouse which still use components from the 1967 renovations. The main connections to the municipal system and Fire Department Connections are also from the renovations. The riser is located in the basement. Access to the room is through the exterior stairwell off the loading dock. There was no signage regarding the riser location posted on the exterior of the building. Fire department pumper connections (FDCs) are provided near the original building entrance, on the north elevation. These connections are currently inaccessible to fire trucks. If a capital improvement plan is implemented, remote standpipes may be required. Proximity to a fire hydrant could not be verified, but the standpipes would need to be within 50 feet of a hydrant per the Fire Code. Recent records indicate that a 5 -year test on the system was conducted in 2019. Summary The fire protection sprinkler and standpipe systems are in adequate condition. The current FCD location does not meet fire code and should be addressed. If a modernization project is undertaken, modifications to the fire sprinkler system are likely in order to respond to updated codes and reconfigured spaces. 2241 Page 6 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 3.8 VERTICAL CIRCULATION SYSTEMS Elevators There are no elevators on this project. The building is single -story, at grade level. There are some basement spaces for maintenance personnel only. Stairways The interior stairways are wood framed and only used by maintenance personnel. The handrails do not meet current code and the finishes are poor. The exterior concrete stair to the basement is in need of repair to keep rainwater from infiltrating the building. See "Building Shell" for more details. 2241 Page 7 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 3.9 ACCESSIBILITY General Accessibilit The Americans with Disabilities Act of 2010 (ADA) provides standards for universal accessibility that need to be met in buildings of public accommodation or commercial facilities. Generally, these standards require provisions that allow people with physical disabilities to access, enter and use a site, facility, and building. While accessibility codes were nonexistent when the building was originally constructed, McKay Health desires to provide access to the residents for both safety and operational reasons. The ANSI A117.1 — 2009 would become applicable to the reconfigured resident rooms. Accessibility for the building is generally not in compliance. Exterior site and building access do not meet requirements. There is one designated accessible parking stall that does not have the correct signage or slope. The total number of parking stalls is unclear because they are not all striped, but the proportion of accessible stalls should be at least 5%. The path from the parking lot to the building does not meet the standard for slope. Sidewalks form the building to exterior amenities include ramps that are also noncompliant. The exterior doors are wide and have low -profile thresholds that meet requirements. There are automatic openers to assist with the force required to open the large doors. On the interior, the circulation areas have sufficient space to meet accessibility requirements. Doorways into resident rooms are very wide and have no threshold. The restrooms and shower rooms are deficient in their access, toilet height and grab bar configuration, and fixture clearances. 2241 Page 8 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 3.10 HEALTH AND SAFETY Exiting, The building is equipped with several exit doors, located throughout the building. The corridor includes some fire doors which are held open by magnetic devices. These doors close in the event of a fire. These systems should receive routine maintenance and testing to ensure they are in working order. The building is also equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system (see separate section for system evaluation.) Handrails and Guardrails Stairs throughout the facility are equipped with handrails. However, these handrails do not meet code. Current code requires that the top of handrail gripping surfaces be at 34" minimum and 38" maximum above the stair nosing. These stairs are only used by maintenance personnel, so the requirement to upgrade these outside of an improvement project is voluntary. Guardrails and handrails at the exterior ramps and stair do not comply with current code. There are no handrail extensions or vertical pickets. The guardrail height is not in compliance. The ramps do not have edge protection and the slope appears to exceed the maximum limit between landings. Per the Existing Building Code, these deficiencies must be corrected as part of major renovations or alterations to the building. Lead Based Paint The McKay Healthcare building was constructed in 1935 and renovated in 1967, before the 1978 ban on lead based paint; therefore, lead based paint might be present in the building. A hazardous materials study is recommended. Asbestos Containing Material The McKay Healthcare building was constructed in 1935 and renovated in 1967, before the 1978 ban on asbestos containing construction materials. Recent hazardous materials testing has shown asbestos containing materials to be present in the building. A "good faith survey" is required by State law to be conducted prior to any construction work. Mold and Mildew The subject property was visually inspected for the presents of moisture intrusion and mold growth. No evidence of moisture intrusion or mold growth was observed during our site visit. Pest Control The subject property was visually inspected for pest invasion. No evidence of pests was observed during our site visit. 2241 Page 9 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 3.11 Owner Proposed Improvements McKay Health is exploring a variety of improvements, in various stages from concept to completion. Emergency Generator Design and pricing for the system is complete. New Laundry Equipment One commercial washer and two commercial dryers have been funded. This report includes the equipment as installed. Reconfiguration of Resident Rooms Preliminary concept plans and cost estimate have been developed by Kovach Architects. The costs for resident room reconfiguration and asbestos mitigation are included in the 20 -year analysis under "Owner Proposed Improvements." Inflation has been added to the estimate. (Costs related to finishes or HVAC are incorporated into the baseline categories of the report since those items have exceeded their expected useful life.) Construction of New Wina The owner has provided conceptual plans that lay out a new, 17 resident wing of approximately 6,400 sf. Current estimates on a cost -per -square -foot basis for new construction of a building of this type are included in the analysis. These costs may range from an estimated $285-$325 per square foot and would include general contractor markup and associated site work. These costs would not include design fees, engineering, permit fees, special inspections, taxes, etc. 2241 Page 10 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 PART 4 - OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS Modernization of Existing Facility + New Wing (Phased Approach) Probable Costs are tabulated and presented using the "Opinion of Probable Costs to Remedy Physical Deficiencies" worksheet from HUD's Baseline Property Condition Assessment Process. This outlines a repair scope over the next 20 -years (see Appendix A). The condition of each component of the facility is evaluated with respect to its Estimated Useful Life (EUL) and Remaining Useful Life (RUL). The worksheet then assigns the replacement costs to the appropriate year (column) in the table. When looking ata major capital improvement project, any repair scope falling within Years 1-5 of a 20 -year analysis should be incorporated. Also included in the modernization budget are the Owner Proposed Improvements, which include some reconfiguration of resident rooms to provide accessibility and greater privacy. A small new wing would be necessary to accommodate existing residents and maintain the same number of beds once the modernization is complete. As such, the costs of a new wing are included as part of the modernization approach. The size of a new wing containing 17 single -occupancy rooms was referenced from the conceptual plans by Kovach Architects. Current pricing for this building type was applied based on RS Means data. (Note, for this line item, 18% GC Markup was removed from the RS Means data so that it is not duplicated in the comparison below.) New Construction of a Comparable FacilitX The size of a new facility for the purpose of this report is an estimation. The conceptual plans by Kovach Architects for the new wing and space reconfiguration provide an estimate for the purpose of baseline comparison. However, if McKay decides to proceed with a new building, they might determine that a larger building would serve their needs better (with more single rooms instead of doubles, for example). As such, I have outlined the costs for both the baseline comparison and a slightly larger alternative. The area for this larger building is based on ZBA Architecture's experience with facilities of this type. An important part of this comparison is to ensure that McKay can continue to operate and accommodate residents during the construction. This assessment presumes the demolition of the existing building would occur after the new building is constructed elsewhere on site. Long term plans for the McKay campus should be reviewed to ensure this is a compatible solution. Other Project Costs Other project costs such as architectural and engineering fees, permit fees, sales tax and other soft costs (like furniture, fixtures and equipment) are not included. These costs are often represented as a percentage of the cost of construction. While they would be equivalent for the purposes of comparison, they should be included in an overall project budget. Architecture and engineering fees, based on the state fee schedule, would range from 7-9.5% Ongoing maintenance and operational costs should also be considered in the true costs of such a comparison. Consideration should be given to the energy efficiency of the existing structure. The modernization budget includes some repairs to existing insulation and air sealing, however it does not address the more aggressive measures that would be needed to achieve the same energy efficiency as new construction. This would have long term cost implications and may need to be addressed eventually if the Washington State Clean Buildings Act legislation is passed. 2241 Page 11 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 Cost Comparison Breakout Modernization + New Wing PHASE ONE New 17 Bed Wing 61500 SF @ $325 $2,112,500 (includes GC markup) PHASE TWO Capital Improvements Years 1-5 $4,249,600 Reconfiguration of Space $1,794,000 (private rooms, ADA) Asbestos Abatement $335,100 General Contractor Markup +/-18% $1,148,166 Subtotal $7,526,866 TOTAL $9,639,366 2241 Page 12 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 PART 5 - PHOTOGRAPHS 2241 Page 13 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 [ F 9'b V Jl 7 i- C Y f r/t VY. f : '"<k t J C' FtV S'v } Y f ,� ,1 i i , NF.4- 7 1,. ^lf..:a r.. yk i.f{ i M1 R ,J d,t,.T.F°2 Z ?,,Yl': iiiiiiY.H' v rd k.�ry %a«7.:L W.,:.._ '),' 3r ilvi'' -L .-r t rt..rn`: 'S1�✓. x QAf'atyx t.PwJ :tT. �' d- f N t ' s rZ't a X us - S 1. f +Y L�*. F 2e X-: _.:{�T e... z ", i?;, 74"-b :: 7 +SNi.. _ t f --T.�'f3" .r.i.L.. 4f' ` :.. :ta... a a _. k :Y i £..2.. 'V +- ` t "t, i { 3 P rr .,. , i,,: !� 'r, �v= i .`1. , ,t . .,?�.; X xY t { ,F. .� ..!! `� 'N A �`,•': r E ",S "Y. "-'� 1 1 , F k i k_ ;r k f yi , 'j� �. .{:ily ..� %k ( h. 3`. '. ✓{.>'�1`. t VIII s 1 6 ! A`k 1. 1111 i ..F.s"^ } - :. :_ 1. 2. Y ,. ., r y / 1 2 ,SpY+,°Y l s s,.. .at 'J+-,�� ! 4 �f.:ek Y,..,,.it esJ. >$': -ti . f✓t ,sy s" t .+1' ,1 ."' 4[�,�r d•..i i,,: t"i' %% `C 'I•i'"� ;r,M L H::K ;tpS' YDS d,'Yii :Y yy, . tij x �� t<, Jf. Jt s(.. ,}d ,5-'. +" F"4[ } ,l Y .l --`F ? 'ifs :--.rr "'" ..v'�., :.,° y t a.? t. 9 r '.'J t -a'. L. .l v En. I 11..: ,: S r a e .fyy-"` •ti• k i« 1 1,I. S ',Jr',!`".. C.?J.v :.t.4`.> . i.r _.L t x a. r .y ,li. 2' E Y < .�'' -k: iv f.yr: ,. T•.G ,.. ; rn' ,i ` Vii.> ,=if }r9,z%k;. ,/.. i at kt. ,*.r ,. 'r sci;" is ':,.,t .,F' ':aJ- "�w :"SX` 2'11. ';9 . x•• } ::'ti%. ,-S . _.�_ ....-.3is?Nixt:t+i ,i 7� a 3>� 'C-.L.''i. .4F G <' ..7`, :{ ;A, 3 i 3 E. i, y �. 2`. ' ,`:a ; y,- • -sr 'S.'.w"'y' kzt% <,e.£.• "`''u„ `x ,t,, "� A%1...6y:;z, - i I A 1 . r?Pi S y. r a # 1•f y( �{ ,+�• dy:N, %5 t �"' ,m.''r-��Lo "'' i3,: y .`�.i' ^ip?x..'N , Yr .,j's'. n�=, s i3 ` S �.,, .,y- 'v`��g1111 6,4 d w'i �i RiS' Cy y Yh ••X 'krv,1't^r^ 4!w'k _ c .,c% S <xG-: e ^Y.: : f: .4 >11T. a. R _ s f<k� •�`': y : i ... .: tI '�� _ �' .. 'i ss �( �� 3 S•" "" _ fly r +Y,^.•n+.*.e,^_<. y�y 1 ,IF, x ,Y 9 s :.. .. ,.i.:. ,.`Y �:-*- ,a.,,.`..c_s �.,,cr �__. i,.. 4. - E �� u _ w,. �r" _ x 4e :- '�^''1. y,.c '+zr»n y �» ,, s - b - " '•_-__ x �- ..;�. y .axe... -�,,,, t -. 1 :� .;� r« �l ��''yyi.r„. ,,.-'r �y ITX;w- Fk2'- h1-12� f AAs' _ y I -11,�rv��j'', s+.e�•r'Pe {�C fir!` '� ✓_d v < ,��; � ;,,.r _ N � �„ tx yF ......- a..-. . ,C'au,r+^+, �' 2k3,t .. .r` . #y "'J ; x.. •-ys� t� %m s. - _ . h t X� ' i t f, �,�. i. �i+''iCSZ4 .,, r J^it ._3Tf 3 � K .r' `,''1' '3y f _ Pif Sd'._ ,J,�` .A ��i',� ,'(I:r� g,g E 'u hf S�. "t` i`y�^, �h-0- tI v`y -, i`q vo- t - at'#a ^'` ''Rkf $. q.' Si "'1�? �7 �. q,. 'iz�,; d{',r`"�. �is."'43, a.kv f1�'"Y. K fi':. tz '2 ':m'�,., ,.✓ F S' t' ' �'. � Jy r 5Y f'• .�' �'4:z : 'S�r� i„` `i S' b 4.� :f. t�,. .! £T1" 'JS �` 1 " 4r * 'irr. +1'^x,d.. 'tom 'j {:' - k tom... 4 ` . � - �,,".'I, I '�.� ��.:y? 9 ,�y{ ,y a „,t' k v./fi Uc'cc]],kfi, zR„ it A klA�' 1'S•;'ti.GY. r' nrr�# i';' .:. r t}u f Y•.','.., {' <�ls..<, r^..... r?. 4,n;. / A'2."S'✓..,<.n ,✓ ,...+t ..t`... `!ttrt ;i .aSPL"' ;t .:.y., .,. ,., ..:. r ',."a/,9.3. .,..-... ak+.r..x ,n ;:'' moi: ..,-,..:} ., d: .... .,, .z£4 5 1 : ♦MM 'I1 -"!.J 1aE..�ivt.� �.<�� . ,rF`/fi. .-i/, ,'M^_d C� :.\ - 9 ,}.��<G7'',,K .y s fs .k z,l:, 4r t,�?., 3 >. r` -r t. <a•,s' . .'z�'`''.`.`�.. .S.$'&' i,'<' F t'�1: , ,< �t; ,1-. '��Y .., (fi,+ �s3 -.+R' .,,'i'{�'}.. '.✓n:.'.< !Y ;,g,4.. �t,, / •vz. MM,i. `w,.(i!'i5 ��: Y�'S �i ' ".:;i,'I'll �?cr`fi. x •`rte' ,.c a ..$"< 11 '" ,. y i-z� 4 Y . . y. $ .. A .-..0 - ,>! ..'. 'Yi x•7p�..�_Fy �`d <�l- .:•#.k• :<. ',A.%.+.2!'. r;,,,.A,� d «2 A!...7' lis y' � '%ay.: ' t , i .,' +'16 Wit,. ? "'rf+r• 3�* ,i� .$ ah . :3 .�7.. �...@."✓' i,Y.t..<. ;�1,.'. Y:.� '>rry„ i,, F� .R.. �,,.�dr...fW r 'xZ R}. 1 f..o.,, t Wiz...' , 't, , 1 + •"' , 6 ,t•s�. .i . Greenhouse • Staff • • • s v ni 24:.6 3 f'3. { _ d,{ s' 9.-�: ,}« y; ;:k. �r. .v3 y..E.., ,f. 7 C X � �: a< ;r i. t': J *y ! "d t ��.s. -a f> d't t*i * e`Qi. 1' y {;y v>' cc ,*` "sf1iG 4: ,.4r e ! ;- :.J �. rT ta,. �' "�;�,i Y" R..r wz it t�sy, f� � - i n 2 ��¢3. : a. t r s ...ii' , _. .r --;; it :..,.-: �.. vt'; -,. ,?. '-, :.::...?� , :' ,: u, _: - `�: -t.,.,.. r'-; 33,- ._ N _ A ""<L.: - :y �i b ',Y i', - "7i s« x .i 'V ... a' k' yY ,«.. _ S: k'{t- .y6. t c ., ".a. 7..;s:"."t ,. .. t :.1 ':Er% i '' •:3', :.� �i "` Y a�-. s is d..''-�„ ,dt t. ;:;mt 4(., g z "- ;z . ux,.ziyyJ />.z �,: x r. ., �•.d "',f/ rp '�, a, - ", t, rk 4. a, .A i �'..BtY. • ,, �p 9 .�k,. 7, rcyd ,�. ( �?f`.q�,�,. .:' �.<.yin t VIif '�.k,-,. -'k . ' 1; fr t S't .y,; ,r�'• SK d$:S , . M�' Yµq'} d ... R �W � ";, f y i i r .ia'' '.xC., is ..n rb 4 �I.F-,. x..:. .sem y y ii. „* .� ,r w 'd w J '.' ,_ _. > I -4 r. �p ' y . S x p 1. .,F , ... .^Y t ,' f .n a s 34`. i S a- f :. .;i! 'r ...a .; i s y, ' >86`' , ' § 4 E's q tp, "I' ., fit: v 9>.:�f . [ r:._;. ��' f`i'r < 7 '`.ri:-. s Tt :t rrb k Gi. "., '.. }} �! .�' s . ,.a is !{ '7�' i" k�i z%4 `A ti. _♦3. %ar. .*roc ,,: .' F 1 th A, --,r.,...-%, ,,XML 'yF i :'t, y.: ` z i "- ";tN-Y' `yy :�,g t,�"r 4 `S i. - d .,t,'4 „E'x r .t ,4c',;ty :i 4 't.'� 7 -i ..� } _ . !� 3 ' ?- FS ^+.3..4 +`. _ ys»^ is c ((ttomu ..... Sir. .,-. .... ,. T'�" , [ f..r .,i."'"x ,^'° .. ....�s�r L ^»-e+t` ; - M�." .:�,.. ^`iso' y.Y , � k ? t1 r�...�..�i .idv 7 y„ x q ti :s.. ^ r `3 "'a i. r. 4 A i�5��. . , . -, , ..X' :t:..::' .' .._ . , .I ; -: �' . {« ; - k 1 e*' rf, : h*-' '� i i#SC ., w✓r 25RF3._ Ar ,. ..sst ,;e'ar D '',`� ,7�. °: r .'.' ' 4 . , r at<.3,' 1.a- . r . %1,^ ...... s :...'�`; - 4r i.' ° �"-, .b`Y` ,:I 1.3 T„#...Mst f i _ n.,,.-, ...+, n - _.�*. .'+� , ! zg'.zs ;mss` rr x«s k+= , b.$ 'l }y-',+,�y'. -i if tin'ii;� '1 2r�N 4C' y >� ,/�`' .,,. ({({i °�r 4• jar,, 7 {y k. . -- � , , � j -- :ti €44; 7 �" n1 w. Yt t r k 2' ,'" ! 9 1 r,.% '�.� �r.I 'r ''.414 J n{if7:;. RF� d'r , '." j�`h ,?lp k�„ /� f •i 'S' a '."r - rt`.. .. rt +^s i,. '.. izg' >t._, I C.,^�y. 2. i.w '�71� ' T 5 fIv -, kt 9. >.�".• a T',= 5 T�" wr ✓ t [ ` '.,?�. ; :.:�y.?rk .. .. •. -,.. q t..,�. .,,,a"N::.:. 1 , _ - i^yif - '7 ��"" 1A Y^C MijiiM14AS,.^.�r'.�VF C... xg,�,y : ff zr3sYq; ,fib„ :t :;,�: _ 3.IM' �a'2T'a'+ . if.H ; ;'j tI t. t "�, -£: 6 - - - „ x f`T�yt�.^„y,.11 f;f t'k b . x . xy�-fa+ns'11 11. «. i ' � f'x�*-=, . i•E xT K_14'.,• f ,k % � • ~ •.,( 3'<^. � 3 s111 �:r'ft"�i`ifir'.- .. I- ,Gi,% .. - .. �r .`. Jr -*»wb ' ' ' S -.t : I'll r 3� _ �� I k _- - .1 , : . . ..: :.:. - : Fire r , ' .w r,. / _ -1 °fi,y'S3 : ,«, t 1 Y. '�sr: I'll, I 11. Y >3 a". - , " t 1j,« ;. S `/f_ t t ;'a y �,t"!. .-'kj" .`'. w fix r 2��': Y-" 37 .4 i , },ie� i , - _. ,i �T>. ' i a �,:x�ss}y - »� (y as P° , yG` 1 F r+ .�- a x .; 1j '" .:Y r ..y^ 9 .4 ,.� J`I' +s� , k i L 'i'fny. ` f J f A st l :'S"` 3t.:r'�£�xFsx $[ ;.:A dot' _ k'Y .f si � ✓�"a C! yY�d3 •� i1 !- i ` 1 • ,y di:i [ +�Y..ff 1 ? f;,L 1 , r { Af' 3yGr , ,,r' a r .:-JP.''E ,r : 'i lrt 'Y 1 : � !• . r , ;. 1 .. : .. �} :g a,M '°' j3'i't "'f-; ' -JN - , .s,*r" " ;.:i". ,. ; ^T29 _ `- 3. ., ,:� f .k -Y '"0.a+'t ter.; ±U&t v-1? .; 7 n%=: :r2 yy�,. `r ��y.133 �;3 '"f . i :. , < -i. , fit x - :3 ds43 "... - a...a.- i '' �, ti: :. .l 4 ,.«.-........ - to 1.'rz ,r,51 �" :K ,. `" :58� A1n .. �. ... .... w 1�1,.rz- r tt� -.-� s?! i '. '"!� 'w'.'A. :.. :.mY�. + -it ... ' , .. R.'Sr'+i S r "1 - + ,�� »�„+ - ` ,_ .. Woo 1,. ,:Y l'.,'.,Z:.«..ai..bv&,.�5'.k"1.`59.oN..i rt.:.<: r..w,lrwwr.,.c-. ..... ffi,yi if;J,� , -fes, .11 I I I DF, s7i. - I , ,�- � -- I',, . - �, 4 s , • :: - - - 1. I - _ " - . ' , , - .. ,- . .. , '` ; t",his,'@ .. ., - {.. - ,k - ' . . _ _ % Parking r r 2241 Page 14 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 BUILDING ENVELOPE Typical windows and exterior finish Exterior stucco finish Loading dock area Roof drain overflow, where leak is occuring Interior of wall where repair is occurring Typical exterior doors 2241 Page 15 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 2241 Page 16 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 1.11 18171 OLOIll Ilf��Ce]:1 Typical corridor Main entrance Acoustical ceiling tile Crawlspace access Resident toilet room Resident wing corridor 2241 Page 17 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 2241 Page 18 of 20 _ WOW r. k ay .. � a r 4:: t : �dF,i K �r � l �r�sx _ r _ - i• � .. � : > £ � S� L'��rk a3 � t ..; r.' �: �. t - � r-•�3i`S. 4i' f 43�fiase�+� 's � �s�i,ti,s,.{,?��,�, lf�• � '}�{, �aF'. � qty :;� E N Y y �,?',. 66 s VM, j a, f s . s T �'•Fx � t��.ar,n .f t _ �� s�3t' Y k yy 3"4 } s%�1 AT Tile flooring damage l:: ` ��P^: ..�.. m,., s.. �s .. { , Kiri-„xw, s, Jl�4 ��•, - j,. Y ;.k�'� G. .. 'f4F)f�l✓d.* rq � �� 'tr S- '�# ,�, C:;. i 1• � _ � � : • .«, ; i E . 7 f � fv��*'sem � l �� = e a' ------------- • • • . • £ �`. is „ ♦ .xJ' k7#�'�I��h i 3 ." ...� , :�y:f. .,.'`. -J.'F� .: S 9 . d s� a � �¢.5if }i _ 1, `� � Mi,'�":.°-�, �W'�fU.j,•• �`J'�f ,{:,,f �f/3°`�i��%J�'' r;.•,t�,x G ffv;kJ ,=1 k�ii> �Mi l .. 3� 3 5 3 gyp,. �,:� '{ '' ,� may.�qp�� _ 4. �• � u� sY " t • � ,� �� c �� 3, _`3� R i' } 1Fy''•yY WE y K'r C k k� � 17 t 2241 Page 18 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 2241 Page 19 of 20 s.. • )'� ,�+� t 9 � ri. 'fir' r 'aRR r . � Z p - � � R f, J � r,:n� W� "-�It }">s k .F fb iii � 3 � - � ?". • <�i �'i � G ; �m`zG4L 4i _ eBYcyL�A',53�. S ZZ{� f7s ON t� rr .-. �� ' . +uvs :.:,a'•.t .ff � -. � J dX � ,+f� iKF'^"y � �� !, �r 1 "'� ' � t- L 'E ''�' f•G'e� f i � 1 1 S r �,..:.... �Yi3•S i .� ,. 1, y ; 1 �•.n �W` .iw ^�� .._V �p '�S SSP ,3c% M1:: j f. 4 5.� •Kitchen dry storage l �r. �^".. t � �� .�- V �t' v{ . ie,�a C`. �' __aft• r AM a1 (AV `4m Y YtY, I')j�� dE�y..� n t i �-, iR...�.rr ::r..tn`:..'1 � 4, Y.: �s ��"1- .4+:�"• �.� .iia. s^ t P W^ 1 , � 3 1 Dishwashing area -1, H R "-- - - A. Q . ? r • tf. - - l �� 3•- -. �� d �ia�. i14aa$ � - � y31,3'aLh � '• 23i ..:�� XD��>�- � ��"�- y- f" �. �' �._� �: , 'T � Yet L. Mr.� >¢ .r } • ;� d t s„'r'' _t k''��aaf.�'"II+ tF.-..Jjr"��'>��_ 'S�y ✓ as ;z '. � ..- � t :.. r �..aA ��**a4 ;�,.+A�`4 3f 1p{�� k+-.��[y'� .��y� i�"' ( `�� ✓{Z�a�.ai'^ Rl "'l Til 3'7� SAtY ;w+ jL f . i O}:d'- �.',SM x) .� E +'<.'�e s + .� �`z. a :- � �M ;,, �.'!+y ., lamj'. N. CS ��,ia+sRe. g�.2,tL° y?�rYT.TSJ �f,+ _».> �a "i b�'•w� g S {�yp�,i.P". � ,at i•l�)1�'"� 41 f'%F. :.� }b��'SN�tlj�y" r'}P •kN � S� Li`� ¢ r .t :' i' ' �' �'t' �,��$ag�'t�F ikRii �s�j. ism,': +'�-�:: .t� aS.,r ,;,; �; �i�`}(�, Y?! �S i�++T � ,.pY^�j � � :§iI � 33 y� �L' 'Y}Y�.,*[� �t�`✓ly: �'; _ 2241 Page 19 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 - ji u i 17 t a. _ _ N - t �' 1 kj y e 'es Jlw,\ x Y.i.�'s h.'.: � •.� i l` ,C �f� `."f�, c 5/�y., l'�s�h,1t�> Resident bath room �f f s� [ Ae r y $uas �✓ �'. 3 z >f Y vi i +�� "iw�u' �3��.�•ff�wTfS� I d %,y { Z }. Ln�'?s X� y w .Cf'..• .1 - � �i �• �Y :,; Sys, :_ '�*sn � y: +r n t 3� z i • - �,� j 4C %7,N }fes{... jY W"Alk VII 1 End of Property Condition Report 2241 Page 20 of 20 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 Opinion of Probable Costs, 20 -Year Cost Estimate W-51 CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 APPENDIX B Needs Assessment, Mechanical 2241 o Engineering t R High Performance Design x� MEMORANDUM DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT COMPANY: SUBJECT: REMARKS: Sarah, McKay Health Center D SITE CONFERENCE TELEPHONE Project Journal DATE January 27, 2023 JOB. NO. 2022-042 BY Brad Bergler, P.E. ZBA Architecture ATTN: Sarah Brede Mechanical Narrative The following are some items of interest regarding the mechanical systems at McKay health based on our December 15 2022 building tour: The original building was built in 1935, with a major renovation and addition completed in 1966. Mechanically, the building is served by a gas (propane) fired steam boiler, which provides steam for heat to air handlers and steam unit heaters. A steam to water heat exchanger provides pumped hydronic heating water to unit ventilators in each of the patient rooms. A water cooled chiller provides chilled water to the unit heaters in residents rooms during summer, utilizing the heating water pipes and pumps. The air handlers provide ventilation air to the occupied spaces. Controls are a mixture of pneumatic and electromechanical controls. The Kitchen is served by a rooftop make up air unit, hoods and exhaust fans. The plumbing system shows signs of its age, and is past it's useful life, except for newer water storage tanks and the new water softener. A note about the Clean Buildings Act. The CBA was passed by the legislature and requires all buildings greater than 50,000 SF to meet energy use criteria prior to staggard compliance dates. Buildings that do not comply will be required to pay fines of up to one dollar per square feet annually. The McKay health facility does not meet the area requirement threshold. However, phase II of the CBA now requires buildings down to 20,000 SF to calculate and report energy use. It is our assumption that the phase II buildings will be required to meet energy use criteria in the future. This should be taken into consideration during future planning exercises. Mechanical: • Controls — The 1965 temperature controls are pneumatic controls with air compressors in the basement, with some amount of conversion to electromechanical controls. This system is well beyond its useful life. The technology was great at the time, but has now been completely replaced with Direct Digital Control Systems. Any new controls will be DDC. Sarah Brede January, 2023 Page 2 Pneumatic control panel Compressor Manual control • Air handling units. The upper mechanical room has two air handling units and one relief fan, one of the AHUs is partially disassembled. These appear to have been providing ventilation air to the entire building. All units are well beyond their useful life. The east unit is still in operating, but appears to be just getting by, with plywood over louver openings as make shift dampers. Disassembled AMU Relief fan East AHU Chiller and associated fluid cooler. The chiller and cooling tower are in need of replacement. They require manual control and change over to utilize the 2 -pipe heating system. The chiller uses R-22 refrigerant which is being phased out and is no longer produced or imported. Chiller Cooling tower Corrosion Cooling tower 216 W. Pacific Suite 211 Spokane, WA 99201 Principals: (509) 747-2179 FAX (509) 747-2186 E-mail Iseng@lseng.com Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. Sarah Brede January, 2023 Page 3 • Boilers —the facility has three propane fires steam boilers. Two are from the original construction, but only one is operational. The third is a "new" boiler, installed in the 1960's. The original boilers are well past their useful life. The third boiler, while past its useful life is in good working condition and can be expected to last until a decision is made regarding expansion. Original boilers 1966 Boiler 216 W. Pacific Suite 211 Spokane, WA 99201 Principals: (509) 747-2179 FAX (509) 747-2186 E-mail Iseng@lseng.com Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. Sarah Brede January, 2023 Page 4 Steam system components; steam to water heat exchanger, steam piping, traps and condensate sumps/feed pumps, are all past their useful lives. Steams serve steam coils in the air handlers and various steam radiators, and a steam to water converter for hydronic heating of unit ventilators. Steam to water heat exchanger Steam condensate receiver and boiler feed pump. 216 W. Pacific Suite 211 Spokane, WA 99201 Principals: (509) 747-2179 FAX (509) 747-2186 E-mail Iseng@lseng.com Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. Sarah Brede January, 2023 Page 5 • Hydronic pumps, piping and accessories —the hydronic system is beyond its useful life. There are two heating water pumps (providing redundancy) that serve as chilled water pumps during summer. No pipe insulation was observed. • Kitchen hoods, exhaust fans and make up air unit. The Kitchen is served by a gas fired make up air unit, with evaporative cooling. Hoods and exhaust fans are in operation and used every day. All equipment is past their useful lives. Kitchen MAU and Exhaust fans Kitchen hood System Longevity — All of the mechanical systems are beyond their useful lives. The boiler system and kitchen are the most critical to be in operation, and currently appear to be operating as intended and should be able to be maintained for the short term. Limitation to remodel or expansion: Mechanically there are no real limitations to expansion, other than energy code changes which will eliminate propane as an option for a source of heat. The biggest limitation regarding remodel will be space. The current energy code will require a dedicated outdoor air system, which would most likely require a large air handler and extensive ductwork. The current facility does not have adequate space for all the equipment that will be required to satisfy current codes. 216 W. Pacific Suite 211 Spokane, WA 99201 Principals: (509) 747-2179 FAX (509) 747-2186 E-mail Iseng@lseng.com Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. CNA & Modernization Feasibility Study McKay Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center December 15, 2022 APPENDIX C Needs Assessment, Electrical 2241 IEPNWAM High Performance MEMORANDUM � SITE DATE January 13, 2023 DESIGN � CONFERENCE JOB. NO. 2022-042 CONSTRUCTION � TELEPHONE BY Jessica Wagoner PROJECT McKay Health Center COMPANY: ZBA Architecture ATTN: Sarah Brede SUBJECT: Narrative CC: REMARKS: Sarah, Please see the following comments from our site inspection on December 15, 2022. • The service to the building is fed underground from a pole to a pad mounted transformer owned by Grant County PUD. The service is rated at 120/208V, 3 phase, 4 -wire, 1600 amps. The service capacity is adequate for the existing building and should be able to supply a new wing addition. The high demand in December was 186 KW. With NEC factors applied this equates to 258 KVA, 718 amps. Figure I Power Po% t Figure 2 Transformer 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 2 Figure 3 Utility Meter The main switchgear was installed during a 1967 addition and remodel of the 1935 building. It is beyond its useful life and finding replacement breakers are difficult. The main gear is also limited to six main service disconnects, since it does not have a main breaker. Six service disconnects are already used, so no additional main breakers may be added. The 2020 NEC placed additional requirements on the service disconnects. They may no longer be mounted in the same vertical enclosure. Anew switchboard would require just one main service disconnect to avoid having six separate vertical sections. Mounted on the side of the switchgear is a manual transfer switch and disconnect for the range and hood. It is unclear whether this has been tapped off the main bus. It may be an additional main breaker which would violate the six main service disconnect rule. Figure 4 Switchgear 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 3 Figure 5 Manual Transfer Switch • Many of the branch circuit panels are original to the 1967 remodel. They have limited spare capacity and breaker space available. They have outlived their useful life. There are a few newer panels that have been installed with some spare breaker space. In general, the electrical distribution system needs to be upgraded. Figure 6 Existing Panelboards 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 4 The generator is housed in the basement behind the boiler. It is difficult to access and refill the fuel tank. it needs to be replaced with an outdoor generator. The generator capacity is limited to 50 kw. Existing emergency panels do not have loads separated between emergency equipment and life safety. To meet current codes, new panels dedicated to life safety or equipment branch would need to be provided. The generator must provide a minimum of four hours of power for night lights, exit signs, exit corridors, stairways, dining and recreation areas, workstations, medication preparation areas, boiler rooms, electrical service room and emergency generator location. If residents congregate in the recreation areas/dining areas during power outages, the HVAC System in those areas must receive power through the generator. It does not appear these areas are provided with emergency power. Figure 7 Emergency Generator 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.lseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 5 • Existing fixtures are mostly fluorescent with some incandescent in maintenance and utility areas. Fixtures should be updated to more energy efficient LED. Lighting controls are limited to on/off control. Resident rooms are provided with wall mounted bed lights as required by code. There are no occupancy sensors, daylight sensors or dimming controls to help reduce energy costs in the facility. New construction nursing homes require night lights for resident rooms with a switch at the door. The current configuration would not meet the Washington State Energy Code. Figure 8 Hallway Fixture Figure 9 Above the Bed Fixture 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 6 • The Fire Alarm system is limited to hallways and select room smoke detection with horn/strobes for notification. It appears to cover the main exit pathways with pull stations at exit doors. The fire alarm system monitors the flow and tamper switches of the sprinkler system. The system has been updated with a Silent Knight combination panel and communicator. Parts of the outdated Simplex system still exists in the Nurses Station. Adding to this system might require a panel upgrade. Patient rooms are not monitored with smoke detection. Figure 10 Nurse's Station FA Annunciator Figure I I Fire Alarm Panel 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.lseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 7 • The current paging speakers in the hallways are not functional. Figure 12 Paging Speaker • The Nurse Call system is a Newer Jeron Provider System. It replaced the original Rauland Nurse Call System. It appears to cover areas required by code. The resident rooms have call buttons at their beds, the bathrooms have pull cords, and in the hallways, there is dome light notification. There are also additional call buttons for staff assist. Figure 13 Nurse Call Bed Cords 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 8 Figure 14 Staff Assist Call Station Figure 15 Nurse Station Call Annunciator Figure 16 Nurse Call Panel 216 W. Pacific Avenue,, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 9 Figure 17 Nurse Cell Pull Cord Figure 18 Nurse Call Dome Light Above Door • The Wander Alert system was just installed, I do not believe at this time that the residents have the bracelets or badges that stop them from exiting the building by locking the doors. • The Stanley door lock system monitors select doors. (Front Door, Admin Office, Kitchen, A Hall, and Physical Therapy). The alarms are annunciated at the Nurse's Station. If automatic door locking is added to the Wander Alert System, the doors would need to automatically release if power is lost to the system, the fire alarm system is activated, or an override switch is activated at the staff workstation. 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 10 Figure 19 Stanley Keypad Figure 20 Stanley Nurse's Station Annunciator Figure 21 Stanley Door Monitoring 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.Iseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. McKay Health Center Sarah Brede January 13, 2023 Page 11 • Resident Room receptacles for new construction must meet WAC 388-97-3200. Each resident room must have a minimum of seven outlets including four hospital grade electrical outlets located at 44 inches above floor at the bed, two electrical outlets in resident room and 1 duplex GFI outlet at the handwash sink. Per the 2020 NEC all electrical outlets in patient sleeping rooms of nursing homes must be Arc -Fault protected. Currently receptacles do not meet all these requirements. No outlet was installed at the handwash sink and receptacles are not Arc -Fault protected. Figure 22 Above Bed Receptacles Figure 23 No GF/ Receptacle at sink 216 W. Pacific Avenue, Suite 211, Spokane, WA 99201 Mechanical Principal: Bradley G. Bergler, P.E. (509) 747-2179 Fax: (509) 747-2186 Website: www.lseng.com Electrical Principal: Jessica D. Wagoner, P.E. Attachment 1: County Comp Plan Amendment: is Except of BOCC Resolution dated November 22, 2022 including App. A and • Appendix J- List of SIP Projects • Public notice of comp plan amendment to establish SIP Project list. BOARD OF COUNTY COMAUSSIONERS GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO, dd- 1ly]' M A Resolution Relating to Comprehensive Planning in Grant County in Accordance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70 A) and amending the Comprehensive Plan, associated Zone Changes and Unified Development Code Amendment, WHEREAS; in 1990, the Washington State Legislature passed, and the Governor signed into law the Growth Management Act (GMA) as contained in SHB No 2929 (Washington Laws, 1990 lst Ex. Sess., Ch 17), which was subsequently codified as among other chapters, Chapter 36.70A RCW; and, WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires all counties and cities in the State to plan extensively in keeping with state goals and policies on: sprawl reduction, affordable housing, economic development, open space and recreation, regional transportation, environmental protection, property rights, natural resource industries, historic' lands and buildings, permit processing, public facilities and services, and early and continuous public participation; and, WHEREAS, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires all counties and cities within the state to classify, designate, and conserve natural resource lands (agriculta rat and mineral) and protect critical areas (wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, aquifer recharge areas, and frequently flooded areas); and, WHEREAS, Chapter 36.70 RCW required Grant County to adopt a Comprehensive Plan that met specified GNU goals and addressed the mandated GNU elements; and, WHEREAS, after complete review and public record of the State Environmental Review process, Grant County issued a Final Environmental Impact Statement on July 2, 1999; and subsequent amendments through 2018; and, WHEREAS, on July 11, 2022, Grant County issued a SEPA Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) for these non -project proposals; and, WHEREAS, over the past years, the Comprehensive Plan's policies may have changed to ensure that the development patterns in the County remain consistent with the intent of the communities' vision for the future and the Plan's goals and policies; and, WHEREAS, it is important that amendments to this plan retain the broad perspectives articulated in the community vision statements,, satisfies the goals and policies of this.Plan, and remain consistent with the intent of the GNIA; and, Grant County Board of County Commissioners Grant County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution for the Year 2022 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act (GMA) establishes procedures for the review and amendment of Comprehensive Plans governing counties and cities planning under the Act; and, WHEREAS, the County has established a public participation program identifying procedures whereby proposed amendments or revisions of the Comprehensive Plan are considered by the governing body of the County no more frequently than once every year; and, WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan fall into several maj or categories or types and different review application and review criteria apply to each. The kinds of amendments identified herein may include: 0 Urban Growth Area Boundary Changes; 0 Plan policy or text changes; • Plan Map changes; 0 Supporting document changes; emergency amendments; and • Site-specific amendments; and, WHEREAS, policy amendments may be initiated by the County or by other entities, organizations or individuals through petition; and, WHEREAS, petitions were received on forms provided by the Department, containing appropriate maps showing the proposed change and addressing the policy or map evaluation criteria as described in the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, On May 3, 2022, the Board of County Commissioners directed -staff to initiate the SEPA review process and schedule each of the complete amendments proposed, along with staff recommendations before the Planning Commission for public hearing; and, WHEREAS, public hearings were conducted by the Planning Commission on August 24 and August 25, 2022, to hear staff recommendations and take public testimony on each of the proposed amendments to the Grant County Comprehensive Plan and proposed Zone Changes; making recommendations and listing Findings of Fact on each amendment and zone change; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission staff reports, and recommendations are made a part of the record of this public hearing as it relates to SEPA and the attached amendments and zone changes; and, WHEREAS, a non -project proposal to consider adoption of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including site-specific land use designation changes, changes to various Urban Growth Areas were considered, as well as associated Zone Changes: and, WHEREAS, copies of the SEPA DNS were distributed to agencies, organizations and individuals listed on the Planning Department distribution list and requesting that comments be submitted in accordance with WAC 197-11-340 (2); and, Grant County Board of County Commissioners Grant County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution for the Year 2022 2 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners conducted an open -record public hearing on Tuesday, November 1, 2022, to consider the 2022 requests for amendments to the Grant County Comprehensive Plan, and the recommendation from the Planning Commission for each of the' proposed amendments and their respective zone changes (if applicable); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners for Grant County adopts the attached Findings of Fact per Attachment "B" and the attached record pertaining to the approval or denial of the 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendments and Zone Changes; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners for Grant County adopts Findings of Fact as per Attachment "A" in support of these actions. PASSED by the Board of County Commissioners in regular session at Ephrata, Washington, by the following vote, then signed by its membership and attested to by its Clerk in authorization of such passage this day of 4kP?04e,--- 20,22. DATED this jPrd day of AIZW04e'�- ,2022. BOARD OF COUNTY .COMMISSIONERS Yea Nay Abstain GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON �4 Danny S,4one, Chair ATTEST: Clerkof A , --a'rd t - d ❑ V Ce- r !Ro &, I ',. s 13 4Cindyer, Memb-e.39; Grant County Board of County Commissioners Grant County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution for the Year 2022 3 ATTACHMENT "A" GRANT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 2022 FINDINGS OF FACT Section I — General Findings 1.1 Grant County has experienced and will continue to experience population growth and accompanying development, resulting in competing demands for public facilities, services and land uses, and is required to prepare and adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations pursuant to the Growth Management Act. 1.2 Growth Management requires that land be managed properly and wisely. Otherwise meeting the demands of a rapidly growing county population is likely to cause urban and suburban sprawl, commercial strip development, development at inappropriate locations and densities, damage to environmentally sensitive areas, and the loss of natural resource lands, rural character, open space, and critical areas. Also, this pattern of development is likely to create demands for urban services and -utilities that are insufficient to support their extension in a cost-effective manner. 1.3 The 2022 Comprehensive Plan amendment process responds to the environmental concerns raised during the public hearing process, while protecting property owners from unconstitutional takings and substantive due process violations. 1.4 RCW 36,70A.020 sets for a list of 13 goals "to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations." In the amendment public hearing process, and these findings of fact, the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners considered the 13 Growth Management Goals, weighed them as they apply to the subject matter of these findings, and has attempted to achieve a reasoned balance among them. Section 2 - Public Participation 1 2.1 Petitions received by the Planning Department were reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners, and the Board directed the Planning Department to proceed with further review of the petitions and to prepare environmental documentation consistent with the requirements of RCW 43.21 C and Grant County Code Chapter 24.04 (SEPA). 2.2 In accordance with Grant County Unified Development Code Chapter 25.12 -- Legislative Actions, the Planning Commission held public hearings on August 24 and August 25, 2022, at which time testimony was taken from interested agencies, organizations, and individual citizens, regarding the proposed amendments and zone changes. Attachment "All Grant County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2022 General Findings of Fact 2.3 Board of County Commissioners and Planning Commission meetings, hearings, and study sessions requiring "legal notice" were advertised in the local paper of record pursuant to the requirements of R.Cw 36.70 and the Grant County Unified Development Code. Copies of the proposed amendment applications were broadly disseminated for public and agency review at no charge. All meetings and hearings to which the public was invited were conducted in an open f6rum. At hearings, all persons desiring to speak were given an opportunity to do so. Public testimony and written correspondence were given full consideration as part of the amendment process. 2.4 The existing enhanced public participation policies within Grant County ensure that the public had an opportunity to provide meaningful comments on the proposed amendments. 2.5 The appeal mechanisms contained within Grant County ordinances provide sufficient due process to allow interested parties an opportunity to respond at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner. Section 3 — Criteria for Amendment Approval 3.1 A petition for a site-specific land use redesignation.. was reviewed for conformance with pertinent provisions of the Grant County Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. 3.2 In reviewing the amendments, the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners considered testimony provided at public hearings and recommendations provided by staff and interested or affected agencies with jurisdiction. The Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners approved, approved with conditions, or rejected an application for a change of designation or density based on the following criteria: (a) The change would benefit the public health, safety, and/or welfare; (b) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for additional property in the proposed land -use designation. (c) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the Comprehensive Plan. (d) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. (e) The change has merit and value for the community as a whole (f) The change, if granted, will not result in an enclave of property owners enjoying greater privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves with different designations. (g) The benefits of the change will outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change Attachment "A" Grant County Comprehensive Pian Amendment 2022 General Findings of Fact (h) The change. is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirement s of Grant County Code Titles 22, 23, 24, and 25; and (i) The change complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of Grant County Unified Development Code Chapter 25.12 Section 4 — Board of County Commissioners Final Recommendations And/or Actions 4.1 Recorded motions. by the Board of County Commissioners for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment and Findings of Fact are listed in Attachment "B" 4.2 Recorded motions by the Board of County Commissioners for each proposed zone change and Findings of Fact are listed in Attachment "B" 4.3 Supporting Findings of Fact for each decision were identified under Section 3 as detailed above, unless - otherwise noted in the record of the Board of County Commissioners. 4.4 Detailed applications along with supporting documentation and staff reports are made a part of this recommendation. Attachment "All Grant County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2022 General Findings of Fact 2) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for additional property in the proposed land -use designation; 3) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the Comprehensive Plan; 4) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; 5) The change does have merit for the community as a whole; 6) The change, if granted, will not result in a group of 'property owners enjoying greater privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves which justify different designations-, 7) The benefits of the change will outweigh any signifi 4) The public interest will he served by the proposed amendments; 5) Appropriate notice has been given to the Washington State Department of Commerce Growth Management Services in accordance with ROW 36.70A..106; 6) The proposed amendments are consistent with applicable portions of RCW 36.70B; and 7) The Planing Commission authorizes staff to make, necessary language revisions to maj<e the Code relevant. Attachment "B" Decisions and Findings of Fact Board of County Commissioners 2022 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes 13 fac.inties.1in rural countes I CW 82.14*370 Sales and use tax for public (3)(0) Morlelys collected under this section may only be used to finance public facilities serving economic development purposes ire rwral,counties and finance personnel in economic development offices. The public fability mu S -t b listed as an ite m in ine officially adopted overall econornic�development 'Ian, or. the economic develoPpmenL P section of the co"untv'o pr h ve plan. The Funding Source is Account, 11 3.155.Econo-micEnha-nceme'nt SIP, 2022 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS _EDC ORGANIZATION PROJECT FUNDING COST -McKay Healthcare Needs Assessment & Modernization Feasibility Study 113.155 $26Y000 New Wing 113.155 $3,271,538 Main Building Conversion 113.155 $9,634,468 Outdoor Area Improvements 113.155 $944,500 Subtotal $13s876,506 Port of Quincy Intermodal Yard Loading and Unloading Expansion 113.155 $2817500 Addition across Dock Facility — Intermodal Yard 113.155 $88,180 Upgrade Security and Asset Tracking Systems 113.155 $250,000 Subtotal $6195964 Beverly Water District New Well and Water Reservoir 113.155 $1,517,400 Water Distribution System 113.155 $636,500 Subtotal $1,5815050 r. -Port of Warden Industrial Park #3 Infrastructure Improvements 113.155 $530,000 Industrial Park #5 Expansion & Infrastructure 113.155. $1,285,000 Airport Master Plan Study and Runway Rehab. 113.155 $230,000 Subtotal $2,045,000 Samaritan Healthcare District I Moses Lake New Hospital 113.155 $167,000,000 Subtotal $1679000,000 .. 77777=.rt Port of Mattawa, Wastewater Improvement Project 113.155 $500,000 Sentinel Gap Industrial Park 113.155 $2,500,000 Subtotal $31000$000 iii 1- 1. 5., Town of Coulee City Rodeo Ground Improvements 113.155 $1,770;000 Campground Improvements 113.155_ $17200,000 New Medical Clinic 113.155 $3,260,000 Subtotal $6,230,000 -Port of Royal Industrial Park Rail Siding 113.155 $2,000,000 Well #3 and Fire Pump Facility 113.155 $3,600,000 New 12 -inch Water Main Extension 113.155 $2,000,000 Road Expansion 113.155 $1,000,000 Trans Loading Facility 113.155 $400,000 Subtotal 113.155 $9,000,000 Total 2022 Eligible Projects 1 1 $203,3533020 Notice of Application and Public Hearing June 13, 2022 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that Grant County has received the following Comprehensive Plan amendment and zone change applications and associated SEPA Checklists. The Grant County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing in accordance with Chapter 25.12 of the Grant County Unified Development Code to consider proposed amendments to the Grant County Comprehensive Plan and Zone Changes submitted in accordance with the criteria listed in the Unified Development Code adopted in October, 2000, and in accordance with State Law RCW 36.70A. DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT PROPOSALS: Non -project proposals to consider the adoption of amendments to the Grant County 2018 GMA Comprehensive Plan. Proposed amendments considered for adoption include site-specific land use designation changes, zone changes, UGA Amendment and SEPA Checklists. The proposed amendments specifically include proposals submitted by the following list of applicants and will be heard by the Planning Commission on Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 7 p.m., and Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 7 p.m., in the Grant County Commissioner's Hearing Room on End of Notice the bottom floor of the Grant County Courthouse in Ephrata, Washington, at which time any person may appear and be heard either for or against the proposed amendments being considered at the public hearing. Limited in person attendance will be allowed. To participate in the hearing via audio please call the following numbers and enter the event number listed for each day. Anyone who wishes to submit written comments on the proposed amendments must do so by the end of business hours on June 28, 2022. A summary of the site specific proposals are listed below: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 Call-in number: 1-408-418-9388 Access Code: 2492 776 1781 Tentative Agenda: P22-0130 P22-0131— BEXCO Property XXII LLC — Warden Area — Land use designation change to RD and zone change to RD. P22-0152 P 22-0153 — Deanna Detwiler — Rural Moses Lake Area — Land use designation change to RR1 and zone change to RR1. P22-0156 P22-0157 — Astro Enterprises, LLC — Rural Moses Lake Area — Land use designation change to RR1 and zone change to RR1. P22-0154 P22-0155 — REC Silicon Inc — Moses Lake Area — Land use designation change to Urban Industrial and zone change to UHI. Expansion of Moses Lake UGA. Thursday, August 25, 2022 Call-in number: 1-408-418-9388 Access Code: 2498 546 4584 Tentative Agenda: P22-0138 P22-0139 — Jay Gerow - Quincy Area — Land use change to SD4/RRem and zone change to SD4/RRem. P22-0142 P22-0143 — Live Nation — Quincy Area — Land use designation change to MPR and zone change to MPR. P 22-0150 P22-0151— Sentinel Shores LLC — Beverly Area — Land use designation change to RC and zone change to RC. P22-0158 P22-0159 — Grant County — Ephrata Area — Siting of an essential public facility. P22-0160 P22-0161 — Grant County — Countywide — Establish Strategic Infrastructure Project list as an appendix to the Grant County Comprehensive Plan. Copies of the proposed amendment applications, zone changes and SEPA Checklists are available for review at the Grant County Planning Department, 264 West Division Avenue, Ephrata, WA. Additional background data, including the petitions for site specific land use re- designation and other amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, Zone changes and SEPA checklists prepared for proposed amendments, and other pertinent data is also available for public review. Contact Tyler Lawrence, Deputy Director, at (509) 754-2011, ext. 2501. Note to Pticblisher: Please publish the following on Monday, June 13, 2022 and bill Grant County Development Services (Planning Division). We also require an Affidavit of Publication. Please place the ad in your normal six -column format, columnar, as shown.