HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 97-189-CCGRANT COUNTY
OFFICE OF
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
POST OFFICE BOX 37
EPHRATA. WASHINGTON 98823
1509) 754-2011
BOARD OF COUNTY COn�Il9�IISSIONERS
GRANT COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN 'TI3E MATTER OF CHANGING
THE ZONII�TG FROM AGRICULTURE
TO GC (GENREAL COMMERCIAL)
IN A PORTION OF SECTION
4, TOWNSHIP 17 N. , RANGE 26 E. ,
W.M., GRANT COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
Resolution # 97-189-CC
RESOLUTION DENYING A
ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURE
TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL
DUANE LANG -
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant County have been
advised by the Grant Counry Planning Commission that a public hearing was conducted on
July 2, 1997 on the matter of changing the zoning from "AGR (Agriculture)" to "GC (General
Commercial)" in a portion of Section 4, Township 17 No�th, Range 26 East, W.M., Grant
County, Washington, and;
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Grant Counry have been
advised by the Grant County Planning Department that the Grant County Planning
Commission recommended denial on said matter, and;
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, having said
recommendation, have given notice this matter would be coaisidered at a public hearing on
August 11, 1997, and; .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Counry
Commissioners of Grant County, Washington do by this resolution deny the zone change
request from Agriculture to General Commercial on the following described property.
A portion of the East 1/a of the Northeast 1/4 of Government Lot 1, located in Section
4, Township 17 North, Range 26 E.W.M., Grant County, VJashington (Parcel #16-
0182-001).
Findings and Facts:
1. The property on which the zone change is proposed for is nat within the Columbia Basin
Project and does not receive a water allotmen�.
2. The proposal is not consistent with the Grant Counry Comgrehensive Plan and surrounding
uses.
3. The proposal does fall within a Critical Area as defined by the Grant County Resource
Lands and Critical Areas Development Ordinance.
4. The proponent has not presented sufficient evidence that changed circurnstances in the area
of the subject property warrant a rezone of the property.
5. The proponent has not presented sufficient evidence that there is sufficient need in the area
for the types of uses allowed and size of lots.
Page 2 af 2
IN THE MATTEIt OF
THE ZUNING FRdM AGRICULTURE
TO GC (GEhfREAL COMMERCIAL}
IN A PCIRTI(JN C.}F SECTIQN
4, iOWNSHIP 17 N., RANGE 26 E.,
W.M., GRANT COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
a � �
Done this ��.��; day af �'� d�,�t �, 1997.
;,s / ,� ._.
� �
� � cna��
ATTEST: ;�
��.°f.c�rk of ihe Boa,�
Commissioner
�� � �
�� � Commissioner
Canstifniing the Boaad af County Co�nmisssioners o£ Grant
Cnunty, Washington.