HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 96-116-CC�
�RANT COUI'�i�TY�
pFFIGE gF
BOAR� tJF COLINTY' C�}MIVIISSIO;�IERS
PtJST tTF'FlCE BC?X 3?
EPF(RATA. WASFi1NGTON s8823
t5091 754-20ti
BOAItL} OF Ct)U�iTY CtJhIlt�l[SSIONERS
GRANT COU�TY, WASHINGTCIN
IN TEiE MATTER QF CHANGING � RESQLUTIDN No. 96-116—CC
THE ZQI+iING FROM AGRICULTURE �
TO SUBURBAN-2 IN A PCiItTION pF � RESC}LUTION APPRCIVII'+1G AN
SEGTIC;N 02, TCIWNSHIP 2i NORTH, ( AMENDMENT TG THE COMPRE-
RANGE 26 BAST, W.M. � HENSIVE PLAN C?F GRANT CQUNTY
Mattfzew and Kasi Hermanson
VVHEREAS, the Board of County Cammissioners of Grant County have been advised
by the Grant C�unty Ptannin� Commission #hat a public hearin� was conducted on June 5, 1996 on the
matter of changing the zoning fa�m AGRICULTURE to SUBURBAN-2 in the Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Qazazter of the Narthwest Quarter of the Scauthwest Quarter af Sectian 02, Township 2i
North, Range 26 East, W.M., Grant County, Washin�tc�n,
WFiEREAS, the Grant Caunty Pian�ing Commission made a recommendation ta deny
the zone change.
WHEREAS, the Grant County $oard of Cottnty Com�nissioners held a public meeting
on 3uly $, 1996 and d�ide�i to conduct a public hearnng an che rezvne request.
WHEREAS, the Grant County Board of County Commissioners held a pubiic hearing
on August 12, 1996.
WHEItEAS, the Board of Caunty C�mmissioners found sufficient evidence to nak
uphflld the recc�mmendations c�f the Grant County Pla�ning Commissian.
W�-IEREAS, the Baard of County Commissionars have found thst the praponent did
present sufficient evidence that chariged circums#ances u� t}fe area of the subject property warranted a
rea.c�ne of the property.
W��EREAS, the Board of Caunty Commissioners hxve found that ihe area withan and
near t�ae proposed rezone has littte or no agriculhiral �Sotentiai.
WF�EREAS, #he Board of County Com�nissioners hava faund khat the proposed rezone
is in the public's best interest and bears a sulbstantial retationshzg to t�e geueral welfare of the residents,
WHEREAS the Boasd of County Commissioners have found t�at the proponent has
der�crostrated that a need eaists in the area fc�r smaller iats that allow manufacturer] homes.
WHEREAS smattsr acreages exist i� the area surraunding the subject progerty that
were subdivided and soId by ti3e United States Govera�mant that are 4.5 to 5 acses in size.
VJHEREAS Vivian Peierson, Senior Planner for the City of Ephrata, was cantacted
iwice by US Mail, by phone, and personally os� Jnly 9, 1996 by Peter Camenza of the Grant County
Plauning Dapartment and asked to cornment an the pr�pased rewne r�uest.
WHEREAS, The City of Eghsata di�t not comment on the proposal.
N�W, THEREPORE, BE IT RESC3LVED, that tha Board of Count}� Cammissioners
for Grant Caunty, Washingtan approve by #his Resoi�tion, a zone change for the fotlowing describec2
P�P�rtY=
The St�uthwest Quarter af the Northwest Quarter of tti� Narthwesi Quartar of the Southwest Quarter of
Sectinn 02, Tawnship 2l. North, Range 26 East, W,Ni., Grant Caunty, Washingtou. 'The subject
praperty is spproximateiy 2.S acres ia� size and 'as curr�ntiy knowa as parcet # 1C-0704-UOp.
Done this 19t__ h__��day of Au�ust , 1995.
_-..�.----",
. � � f.s�Gd
�iBiiIfllIi
Page 2
Il�T THE MATTER OF CF�ANGiNG
THE ZONING FR�M AGRICUI.TUI�E
T� SUBURBAN-2 lN A PC►RTION 4F
3ECTIUN {}2, Tt7WNSI�iP 21 NC}RTH,
RArIGE 26 EAST, W.M., GRANT CUt�NTY,
i�i�A3HINGTON
1- ,
ATT"EST: �-
����erk nf the 'rd
� �,� `�
_ :..r' �� ���
c���;o��r
cQ����flA��
ConstiEuting the Board of Counfy �ommissioners e�f Grant County, Washington