HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 00-144-CC�
B(J�RI.� OF C(�UNTY CO�!?MISSIOTTERS
Grant County, Washington
RESOLUTION NUMBER 2�00-144-CG
ASSESS�ENT RATE FOR
GATEWA� LIGHTING DISTRICT Ft�R
200i SET AT $3G.04 PER PARCEL
WHER_EAS, Resc►Iution 93-10-C� approved the fo�matzan o�' the
Gateway Lighting District, and
�-IEREAS, ihe Ordez� sei forth that ihe amount af the annual
assessment for the LID was to be determined by Pub�ic Utility L}istrzct No. 2
of Grant Count�, and
�VVH�REAS, the current ass�ssment of $4{}.d0 per iaxable parcel wi11
more than cover the estimated 2001 charg�s,
NO�, TKEREFCJRE, BE IT HER:EBY RESOLVED, that pursuant to
the Oxder, the Baard certif es to the Grant County Treasurer the assessmen-t
rate for 20(}1 will be lowered to $36,00 per taxab�e parcel zn RID NO. 93-2,
and
IT IS FURTKFR RESfJLVED that the Treasurer use these figures for
the assessment rate in all fizture assessment ro�ls af RID No. 93-2 uniil
further order of the Board.
DATED tlais 14th day ofNavember,2000
B(J�,R� C}F CCiL1N1� COMMISSIOI�RS
ATTEST: GRANT COUNTI�, WASHIN{1TC3N
%�!_. L ��IL.L►.L..../ �
i �
f� ' i � • ��
V�
�
November 13, 2000
TO: GRANT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: DARRYL PHEASANT
GRANT COUNTY TREASURER�
RE: 2001 ASSESSMENTS FOR GATEWAY LIGHTING DISTRICT
I have received from Jerry Tate of the Grant County PUD the estimated costs for 2001
that need to be paid and assessed on the properties within the boundaries of the Gateway
Lighting District 93-2 in 2001. The original resolution state that no new assessment will
be prepared unless there is an increase or decrease in the annual anticipated lighting costs
submitted by the Grant County PUD. Last years assessment rate was set at ($40.00) per
parcel for 2000. The anticipated carryover going into 2001 amounts to around $662.00.
The carryover balance is higher than anticipated due to the PUD's actual 2000 rate being
less than forecasted (an $11.00 per month savings). Another unknown factor is the City
of Moses Lake's annexation around Gateway Estates. They have yet to admit to what
exactly they have annexed which may include some street lights. The PUD has also
gotten no where with them on this annexation. Depending on what they annexed, the
annual bill for streetlights in Gateway Estates may actually be less. The PUD has
informed me of no increases for 2001 for the street lights. Assuming the annexation does
not affect our responsibility for paying all street lights and that rates were lower and will
not change for 2001, I pro�ose lowering the annual rate per parcel in 2001 from
$40.00 to $36.00 . Please start the hearing process to decrease the assessment rate to
$36.00 for 2001.