Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 15-058-CC BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION�RS GI�AI�T COUNTY, WASHIlVGTOI�T RESOLUTION NO. ��-' 0°���-°- CC� A Resolution Relating to Comprehensi�e Pl�nning in Grant County in Accordance with the Washington State Growth Man�gement Act (RCW 36.70 A) and amending the 2006 Comprehensive Plan and Zone Changes. WHEREAS, in 1990, the Washington State Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law the Growth Management Act(GMA) as contained in SHB No 2929 (Washington Laws, 19901st Ex. Sess., Ch 17), which was subsequently codified as among other chapters, Chapter 36.70 A RCW; and WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act requires all counties and cities in the State to do some planning and the fastest growing counties and cities with them, to plan extensively in lceeping with state goals and policies on: sprawl reduction, affordable housing, economic development, open space and recreation, regional transportation, environmental protection,property rights, natural resource industries, historic lands and buildings, permit processing,public facilities and services, and early and continuous public participation; and WHEREAS,the Washington State Growth Management Act rec�uires all counties and cities within the state to classify, designate, �nd conserve natural resource lands (agricultural and mineral) and protect critical areas (wetlands, geologically hazardous areas, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, aquifer recharge areas, and frequently flooded areas); and WHEREAS, Chapter 36.70 RCW required Grant County to adopt a Comprehensive Plan that met specified GMA goals and addressed the mandated GMA elements; and WHEREAS, after complete review and public record of the State Environmental Review process, Grant County issued a Final Environmental Impact �tatement on July, 2, 1999; and subsequent amendments through 2015 and; WHEREAS, over the past years, the Comprehensive Plan's policies may have changed to insure that the development patterns in the County remain consistent with the intent of the communities' vision for the future and the Plan's goals and policies; and WHEREAS, it is important that amendments to this plan retain the broad perspectives articulated in the community vision statements, satisfies the goals and policies of this Plan, and remain consistent with the intent of the GMA; and Grant County Board of County Commissioners Resolution Adopting Amendments for the Year 201 S To the Grant County Comprehensive Plan 1 WHEREAS,the Growth Management Act(GMA) establishes procedures for the review and amendment of Comprehensive Plans governing counties and cities planning under the Act; and WHEREAS,the County has established a public participation program identifying procedures whereby proposed amendments or revisions of the Comprehensive Plan are considered by the governing body of the County no more frequently than once every year; and WHEREAS, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan fall into several major categories or types and different review application and review criteria apply to each. The kinds of amendments identified herein may include: • Urban Growth Area Boundary Changes; • Plan policy or text changes; . • Plan Map changes; • Supporting document changes; emergency amendments; and e Site-specific amendments; and WHEREAS,policy amendments may be initiated by the County or by other entities, organizations or individuals through petition; and WHEREAS,petitions were received on forms provided by the Department, containing appropriate maps showing the proposed change and addressing the policy or map evaluation criteria as described in the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, On Apri127, 2015 the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to initiate the SEPA review process and schedule each of the complete amendments proposed, along with staff recommendations before the Planning Commission for public hearing; and WHEREAS,public hearings were conducted by tha Planning Commission on August 5, 2015, to hear staff recommendations and take public testimony on each of the proposed amendments to the Grant County Comprehensive Plan and proposed Zone Changes; making recommendations and listing Findings of Fact on each amendment and zone change, and; WHEREAS,the Planning Commission staff reports and recommendations are made a part of the record of this public hearing as it relates to SEPA and the attached amendments and zone changes, and WHEREAS, a non-project proposal to consider adoption of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, including site-specific land use designation changes, changes to Figure 5-5 Future Land Use Map, changes to the Moses Lalce Urban Growth Boundary were considered, as well as associated Zone Changes, and; Grant County Board of County Commissioners Resolution Adopting Amendments for tlie Year 2015 To the Grant County Comprehensive Plan 2 WHEREAS, copies of this EIS Addendum were distributed to agencies, organizations and individuals listed on the Planning Department distribution list and requesting that comments be submitted in accordance with WAC 197-11-340 (2), and; WHEItEAS,the Board of County Commissioners conducted an open-record public hearing on Monday, September 14, 2015 to consider the 2015 requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, and the recommendation from the Planning Commission for each of the proposed amendments and their respective zone changes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Board of County Commissioners for Grant County adopts the attached rindings of Fact per Attachment"B" and the attached record pertaining to the approval and/or denial of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan amendments and Zone Changes; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Board of County Commissioners for Grant County adopts Findings of Fact as per Attachment"A" in support of these actions. PASSED by the Board of County Commissioners in regular session at Ephrata, Washington, by the following vote, then signed by�its membershi �nd ttested to by its Clerk in authorization of such passage this /�l% day of—`]��� 2015. , DATED this l� 'f�day of ,jj�,�� , 2015. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Yea Nay Abstain GRANT COUNTY, . SHINGTO . `� � � Richard Stevens, Chair ATTEST: y� � ��c-�j�-/ J ❑ ❑ � Cindy Carter, Vice Chair Clerk f t o� d � �������� � ' L'�1 ❑ ❑ Carolann Swartz, Member Grant County Board of County Commissioners Resolution Adopting Atnendments far the Year 2015 To the Grant County Comprehensive Plan 3 ATTACHMENT "A" GRANT COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 2015 FINDIl�TGS OF FACT Section I—General Findings 1.1 Grant County has experienced and will continue to experience population growth and accompanying development, resulting in competing demands for public facilities, services and land uses, and is required to prepare and adopt amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations pursuant to the Growth Management Act. 1.2 Growth Management requires that land be managed properly and wisely. Otherwise meeting the demands of a rapidly growing county population is lilcely to cause urban and suburban sprawl, commercial strip development, development at inappropriate locations and densities, damage to environmentally sensitive areas, and the loss of natural resource lands,rural character,open space,and cxitical areas. Also,this pattern of development is likely to create demands for urban services and utilities that are insufficient to support their extension in a cost-effective manner. 1.3 The 2015 Comprehensive Plan amendment process responds to the environmental concerns raised during the public hearing process, whole protecting property owners from unconstitutional takings and substantive due process violations. 1.4 RCW 36.70A.020 sets for a list of 13 goals "to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations." In the amendment public � hearing process, and these findings of fact, the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners considered the 13 Growth Management Goals, weighed them as they apply to the subject matter of these findings, and has attempted to achieve a reasoned balance among them. � Section 2 - Public Participation 2.1 Petitions received by the Planning Department were reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners, and the Board directed the Planning Department to proceed with further review of the petitions and to prepare environmental documentation consistent with the requirements of RCW 43.21 C and Grant County Code Chapter 24.04(SEPA). 2.2 In accordance with Grant County Code Chapter 25.12 — Legislative Actions, the I Planning Commission held public hearings on August 5, 2015 at which tima testimony � was taken from interested agencies, organizations, and individual citizens, regarding ! the proposed amendments and zone changes. �; 'I Attachment"A" a Grant Coimty Comprehensive Plan � Amendment 2015 I General Findings of Fact i� � 2.3 Board of County Commissioners and Planning Commission meetings, hearings, and study sessions requiring "legal notice" were advertised in the local paper of record pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.70 and the Grant County Unified Development Code. Copies of the proposed amendments, and 2015 Addendum to the Environmental Impact Statement were broadly disseminated for public and agency review at no charge. All meetings and hearings to which the public was invited were conducted in an open forum. At hearings, all persons desiring to speak were given an oppoi�tunity to do so. Public testimony and written correspondence were given fitll consideration as part of the amendment process. 2.4 The existing enhanced public participation policies within Grant County ensure that the public had an opportunity to provide meaningful comments on the proposed amendments. 2.5 The appeal mechanisms contained within Grant County ordinances provide suf�cient due process to allow interested parties an opportunity to respond at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner. Section 3 —Criteria for Amendment Approval 3.1 A petition for a site-specific land use redesignation was reviewed for conformance with pertinent provisions of the Grant County Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code. � 3.2In reviawing the amendments, the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners considered testimony provided at public hearings and recommendations provided by staff �nd interested or affected agencies with jurisdiction. The Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners approved, approved with conditions, or rejected an application for a change of designation or density based on the following criteria: (a) The change would benefit the public health, safety, and/or welfare; (b) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for additional property in the proposed land-use designation. (c) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the Comprehensive Plan. (d) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subj ect property. (e) The change has merit and value for the community as a whole (� The change, if granted, will not result in an enclava o�property owners enjoying greater privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves with dif�erent designations. (g) The benefits of the change will outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change Attaclunent"A" Grant County Comprehensive Plan ' Amendment 2015 j General Findings of P'act (h) The change is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirement s of Grant County Code Titles 22, 23, 24, and 25; and (i) The change complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of GCC Chapter 25.12 Section 4—Board of County Commissioners Final Recommendations And/or Actions 4. 1 Recorded motions by the Board of County Commissioners for each proposed amendment and Findings of Fact are listed in Attachment"B" 4.2 Recorded motions by the Board of County Commissioners for each proposed zone change and Findings of Fact are listed in Attachment"B" 4.3 Supporting Findings of Fact for each decision were identified under Section 3 as detailed above, unless otherwise noted in the record of the Board of County . Commissioners. 4.4 Detailed applications along with supporting documentation and staff reports are made a pai�t of this recommendation. Attachment"A" . Grant Coimty Comprchcnsive Plan Amendment 2015 General Tindings of Tact ATTACHMENT `B' FINAL ACTION AND FINDINGS OF FACT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 2015 AMENDMENTS 1) 15-6064—Hintz Land 2) 15-6066—Lewis Neilson 3) 15-6065 —Moses Lake School District/L Brothers #1. FILE NO. 15-6064 HIle1TZ I,AND SITE-SPECIFIC LAND USE REDESIGNATION AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATION: The subjact site is located at the intersection of Beverly Burke Rd. NW and Baseline Rd. W., on the east side of Beverly Burlce Rd. NW. Located in the NW 1/4 of Section 6, Township 18 No��th, Range 24 East, W.NI., Grant County, WA. Portion of Parcel #20-1541-000 STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant has submitted a request for a site-specific land use re-designation consisting of a portion of one parcel. The proposed change is from"Commercial, Urban"to "Residential, Suburban". The parcel currently has an existing residential home site located in the Northwest corner of the property. This is the portion of the property for which the change is proposed. The remainder of the property is being used for agriculture (irrigated circle) and is proposed to remain with the existing Urban Commercial designation. The property is currently located within the UGA for the town of George, WA. There is no change to the Urban Growth Area proposed as part of this application. The existing residence located on this property was built in 1959. The proponent would like to continue to utilize this portion of the property for residential use. The land use designation proposed would make the designation consistent with the existing and ongoing land use (residential) and allow the residence to be maintained as a legal conforming use. PLAle1NING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RE-DESIGNATION: The Planning Commission conducted an open record hearing for this application on August 5, 2015. At their hearing the Commission voted to recommend approval of Site Specific re- designation from Commercial, Urban to Residential, Suburban. DECISION: Attachment"B" Decisions and Findings of Fact Board of County Commissioners ' 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes , 1 The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission and a rove the following request for a Site Specific Land Use Re- designation: 1) The re-designation of approximately 3.2 acres (Portion of Parce120-1541-000) to Residential, Suburban. The Board of County Commissioners established the following Findings of Fact: 1) The change would benefit the public health, safety, and or welfare; 2) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for additional property in the proposed land use designation. 3) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the Comprehensive Plan. 4) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 5) The change �loes h�ve merit for the community as a whole. 6) The change, if granted, will not result in a group of property owners enjoying greater privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves which justify different designations. 7) The benefits of the change will outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change. 8) The change is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of GCC 22, 23, 24 and 25. 9) The change cloes comply with all other applicable criteria and standards of Chapter 25.12 UDC. ZONE CHANGE ' PI,Al`1NING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND RECOMMEI�IDATION The Planning Commission conducted an open record hearing for this application on August 5, 2015. The Planning Commission made a recommendation to approve the proposed zone change from Urban Commercial 1 to Urban Residential 1. DECISION: The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the following re-zone: 1) A zone change of approximately 3.2 acres (portion of Parcel#20-1541-000)'to Urban Residential 1. The Board of�County Commissioners established the following Findings of Fact: 1) The proposed rezone will not be contrary to the intent or purposes and regulations of the Grant County Code or the Comprehensive Plan; 2) The property in question is suitable for uses allowed under the proposed zoning district; 3) Uses allowed under the proposed zone change are compatible with neighboring land uses; 4) The proposed rezone can be seived by adequate facilities including access,fire protection, water, storm-water control,and sewaga disposal facilities; 5) Substantial changes tlo exist to warrant an amendment to the current zoning district; Attachment"B" Decisions and Findings of Fact Board of County Commissioners ; 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes � 2 6) A public need does exist for the proposed rezone. Public need shall mean that a valid public purpose,for which the comprehensive plan and this chapter have been adopted,is served by the proposed rezone. • " 7) The proposed rezone will not result in significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be mitigated by conditions of approval; 8) The cumulative impact of additional requests for lilce actions(the total of the rezones over time or space)will not produce significant adverse effects to the environment that cannot be mitigated by conditions of approval; 9) The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the rezone will not be hazardous to existing and anticipated traffic in the neighborhood; and 10) The proposed zoning district�Zoes not include any allowable use or activity that would result in the location of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield(RCW 36.70). #2. File No. 15-6066 LEWIS NEILSON SITE SPECIFIC LAND USE REDESIGNATION AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATION: The subject site is located on Road U SE approximately three (3) miles south of Warden(on the west side of Rd. U). Located in a portion of the SE '/4 of Section 33, Township 17 N, Range 30 E, W.M,, Grant County, WA. Parcel #18-1117-001 STAFF ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to designate the property as "Irrigated Agriculture". The current land use designation is "Industrial, Rural." The site was historically part of the Warden Titan Missile facility, and received its original Comprehensive Plan designation based on its status as a Limited Area of More Intensive Rural Development(LAMIRD), specifically this site was identified as "Warden 1 LAMIRD". The site was eligible foi LAMIRD inclusion because the site had been developed prior to July 1, 1991. The subject property is developed with a building of approximately 7000 square feet that the applicant intends on using for agricultural uses and activities if this amendment is approved. Agricultural uses and activities are not a permittad use under the current land use designation and zoning classification. The property is located in an area that is almost exclusively used for agriculture. The site is surrounded by properties that are currently designated"Irrigated" and are zoned "Agriculture." These properties are all in agricultural production. The property is not located within a Farm Unit; however it is located within the boundaries of the East Columbia Basin Irrigation District. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RE-DESIGNATION: The Planning Commission conducted an open record public hearing for this application on August 5, 2015. At their hearing the Commission voted to recommend approval of this land use re-designation application from Industrial, Rural to Irrigated. Attachment"B" Decisions and Findings of Fact Board of County Commissioners 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes 3 DECISION: The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission and approve the following request for a Site Specific Land Use Re- designation: 1) Re-designate approximately 2 acres (Parcel#18-1117-001) from Industrial, Rural to Irrigated. The Board of County Commissioners established the following Findings of Fact: 1) The change would benefit the public health, safety, and or welfare; 2) The change is warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a nead for additional propei�ty in the proposed land use dasignation. 3) The change is consistent with the criteria for land use designations specified in the Comprehensive Plan. 4) The change will not be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 5) The change does have merit for the community as a whole. 6) The change, if granted, will not result in a group of property owners enjoying greater privileges and oppoi�tunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves whi�h justify different designations. 7) The benefits of the change will outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change. 8) The change is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of GCC 22, 23, 24 and 25. 9) The change does comply with all other applicable criteria and standards of Chapter 25.12 UDC. ZONE CHANGE PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission conducted an open record hearing for this application on August 5, 2015. The Planning Commission made a recommendation to approve the proposed zone change from Urban Commercial 1 to Urban Residential 1. DECISION: The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to uphold the recommendation of the ' Planning Commission and approve the following re-zone: 1) A zone change of 2 acres (Parcel #18-1117-001) from Rural Light Industrial to Agriculture. The Board of County Commissioners established the following Findings of Fact: Attachment"B" Decisions and Findings of Fact Board of County Commissioners 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes 4 1) The proposed rezone will not be contrary to the intent or purposes and regulations of the Grant County Code or the Comprehensive Plan; 2) The property in question is suitable for uses allowed under the proposed zoning district; 3) Uses allowed under the proposed zone change t��e compatible with neighboring land uses; 4) The proposed rezone can be served by adequate facilities including access,fire protection, water, storm-water control,and sewage disposal facilities; 5) Substantial changes�lo exist to warrant an amendment to the current zoning district; 6) A public need does exist for the proposed rezone. Public need shall mean that a valid public purpose,for which the comprehensive plan and this chapter have been adopted,is served by the proposed rezone. 7) The proposed rezone wiCl not result in significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be mitigated by conditions of approval; 8) The cumulative impact of additional requests for lilce actions(the total of the rezones over time or space) wzll not produce significant adverse effects to the environment that cannot be mitigated by conditions of approval; 9) The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the rezone will not be hazardous to existing and anticipated traffic in the neighborhood; and 10)The proposed zoning district tloes not include any allowable use or activity that would result in the location of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield(RCW 36.70). #3. FILE NO. 15-6065 MOSES LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT/L BROTHERS STTE SPECIFIC LAND USE REDESIGNATION, UGA EXPANSION AND ZONE CHANGE LOCATION: Four parcels located at the intersection of Harris Rd. NE and Stratford Rd. NE. The L Brothers LLC properties are located in the NW corner of the intersection; the School District propei�ties are located in the NE corner of the intersection. The site is located in a portion of Section 3, Township 19 N, Range 28 E and Section 2, Township 19 N, Range 28 E, W.M., Grant County, WA. (Parcel #s 19-0340-000, 19-0343-000, 31-3338-000, & 31-3339-000) S'I'AF'F ANALYSIS: The MLSD initially contacted the Grant County Planning Department to discuss this UGA amendment in the fall of 2014. At that time the MLSD was informed that they would need to try to establish a stronger adjacency to the UGA because the site currently is only adjacent at a single point in the southwest corner of the site. The MLSD conducted a survey/outreach project to the propei�ties along Stratford Road and asked if they were interested in including their property with the MLSD application to amend the UGA. Although there were a few that were supportive of the idea, the majority of the responses that the Grant County Planning Department were provided indicated that they did not want to be included in the UGA, nor did they want to be annexed into the City of Moses Lake. The MLSD then amended its application to include properties located immediately west of the site across Stratford Road. The MLSD property is currently undeveloped; however it is being used for agricultural production (center pivot irrigation). The L Brothers properties are also Attachment"B" Decisions and P'indings of I'act Board of County Commissioners , 2015 Cornprehensive Plan Amendtnents and Zone Changes 5 currently irrigated and are used for agricultural production. There is also a meat cutting Facility located on one of the southernmost L Brothers parcel. While analyzing the application submitted by MLSD and Planning Department Staff(Staf� needed to determine whether or not there was in fact a need I'or additional land within the Moses Lalce Urban Growth Area(UGA). StaFf utilized available GIS data,,aerial photographs, and the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map overlay to determine how much undeveloped land existed within the unincorporated UGA. This analysis determined that within the UGA of Moses Lake there are approximately fifty-nine parcels twenty acres in size or larger totaling just over five thousand acres (of varying land use designations). Of the five thousand acres mentioned, approximately twenty five hundred are designated as residential. Grant County Comprehensive Plan Policy UR-2.3 states that unincorporated areas of UGAs should maintain an average density of four dwelling units per acre. If we use this number as an average for the residential acreage we know to be available then there is the already the potential for over ten thousand dwelling units within the UGA alone, this excludes developable lands within the corporate limits of Moses Lake. This number was achieved when only using undeveloped properties over twenty acres in size. Goal UR-1 of the Comprehensive Plan is to "Encourage urban growth within designated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs)." As was stated above the, UGA for Moses Lake already has a significant amount of undeveloped land available. Policy UR-1.4 echoes this goal by stating that growth should be encouraged in areas already characterized by urban growth and have appxopriate levels of existing urban level services. The application states that the nearest services(water and sewer) are 4000 feet away. The area in question is not currently characteriaed by urban level growth; the area is rural in character and marlced by agricultural uses and rural density residential development. Staff also must recognize that Comprehensive Plan Policy UR-1.3 seeks to encourage infill urban development wherever possible in order to avoid sprawl and leapfrog development thus preserving the fringe lands. Clearly as the above analysis shows, there is opportunity available for infill development within the UGA for Moses Lake. Finally the County must also recognize the need to preserve the "Rural Character" of Grant County,policy UR-2.4. The parcels subject to this request are rural in nature and character as currently used and designated, urban services are not within the immediate vicinity and the any extension of those necessary services would result in those services passing by parcels not located within the UGA and unable to utilize those services. Extension of urban services needs to ba done in such a way to be efficient and support the appropriate conversion of lands to urban character. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RE-DESIGNATION: The Planning Commission conducted an open record hearing for this application on August 5, ', 2015. At their hearing the Commission voted to recommend denial of this re-designation from I Rural Rasidential 1 and Rural Residential2 to Residential Suburban and Public Facility as well ; as expansion of the UGA. �� ''� Attachment"B" ; Decisions and Pindings of Pact � Board of County Commissioners I 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes � 6 � DECISION: The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission and deny the following request for a Site Specific Land Use Re- designation: 1) Re-designate approximately 314 acres (Parcel#s 19-0340-000, 19-0343-000, 31-3338- 000, & 31-3339-000) from Rural Residential 1 and Rural Residential2 to Residential Suburban and Public Facility as well as expansion of the UGA. The Board of County Commissioners established the following Findings of Fact: 1) The change would not benefit the public health, safety, and or welfare; 2) The change is not warranted because of changed circumstances or because of a need for additional property in the proposed land use designation. 3) The change is not consistent with the criteria for land use designations speci£'ied in the Comprehensive Plan. 4) The change will be detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 5) The change does not have merit for the community as a whole. 6) The change, if granted, will result in a group of property owners enjoying greater privileges and opportunities than those enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity where there is not substantive difference in the properties themselves which justify different designations. 7) The benefits of the change will not outweigh any significant adverse impacts of the change. 8) The change is not consistent with the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of GCC 22, 23, 24 and 25, 9) The change does not comply with all other applicable criteria and standards of Chapter ' 25.12 UDC. 10)The Planning Commission has considered the comments received from the Department � of Commerce and taken them into account when making their recommendation of denial. ZONE CHANGE PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDA'I'ION: The Planning Commission conducted an open record hearing for this application on August 5, 2015. The Planning Commission made a recommendation to deny the proposed zone change from Rural Residential 1 and Rural Residential2 to Public Facility and Urban Residential 1. DECISION: The Board of County Commissioners voted unanimously to uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission and denv the following re-zone: 1) A Re-zone of approximately 314 acres (Parcel#s 19-0340-000, 19-0343-000,31-3338- � 000, & 31-3339-000) from Rural Residential 1 and Rural Residential2 to Urban � Residential 1 and Public Facility. � i � Attachment"B" I Decisions and Findings of Fact ! Board of County Commissioners ! 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes � � I I The Board of County Commissioners established the following Findings of Fact: 1) The proposed rezone will be contrary to the intent or purposes and regulations of the Grant County Code or the Comprehensive Plan; 2) The property in question is not suitable for uses allowed under the proposed zoning district; 3) Uses allowed under the proposed zone change �re not compatible with neighboring land uses; 4) The proposed rezone c�znnot be served by adequate facilities including access, fire protection,water, storm-water control, and sewage disposal facilities; 5) Substantial changes do not exist to warrant an amendment to the current zoning distirict; 6) A public need tloes not exist for the proposed rezone. Public need shall mean that a valid public purpose, for which the comprehensive plan and this chapter have been adopted, is served by the proposed rezone. 7) The proposed rezone will result in significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be mitigated by conditions of approval; 8) The cumulative impact of additional requests for lilce actions (the total of the rezones over time or space) will produce significant adverse effects to the environment that cannot be mitigated by conditions of approval; 9) The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the rezone wilC be hazardous to existing and anticipated traffic in the neighborhood; and 10)The proposed zoning district �loes 'include any allowable use or activity that would result in the location of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield(RCW 36.70). Attachment"B" Decisions and Findings of Fact Board of County Commissioners 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Zone Changes 8